2/27/2014 1 STRAIN ANALYSIS UNDEFORMED DEFORMED KINEMATIC ANALYSIS Kinematic analysis is the reconstruction of movements c f A. Rigid Body Translation b a f a B. Rigid Body Rotation c f c d e b a c f d e b E. Nonrigid Deformation by Distortion C. Original Object e b d a b a c b e d f c d f e D. Nonrigid Deformation by Dilation (Davis and Reynolds, 1996)
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
2/27/2014
1
STRAIN ANALYSIS
UNDEFORMED DEFORMED
KINEMATIC ANALYSISKinematic analysis is the reconstruction of movements
cf
A. Rigid Body Translation
ba
f
a
B. Rigid Body Rotation
cf
cde
ba
cf
d
e b
E. Nonrigid Deformation by Distortion
C. Original Object
e
b
d a ba
cb
e d
f c
d
f
eD. Nonrigid Deformation by Dilation
(Davis and Reynolds, 1996)
2/27/2014
2
TYPES OF STRAIN
H
I
H
B. Inhomogeneous strain
A. Homogeneous strain
HH
l = 5 cmo
L' = 3 cm
L
l 8
Fundamental Strain Equations
Strain
R e = n
Deformed StateUndeformed State
R = 1θ θ
r = Sn
L
l = 8 cmf
L' = 4.8 cm
Extension (e) = (lf – lo)/lo
Stretch (S) = lf/lo = 1 + e
Lengthening e>0 and shortening e<0
Strain
B. Shear strain
Deformed StateUndeformed State
A. Extension and stretch
θr
θ
T
Re tans = 1/2 ψt
ψ
γ ψ = tan ψ
Shear Strain ( ) γ
Quadratic elongation (λ) = S2
λ’ = 1/λ = 1/S2
2/27/2014
3
S1
Strain Ellipsoid
S1 = Maximum Finite StretchS3 = Minimum Finite Stretch
S2
S2S3
S3
S3
S1
S1(Davis and Reynolds, 1996)
Mohr Strain Diagram
Ad
θd = +15º
S1
1 Unit
A
S1
B
γ/λ
.49
1.01.0
2 = +30ºθd
(λ γ λ', / )
C
Distorted Clay Cake
γ/λ
1.01.0
2 θd
λ −λ
2' '3 1
λ'3.0
.56
0 C
d
λ' 2.43 = λ'1 = .42 2.01.0
A
γ λ = λ −λ . 2θ
2/ ' ' SIN 3 1
d
λ'33.0
Minus
C
λ λ' + ' 2
1 3
2.01.0
λ −λ . 2θ2
' ' COS 3 1 d
0 A'λ'1
Equalsλ'
(Davis and Reynolds, 1996)
2/27/2014
4
HOMOGENOUS DEFORMATION
O
N
Simple Shear(Noncoaxial Strain)
A B
ML
Pure Shear(Coaxial Strain)
Progressive Deformation
M
S1
25% FlatteringS3
S1
S3 S1+ 22º
+ 31º S3S1 S3
30% Flattering
S3S3
S1
S1+ 45º
40% Flattering
(Davis and Reynolds, 1996)
2/27/2014
5
A. Regional scale
100 m
perpendicu larto layer ^^
S1
S2S3
S1^
^ ^ ^S2 < 1 S2 = 1 S2 >1
STRAIN HISTORY Scale Factor
100 mμ
B. Outcrop scale
10 mm
C. Hand sample scale
D.
A.
perpendicu larto layer
perpendicu larto layer
C.B.
^
^
S1^
S1^
S2^
S2^
S2S3^
S3^
S3
D. Microscope scale
E. F.
Structural development in competent layerbased on orientation of S1, S2 and S3