Top Banner
Helena Calado W 1/2 What are the research needs and Genetic Resources for planning in 21st century? #BalticMSP Geography, Process, and Governance: future needs for MSP University of the Azores- Research Center in Biodiversity
23

Geography, Process, and Governance: future needs for MSP at the 2nd Baltic Maritime Spatial Planning Forum

Jan 07, 2017

Download

Baltic SCOPE
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Geography, Process, and Governance: future needs for MSP at the 2nd Baltic Maritime Spatial Planning Forum

Helena Calado

W 1/2 What are the research needs

and Genetic Resources

for planning in 21st century?

#BalticMSP

Geography, Process, and Governance:

future needs for MSP

University of the Azores- Research Center in Biodiversity

Page 2: Geography, Process, and Governance: future needs for MSP at the 2nd Baltic Maritime Spatial Planning Forum

RESEARCH NEEDS

not the same as

DATA or INFO NEEDS

- GEOGRAPHY dimensions and proportions

- Academic works under EMMCMSP

- Exploring the new EU MSP Platform

htt

p:/

/ww

w.1

23rf

.co

m/

Page 3: Geography, Process, and Governance: future needs for MSP at the 2nd Baltic Maritime Spatial Planning Forum

Temporal evolution of publications on msp based on

wos analyse1

© PADDLE

Growing interest in MSP reflects on Scientific Literature

production

Page 4: Geography, Process, and Governance: future needs for MSP at the 2nd Baltic Maritime Spatial Planning Forum

Associated countries in scientific literature on MSP; very few

southern countries are involved

© PADDLE

Page 5: Geography, Process, and Governance: future needs for MSP at the 2nd Baltic Maritime Spatial Planning Forum

MSP initiatives

Page 6: Geography, Process, and Governance: future needs for MSP at the 2nd Baltic Maritime Spatial Planning Forum

(Un ) proportional Sea /Land/Sea

Page 7: Geography, Process, and Governance: future needs for MSP at the 2nd Baltic Maritime Spatial Planning Forum

(Un)proportional Knowledge?

Page 8: Geography, Process, and Governance: future needs for MSP at the 2nd Baltic Maritime Spatial Planning Forum

Source: Mario Caña Varona

Small , fragmented, isolated…Knowledge?

Page 9: Geography, Process, and Governance: future needs for MSP at the 2nd Baltic Maritime Spatial Planning Forum

Marine Policy

Near-term priorities for the science, policy and practice

of Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning (CMSP)Benjamin S. Halperna, , , jordan Diamondb, , Steve Gainesc, , Stefan Gelcichd, , Mary Gleasone, , Simon Jenningsf, g, , Sarah Lesterh, , Amber Macei, , Laurence McCookj, , Karen McLeodk, , Nicholas Napolil, , Kit Rawsonm, , Jake Ricen, , Andrew Rosenbergo, , Mary Ruckelshausp, , Bettina Saierq, , Paul Sandiferr, , Astrid Scholzs, , Anna Ziviant,

January 2012,

PROCESS

TRADE OFFS and VALUATION (conflicts)

COMMUNICATION and ENGAGEMENT

(STAKEHOLDERS)

DECISION SUPOORT

Page 10: Geography, Process, and Governance: future needs for MSP at the 2nd Baltic Maritime Spatial Planning Forum

Trainning for marine planners: Present and

future needs

Giliian Glegg

2014,

CHALLENGES:

Engaging all different relevant parties –

STAKEHOLDERS

Assimilation of existing management rules (

sector/existing coastal land uses plans)

Integrating Science and policy on Decsion

Making

Page 11: Geography, Process, and Governance: future needs for MSP at the 2nd Baltic Maritime Spatial Planning Forum

Thesis themes - EMMCMSP Main General Themes:

-How to define explicit SPATIAL objectives?

-Better, operational, affordable, dynamic, MAPPING tools/solutions?

- Innovation: MODELS and extrapolation methods and proxy parameters (overcome data gaps)?

-SCALES dynamics: Scales of available data, jurisdictions, Ecosystems?

- Innovation: efficient /operational STAKEHOLDERS participation methods?

Specific Themes:

-The role of citizen Science and Social Networks?

-Integration of Strategic and Spatial Planning?

-Land/Sea planning issues integration

-Assessment and Evaluation

-EIA and SEA

-EBM and Cumulative Impacts

-Governance: Transboundary – Role of RSC

-Underwater Cultural Heritage

-Uses, Conflicts and Co allocation

Page 12: Geography, Process, and Governance: future needs for MSP at the 2nd Baltic Maritime Spatial Planning Forum

Nº Thesis Total

1 Lessons Learn 9

2 Sector Aproaches 12

3 Process/Steps 16

8 EBM 5

11 Governance 5

Page 13: Geography, Process, and Governance: future needs for MSP at the 2nd Baltic Maritime Spatial Planning Forum

02468

10121416

9

12

16

5 5

EMMCMSP THESIS

Page 14: Geography, Process, and Governance: future needs for MSP at the 2nd Baltic Maritime Spatial Planning Forum
Page 15: Geography, Process, and Governance: future needs for MSP at the 2nd Baltic Maritime Spatial Planning Forum

2226%

1822%

1518%

1316%

911%

11%

56%

Lessons LearnSector Approaches

MSP ProcessesCross Border CooperationEBMGovernanceOthers

Projects

by “subjective classification”

So

urc

e:

Page 16: Geography, Process, and Governance: future needs for MSP at the 2nd Baltic Maritime Spatial Planning Forum

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

102

42

117

62 65

95

55

32

45

14

53

94

Practices

by Type of issue by Stage of MSP Cycle

So

urc

e:

Co

exis

ten

ce

of

use

s

Cro

ss-b

ord

er

co

op

era

tio

n

Da

ta

Ec

on

om

ica

spe

cts

Ec

osy

ste

m-b

ase

d

ap

pro

ac

h

En

viro

nm

en

tal

asp

ec

ts

Lan

d-s

ea

inte

rac

tio

ns

Re

silie

nc

eto

clim

ate

ch

an

ge

Sa

fety

asp

ec

ts

Se

a-b

asi

n

co

op

era

tio

n

So

cia

la

spe

cts

Sta

ke

ho

lde

rs

Page 17: Geography, Process, and Governance: future needs for MSP at the 2nd Baltic Maritime Spatial Planning Forum

Projects

So

urc

e:

6224%

5521%

5521%

3112%

259%

239%

114%

StudyGuidanceTools

MethodologyPilot PlanPlanHandbook

by Type

Page 18: Geography, Process, and Governance: future needs for MSP at the 2nd Baltic Maritime Spatial Planning Forum

14635%

10826%

9021%

7418%

Analyse spatial aspectsVision and aims

Develop and implement planStocktake

Practices

by Stage of MSP Cycle

So

urc

e:

Page 19: Geography, Process, and Governance: future needs for MSP at the 2nd Baltic Maritime Spatial Planning Forum

Projects

So

urc

e:

by Sea Basin

32

1

0

11

23

12

20

Page 20: Geography, Process, and Governance: future needs for MSP at the 2nd Baltic Maritime Spatial Planning Forum

Team

So

urc

e:

by Sea Basin

Page 21: Geography, Process, and Governance: future needs for MSP at the 2nd Baltic Maritime Spatial Planning Forum

European MSP Platform Team

So

urc

e:

by Sea Basin

2012

101123

32

Page 22: Geography, Process, and Governance: future needs for MSP at the 2nd Baltic Maritime Spatial Planning Forum

CONCLUSIONSeveral themes are a general concern for actual and future

Research:

EBM,

Planning Process adaptation to tailored solutions,

Uses Co allocation and conflict solving

Scales, Decsion Making,

Stakeholders participation,

Transboundary processes,

Assessment, …

But diferentt needs within

GEOGRAPHY….

and diferente stages of the PROCESS…