Top Banner
GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 14 Nov 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 ead for Wed 19 Nov: T&S 226-241 : Te and Dynamics ance for subduction slab angle (T&S 6-11!) udes slab buoyancy, (absolute) velocity of over-rid e, aperture of wedge flow (plate thickness + subduc e!) & viscosity of subduction wedge on (Pérez-Gussinyé et al. 2008): South American slab (Peru, Chile) has (possibly) buoyant crust ne hern edges, otherwise no strong correlation to buoy rench velocity… But strong correlation to distance ch to high T e ! confirm that thicker over-riding plate near the tre rs flat slab subduction (but only for idealized sla alistic rheology… Breaks down for real-Earth?)
11

GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 14 Nov 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Wed 19 Nov: T&S 226-241 Last Time: Te and Dynamics Force balance for subduction slab angle.

Jan 14, 2016

Download

Documents

Madison Lyons
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 14 Nov 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Wed 19 Nov: T&S 226-241 Last Time: Te and Dynamics Force balance for subduction slab angle.

GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 14 Nov 2014

© A.R. Lowry 2014Read for Wed 19 Nov: T&S 226-241

Last Time: Te and Dynamics

Force balance for subduction slab angle (T&S 6-11!) includes slab buoyancy, (absolute) velocity of over-riding plate, aperture of wedge flow (plate thickness + subduction angle!) & viscosity of subduction wedge

Observation (Pérez-Gussinyé et al. 2008): South American flat slab (Peru, Chile) has (possibly) buoyant crust near southern edges, otherwise no strong correlation to buoyancy or trench velocity… But strong correlation to distance from trench to high Te!

Models confirm that thicker over-riding plate near the trench favors flat slab subduction (but only for idealized slab with unrealistic rheology… Breaks down for real-Earth?)

Moral?

Page 2: GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 14 Nov 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Wed 19 Nov: T&S 226-241 Last Time: Te and Dynamics Force balance for subduction slab angle.

Next Journal Article Reading:For Monday Nov 17: Karow & Hampel (2010) Slip rate variations on faults in the Basin-and-Range province caused by regression of Late Pleistocene Lake Bonneville and Lake Lahontan, Int. J. Earth Sci. 99 1941-1953.(Nick will lead)

Page 3: GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 14 Nov 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Wed 19 Nov: T&S 226-241 Last Time: Te and Dynamics Force balance for subduction slab angle.

Isostasy with a viscoelastic fluid asthenosphere (“Rebound”)Given some initial sinusoidal deflection of the Earth’s surface:

where k is wavenumber = 2/

what is the evolution of w through time?

w = w0 cos kx( )

Elevated beaches or“strandlines” in Hudson’sBay region of Canada…

Page 4: GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 14 Nov 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Wed 19 Nov: T&S 226-241 Last Time: Te and Dynamics Force balance for subduction slab angle.

We impose:

(1) Conservation of fluid: (2D)

(This is referred to as an incompressible fluid!)

u

u +∂u

∂xδx

v +∂v

∂zδz

v

xz

z + z

x + x

∂u

∂x+

∂v

∂z= 0

Page 5: GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 14 Nov 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Wed 19 Nov: T&S 226-241 Last Time: Te and Dynamics Force balance for subduction slab angle.

We impose:

(2) Elemental force balance: includes pressure forces, viscous forces, and body force (= gravity).

For pressure forces, the imbalance is givenby the pressuregradients: (2D) p(x)z

p(z)x

xz

z + z

x + x

p(z+z)x

p(x+dx)z

−∂p

∂xˆ x −

∂p

∂zˆ z

Page 6: GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 14 Nov 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Wed 19 Nov: T&S 226-241 Last Time: Te and Dynamics Force balance for subduction slab angle.

We impose:

(2) Cont’d: viscous forces: The net viscous forces are given by

(to first order). For a Newtonian fluid with viscosity ,

zz(z)x

xz

z + z

x + x

zz(z+z)x

xx(x)zxx(x+x)z

xz(x)z

xz(x+x)z

zx(z)x

zx(z+z)x

∂ xx

∂x+

∂τ zx

∂z

⎝ ⎜

⎠ ⎟ˆ x +

∂τ zz

∂z+

∂τ xz

∂x

⎝ ⎜

⎠ ⎟ˆ z

xx = 2η∂u

∂x;τ zz = 2η

∂v

∂z

zx = τ xz =η∂u

∂z

Page 7: GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 14 Nov 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Wed 19 Nov: T&S 226-241 Last Time: Te and Dynamics Force balance for subduction slab angle.

The body force is simply xz in the z direction; typically we simplify pressure by subtracting a hydrostatic:

P = p – gz

Then (after some algebra; see T&S) we have the force balance equations:

∂2u

∂x 2+

∂ 2u

∂z 2

⎝ ⎜

⎠ ⎟−

∂P

∂x= 0

∂2v

∂x 2+

∂ 2v

∂z 2

⎝ ⎜

⎠ ⎟−

∂P

∂z= 0

Page 8: GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 14 Nov 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Wed 19 Nov: T&S 226-241 Last Time: Te and Dynamics Force balance for subduction slab angle.

We can define a stream function (= potential of the flow field) such that (for an incompressible fluid):

is flow velocity in the x-direction;

is flow velocity in the z-direction (vertical).

Solutions must satisfy:

Substituting for u and v, find the biharmonic equation has (eigenfunction) solutions of the form:

u = −∂ψ

∂z

v = −∂ψ

∂x

∂4ψ

∂x 4+

2∂ 4ψ

∂x 2∂z 2+

∂ 4ψ

∂z 4=∇ 4ψ = 0

exp±2πz

λ

⎝ ⎜

⎠ ⎟

z exp±2πz

λ

⎝ ⎜

⎠ ⎟and

Page 9: GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 14 Nov 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Wed 19 Nov: T&S 226-241 Last Time: Te and Dynamics Force balance for subduction slab angle.

Solving (with boundary conditions) we find that:

Where decay constant

w t( ) = w0 exp−λρgt

4πη

⎝ ⎜

⎠ ⎟= w0 exp −

t

τ

⎝ ⎜

⎠ ⎟

=4πη

ρgλ=

2kη

ρg

Page 10: GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 14 Nov 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Wed 19 Nov: T&S 226-241 Last Time: Te and Dynamics Force balance for subduction slab angle.

Everybody’s favorite local example: Gilbert was the first to recognize that shorelines of former Lake Bonneville are higher in the middle than at the edges…

Page 11: GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 14 Nov 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Wed 19 Nov: T&S 226-241 Last Time: Te and Dynamics Force balance for subduction slab angle.

By a lot!