Top Banner
General Theory of Wireless Networks with Side Information Ahmad Khoshnevis, Debashis Dash Rice University Nokia Seminar February 10, 2006
14

General Theory of Wireless Networks with Side Information Ahmad Khoshnevis, Debashis Dash Rice University Nokia Seminar February 10, 2006.

Jan 17, 2018

Download

Documents

Why Protocols? Queues have time-varying state –Might be empty sometimes In effect, # of active nodes is time varying Design for Max # of user is conservative –Underutilized network for many traffic “Active” management of queue states = Medium Access Protocols q2q2 q1q1 S1S1 S2S2 q3q3 S3S3
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: General Theory of Wireless Networks with Side Information Ahmad Khoshnevis, Debashis Dash Rice University Nokia Seminar February 10, 2006.

General Theory of Wireless Networks with Side Information

Ahmad Khoshnevis, Debashis DashRice University

Nokia SeminarFebruary 10, 2006

Page 2: General Theory of Wireless Networks with Side Information Ahmad Khoshnevis, Debashis Dash Rice University Nokia Seminar February 10, 2006.

Wireless Networks

• High data rate– WiMax, Mesh– 802.11x– 4G

• Irony– Current protocols such as 802.11 cause 30-50% non-data

communication (overhead)

First question: Is existence of protocols necessary?

Page 3: General Theory of Wireless Networks with Side Information Ahmad Khoshnevis, Debashis Dash Rice University Nokia Seminar February 10, 2006.

Why Protocols?

• Queues have time-varying state– Might be empty sometimes

• In effect, # of active nodes is time varying

• Design for Max # of user is conservative– Underutilized network for many traffic

“Active” management of queue states = Medium Access Protocols

q2

q1 S1

S2

q3

S3

Page 4: General Theory of Wireless Networks with Side Information Ahmad Khoshnevis, Debashis Dash Rice University Nokia Seminar February 10, 2006.

How Much Overhead?

Second Question: What is the minimum amount of overhead? How can it be reduced?

Page 5: General Theory of Wireless Networks with Side Information Ahmad Khoshnevis, Debashis Dash Rice University Nokia Seminar February 10, 2006.

Observation

• If S1 knows q2 and S2 knows q1

– No need for handshaking

– TDMA scheduling– No collision

• As load increases– Probability of queue empty reduces– Network utility increases

Having the “side information” aboutQueue states, increases the utilization

1

2q2

q1 S1

S2

D

Page 6: General Theory of Wireless Networks with Side Information Ahmad Khoshnevis, Debashis Dash Rice University Nokia Seminar February 10, 2006.

Implementation of the idea

• Perfect carrier sense no collision

• While q1 and q2 non empty– TDMA guarantees no collision

• When – q1 and q2 are empty – |t1-t2| < – Collision happens

• Collision resolution takes resources– Modeled as wasted time, c

• Probability of Collision is determined by probability of q1=q2=

q1 S11

2q2

S2

D

t

S2

S1

t1t2

c

Page 7: General Theory of Wireless Networks with Side Information Ahmad Khoshnevis, Debashis Dash Rice University Nokia Seminar February 10, 2006.

Performance

Page 8: General Theory of Wireless Networks with Side Information Ahmad Khoshnevis, Debashis Dash Rice University Nokia Seminar February 10, 2006.

Generalization

• In general “side information”– Queue state– Number of nodes– Battery life, …

• Catch• The “side information” is not of interest, data is• Gathering “side information” requires resources

– Perfect information causes a lot of overhead– Partial information gives more room for data, but more uncertainty

Page 9: General Theory of Wireless Networks with Side Information Ahmad Khoshnevis, Debashis Dash Rice University Nokia Seminar February 10, 2006.

Fundamental Tradeoff

There is a tradeoff between amount of side information and total throughput of a network.

What is the maximum data rate for a given amount of side information?

Page 10: General Theory of Wireless Networks with Side Information Ahmad Khoshnevis, Debashis Dash Rice University Nokia Seminar February 10, 2006.

New Source Model

• There are two information need to be transmitted– The actual data, M– The source state, S

• The message– Conveys useful information– Need to be sent error free

• The source state– Can’t be sent perfectly (takes all the capacity)– The rate of source information is controlled by distortion between S

and S’

M

S S’X

S.Enc

C.E

nc

New Source Model

Page 11: General Theory of Wireless Networks with Side Information Ahmad Khoshnevis, Debashis Dash Rice University Nokia Seminar February 10, 2006.

Channel Model

• Discrete memoryless channel

• The channel is described by P{Y|X1,X2}

Page 12: General Theory of Wireless Networks with Side Information Ahmad Khoshnevis, Debashis Dash Rice University Nokia Seminar February 10, 2006.

Formulating the Problem

Page 13: General Theory of Wireless Networks with Side Information Ahmad Khoshnevis, Debashis Dash Rice University Nokia Seminar February 10, 2006.

Additional Insights

• Particularly in our approach– Generalization of side information & being independent of

interpretation– Addressing penalty associated with knowing side information

• Considered in earlier models– Is extendable to a network with arbitrary number of users– Simultaneously can answer both question

• Total network throughput• Per user throughput

Page 14: General Theory of Wireless Networks with Side Information Ahmad Khoshnevis, Debashis Dash Rice University Nokia Seminar February 10, 2006.

Road Map

• Improving the Model– More interesting case is conferencing

• Find I(M1,M2;Y|S’1,S’2)• Properties of solution space and possible solution for special

cases