Gene Davis TD Solutions Division M&S Technical Manager J7, Joint Warfighting Center

Gene DavisTD Solutions Division M&S Technical ManagerJ7, Joint Warfighting CenterU.S. Joint Forces Command

Joint Modeling & Simulation Capability Working Group

Training Gaps Analysis Forum(TGAF)

Worldwide Joint Training and Scheduling Conference

Agenda

• Purpose

• TGAF Background

• M&S Training Issues Discussion– Top M&S Issue Quad Charts– Breakdown of Needed Resources

Purpose

• To provide the Joint Modeling & Simulation Capability Working Group an update on the genesis of the TGAF, the issues arising from the forum, and discuss the Top M&S issues.

4

TGAF Background (1)

Background• Formerly met as the Joint Training Review Group

(JTRG)

• Reconvened Nov 24 - 25, 2008 at JFCOM as TGAF with same charter and membership as JTRG

• TGAF collected the top M&S training issues from stakeholders

• Additionally TGAF updated terminology and reprioritized the 35 TC AoA Gaps with COCOM/Service concurrence as Training Needs

• Provided top TGAF Issues and actions

5

TGAF Background (2)

Outcomes• Continue to work with stakeholders to update

training needs and capabilities• Complete plan to include POM by WJTSC 09-2

Actions• Briefed the TGAF M&S strategy and process at

WJTSC 09-1 March 09 • Submitted M&S issues in FY11 Program Review

Package, issues fell below the line, will resubmit for FY12

• Provide input for the Training Community M&S Business Plan

6

Top M&S Issues from Nov ‘08 TGAF

• Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD)

• Exercise Design, Conduct and Integration

• Cross Domain Information Sharing (CDIS)

• Joint Logistics

Note: Air Ops issue rolled into IAMD

Integrated Air and Missile MissionTN # 7: Provide multi-command missile defense training

Milestones Estimated Cost

Potential Solutions:

Currently Unknown

Through the “All Things Missile” (ATM) initiative, USSTRATCOM w/ USJFCOM J7/J8 support will complete the functional needs analysis completed May 09. The functional solutions analysis and analysis of alternatives will be complete NLT Nov 09. All findings will continue to be vetted and prioritized among the COCOM and Service ATM stakeholders with MDA support.

• Intent is to establish ATM as a Program of Record

• Unfunded estimated total cost is $10M

Need: CCDRs require a distributed, integrated, synthetic Missile Warning (MW) and Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) training and exercise modeling and simulation (M&S) capability that stimulates real world display systems that is dynamic, portable, scalable and affordable.

In the operational world, the Missile Mission area occurs accurately and seamlessly. Missile Mission functional training occurs in isolation (i.e. lacks the big picture) and lacks synergy. This results in a dysfunctional team where true teamwork does not occur and each function is only looking at its individual area and not the mission as a whole. Therefore, each mission area is trained individually. Additionally, there is no cross functional technical training capability that allows for fully integrated, dynamic training across COCOMs and Services within the Joint Training Environment.

TGAF Issue #1, USSTRATCOM (w/USNORTHCOM)

• Training Requirements Analysis- completed May 09 • Technical Requirements Analysis-NLT Sep 09• Initial draft ATM ICD, an annex to the current IAMD

ICD - Dec 098

9

Breakdown of Needed Resources

Integrated Air and Missile Mission

EFFORT FY 11 FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15

(R&D) ATM JCIDS $203 K $203 K $203 K $0 $0

(R&D) ATM Design $1.5 M $1.5 M $1.5 M $500 K $500 K

(O&M) ATM Design $0 $0 $0 $1 M $ 1M

(OP) ATM Design $500 K $500 K $200 K $200 K $100 K

Exercise Design, Conduct & IntegrationTN # 3: Provide faster/higher fidelity Mission Rehearsal

Milestones Estimated Cost

Need: Potential Solutions:

1. Maintain/Sustain JTLS (funds for FY10 approved, seeking additional funds for FY11

and beyond)2. Enhance JECS and JLOD3. Develop way ahead for JLVC CORE Capability

• 1.3M funded for solution 1 (JTLS)• unfunded estimated total cost of 16M dollars for enhancements and initial capability for solutions 2 & 3

This capability directly supports the intent for TC AoA Alternative 5 – Low cost light weight simulation solutions

•Establish modular JLVC Federation that can scale to support a range of needs and requirements (12 Months)•Implement the ability to stimulate Joint C2 Systems to reduce exercise support and footprint cost. (12 months)•Deploy light-weight staff training capabilities that provide Joint Context within DoD sites—in progress with initial capability.•Develop way ahead for NEXTGEN capability– in progress

Low cost, small footprint training capability that is modular and can be tailored based on training requirements for large exercises and home station training day to day.Capabilities that support home station staff training that are light-weight and can be operated by existing staff for individual and collective training

TGAF Issue #2, USPACOM

10

11

Breakdown of Needed Resources

EFFORT FY 11 FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15

(R&D) JLVC JCIDS $203 K $203 K $0 $0 $0

(R&D) JLVC Design $3 M $3 M $3 M $2 M $1 M

(O&M) JLVC Design $0 $0 $500 K $1.5 M $2 M

(OP) JLVC Design $500 K $500 K $200 K $100 K $100 K

Exercise Design, Conduct & Integration

Cross Domain Information SharingTN #2 :Train forces in a JIIM environment

Milestones Estimated Cost

Potential Solution: Develop a Cross Domain Information Sharing

(“guard”) training capability with correct rule set to allow sharing of mission critical simulation data with mission partners.

• Total unfunded estimated cost is 9.3M• FY 10 funds available ( 600K R&D/500K OP) for initial capability

Need: Ability to share mission critical C2ISR data and training environment data with coalition partners and US DoD/Interagency partners at different security levels.

Currently, US is unable to share joint training environment simulation data (HLA, DIS, TENA formats) with mission partners in multiple theaters due to network security and information sharing policy and lack of secure network interface infrastructure. TGAF Issue #3, USEUCOM

• Conduct and document front end analysis

Develop Training Use cases ( AC-10, HOA)–in progress

• Establish CDIS COI ( COCOM/Service)—in progress• Host CDIS Summit/PAT– TBD Oct 09

12

13

Breakdown of Needed Resources

  FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15

Proposed CDIS (RTD&E)

Proposed CDIS (O&M)

Proposed CDIS (OP)

Cross Domain Information Sharing

$800K $600K $600K $600K $600K

$0 $400K $500K $800K

$600K$600K

$600K

$800K$800K$1 M

Joint LogisticsTN # 6: Train forces on realistic logistics requirements including RSOI

Milestones Estimated Cost

Need: Solution:

Enhance JDLM-DESS Capabilities to stimulate IGC during JLVC Spiral Development.

Enhance JDLM and Maneuver Simulations within the JLVC to support Retrograde Operations in JLVC Spiral.

Requirement Analysis (3 Months May-June 09)

JLVC Spiral IV Design Meeting (August 09)

JLVC Test Cycle Jan-June 10)

JLVC Spiral IV Delivery Jul FY10

TCAoA Gap #14: Train forces on realistic logistics- Specifically Strategic Level Force Flow and Sustainment in support of TRANSCOM and COCOM Training Audiences

• Support TRANSCOM migration to Integrated Data Environment Global Transportation Network Convergence (IGC) to ensure realistic training

• Enhance Force Flow capabilities to include Retrograde Operations

TGAF Issue #4, USTRANSCOM

• Total cost: 4M FY11-15

Current funding provided by JDTC, funding expected to continue FY11-15

14

15

Breakdown of Needed Resources

Joint Logistics

EFFORT FY 11 FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15

(R&D) LOG Devel $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

(O&M) JLVC Design $800K $800K

(OP) JLVC Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

$800K $800K $800K

Questions?

16UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

QUESTIONS?