Top Banner
GENDER BASED DIFFERENCES IN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM (AAA) RUPTURE -Srikrishna Varun Malayala, MBBS Mentors: -Khalid J Qazi, MD, MACP -Paul M Anain, MD 1. http://aorticstents.com/what-is-abdominal-aortic-aneurysm/ (05/23/13)
34

GENDER BASED DIFFERENCES IN ABDOMINAL AORTIC … · Screening guidelines • USPSTF – Grade B recommendation (benefit>risk) • Ultrasound has 90% sensitivity and 100% specificity.

Jul 13, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • GENDER BASED DIFFERENCES IN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM

    (AAA) RUPTURE

    -Srikrishna Varun Malayala, MBBS

    Mentors: -Khalid J Qazi, MD, MACP -Paul M Anain, MD

    1. http://aorticstents.com/what-is-abdominal-aortic-aneurysm/ (05/23/13)

  • Disclosures

    None

    1. http://aorticstents.com/what-is-abdominal-aortic-aneurysm/ (05/23/13)

  • Cardiovascular diseases

    U.S. Preventive Services Task Force-March 2009

    Screening modality Grade

    Smoking Counseling on cessation

    A

    Hypertension Blood pressure monitoring

    A

    Dyslipidemia Lipid profile A

    Diabetes Mellitus Fasting plasma glucose

    B

    Obesity Lifestyle modification

    B

    Prevention of Cardiovascular diseases

    Aspirin B

    1. http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstopics.htm

    • Cardiovascular disease is the number one cause of death for both men and women in the United States1.

    • Preventive medicine is practiced by screening tests, counseling and preventive medications owing to the impact of cardiovascular diseases.

    Performance Improvement Projects ??

    A- Strongly Recommended Benefit>>Risk B-Recommended Benefit>Risk

  • Introduction

    -Dilatation or widening of the abdominal aorta. -Definition: An abdominal aortic diameter of 3 cm or more, which is usually more than 2 standard deviations above the mean diameter1.

    1.Steinberg I, Stein HL. Arterosclerotic abdominal aortic aneurysms. report of 200 consecutive cases diagnosed by intravenous aortography. JAMA 1966;195:1025. 2. Brown LC, Powell JT (September 1999). "Risk Factors for Aneurysm Rupture in Patients Kept Under Ultrasound Surveillance". Annals of Surgery 230 (3): 289–96; discussion 296–7. doi:10.1097/00000658-199909000-00002. PMC 1420874. PMID 10493476

    Modifiable • Smoking • Hypertension • Hyperlipidemia • Atherosclerosis

    -Risk factors1: Non modifiable

    • Age • Male gender • White race • Family history

    -My out-patient PI project: Screening for AAA in high risk patients.

    -AAA rupture is a medical and surgical emergency. -Mortality could be up to 50%2.

  • Introduction

    1.http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/003789.htm (05/23/2013) 2.http://www.surgical-tutor.org.uk/default-home.htm?system/vascular/aaa.htm~right (05/23/2013) 3.http://www.radiologyassistant.nl/en/p4530b48a07dbd/aaa-rupture-1.html (05/24/13) 4. Brewster DC, Geller SC, Kaufman JA, Cambria RP, Gertler JP, LaMuraglia GM, et al. Initial experience with endovascular aneurysm repair: comparison of early results with outcome of conventional open repair. J Vasc Surg 1998;27:992-1003.

    Normal CT scan Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture

    • The strongest risk factor for the rupture of an AAA is maximal aortic diameter4.

    • Risk of rupture4: i. < 4 cm = 0.5% per year ii. 4.0 – 4.9 cm = 1% per year iii. 5.0 – 5.9 cm = 11% per year iv. 6.0 – 6.9 cm = 26% per year v. 7.0 – 7.9 cm = 40% per year vi. > 8 cm = 50% year year

    1 2 3

    • Management5: i. Open repair : conventional method of repair ii. Endovascular repair: faster recovery, reduced length of stay in ICU,

    reduced hospital stay

  • Screening guidelines • USPSTF – Grade B recommendation (benefit>risk) • Ultrasound has 90% sensitivity and 100% specificity.

    1. Fleming C, Whitlock EP, Beil T, Lederle F. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a best-evidence systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:203-11. 2. http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf05/aaascr/aaars.htm 3. http://www.fomadistrict2.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/SAAAVE-ACT.pdf

    • “Effective for services furnished on or after January 1, 2007, payment may be made for a one-time ultrasound screening for AAA for beneficiaries who meet the following criteria2:

    • Men aged 65-75 who ever smoked(100 cigarettes in life time) • Men and women with a family history of AAA • As a part of “Welcome to Medicare” within the first year of

    enrollment

    • AAA screening in women: Grade D (not recommended)

    SAAAVE Act

  • Management guidelines

    • Indications of elective surgery1: • Diameter of 5.5 cm for an ‘average’ patient. • Symptomatic AAA (irrespective of the size) • Rapid expansion-1 cm in one year (irrespective of the size) • Decision on repair must be “individualized for each patient”.

    1. David C. Brewster,a MD, Jack L. Cronenwett, MD,b John W. Hallett, Jr, MD,c K. Wayne Johnston, MD,d William C. Krupski, MD,e and Jon S. Matsumura, MD,f Boston, Mass; Lebanon, NH; Bangor, Me; Toronto, Canada; Denver, Colo; and Chicago, Ill; Guideliens for treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms, Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2007

  • • Night float-PGY-2: 3 female patients with AAA in the same rotation. • Aorto-enteric fistula • 7 cm AAA with elective repair and admitted to ICU • Multiple aneurysms (aorto-iliacs) with rupture

    Case report on aorto-enteric fistula “Time bomb in the belly”

  • Introduction

    Epidemiological differences: • Prevalence: 7.6% in males vs 1.3% in females1,2

    • Rate of rupture for any given size is higher in females3.

    1. Pleumeekers HJCM, Hoes AW, van der Does E, van Urk H, Hofman A, de Jong PTVM, Grobbee DE. Aneurysms of the abdominal aorta in older adults. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142:1291–1299. 2. 2cott RAP, Bridgewater S, Ashton HA. Randomised clinical trial of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in women. Br J Surg. 2002;89: 283–285. 3. Katz DJ, Stanley JC, Zelenock GB. Gender differences in abdominal aortic aneurysm prevalence, treatment, and outcome. J Vasc Surg. 1997; 25:561–568. 4. Manson JE, Hsia J, Johnson KC, Rossouw JE, Assaf AR, Lasser NL, Trevisan M, Black HR, Heckbert SR, Detrano R, Strickland OL, Wong ND, Crouse JR, Stein E, Cushman M, for the Women’s Health Initiative Investigators. Estrogen plus progestin and the risk of coronary

    heart disease. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:523–534.

    • Women with AAA have a stronger familial association than men4. • Estrogen does have a protective effect on the AAA in women4.

  • Biological differences:

    • At any given age, males have larger abdominal aortic diameters than women1,2.

    1. Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, Gordon IL, Chute EP, Littooy FN, Krupski WN, Brandyk D, Barone GW, Graham LM, Hye RJ, Reinke DB, Aneurysm Detection and Management Investigators. Relationship of age, gender, race, and body size to infrarenal aortic diameter. J Vasc Surg. 1997;26:595– 601. 2. Singh K, Bonaa KH, Jacobsen BK, Bjork L, Soldberg S. Prevalence of and risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysms in a population-based study. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;154:236 –244. 3. Sonesson B, Hansen F, Stale H, Lanne T. Compliance and diameter in the human abdominal aorta: the influence of sex and age. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1993;7:690 – 697.

    • Suitability for EVAR is different: The angulation of iliacs, size of femoral arteries and tortuosity of aortas are different in females3.

  • N-67,800 All of them=men

    • UK Small Aneurysm trial:

    Multicentre, randomised controlled trial conducted across 93 UK hospitals 83% males • ADAM study (Aneurysm Detection and Management): 73451 veterans aged 50 to 79 99% males

    1. The United Kingdom Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Long-term outcomes of immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1445–1452. 2. Lederle F, Wison S, Johnson G, Reinke D, Litooy F, Acher C, Ballard D, Messina L, Gordon I, Chute E, Krupski W, Bradyk D. Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms.

    N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1437–1444.

  • •Traditionally, all the cardiovascular diseases were considered as “men’s diseases.” •Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the number one killer of women1.

    •Mortality is more than all forms of cancers combined (breast , cervical and lung cancer)2.

    1. http://www.world-heart-federation.org/press/fact-sheets/women-and-cardiovascular-disease/ 2. American Heart Association. 1997 Heart and Stroke Facts: Statistical Update. Dallas, Tex: American Heart Association; 1996. 3. Mikhail GW. Coronary heart disease in women is underdiagnosed, under- treated, and under-researched. BMJ. 2005;331:467–468.

    Gender based differences in cardiovascular diseases

    • “Women continue to be under-represented in research on heart disease. 3. • Still women continue to receive similar treatments to men on the basis of trials that include

    mainly male participants3.

  • Goals: 1.Emphasize the importance of screening for AAAs in high risk women. 2.Emphasize the importance of “sex-specific” management guidelines of AAA. Objectives: 1.Compare the outcomes of ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms between men and women. 2.Compare the characters of ruptured AAAs in men and women.

  • • Sample: All the AAA ruptures in Sisters and Mercy Hospitals admitted from January 1 2007 to September 2012 (6 years).

    • Type of study: Retrospective review of paper charts and Electronic Medical Records.

    • A total of 39 parameters were compared between males and females.

    • SPSS v.19 was used for statistical analysis. • Binary logistic regression, ANOVA (analysis of variance) and ANCOVA (analysis of

    co-variance) were used for comparing the means.

    • Survival plots were created by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

    Methods

  • • Total no. of cases reviewed= 1538 (100%)

    Results

    Exclusion criteria Elective repairs Endovascular leak Endovascular revision

    • Total no. of cases excluded = 1417 (92%)

    • Total no. of cases included= 117 (8%)

  • Results Incidence of AAAs

    N (%) Males 79 (67.6%)

    Females 38 (32.4%) Total 117

    67.6

    32.4

    Males

    Females

    N (%) Males 1085 (70.6%)

    Females 453 (29.4%) Total 1538

    70.6

    29.4

    Males

    Females

    Incidence of AAA ruptures

  • Demographics Males Females Total p-value

    Site

    0.17 SOCH 52(65.8%) 20(52.6%) 72 SBMH 27(34.2%) 18(47.4%) 45

    Race

    N/A Caucasian 79 (100%) 38(100%) 117 Others 0 0 0

    BMI (n=77)

    0.02 Normal 15(25.8%) 11(58.0%) 26 Overweight 24(41.3%) 6(31.5%) 30

    Obese 19(32.9%) 2(10.5%) 21

    Smoking 0.06

    Yes 66(83.5%) 26(68.4%) 92 No 13(16.5%) 12(31.6%) 25

  • Co-morbidities and medications Males Females Total p-value

    Hypertension

    0.64 Yes 66(83.5%) 33(86.8%) 99

    No 13(16.5%) 5(13.2%) 18

    Major co-morbidities

    0.64 Yes 38 (48.1%) 20(52.6%) 58

    No 41(52.9%) 18(47.4%) 59

    Statin

    0.74 Yes 40(50.6%) 18(47.4%) 68

    No 39(49.4%) 20(52.6%) 59

    Beta-Blocker

    0.48 Yes 24(30.4%) 14(36.8%) 38

    No 55(69.6%) 24(63.2%) 79

    Aspirin 0.10 Yes 40(50.6%) 18(47.4%) 58

    No 39(49.4%) 20(52.6%) 59

    Clopidogrel 0.47 Yes 7(8.9%) 5(13.1%) 12

    No 72 33(86.8%) 105

  • Age at rupture

    p=0.005

    N Mean (years)

    S.D. (years)

    Range (years)

    Males 79 75.75 10.0 50-97

    Females 38 82.39 8.6 59-103

    Overall 117 77.91 10.1 50-103

    • Gender was an independent predictor of age of rupture after controlling the effects of hypertension, co-morbidities, smoking, use of statins and previous history of aneurysms.

    Chart1

    Males

    Females

    Age at rupture

    75.75

    82.39

    Sheet1

    Age at rupture

    Males75.75

    Females82.39

    To update the chart, enter data into this table. The data is automatically saved in the chart.

  • Characters of AAAs at presentation

    Males Females Total p-value

    Location

    0.28 Infra-renal 75 (94.9%) 34 (89.5%) 109 Supra-renal 0 1 (2.6%) 1

    Both 4 (5.1%) 3 (7.9%) 7

    Iliac arteries

    0.42 Left 6 (7.6%) 1(2.6%) 7

    Right 9(11.4%) 4(10.5%) 13 Both 12(15.2%) 3(7.9%) 15

    None 52 (65.8%) 30(78.9%) 82

    (Parameters from the CT scan abdomen at admission)

  • Characters of AAAs at presentation

    Size at rupture

    Mean size (cm)

    S.D. (cm)

    Range (cm)

    Males 8.23 1.84 4-12

    Females 7.46 2.09 3-14.7

    p=0.04

    Chart1

    Men

    Women

    Series 1

    8.23

    7.46

    Sheet1

    Series 1

    Men8.23

    Women7.46

    To update the chart, enter data into this table. The data is automatically saved in the chart.

  • Effect of gender on Hospital course

    Yes No

    Males 74 (93.7%) 5 (6.3%)

    Females 24 (63.2%) 14 (36.8%)

    Incidence of surgery

    P=0.03

    Males Females Total p-value

    EVAR 57 (72.2%) 16 (42.1%) 73

  • Use of ventilator+

    Pressor Support+

    LOS ICU (days)

    Post-op complications*

    Males 59.5 % 54.1 % 4.1 48.6%

    Females 75 % 70.8 % 5.5 58.3%

    *Major co-morbidities was a significant predictor of post-operative complications, VDRF and use of vasopressors (p

  • Overall Mortality Alive Dead Total

    Males 54 (68.4%)

    25 (31.6%)

    79

    Females 12 (31.6%)

    26 (68.4%)

    38

    Overall 66 (56.4%)

    51 (43.6%)

    117

    -P=0.001 -Adjusted for hypertension, smoking, statins, major co-morbidities (logistic regression)

    Post-operative mortality -P=0.05 -Adjusted for hypertension, smoking, statins, major co-morbidities (logistic regression)

    Alive Dead Total

    Males 53 (71.6%)

    21 (21.4%)

    74

    Females 12 (50.0%)

    12 (50.0%)

    24

    Overall 65 (66.3%)

    33 (33.7%)

    98

    EVAR OPEN

    Males 17.5 % 64.7%

    Females 43.8% 63%

    P-value 0.02 N/A

    Mortality based on type of surgery

    -Adjusted for hypertension, smoking, statins, major co-morbidities (logistic regression)

  • Mean size (cm)

    S.D. (cm)

    Range (cm)

    Males 4.0 3.3 4-10

    Females 5.0 2.6 3-9.3

    Elective surgery could have been performed !!

    Size at previous diagnosis

    Chart1

    MalesMalesMalesMales

    FemalesFemalesFemalesFemales

    Total

    Diagnosed now

    Diagnosed previously

    Surgically repaired previously

    79

    46

    33

    23

    38

    19

    19

    4

    Sheet1

    TotalDiagnosed nowDiagnosed previouslySurgically repaired previously

    Males79463323

    Females3819194

  • Long term survival

    Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis

    Males=11.0 months Females=9.3 months P= 0.41 -unadjusted data. -very small sample.

    • Patients discharged alive were followed for a period of -2 years. • Date of death was procured from ssdmf.com (SSN database)

  • It is about….….

    Will the screening be cost effective?

    1.http://www.123rf.com/photo_18118258_elderly-woman-suffering-with-a-belly-pain-in-the-living-room.html-05/232013

    1

  • Summary of financials from previous 3 years (SOCH & SBMH)

    • Average re-imbursement for surgical repair after a AAA rupture was 8500$

    more for male patients over female patients. • Average re-imbursement for AAA rupture admissions was 7500$ more for

    male patients over female patients.

    • Average re-imbursement for an ultrasound for AAA screening=97.77$1

    http://www.gehealthcare.com/usen/community/reimbursement/docs/Vascular_Surgery_reimbursementv2.pdf

    Will the screening be cost effective?

  • Conclusions: “Lower AAA prevalence is balanced by a higher rupture rate, mortality and morbidity. So screening is indeed cost-effective.”

  • Limitations

    • Study could not comment on the current guidelines of elective surgery at 5.5 cm

    • Single center study

    • Missing co-variates: smoking quantity, COPD (use of steroids), family history, age at menopause, occupation

    • Small AAAs (Prospective trial) • Total no. of visits (Catholic Health System) = >1500

    Future studies….

  • Conclusions • The overall incidence of AAA rupture was higher in males

    (68%) than in females (32%). • There was a significant effect of gender on the age of death

    from AAA rupture after controlling the effect of hypertension, co-morbidities, smoking, use of statins and previous history of aneurysms; F (1,110)=8, p=0.005.

    • There was a significant difference in the size of AAA rupture

    between females (mean=7.4 cm, SD=2.0) and males (mean=8.2 cm, SD=1.8); t (115)=2.0, p = 0.04.

    • The probability to undergo surgery for ruptured AAA was

    significantly lower for women as compared to men, even after adjusting for age at admission and major co-morbidities (p=0.03).

  • Conclusions • There was a significant effect of gender on the overall mortality

    (p=0.001) and post-operative mortality after EVAR (p=0.02) from AAA rupture after controlling the effect of hypertension, co-morbidities, smoking, use of statins and previous history of aneurysm.

    • Length of ICU stay, incidence of post-operative complications, use of pressors and use of ventilator was more in females.

    Using a similar threshold of size (5.5 cm) for elective surgery for both males and females might not be appropriate.

    AAA screening might be warranted for high risk females owing

    to their higher morbidity and mortality.

  • oCHS IRB members oAndrew Bishop (Data analyst)-- Financial analysis oKamal Tourbaf, MD oHenri Woodman, MD oPaul M Anain, MD oKhalid J Qazi, MD, MACP

    Acknowledgements

  • THANK YOU

    Slide Number 1Slide Number 2Slide Number 3Slide Number 4Slide Number 5Slide Number 6Slide Number 7Slide Number 8Slide Number 9Slide Number 10Slide Number 11Slide Number 12Slide Number 13Slide Number 14Slide Number 15Slide Number 16Slide Number 17Slide Number 18Slide Number 19Slide Number 20Slide Number 21Slide Number 22Slide Number 23Slide Number 24Slide Number 25Slide Number 26Slide Number 27Slide Number 28Slide Number 29Slide Number 30Slide Number 31Slide Number 32Slide Number 33Slide Number 34