Gas-FACTS: Gas - Future Advanced Capture Technology Options Jon Gibbins University of Edinburgh Mathieu Lucquiaud University of Edinburgh Hyungwoong Ahn University of Edinburgh Mohamed Pourkashanian University of Leeds Paul Fennell Imperial College London John Oakey Cranfield University Chris Wilson University of Sheffield Prashant Valluri University of Edinburgh Hannah Chalmers University of Edinburgh Martin Trusler Imperial College London Kevin Hughes University of Leeds Meihong Wang Cranfield University Pericles Pilidis Cranfield University Geoff Maitland Imperial College London Chemical Eng and Amparo Galindo Imperial College London George Jackson Imperial College London Claire Adjiman Imperial College London Nina Thornhill Imperial College London
17
Embed
Gas-FACTS: Gas - Future Advanced Capture Technology Options · modelling activities . Imperial: Properties of CO2-capture solvents for natural gas; real-time control. Leeds: Experimental
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Gas-FACTS: Gas - Future Advanced Capture Technology Options Jon Gibbins University of Edinburgh Mathieu Lucquiaud University of Edinburgh Hyungwoong Ahn University of Edinburgh Mohamed Pourkashanian University of Leeds Paul Fennell Imperial College London John Oakey Cranfield University Chris Wilson University of Sheffield Prashant Valluri University of Edinburgh Hannah Chalmers University of Edinburgh Martin Trusler Imperial College London Kevin Hughes University of Leeds Meihong Wang Cranfield University Pericles Pilidis Cranfield University Geoff Maitland Imperial College London Chemical Eng and Amparo Galindo Imperial College London George Jackson Imperial College London Claire Adjiman Imperial College London Nina Thornhill Imperial College London
Poyry, Impact of intermittency: how wind variability could change the shape of the British and Irish electricity markets, Summary report, July 2009, http://www.poyry.com/linked/group/study
Wind and thermal generation in January 2030 with the UK wind patterns from 2000
Poyry, Impact of intermittency: how wind variability could change the shape of the British and Irish electricity markets, Summary report, July 2009, http://www.poyry.com/linked/group/study
Poyry, Impact of intermittency: how wind variability could change the shape of the British and Irish electricity markets, Summary report, July 2009, http://www.poyry.com/linked/group/study
~ 10 GW of baseload available with 43GW of wind
Amount of time power demand is less than GW shown
Dispatchable (infill/backup) generation capacity
Wind
Estimates for 2030
Nuclear and wind competing for load some of the time
Poyry, Impact of intermittency: how wind variability could change the shape of the British and Irish electricity markets, Summary report, July 2009, http://www.poyry.com/linked/group/study
Wind – 43 GW (+10GW baseload) No wind – extra 20GW baseload 7GW less LF>5% ~10GW less LF<5% (and 43GW less wind)
Load factor distribution for infill power generation
0 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Some capacity doing ‘backup’
A lot of ‘infill’ capacity doing serious amounts
of energy generation
Original curves from Poyry, Impact of intermittency: how wind variability could change the shape of the British and Irish electricity markets, Summary report, July 2009, http://www.poyry.com/linked/group/study, but derived numbers are estimates from reading the graph above with assumed baseload from previous slides.
ILLUSTRATIVE COST BREAKDOWN FOR UK GENERATION OPTIONS
Based on Redpoint: Decarbonising the GB power sector: evaluating investment pathways, generation patterns and emissions through to 2030, A Report to the Committee on Climate Change, September 2009.
2008 capital costs, assumed £30/tCO2 carbon price, gas price £12.5/MWhth, coal price £6.25/MWhth. 10% interest rate
£/M
Wh
If wind or nuclear is run as fill in power
then costs go up even more than for fossil
If CCGT+CCS is costed at 20% LF then 63% LF electricity at very low
cost is not being used.
Generating Technology and Load Factor
Conclusions for future gas CCS plants Electricity demand is variable and will remain so – but unclear Wind output will always be variable – but no agreed data to properly address the question available in the public domain A lot of electrical energy is required to fill the gap, at a range of load factors – not clear how much could be electricity storage Quite a lot of low-load factor ‘backup’ power is also required 43 GW of wind + ~ 7GW of 20-90% LF + ~10GW of backup (~60GW capacity in total) replaces ~20GW of baseload capacity (estimated using data from the Poyry 2030 scenario) Operating fossil flexibly with and without CCS important Recovering the capital involved at reduced LF is likely to be very uncertain – low capital cost important
~ HRSG
Advanced Post
Combustion Capture
Gas turbine
Air inlet
Exhaust Gas Recycle - EGR
CO2 Transfer & Recycle - CTR
Gas in
Low carbon
electricity out
Decarbonised flue gas out
Decarbonised flue gas out CO2 transfer
Water/steam injection
Gas turbine capture systems
Gas-FACTS: Gas - Future Advanced Capture Technology Options
modelling activities Imperial: Properties of CO2-capture solvents for natural gas; real-time control. Leeds: Experimental measurement and modelling of amine degradation. Sheffield: Gas turbines running component and engine tests, HATS and EGR Cranfield: Membrane prescrubber evaluation and process/technoeconomic modelling.
WP1 Future roles for natural gas CCS plants
WP2 Gas turbine options for
improved CCS system performance
2.1 High humidity operation
2.2 Exhaust gas recycle
2.3 CO2 recycle
WP3 Advanced post combustion solvent capture for future gas power systems
3.1 Gas-specific solvents
3.2 Flexible capture systems
3.3 Advanced testing
WP4 Integration and whole systems performance assessment
WP5 Impact delivery and expert interaction activities
The Centre is funding commissioning and operating support for UKCCRSC-PACT for next 5 years, costing 810k, and is also offering support worth up to 630k for UKCCSRC members and other academics to undertake new research activities using UKCCSRC-PACT facilities, to complement £2.9M funding from DECC to move and set up equipment provided by RWE Npower.