GARLOCK EXPANSION JOINT (MSDI-P13671) Systems Design Review January 11 th, 2013 Friday, January 11, 2013P13671 - Garlock Expansion Joint 1.

GARLOCK EXPANSION JOINT (MSDI-P13671)Systems Design Review

January 11th, 2013

Friday, January 11, 2013 P13671 - Garlock Expansion Joint 1

2

P13671 Members

Left to Right:

Allison Feinberg (Member)

Sam Kulpinski (Member)

Don Thompson (Member)

Wayne Evans (Customer)

Elspeth Ochs (Member)

Joseph Harkins (Team Lead)

Danny McCormick (Member)

Dr. Jason Kolodziej (Faculty)

Friday, January 11, 2013 P13671 - Garlock Expansion Joint

3

Introduction to P13671

Timeframe: Winter & Spring quarter MSD

Objective: Design and build rig to test Garlock Expansion joints under high temperatures and actuation until failure while logging data


4

Project Schedule

Major Dates:• Detailed Design Review (DDR):

• 2012-2 Week 10 (around 2/8/13)

• Imagine RIT:• May 5, 2013

• Final Presentation:• 2012-3 Week 10 (around 5/8/13)

• Celebrate our success and graduation • After Final Presentation!

Link to our MS Project file: /public/Project Schedule.mpp


https://edge.rit.edu/dav/P13671/web/public/Project%20Schedule.mpp

https://edge.rit.edu/dav/P13671/web/public/Project%20Schedule.mpp

5

Customer Needs


6

Project Specifications


7

House of Quality


8

Risk Assessment


ID Risk Item Effect Cause Severity Likelihood Importance Action to Minimize Risk Owner

1 Project scope too large Project not completed in time Project improperly scoped 3 2 3Project scope discussed with

customer week 1Team Lead

2 Parts ordered too late Test rig can't be built on timeLong lead times not properly identified and accounted for

2 2 3Long lead time parts identified

and ordered by Week 6 of MSD ITeam Lead

3 Unsafe failure mode Potential burns to operator Improper safety precautions 3 1 3Ensure proper safety measures

around rigStructual Engineer

4 Poor team work ethicWork not done on time or

properlyPersonality conflicts, personal life conflicts

2 1 2Ensure constant communication

between team members with regards to personal conflicts

Team Lead

5Uneven distribution of temperature within EJ

Customer unsatisfied with product

Improper simulation of fluid flow within EJ

1 3 1Use CFD simulation to better

understand flow within EJFluid/Thermal

System Engineer

6 Failure of actuation methodUnable to satisfy customer

requirements Improper design of actuation

method1 2 2

Use FEM to model stresses in components and ensure proper usage of equipment to ensure

reliable operation

Actuation Method Engineer

9

Functional Decomposition


10

TEST RIG OVERVIEWSubsystem Breakdown


11

System Overview


Test Fluid

Tank, Tubing & Piping

Pumping System

Heating System

Actuation System

EJ Installation

System

Broken down into major subsystem components:

• Fluid• Tank, Tubing & Piping • Pump• Heating Components• Actuation & EJ Mount

12

SYSTEM FLUIDConcept Generation & Selection


13

PEW Chart

Fluid Concepts

Selection CriteriaDynalene

LO170Dynalene

HCDynalene

SFParatherm MR

(Reference)Dowtherm

G Corn oil Canola oil

Max optimal Temp - - + 0 + - -

Cost - - - 0 + + +

Viscosity at 350 deg + 0 - 0 - - -

Availability 0 0 0 0 0 + +

Safety 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Thermal Conductivity + - 0 0 + - -

Sum + 's 2 0 1 0 3 2 2

Sum 0's 2 3 3 6 2 1 1

Sum -'s 2 3 2 0 1 3 3

Net Score 0 -3 -1 0 2 -1 -1

Rank 2 7 4 2 1 4 4

Continue? No No No No Yes No No


14

Preliminary Fluid Selection• Dowtherm G

• Temperature Range – 20°F - 675°F• Cost – Unknown (Dr. Kandlikar said less than $5/gal)• Availability – Needs to be ordered (awaiting response from

supplier)• Low viscosity• Low Thermal Conductivity• Non-Toxic


15

TANK AND COMPONENTS, TUBING & PIPING


Concept Generation & Selection

16

PEW Chart – Tank


17

Preliminary Selections

Tank: Parker SMS30• 30 gallon steel tank• Lowest price, can be bought locally• Easy installation of heat cartridges due to rectangular

shape


18

PEW Chart – Tank Insulation


19


Tank Insulation: High Temperature Fiberglass & rigid foam

• High Temperature Fiberglass close to tank• Temperature Range: 0°F to 450°F• High density

• Add cheap rigid foam to outer layer to help minimize heat loss over time


20

PEW Chart – Mixer


21


Tank Mixer• TBD, depending on tank

Tubing & Piping• Metal rigid piping • Metal braided flexible tubing


22

PUMP SELECTION



23

PEW Chart


24

Preliminary Pump Selection

Gear Pump• Maximum temperature of up to 500°F• Maximum pressures from 250 psi to 500 psi• Maximum flow rates from 20 GPM to 120 GPM• Fluid Compatible• Small footprint – approximately 1 ft3 before motor• Maximum 1800 rpm


25

HEATING COMPONENTS



26

PEW Chart


27

Preliminary Selection

Cartridge Heaters• Using multiple smaller heaters helps increase power

potential and thus decrease time to heat the fluid• Relatively low cost per Watt (~ $0.03/Watt)• Using multiple heaters allows for even distribution of

temperature• Drill holes in sides of tank to attach heaters


28

Power Requirement

Cp Fluid = 1.878 KJ/kg*K

ρ Fluid = 973.25 kg/m3

Volume (30 gal) = .114 m3

ΔTemp = 200°CTime = 1 hr = 3600 s


29

ACTUATION COMPONENTS & EJ MOUNTING TECHNIQUE



30

PEW Chart


31

Preliminary Selection

Actuation & EJ Mount System: The Direct Mount Design


32

Estimated Project CostItem Price

Fluid $275.00 Tank $350.00 Solid Piping $250.00 Flex piping $1,325.00 Actuator $2,000.00 Pump $3,000.00 Fluid Mixer $500.00 Heating Element $250.00 Framing and stand $2,000.00 Total $9,950.00


Subsystems:• Fluid• Tank, Tubing & Piping • Pump• Heating Components• Actuation & EJ Mount

GARLOCK EXPANSION JOINT (MSDI-P13671) Systems Design Review January 11 th, 2013 Friday, January 11, 2013P13671 - Garlock Expansion Joint 1.

Documents

garlock expansion joints

test fluid tank

system overview

pew chart tank insulati

preliminary selections

major subsystem components

gallon steel tank lowest

p13671 timeframe