UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION LUIS A. GARCIA SAZ and wife, MARIA DEL Case No. 8:13-CV-220-T27 TBM ROCIO BURGOS GARCIA, Plaintiffs, vs. CHURCH O SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST, et al.; Defendants. ~ / PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AUTHENTICATED COPY OF COMPLETE 1963 HCO POLICY LETTER Plaintiffs , LUIS A. GARCIA SAZ and MARIA DEL ROCIO BURGOS GARCIA , y and through their undersigned attorneys , file this response to Defendants ' Motion for Leave to File Authenticated Copy of Complete 1963 HCO Polic y Letter [D.E . 127] and state: 1 Plaintiffs are reluctant to object to the introduction o f the authenticated copy of the complete 1963 HCO policy letter because even a cursory review o f it shows that the s o-called Rules of Committee of Evidence has zero to do with arbitration , which is not even mentioned in the letter. In fact , the procedure for a Committee of Evidence couldn ' t possibly be used in arbitration. • The Committee is convened by a convening authority , not the parties. • The subject matter o f the jurisdiction o f the Committee is punishm e nt , not fraudulent donations. Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 128 Filed 09/24/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID 2927
4
Embed
Garcia v. Scientology: Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's motion to file 1963 HCO Policy
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
8/11/2019 Garcia v. Scientology: Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's motion to file 1963 HCO Policy