7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013) http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 1/47 Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60 Filed 07/26/13 Page 1 of 4 PageID 1536 UN I T EDST A T ES D I ST R I C T C OU RT MI D DL E D I ST R I CT OFFL OR I D A T A M PA DI V ISI ON L UI SGA RCI ASAZ, and wi f e , MA RIADEL ROCI O GA RCI A ,Ca seNo. 8: 13 -CV -220 -T27 TBM Plai nt if fs, vs . C HU RC H OFSC I EN T OL OG Y RE L I G I OU S TRUS T ; U.S. I ASMEMBERS TRUST; C HU RC H OFSC I EN T OL OGY F LA GSER V I CE ORGANI ZA TION , I NC.; CHURCH OF SCI EN T OL OG Y FL A G SH I PSERV I CE ORGA NI ZATI O N, I NC. d/ b / a Maje s t ic Crui se L i nes, D ef en dant s. / - i PLA INT I FF S, M O T ION FO RP RO T E CT IV E O RDE R RE G A RD IN GD E FE NDA NT S, R EQ UE ST F O R PRO D UC T ION P UR SUA NT T O EX H IB IT A OF DE FENDA NT S, F L A G A N D SH IPSUB PO EN A DUCEST ECU M COMES NOWtheP lai n ti f f s, LUI S GARCI Aan d ROCI O GARCI A , b yand th ro u gh th ei r u nd ersi gn ed atto rn eys and i l e aMo ti o n fo rProtec ti ve O rd er o bjec ti n gto th e p ro d uc ti o n o f d o cu men ts req u ested in m ultip l e s u bpo en as d u c es tec u m ( th e " S ub o enas " ) i ssu ed b y Defen d an ts Ch urc h o f Sc i en to l o g y F l ag Ser vi c e O rgani z ati o n , In c. an d Ch urc h o f Sc i en tol o g y Fla g S h i p Servi c e O rg an i zati o n,In c. (" De f end an ts )" . Th e do c u m en t requ es ts i ssu ed b y Defend ants, as setfo rth i n E xhi bi t A to th eSu bp o en as, are i d enti c a l , and impermissi b l y seek the sweep i n gp ro d ucti o n o f do cum en ts b y (i ) th e sep arate lawf i rms rep resen ti n gP l ai n ti f fs, (i i ) i n di vi d ual co unsel with i n thoselawf i rms; an d (ii i ) n o n- party Mi c hael Rind er . Bec aus eth e do c um en t requ ests are p aten tl y o verbro ad an d u nd u l y b u rd en so m e, P l ai nti f fs object, on th ei ro wn 1
47
Embed
Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)
Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60 Filed 07/26/13 Page 4 of 4 PageID 1539
CERT IFICATE OF SERVICE
We hereby certify that, on July 26 , 2013, we electronically filed the foregoing document
with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. We also certify that the foregoing do cument is being
served this day on all counsel or pro se parties identified below in the manner specified , eithervia transmission of Notices of E lectronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other
authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronicallyNotices of E lectronic Filings .
AO 88 (l{ev. 07/1 0) Subpoena to Appear and TestifY at a He::ring or Trial in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTfor the
Middle District of Florida
Luis Garcia Saz and Maria Del Roclo Burgo Garcia
Plaintiff
v.
)
) .
))
)
CivilAction No. 8:13--cv-00220-T-27TBM
Church of Scientology Refiglous Trust, et al.
Defendant
SUBPOENA TO APPEAR AND TESTIFY
AT A HEARING OR TRIAL IN A CIVIL ACTION
To: Records Custodian for Babbitt. Johnson, Osborne & Le Clalnche, PA , cfo Theodore Babbitt
1641 Worthington Rd., Suite 100, West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
YOU ARE COMMAND ED to appear in the Un.ited States district court at the time, date, and pl ace set forth belo
to testifY at a hearing or trial in this civil action. When you arrive, you must remain at the court until the judge or a cou
officer allows you to leave. ·
I --, . .Sam Gi55ons U n r t e 0 S t r . : : a : ; ; t e : ; ; : ; s " C " " o ~ u 7 . f t : n : h : ; - ; : o ~ u ; ; : ; s e ; : : : - - - - - - - - - - , r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Place: Courtroom No.: 138
801 N. Florida Ave., Tampa, FLL Date and Time: 07/24!2013 9:00am
You must also bring with yo u the following documents, electronically stored information, or objects (blank lfnor
applicable):
SEE ATIACHED EXHIBIT "A"
p r o v l ~ i o n s ofFed. R. civ. P. 45(c), refatlng to your protection aS aperson subJect to ·a. subpoena; and Fed.R. Civ. P. 45 (d) and (e), relating to your duty to respond to this subpoena and the potential' consequences of not doing
so, are attached.
Date: 06/28/2013
CLERK OF COURT
Signa/w-e o fClerk or Deputy Clerk Attorney's signa!ure
The name, address, e-mail, and telephone number of the attorney representing (name ofparty) ChurC?.J:l...?.f ScientologyF l < : !
__ ?ervice Organization, Inc:.. _ _ --··· , who issues or requests this subpoena, are:
AO 88 (Rev. 06/09) Sul:>wena to App-...ar and Testify at a Hearing or Trial in ~ C i v i l Action (page 3)
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 (c), (d)t an d (e) (Effective 1211/07)
(c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena. (d) Duties in Responding to u Subpoena.(I ) Avoiding Undue Burdm or Expense; Sanctious. A part)r or (1) Protluclng Documents or Electronf.cally Stored lnfonnatiofl.
attorney responsible for issuing and serving a subpoena must take These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically
reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a stored information:person subject to the subpoena. 1l1e issuing court must enforce this (A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produceduty and impose an appropriate sanction- which may include lost documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary cours
earnings and reasonable attomey•s f ees - on a par!J or attorney of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the
who fails to comply. categories in the demand.
(2) Commmtd to Produce Materi{C/s or Permit InspecOon. (B) Form for Prod#cing Electronically Stored Information Not
(A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce Specified. lf a subpoena does not specify a form for producing
documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things, Ol' electronically stored information, the person responding must produc
to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the . it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintalnc0 or in a
place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear reasonably usable form or forms.
for a deposition, hearing, or trial. (C) Electrorncally Stored Jnformallon Produced in Only One For11
(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or The person responding need not produce the same electronically stor
tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or information in more than one form.
attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to (D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored lnformation. The person
inspecting. copying, testing or sampling any o r all of the materials or responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored
ro inspecting the premises- or to producingelectronically stored infonnation from sources that the person identifies as not reasonablyinformation in the form or fo1ms requested. The objection must be accessible because of undue burden or cost On motion to compel
served before the earlier of the time specifi_ed for compliance or 14 discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must showdays after the subpoena is served. lf an objection is made, the that the infonnation is not reasonably accessible because of undue
following rules apply: burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good
party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court ma
or inspection. specify conditions for the discovery.
(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and (2) aaiming Privilege or Protection.the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party's (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed
officer from sighificant expense resulting from compliance. Information under a claim that it is privileged or subject to protection
(3) Quaslti!rg or MorlifYlng a Suhpoma. as trial-prepara.t.lon material must:
(A) When Req4lred.. On ~ i m e l y motion, the issuing court must (i) expressly make the claim; and
quash or modifY a subpoena that: (ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communication
(i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; or tangible things in a manner that, without revealing infonnation
(ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party's officer itself privileged or protected. will enable the parties to assess the
to travel more than 100 miles from where that person resides, Is claim.
employed, or regularly transacts business in person- except that. (B) Jnformmion Produced. If information produced in response to a
subject to Rule 45( c)(3XB)(iii), the person may be commanded to subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-
attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any
the trial is held; party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it.
(iii) requires disclosure of ptivileged or other protected matter, if After being o t i f i ~ , a party must promptly return, sequester, or
no exception ot waiver applies; or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use
(iv) subjects a person to undue burden. or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take
(B) When Permiffed To protect a person subject to or affected by reasonable steps to retrieve the info1mation if the par!J disclosed ita subpoena, the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modifY the before being notified; and may pl'omptly present the infonnation to th
subpoena i f t requires: court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who
(i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, produced the infonnation must preserve the information until the clai
development, or commercial infonnation; is resolved.
(ii) disclosing an unretained expert 's opinion or information that
does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from
the expert's study that was not requested by a party; or
(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party' s officer to incur
substantial expense to travel more than JOO miles to attend trial .
(C) SpecifYing Conduions 11s an Alternative. In the circumstances
described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing ormod if ing a subpoena, order appearance or production under
specified conditions 1 e servmg p(i ) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that
cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and
(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonablycompensated. '
(e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who,
having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey the
subpoena. A nonparty's failure to obey must be excused if thesub))Qena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a
place outside the limits of Rule 4S(c)(3)(A)(ii).
Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-1 Filed 07/26/13 Page 4 of 16 PageID 1543
7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)
Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-1 Filed 07/26/13 Page 6 of 16 PageID 1545
All communications , includ ing written ag reements, notes , affidavits , record ings, checks,
recordings , emails , and correspondence , subsequent to January 1, 2007 , relating topayment of compe nsation or remuneration of any kind to Marty Rathbun , between any
of the following individuals or entities: Marty Rathb un, M ike R inder, Rober t Johnson ,
Gray Robinson P.A., Rona ld We il, W eil & Quaranta PA Theodore Babb itt, Babbitt,
Johnson, Osborne & Le C lainche P .A., Morgan & Morga n , Br ian Leung, Holcomb &
Leu ng, Luis Garc ia , and/or Maria Garcia.
1508884
7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)
AO &8 {Rev. 06/09) Subpoena to Appear and TestifY at a Hearing or Trial in a Civil Action (page3)
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 (c), (d), l;jnd (e) (Effective 12/1/07)
{c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.
(1) Avoiding Umfue Burden or Expe11se; Sam::tions. A par1y or
attorney responsible fo r issuing and serving a subpoena must take
reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or e;-cpense on a
person subjectto
thesubpoena The issuing court must enforce
tllisduty and impose an appropriate sanction- which may include lost
earnings and reasonable attorney's fees- on a party or attorney
who fails to comply.
{2) Commmu/. to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection.
(A) Appearance Not Required A person commanded to produce
documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things. or
to penn it th e inspection of premises, need not appear in person at t1Je
place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear
for a deposition. hearing, or trial.
(B) Olljeclions. A person commanded to produce documents or
tangible things or to permit inspection ma y serve on the pruty or
attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to
inspecting. copying, testing or sampling any or ali of he materials or
to inspecting the premises- or to producing electronically stored
information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be
served before the earlier of he time specified for compliance or 14days after the subpoena is served. l f an objection is made, the
· following rules apply:
(i ) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving
party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production.or inspection.
{ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and
the order must protect a person who is neit1Jer a party no r a party'sofficer from significantexpense resulting from compliance.
(3) QufiShingor ModifYing a Subpoena.
{A) When Required. On timely motion, t1Je issuing court mustquash or modify a ubpoena that
(i) fuils to allow a reasonable time to comply;
(ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party's officer
ip'trii.vd more than I00 miles from where t1Jat person resides, is .employed, or regularly transacts business in person- except that,
subject to Rule45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded toattend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where
t1Je trial is lleld;
(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if
no exception or waiver applies; or
(iv) subjects a person to undue burden_
{B) When Pemtitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by
a subpoena, the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify th e
subpoena if t requires:
(i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research,
aevelopment, or commercial information;
(ii) disclosing an ~ n r c t a i n e d expert•s opinion or information !hat
docs not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from
!he expert's study that was nol requested by a party, or
{iii) a person who is neither.a party nor a party's officer to incur
substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.
(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alremative. In the circumstances
escn e - , · lead of uashing or
modifying a subpoen!!, order appearance or production uhdcr
specified conditions if the serving party:
(i) shows a substantial need for th e testimony or material that
cannot be ot1Jerwi se met without undue hardship; an d
(ii} ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably
compensated.
(d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.
(I ) Producing Docume11ls or Electronically Stored lriformatioiL
These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically
stored infunnation:(A) DocUments. A person responding to
asubpoena to produce
documents must produce them as !hey are kept in the ordinary course
of business or must organize an d label them to correspond to th e
categories in the demand.
(B) Form fo r PtoducingElectronically t o r ~ d bifOrmationNot
Speci.fzed If a subpoena does no t specify a forrn for producingelectronically stored information. the person responding must produceit in a fotm or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a
reasonably usabl e form or forms.
(C ) Elecrron:icaUy Stored Information Produced in Only One Form.
The person responding need not produce the same electronically storedinformation in more than one form.
{D) Inaccessible Electronically St.ored lnformation. The person
responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored
information from sources that the person identifies as no t •easonably
accessible because of undue burden or cosL On motion to compel
discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must showthat t1Je information is not reasonably accessible because ofundue
burden or cost Iftbat showing is made, the court may nonetheless
order discovezy from such sources i f he requesting party shows good
cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b (2)(C). The court mayspeci:fY conditions for fue discovery.
(k) Oa.imi11g J>rivilege. or ProtectioiL
(A } Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed
information under a claim that it is privileged or subject to protection
as trial-preparation material must:
(i) expressly make the claim; and
(ii} describe the nature of he withheld documents, communications,or tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information
itselfprivileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the
claim.
( B ) ' i ~ j o r m a t i o n Prcduced. I f nformation produced in response to a
subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trialpreparation material. the person making the claim ma y notify ru'ly
·party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it.
After being nofificd, a party must promptly return, sequester, or
destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use
or disclose the iofurmation until the claim is resolved; must takereasonable steps to retrieve th e information if the par1y disclosed itbefore being notified; and may promptly present the information to the
court under seal fori. determination"of he claim. Th e person who
produced the information must preserve the information until-the claim
is resolved.
(e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempta person who,having been sef\l_ed; fails W i i h ~ u t adequate excuse to obey the
subpoena A nonparty's failure to obey must be excused if the
subpoena purports to require !he nonparty to attend oc produce at a
place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).
Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-1 Filed 07/26/13 Page 9 of 16 PageID 1548
7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)
All written agreements, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to litigation against any
Scientology affiliated entity, between Gray Robinson P .A. or Robert Johnson, and anyof the following individuals or entities: Mike Rfnder, Marty Rathbun, Ronald Weil,Weif &
'-------·- - --· -· - - ----- - --·- · - -- - · - - - - · - - ~The provisions offed. R. Civ. P, 45(c), relating to your protection as a person subject to a subpoena. and Rule
45 (d) and (e), relating to your duty to respond to thls subpoena and the potential consequences of not doing so, areattached.
Date: 07/01/2013
CLERK OF COURT
OR
Si"gnafure ofClerk or Deputy Clerk AtJorney s signalure
e name address, e-mail, and telephone number of the attorney representing (name of arty) Church Scie_ntolo_y Fl§!g_
AO 88B (Rev. 06109) Subpo<;na to Produce Doc_menls-, Information. or Objects or o Permit Inspection oiPremises in a Civil Action{Page 3)
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 (c), (d), and (e) (Effective l'Ul/07)
(c) ProtcctiJJg a Person Subject toll Subpoena.
(1) Avaidbtg Undue Burefen or Expense; SanctUms. A party ora t t ~ n i e y responsible for issuing and serving a subpoena must take
reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on aperson subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this
duty and impose an appropril!te sanction -which may include lost
earnings and reasonable attorney's on a part;Y or attorneywho fails to comply.
(2) Co1Wt1111td to ProduceM¢erf(l]s or Permit I!tspecJiott.(A) Appearance Not Required. t\ person commanded to produce
documents. electronically stored information, or tangible thing.;, orto pcm)it'tbe inspection of ~ , need not appear in person at the
place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear
for a deposition. bearing, or tria).
(B) Objections. A person commllllded to produce documents or
tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or
attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection toinspecting, copying. testing or sampling any or an of he materials or
to inspecting the premises -: - or to producing electronically stored
information in the form or forms requested. The objection must beserved before the earlier of the time ~ > p e c i f i e d for compliance or 14
days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, rhefollowing rules apply: ·
(i ) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the s ~ : < Y i n gparty may move the issuing court for an order compelling production
or inspection.
{ii) These ac1s may be required only as directed in the order, andthe order must protect a pe<son who is neither a party nor a party's
officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.
(3) Qrltrshlngor M udifying a SubpoenfL
(A) When Required On timely motion, the issuing court must
quash or modify a subpoena that:(i ) .thlis tD allow a reasonable to comply;
·· fti) requires a person who is neither a partynor a party's officer
to travel more than 100 miles from where that person resides, Ise m p l o y ~
or regularly transacts business in person- except that,subject to Rule 45(c)(3){D)(iii), the person may be commanded toanend a trial by traveling from any such place withio the state where
the trial is held;(Iii) requires disclosure of t i v i l ~ e < : l or otller protected m"uer, if
no exception or waiver applies; or
{lv) subjr;cts a person to undue burden.
(B) When f>ermilted To protect a person subject to or affect.ed by
a subpoena, the issuing court may, on motion, qua.sh or modifY the
subpoena ifit requires:{i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research,
development, or commercial infonnarion;
(il) disclosing an t ~ n r e t a i n e d expert's opinion or information that
does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from
the expert's study that was not requested by a party; or
{iii) a person who is neither a pilrty nor a party 's officer to incur
substanti;d expense 1o travel more than I00 mites to attend trial.
(C) SpecifYing Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances
• t e court ma: , instead ofquashing or
modifYing a subpoena, order appearance or product1on un er
specified conditions if the serving party:
{i ) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that
cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and{ii) ensures that 1h" subpoenaed person will be reasonably
compensatro.
(d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.
(1) Prod#cl!rg DoC/1.11lenlS or Eleetronically Stored n f f . m n a f ~ m .These procroures apply to producing documents or i < ~ C t r o o i c a l J ystored Information:
(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to producedocuments must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary
course of business or must organize and labd them to corresponcl to
the categories in1he demand.
(B) Form for ProducingElectronically r o r ~ Information NolSpecified. l f a subpoena does not specify a form for producing
electrooica.lly stored information, the person respondingmust
produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or
in a reasonably usable fonn or furms.
(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced il l Only One
Form. The person responding neecl not produce the s;uneelectronically sto.red information in more than one form.
(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored lnforliUJtion. The personresponding need not provide discovery of electronically stored
information from sources that lhe person idcutifies as reasonably
accessible because ofnndueburden or cost On motion to compeldiscovexy or for a protective order, the person responding must show
that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue
burden or cost If that showing is made. the court may nonethelessordl'!' discovery from such sources i f he requesting party shows
good cause, considering the limitations of Rule ?6(b)(2)(C). The
court may specifY conditions for the discovery.
{2) ClaimiflgPrivilege or Protectio1f.
(A) Information Withhelci. A person withholding subpoenaedinformation under a chum that it privileged or subject to
protection as trial-preparation material must
(i ) J ~ : p r e s s l y make the l ~ m ; and
(ii) describe the nature of he withheld documents,communications, or tangible thmg:; in a manner that, without
revealing infonnation itself privileged or protected, will enable the
parties to assess the claim.
(B)Information
ProducedIfinformation produced in response:"fu a ·subpoena Js subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-
preparation material. tbe person making the claim may notit)' any
party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it.Arter being notified, a party m u ~ t promptly return, sequester, or
destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not useor disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take
reasonable steps to retrieve the information lflhe p31ty disclosed it
before being notified; and may promptly present the information to
the court.undt:r seal for a determination o f t h ~ " o c l a i m . The personwho produced the information must preserve the informal on untilthe claim is resolved.
(e) Contempt. The Issuing court may hold in contempt a person
who, having been served, fails without adeqllllte excuse to obey t.!Jc
subpoena. A nonparty's failure to obey must be excuS(:d if he
subpoenapurport!! to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a
place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).
Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-1 Filed 07/26/13 Page 14 of 16 PageID 1553
7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)
All written agreements, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to litigation against any
Scientology affiliated entity, between Gray Robinson P.A. or Robert Johnson, and anyof the following individuals or entities: Mike Rinder, Marty Rathbun, Ronald Weil, Well &
To: Richard Zabak, Gray Robinson, PA, 201 On e Tampa CHy Ctr#2200, Tampa, FL 33602
B Y : _ . . : . . . . ® ' - - -
SHERIFF
APPOJNTED PRO
SERVER
YOU ARE COMMAND ED to appear in the United States district court at the time, date, and place se t forth below
to testifY at a hearing or trial in this civil action.. When you arrive, you must remain at the court until the judge or a court
officer allows you to leave.
Courtroom No.: 138
Date and Time: 07/24/2013 9:00am
You must also bring with you the following documents, electronically stored information, or objects (blank ifno t
appllcable):
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A"
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(c), rela ting to your protection as a person subject to a subpoena, and r"ed.R. Civ. P. 45 (d) and (e), relating to your duty to respond to this subpoena and the potential consequences of not doingso, are attached. ·
Date: 06/28/2013
CLERKOF COURI
Signature o fClerkor Deputy Oerk
e address e-mail, and telephone number of the attorney representing (name o f arty) Church of Scientology Flaq_
____ ~ e i V . . . : . . c . . : i c e : . : _ O r - " g ' - ' a . c . . . n c . : . i z _ a c . . t i o n . . . : c · l _ n c . . c .____ who issues or requests
Unless the subpoena .was issued on behalfof he United States, or one ofits officers or agents, I have also
tendered to the witness fees for one day's attendance, and the mileage allowed by law, in the amount of
$ .
My fees are$ for travel and$ for services, for a total of$ 0.00- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -l declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.
Date:
Server's signature
Prinled name and title
Server's address
Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:
Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-2 Filed 07/26/13 Page 8 of 16 PageID 1563
7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)
Al l written agreements, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to litigation against any
Scientology affiliafed entity, between Gray Robinson P.A. or Robert Johnson, and anyof the following individuals or entities: Mike Rinder, Marty Rathbun, Rof!ald Wei!, Wei! &
Morgan &Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or Maria. Garcia.
Al l evidence of communications, including notes, affidavits, recordings, time records,
emails and correspondence, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to litigation ·against
any Scientology affiliated entity, ~ e t w e e n RobertJohnson or his agents, and any of the
following individuals or entities: Mike Rinder, Marty Rathbun, Ronald Wei!, Wei! &
Quaranta P.A Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne & Le Clainche P.A., Brian
Culkin, Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or Maria
Garcia.
All evidence of communications, including notes, affidavits, recor-dings, time records,
emails, and correspondence, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to litigation
against any Scientology affiliated entity, between Mike Rinder or his agents, and any of
the following individuals or entities: Robert Johnson, Marty Rathbun, Gray Robinson
P.A., Ronald Wei!, Weif & Quaranta PA . Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson; Osborne
& Le Clainche P.A., Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung. Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia,
and/or Maria Garcia.
Al l.evidence .of communications, ·ncluding ~ o t e s , affidavits) recordings, t i m ( ' } . [ f ; G O r ~ : S ·emails and correspondence, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to litigation against
any Scientology affiliated entity7 between Marty Rathbun or his agents, and any of the
following individuals or entities:Hobert Johnson, Mike Rinder, Ronald Wei!, Wei! &
Quaranta P.A. Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne & Le Cfainche P.A, Brian
Culkin, Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or Maria
Garcia.
AU communications, including written agreements, notes, affidavits, recordings, checks,
recordings, emails, and correspqndence, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to
payment of compensation or remuneration of any kind to Mike Rinder, between any of
the following individuals or entities: Mike Rinder, Robert Johnson, Gray Robinson ·P..A.,
Ronald Wei!, WeiJ & Quaranta P .A. Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne & Le
Clainche P.A., Morgan Luis Garcia, and/or
Maria 'Garcia.
Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-2 Filed 07/26/13 Page 10 of 16 PageID 1565
7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)
AO 88B (Rev. 06109) S u b p o ~ n a )o Produce Documents, fnformation, or Object5 or ro l'cmrit!nspection orPremi>% in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTfor the
Middle District ofFlorida
Luis Garcia Saz and Maria De l Rocio Burgo Garcia,
TRUE C
SERV
Plaintiff
v.
)))
)))
Civil Action No.DATE:
8:13-cv-00220-T-27TBMt \ s
Church of Scientology Religious Trust, et al., T I M E : ~- - - -·- - - - · - - - -
( I f t h ~ action is p e o d i n ~ in another ui:;trict. stat\': where; lS:'h.'\,
>Bv:·__. : : ; : r " ~ ; ._ ,Defendcirrt
SUBPOENA TO .PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION, OR OBJECTSOR TO PERMIT JNSPECTlON OF PREMISES IN A CIVIL ACTlON
t ~ : . . . . _ _ - l Z ~ ! . . J L . r ; 7 .
To: Rich<1rd Zabek- Gray Robinson, P A
201 One Tampa City Ctr #22D(}, Tampa, FL 33602
SHERIAPPOINTED P
SERVE
rPfProdllction: YOU AR E COMMANDED to produce at the time, date, and place set forth below the following
doct,tment:s, electronically stored information, or objects, and permit their inspeetion, copying, testing, or sampling f t h ~material: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A
AO 88 B (Rev. 06/09) Subpoena to Produce Documents. lnformi!lion, or ObjectS or (J) Pennit Inspcccion ofPremises io a CiYil Action(Page 3)
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 (c), (d), an d (e) (Effective 12/l/07)
(c) Protecting <1 Person Subject to a Subpoena.(l)Avoiding Undue Burde n ur Expense; Sqn(:l!Dns. A party or
attoroey responsible for issuingand
serving a subpoena must!<lke
reasonable steps 10 avoid i m p ~ i n g u n d u ~ burden or expense on aperson subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this
duty and impose an appropriate S"4Jlclion-which may include loslearnings and reasonable attorney's fees - on a party or attorneywho fails to romply.
(2) Cumntand to Prothtce Materials or Permit Inspec:flott.(A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce
documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things, orto permit the inspection of premise:;, need not li!>Peat: ;:n person at theplace of production or inspection unf(:SS also commanded to appearfor a depo!iition, hearing, or trial.
(B) Object!ora. A pen;on commanded lo produce docWPems or
tllngible things or to permit n s p e ~ t i o n may serve on the party orattorney designmed in the subpoena a written objeaion toinspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of he materi&ls or
to inspecting the premises -or o producing electronically storedinformation In the form or forms requested. The objection must beserved before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14
days after the subpoena is served. Jf an objection is made, thefollowing rules apply:
(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded per.>on, 1..111:: servingparty may move the issuing court fur an order compelling productionor inspection,
(ii) These acts may be required only ns directed in the order. andthe orda- must protect ll person who is neither a party nor a party's
officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.(3) W ~ S h l n g or Modi fying aSubp(}(!nfL
(A) When Required. On timely motion. the Issuing court mustquash ot modify a subpoena that:
(i ) fiUis to allow a r e a s ~ n a b l c time to comply;· (ii) te{{uires a person who is neither a party nor a party's officer
to travel more than 100 miles from where "thai person resides, is
employed, or regularly tqmsac\S business in person - ex:cept that.$Ubject to Rule 45(cX3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded roattend a llial by traveling from any such p!Bce within the state whererhe trial Is held;
(lii) requires disclosur(: of privileged o< orhc• protected matter, if
·no exception or waiver applies; or
(iv) subjectS a person to uncluc burden .(B) When Permilt.ed. To protect a pc:rson subject to or affected. by
a subpoena, the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify thesubpoena if It tequires: ·
(i) disclosing a tradl$ secret or other confidential research,development,. or commercial information;
(ii) disclosing an unrdai.ned expert's opinion or information that
does not describe speci fie occurrences in dispute;; lUld results fromthe expert's study that was not requested by a plllty; or
(iii) a person who is neither a partynor a party's officer to incur
substantial e1<pense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.(C) SpecifYing Condilions as an Alternative. In 1he circumstances
describ m u e c , , · ·modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under
specified conditions if tx:serving party:
(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material thaicannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and
(ii) ensures that the subpoeneed person will be reasonably
compensa.'e<l.
(d ) Duties in Rt'Sponding to a Subpoena.
( 1} Producing Documents or F;lectromc4lly Stored 1nfomwtfoft.These procedures apply to proc!ucing documents or electronicallystored information:
(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to producedocuments must produce: them as they are kept in the ordinarycourse of business or mustorganize ll!ld label them tn correspond tothe- categories in the demand.
(B) Form for Producing Eiedronica/ly Stored lrzformotlon NotSpecifted. If a subpoenadoes not . p ~ t y a form for producingelectronically stored illformation, 1he person responding mustproduce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily ; ~ i n t a i n c d or
in a reasonably uSilble form or forms.(C) Eiectronlcally Stored ftiformaJ.fon Produced ill Only
Fvrm. The person responding ~ not produce the same
electronically stored information in more than one form.
(D) fnacces&ible Eledronical{ySturedlnformation. The personresponding need not provide discovery of electronically storedinformation from sources that the person identifies as not reasonablyaccessible because ofundue burden or cost.. On motion to compeldiscovery or for a protective order, the person responding muse show
that t11e information i s not reasonably accessible because of undue~ u r d e n or cost rr that showing is made, the court may nonethclcssorder discovery from such souro:s if the requesting party shows
good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). Thecourt may specify conditions for the discovery.
(2) Claimillg Privilege or Protedwrt.
(A) Jnforrnation Wl1hheld. A person withholoingsubpoenaed
infonnaiion uudcr- a claim that it .s privileged or subject toprotection as trial-preparation material must:
(i) expressly make the claim; and(ii) describe the nature ofthe withheld documents,
communications, CK" t<mgible things in a manna- that, withoutrevealing information itselfprivileged or protected, will enable theparlies·i> asSesS the claim.
{B) JnforJn4tion Produced. If information produced in response to asubpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trialpreparation material, the person making the claim may notify anyparty that received the information of the claim and lhe basis for itAfier being o t i f i e d , a party must prompTly return, sequester, or
destroy the specified information and any copies: it has; must not use
· or disclose the information on til the claim is resolved; mo st l>!ke
reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the partY disclqsed it
before being notified; and may promptly present the information tothe court under seaJ for a determination of fhc claim. The personwho produced the information must preserve the information untilthe claim is resolved.
(e} Contempt. The issqing coutt may hold in c o n t e m p ~ e personwho, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey thesubpoena. A nonparty's failvre to obey must be excused if the
subpoena purports to require the nonparty ro attend or produce at aplace outside the limits of Rule 45(c){3)(A)(ii).
Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-2 Filed 07/26/13 Page 14 of 16 PageID 1569
7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)
All written agreements, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to litigation against any
Scientology affiliated entity, between Gray Robinson P.A. or Robert Johnson, and anyof the following individuals or entities: Mike Rinder, Marty Rathbun, Ronald Wei!, Wei! &
AO 88B (Rev. 061{)9) Sul>po_ena to Produce Documents, J n f o r m a t i o n , b j c : ~ t s - o r ro ~ e r m n Jospealon ofPremises in a Civil Aclion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTfor th e
M i d d l ~ District o f Florida
Luis Garcia Saz and Marra Del Rocio Burgo'C;_arcia,TRUE COP:SERVED
Plaii71/ff
Chur.Ch of Scientology·Religious Trust, et al.,
)
)
)
)))
Civil Action No. 8:13-cy700220-T-27TBrtrAtEi'?{3.tt?Of the action is p e n d i n ~ ~ ; in another district. sfatewhe'f4ME:._._ ...7;.;.· . ._!;:;5,. ~ : : : : .W f
Defendant ~ Y : - - ~ ~: : , . . . . : . :. .:!....f'J_qj:.___ . _ ~ \ e . _ i L P " ' -SUBPOENA TO P-RODUCE DOCUME)'ITS_, ll,'lFORMATION,.OROB.JECTS
OR TO PERMIT INSPECTION OF PRE:MISES:lN A CIVIL ACTiON
To: Michael Rinder, 808 Bentwood Court, Palm Harbor, Florida 34683 ·SHEPJFF
. APPbiNTED PRO
rpfProduction: YOU AR E C O M M A N D E ~ to produc,e at the time, d a t e ~ f!qil;pJace.setforth b e l o w t h e f o l l o w i n ~ E R V E Rdocuments, electronicaily stored information, of objects, and penn t their inspection, copying, testing, or sampiing,_ fthe
material:SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A
1 l a ~ ; ; ; · Johnl)on ..F>oi>e: B o k o r ~ R u p j n ~ i a . - s u n 1 s , l i . P' 400 East Madison St. Sulte 400
0 l n ~ p e p t i o n ofPremises; YOV AR E COMMANDED toperinih:niry onto the e s ~ g n a t e d prett1)$·es, land, or
o t h ~ t : p r o p e r t y possessed or controiieifby you anhe i m ~ , d a t e , a r t ~ i ' l o c a i i o n set forth below,:so h a t : t h ~ ; ' e q u e s t i n g party
may inspect, measure, survey, photograph, test, or sample the propertY or any designated object or r : a t i o n on it.
i i ~ ~ e : - - - - - - - - - ·- ----- ·- - - - - - .. ---.,.----- _ ._ ·-- ·! ate and Time:- - - - · - - - - · - ~
The -name, address, e--mail; and telephone ,nurnber of he attorney r e i : i t ~ s e i t t i n ~ o ( n a m e ofparry} CljurcJ:LQf ~ . S ~ Q ! . Q l o g y Ff91L$eryJce Q!:g§pizat:iQ!1. Inc.______ _
______ ._ _ __ __,_ _ _ , wh o issues :or:requests this subpoena, are:Robert V. Potter, Esq" 911 Chestnut Street, Cleal'l\fater, Fl33756 Phone: 727-46H 818
Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-3 Filed 07/26/13 Page 2 of 11 PageID 1573
7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)
AO 88B 06109):SubP.O:Cna·to Produce ~ u m e o l 3 ~ J z : l ( o ~ r n a t o r D b j c c t s or ro P e r i n i ~ lnsi>e'c.lon of Premises In a Civil A ~ l i o n (Page 2)
Civil Action No . 8:13-cv-00220-T-27'FBM
P R O O F Q F " S E R V r ~ E(This sectiotl should not be iled with tlte couri un1essf£ujuiredby Fed. R. Cw. P. 45.)
This subpoena for (name of ndividual and title, ifany)
Unless the subpoena was ·issued on behalf.of h ' S ~ ' U ~ i ' t e d States,.or one of its officers ·on.gents, l.ha'l'¢ ; 1 l . ~ otendered to the ·witness fees for one day's attenda.'nce, .and the mileage allowed by ·raw, in the amountof
$
Myfeesare$ for e r v i c i : ! for·a total of$ . __ _O.O.Q...
I deciare under penalty ofperjury that'this i n f o r r n a t i o i l true.
AO 8SB (ReY. 06/09) Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information. or b j ~ l s or'to ~ e r i J i . i l l m p e c ; l i o l ! of Premises in a Civil Action( Page 3)
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 (c), (d), and (e) (Effective 12/i/0.7)
(c) Protecting a Person Subject to S u b p o e n l l .(1) Avoitling Undu.e Bu.rdel! ·or Expense; Sanctians. A party or
attorney responsible for issu.lng and serving a subpoena mus1 m.ke
reasonable steps to a v o ~ d imposing undue burden or t:Xpense on &
person !>llbject to the :subpoena. The issuing court must enforce rhis
duty and impose an·appropdate sanction- which may include lostearning;; and reasomible attorney's fees- on & party or attorneywho .fuils to comply.
(2) Com11umd to P,qduce Mareriafs or Fermlt l!tspectlon.(A} AppearanceNot Required. A person commanded lo produce
documents, eleetronically stored infonnatioo, or tangible things, otto permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at theplace of production or inspection unless also comtnandcd to appearfor a dep\}sit,!Qn, hearing, or r i ~ l .
(B) Objectz'ons. A persOn commanded to produce documents ortangible things-or to pcn:nit inspection may serve on the party orattorney designated in the subpoena a written objection toinspecting, «opy.!ni, testing or sampling any or all of the materials -orto inspeciing·the premises- or to ·produci·ng elcctronica'Hy storedin'fonnation in the form or forms requested. The objection must beserved before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14-
days .after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, thefollowing rules apply:
(i) At any time, on notice to rhe commanded person, the servingparty may move the issuing court for an order compelling productionor inspection.
(Ji) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, andthe o r d ~ r must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party'sofficer from significant expense resulting from compliance.
(3) Quashing or ModifYing a Subpoena.(A) When Required. On timely mo1ion, the issuing court must
quash or modiO' a subpoena that;(i) ·fails to allow a reasonable time to comply;
(if) requires a- pen-on who is neither a party nor a party's officerto travel .more than l 00 miles from where tha t person resides, isemployed,w .regll.larly transacts business-in ·person·- except that;subject-to ·Rule 45(c)(3 )(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to
a t ~ j J . ~ , i : J : i a l by traveling from any such place witliin the i a t e wherethe trlal is held;
(ji l) .rcqujres,qlsc:Josure of.prjviJcgcd or other prolccted matter, i fno cxception -or waiver applies; or
( ! ~ ) su:hjecls a person to undue bur.dcn..(B) When Permi(ted. To protect a person subject to or atTected by ·
a s u ~ p o B n a , the issuing court may. on motion, quash or modifY thesubpoena if.it requires:
(i) disclosinga i'ade sec.ret or ·other confidential research,development, orc.ommercial information;
{ii) disclosing an unreti!lncd expert's opinion or informetion thatdocs not describe specific occurrences in disputeand results from
the expert's study that was not requested by a party; or(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party's officer to incur
substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to auend trial.
(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances
described in Rule 45(c)(J)(B), rhc court may, instead ofquashing·ormodifying a subpoena, order appe8rance or production underspccifi.ed conditions if the serving party,
(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material thatcannot be othenvise met without undue l1<1rdship; and
{ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonablyc o m p e n s ; ~ r e d
·- ··--- - - - -- --
(d) u t i ~ s .il) Responding to a Subpoena.
(l ) Froductng Documents or E/ectronicalfy Stored Tnformntion.These proceou.res apply to producing documents or electronically
s t o ~ d information:
(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce
documents must -produce them as they are keptln the ordinarycourse of business or·rr.mstorganize and label them 10 correspond to
the categories in ·t'he.dcmand.(.B) Formfor r o t / ~ t c i n g Elecrronic(Il/y Stored Information Not
Specified. f f a subpoena docs not specify n form for producingelectronically stored information, the person responding mustproduce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or
in r e l i . S 9 n a b l y · u s a b l e form or forms.(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One
F o ~ P i . p e ~ S o n responding need not produce the sameeiccimnically stored information in more than one form .
([!) lngccessible ElectronicallySrored lnforma({on. The personresponding need not provide d'iscovery of electronically storedirifoi:mation from sources that the person identifies m; not rel!.sonnblyaccessible because of und.ue burden or cos\. On motion to compeldiscovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show
that the Information is not reasonably accessible because of undueburdefl Qr c.qst. Jf.tf!at showing is made. the court may nonethelessor.derdiscovery from such sources if the requesting party shows
g o ~ d cause; con.sidering the limitations of Rule :Z6(b)(2)(C). Thecourt may specifY conditions for the discovery.
(2} Claiming Pri)Jifege or Prdtectlim.{A) Information Withheld A person withholding s u b p o e n ~ e d
information umler a claim that ills privileged or subject toprotection as trial-preparation material must:
(i) expressly make the claim; and(ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents,
communications, or tangible things in a manner tl)lll, withoutrevealing information itsdf privileged or protected, wll! enable theparties to assess the cll!im.(B} Information Procfuced lf information produced in response·to · a
subpoena i& subject_ to·a claim of privilege or of protection as tri&l·
preparation material, :the person making the claim may notify anyp ~ J 1 Y that received the information of the claim and the basis for it.A_tter heing notified, a party must promptly return, scquestcr; .ordestroy the specified information ·and any copies it has; must nor use
o; dis(!lose ihto.lnformatioJ! until the claim is resolved; mUst:Uikereaso·oable step·s to retrieve the inforhlation iflhe party disclosed it
bt:(C?rc Jle.i.ng 1.1olified; and may promptly prescnl the information to
coun tinder seal for a determination of the claim. The person\vho pf!XIuced the information must preserve the informution untilthe clalm is resolvt:d.
(e) Contempt . The Issuing-court may hold in contqnpt a personwhO, l i ~ v i n g · l < ! ! c n served, fails without adequate excuse to obey thesubpoel)a. A nenpBrty's failure to obey must be excused if the
s u ~ j i o c n a p u r p o r t s to require the nonparty to attend or produce at aplace outside the limits of Rule 45(c)f3)(A)(ii).
Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-3 Filed 07/26/13 Page 4 of 11 PageID 1575
7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)
All written agreements, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to litigation against any
Scientology affiliated entity, between Gray Robinson P.A. or Robert Johns.on, and any
of the forlowing individuals or entities: Mike Rinder, M ~ r t y Rathbun; Hohald ·Weil, Wei!·&
Quaranta, P.A., Theodore Babbitt, ,Babbitt, Johnson, ·O.?POrn.e & L e C i a i n c . t : ~ e ~ I ? : A . ,Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leu·ng, ·H6lcomo &.Leung, Luis Garcia, andTor:Mada Garcia.
All evidence of communications, including notes, affidavits, r:ecordings, tii:ne re.cords,
emails and correspondence, subseq·uent to January 1, 20.07, relating to ·litigation against
any Scientology affiliated entity, between Robert Johnson or his agents, and of the
following individuals or entities: Mike Rinder, Marty Rathbun, Ronald Wail, Wei! &
Quaranta P.A. Theodore Babbitt, B a b b i t ~ Johnson, Osborne & Le Clainche P.A., Brian
Culkin, Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or Maria
Garcia.
All evidence of communications , including notes, affidavits, recordings, time records,
emails, and correspondence, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to litigation
against any Scientology affiliated entity, between Mike Rinder or his agents, and any of
the:1oJiowing individuals or entities: Robert Johnson. Marty Rathbun, Gray Robinson
P;A., Ronald Wei!, Wei! & Quaranta P .A. Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne
& Le Clainche P.A., Morgan & Morgan; Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia,
and/or Maria Garcia.
All evidence of commt..mications, im;;luding notes, affidavits_ recordings, .time recOrds,.
em ails and corresporfdence, s u b s ~ q u e n t to January 1, 2Q'07; relating to 1\tigatio'il against
any Scientology affiliated entity, b ~ t w e e n Marty R.athb.L/!Vbthis a g e n t ~ , f 1 ~ ( c ; I I J Y : < ? U h ~foilowing individuals·orentfties:·Rob€frt.Johns6ii·, i \ i H i < € . d ~ l i i C i ~ Ro.nald \tveH, Wei! &
Quaranta P.A. Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne & Le Clalnche P.A., Brian
Culkin, Morga·n & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or Maria
Garcia.
All communications, including written agreements, notes, affidavits, recordings, checks,
recordings, emails, and correspondence; subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to
payment of compensation·or remuneration of any kind to Mike Rinder, between any of
the following individuals or entities: Mike Rinder; Robert Johnson, Gray Robinson P A.,
Ronald Wei!, Weil & Quaranta P:A. Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt,.Johnson, Osborne & Le
Clainche P.A. Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or
Maria G ~ r c i a
Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-3 Filed 07/26/13 Page 5 of 11 PageID 1576
7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)
(c) Protecting a Person Subject to n Subpoena. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.
,
{1) w ~ l d i n g .Uudue Bunfen or Expe11se; Sanctions. A party or (1) Prorludirg Do.cuments or Electronically Stored I11fort1U1Jion.
attorney feSPOJ;lsible for issuing and serving a subpoena must take These:procedures apply to producing documents or electronically
reasonable.steps to avoid iinposing ·undue burden or expense on a stored information:
p.erson subjecfto subpoena. Th e issuing court must enforce this (A) Do.cuments. A person responding:to a subpoena to produce
dtily"-and il)'lpose an l!ppropriate sanction- which may include lost documents must produce them as they are kept in rhe ordinary course
enmings and reasonable attomey·s f ee s - on a party or :attorney of business or must.organ.ize and label them to correspond to the
who fails to cpmply. categories in the demand.
(2) Command to Protiw:e Materials o.rPermit llzspecfiou. (B} Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not(A) Appearant:e Not Requ;red .A person commandexi"to produce Specified. ·If a suQpqena does not specify a form for p r o d t ~ c i n gdocuments, electronicaily stored information, or tangible things; or electronically stored information, the person responding-must produce
to permit the< inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the it.in.a form or forp)s in which it is ordinarily ma:lntained or in a
place of production or inspection unless also comm anded to a p p ~ reas6nably usable form or forms.
for a deposition, hearing, or trial. (C) Electronically Stored Information.Produced in Only One Form.
(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or The perso"n respondi ng need no t produce the same electronically stored
tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or information in more th.an one form.
attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to (D) Inaccessible Efeclronicqfty Stored Information. The person
i n s p ~ i n g . copying, resting or sampling-any or ali of the a t e ~ i a l s <;>r · e s p o n d i n g need not provide discovery ofelectronically stored
to inspecting the premises - ·or to productng electronically stored information from sources that the person ·identifies as not reasonably
informatjon in the fotm or forms requested. The objection must be accessible-because ·of undue burden cir cost. On motion to compel
serveq bef"ore the earlier of he time specified for compliance or l4 discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show
days·aftecthe subp_cna is served. lf an objection is made, the that the ·.-information is not reasonably accessible because of undue
following rules apply: burden,or cost. If that showing is mnde, the court may nonetheless
(i) At any .time, on notice to the commanded person, the ?en>ing order discovery from such sources if he requesting party shows good
party may move th e issuing <..-ourt for an order compelling production cause, consider ing the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C) . The court mayor inspection. specify conditions for the discovery.
(li) These acts may be required on ly as directed in the order, -and (i)"Claiming Privilege or Protecrio11 .
the.order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party's (A) Information Wi/hhefd. A person withholding subpoenaed
officer ft'om significant expense resulting from compliance. informati.on under a claim that it is privileged or subject to protection
(3) Quashing or Moclijj>Jug tr Subpoeila. as trial-prep11.ration material must:
(A) Whe!'! Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must (I) e ~ p r e " s s 1 y make the claim; and
quash ·or modify a subpoena !hat {ii) d.escd.be.the nature of the withheld documents, communications,
(i) fails to allow & reasonable {ime to comply; or tangible things in a manner that, without rev.caling informaiion
(ii) requires -a person who is neither a party nor a party•s officer itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the
_to ravel more than I.OOmiles from where that person resides, is claim.
employed, or re"gti1afiy,i;(ansacts business in person- except that, ( ~ ) 1 ( 1 / o r m a t i o n . _ P r . o d u c e d . If information produced in response to a
subject r f i ~ .uk45(c)(JJ.(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to subpoena is subject o a claim of privilege or of protection as r i a l ~-!lttend a!!:ial t r a v ~ l i n g f r o m any such place within the state where p ~ _ a r a t i p n ! J i l l t ~ t i ? l . the person making the claim may notify-:my
tiie ·r.al Kheifl;' · · .. · · f : i ! ! r t . f ~ a ! ' " t c c c i i v ~ th e information ofthe ·claim and the basis .for. t
(Iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protectedmatter, if Afted>el.Dg.
nptified, a party must promptly reJurh, sequeSter, orno exception or waiver applies; or de.sJ:z:py tJ:ie-specified information and any copies it has: must not use
{iv) ~ u b j e c t J ? a person to undue burden. or. disc.lose the information until the claim is resolved; must take
(B} When P-ermitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by reasonable steps to.-n;trieve the infonnation if the pa.rty disclosed -it.
a subpoena, .the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modifY the before being j o t i f i ~ ; and may promp!ly present the inforrnalion:to the ·
subpoena ifitrequires: cci"ur.t·under seai fof a determination of he claim. The person who
(i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential r c s c a r d ~ p r o d u ~ e d the information mu st preserve the information until the claim
·development. or Cof!lmercial information; is resolved.
(ii) disclosing an unretained expert's opinion or information that
does not d ~ c r . i b e specific occurrences in dispute and results from
the expert's study that was not requested by a party; or
(iii) a person who is neither a pany nor a party ' s officer to incur
substantial·expense to travel more than I 00 miles to attend trial.
(CJ SpecifYing Conditions as an Alternative. In tl1e circumstances
described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead ofquashing or
modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under
specified conditions if the serving pany;·a ubstantial need for the testimony or material that
cannot be ot!j.erwise me t withou t undue hard ship; and
(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably
compensated,
{e) Conte111pt. i S ; > u i n ~ court may hold in contempr a person who,
having been se_r.Y.ed, f<iils without adequate excuse !"o obey the
subpoena .A uoripl!fly·s failure to obey must be excused if he
~ o p o e n i l purportslo require the nonparty to attend or produce at -a
place outside the-iiinits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).
Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-3 Filed 07/26/13 Page 9 of 11 PageID 1580
7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)