Galvanic Corrosion Induced Fatigue Crack Initiation and Propagation Behavior in AA 7050-T7451 Noelle Easter Co, James T. Burns Center for Electrochemical Science and Engineering Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Virginia Motivation Aluminum alloys are used for aerospace applications due to their high strength-to-weight ratio. Assembly of complex structures requires the use of high strength stainless steel fasteners. Knowledge Gaps 1. How do corrosion morphologies typical of galvanic couples influence overall fatigue life behavior in AA 7050-T7451? 2. What features of the corrosion morphology influence the fatigue crack formation and small crack growth behavior of AA 7050-T7451? Step 1: Geometry dependent modeling to determine the the chemistry, pH and potential distribution for a AA 7050-CRES304 galvanic couple (C Liu/RG Kelly) Step 2: Study the microstructure interactions and establish the corrosion morphology associated with these conditions. (V Rafla/JR Scully) Step 3: Determine the influence of varying morphology on the fatigue behavior and structural integrity of AA 7050-T7451 80% 20% Features that Initiate Cracking from USAF Teardown 1 Mechanical damage Corrosion damage Objectives The electrochemical and mechanical interactions of these galvanic couples are poorly understood. As such, a collaborative effort aims to quantify local galvanic environments, determine the corrosion morphology associated with such environments, and how such morphologies influence the fatigue behavior of AA 7050-T7451. 10 -9 10 -8 10 -7 10 -6 10 -5 10 -4 10 -3 -1.4 -1.3 -1.2 -1.1 -1.0 -0.9 -0.8 -0.7 -0.6 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 E vs SCE (V) i (A/cm 2 ) AA7050-T7541 Pure Al 99.99% -phase Al 7 Cu 2 Fe S-phase Al 2 CuMg Mg 2 Si Pure Cu 99.99% SHT 7050 480C 4hrs 10 -12 10 -11 10 -10 10 -9 10 -8 10 -7 10 -6 10 -5 10 -4 10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 0 -1.8 -1.6 -1.4 -1.2 -1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 1M NaCl pH:7 (not adjusted) 1M NaCl pH:8 1M NaCl pH:9 1M NaCl pH:10 E vs. SCE (V) i (A/cm 2 ) SS AA7050 1. Develop a corrosion protocol that will produce damage replicating corrosion morphologies in aluminum galvanically coupled with stainless steel 2. Quantify fatigue behavior (total fatigue life, initiation life) associated with the corrosion morphology 3. Determine the effects of corrosion morphology on small crack kinetics 4. Correlate crack formation with features of the corrosion morphology AA 7050-T7451 Element Al Zn Cu Mg Zr Fe Si Ti Wt % Balance 6.1 2.2 2.2 0.11 0.08 0.04 0.02 Grain width: L: 22-1230 μm S: 12-112 μm T: 14-264 μm Experimental Approach Sample Preparation AA7050-T7451 fatigue specimens polished to 600 grit Corrosion Generation 4 mm 2 area in the reduced gage section (LS surface) exposed to electrochemical conditions Image Analysis 3D profile and top view of generated pits obtained using interferometer and optical microscope Fatigue Test Specimens with pits in the reduced gage section subjected to fatigue test with a pre-determined loading protocol at 90% RH Fractography Fracture surfaces investigated using the scanning electron microscope Data Analysis da/dN vs crack length (a) determined using the marker band spacing 1.5-hour or 5-hour potential hold at -700 mV with 0.5 M NaCl + 8x10 -5 M NaAlO 2 (pH 8) 72-hour potential hold at -700 mV with 0.5 M NaCl + 8x10 -5 M NaAlO 2 (pH 8) 168-hour hold inside the RH chamber at 96% RH and 30 o C with droplet of 1 M NaCl + 0.022 M AlCl 3 + 0.05 M K 2 S 2 O 8 on top of the exposed area Discrete Pits: Surface Recession: Inter Granular Corrosion (IGC): Fatigue specimen loaded in hydraulic frame with flexi-glass chamber to control humidity; loading direction is along L; Maximum load = 200 Mpa. 3D profile obtained using white light interferometer Top view obtained using optical microscope Fracture surface containing marker bands A galvanic couple between aluminum and stainless steel is created when the surface coatings are breached enabling ingress of trapped electrolyte. Such couples lead to corrosion damage. The structural integrity of the aluminum components are affected by this corrosion damage due to its propensity to initiate fatigue cracks. 2-4 T S L 3D microstructure cube: 2” plate (S/8) Composition: Mechanical Properties: T S L Ultimate Tensile Strength: 530 MPa Tensile Yield Strength: 470 MPa Modulus of Elasticity: 71.7 GPa K IC (S-L): 28 MPa√m K IC (T-L): 31 MPa√m K IC (L-T): 35 MPa√m Galvanic Couple Critical Corrosion Sites
2
Embed
Galvanic Corrosion Induced Fatigue Crack Initiation and ... · Galvanic Corrosion Induced Fatigue Crack Initiation and Propagation ... Determination of constituent particle ... This
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Galvanic Corrosion Induced Fatigue Crack Initiation and Propagation Behavior in AA 7050-T7451
Noelle Easter Co, James T. BurnsCenter for Electrochemical Science and Engineering
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Virginia
MotivationAluminum alloys are used for aerospace applications due to their high strength-to-weightratio. Assembly of complex structures requires the use of high strength stainless steelfasteners.
Knowledge Gaps1. How do corrosion morphologies typical of galvanic couples influence overall fatigue life
behavior in AA 7050-T7451?2. What features of the corrosion morphology influence the fatigue crack formation and
small crack growth behavior of AA 7050-T7451?
Step 1: Geometry dependent modeling todetermine the the chemistry, pH and potentialdistribution for a AA 7050-CRES304 galvaniccouple (C Liu/RG Kelly)
Step 2: Study the microstructure interactions andestablish the corrosion morphology associatedwith these conditions. (V Rafla/JR Scully)
Step 3: Determine the influence of varying morphology on the fatigue behavior and structural integrity of AA 7050-T7451
80%
20%
Features that Initiate Cracking from USAF Teardown1
Mechanical damage
Corrosion damage
Objectives
The electrochemical and mechanical interactions of these galvanic couples are poorlyunderstood. As such, a collaborative effort aims to quantify local galvanic environments,determine the corrosion morphology associated with such environments, and how suchmorphologies influence the fatigue behavior of AA 7050-T7451.
10-9
10-8
10-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
-1.4
-1.3
-1.2
-1.1
-1.0
-0.9
-0.8
-0.7
-0.6
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
E v
s S
CE
(V
)
i (A/cm2)
AA7050-T7541
Pure Al 99.99%
-phase Al7Cu
2Fe
S-phase Al2CuMg
Mg2Si
Pure Cu 99.99%
SHT 7050 480C 4hrs
10-12
10-11
10-10
10-9
10-8
10-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
-1.8
-1.6
-1.4
-1.2
-1.0
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
1M NaCl pH:7 (not adjusted)
1M NaCl pH:8
1M NaCl pH:9
1M NaCl pH:10
E v
s. S
CE
(V
)
i (A/cm2)
SS
AA7050
1. Develop a corrosion protocol that will produce damage replicating corrosion morphologies in aluminum galvanically coupled with stainless steel
2. Quantify fatigue behavior (total fatigue life, initiation life) associated with the corrosion morphology
3. Determine the effects of corrosion morphology on small crack kinetics4. Correlate crack formation with features of the corrosion morphology
4 mm2 area in the reduced gage section (LS surface)
exposed to electrochemical conditions
Image Analysis
3D profile and top view of generated pits obtained using interferometer and
optical microscope
Fatigue Test
Specimens with pits in the reduced gage section
subjected to fatigue test with a pre-determined loading
protocol at 90% RH
Fractography
Fracture surfaces investigated using the
scanning electron microscope
Data Analysis
da/dN vs crack length (a) determined using the marker
band spacing
1.5-hour or 5-hour potentialhold at -700 mV with 0.5 MNaCl + 8x10-5 M NaAlO2 (pH 8)
72-hour potential hold at -700mV with 0.5 M NaCl + 8x10-5
M NaAlO2 (pH 8)
168-hour hold inside the RHchamber at 96% RH and 30oCwith droplet of 1 M NaCl +0.022 M AlCl3 + 0.05 MK2S2O8 on top of the exposedarea
Discrete Pits:
Surface Recession:
Inter Granular Corrosion (IGC):
Fatigue specimen loaded in hydraulic frame withflexi-glass chamber to control humidity; loadingdirection is along L; Maximum load = 200 Mpa.
3D profile obtained usingwhite light interferometer
Top view obtained usingoptical microscope
Fracture surface containing marker bands
A galvanic couple betweenaluminum and stainless steel iscreated when the surface coatingsare breached enabling ingress oftrapped electrolyte. Such coupleslead to corrosion damage. Thestructural integrity of the aluminumcomponents are affected by thiscorrosion damage due to itspropensity to initiate fatiguecracks.2-4
T
S
L
3D microstructure cube: 2” plate (S/8) Composition:
Discrete Pit, 5 H Surface Recession, 72 HIGC, 168 H
Nu
mb
er
of C
ycle
s, N
Discete Pit, 1.5 H
Total cycles to failure
Initiation life to 10 um
Crack length, a (um)
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
da
/dN
(u
m/c
ycle
s)
1e-6
1e-5
1e-4
1e-3
1e-2
1e-1
Discrete Pit, 1.5H R1
Discrete Pit, 1.5H R2
Discrete Pit, 1.5H R3
Discrete Pit, 5H R1
Discrete Pit, 5H R2
Discrete Pit, 5H R3
Surface Recession, R1
Surface Recession, R2
Surface Recession, R3
IGC, R1
IGC, R2
IGC, R3
References Acknowledgement
Conclusions Future Work
µm
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
1. Corrosion morphology characterization and combinations of unique imaging techniques for the determination of crack initiation location are presented.
2. The total fatigue life is highly influenced by the initiation life.3. Microstructurally small fatigue crack growth behavior becomes independent of
the macro-feature when the crack extends away from the initiation point.4. Severe “macro-scale metrics” do not correlate with the observed crack
formation location5. These efforts motivate the investigation of the microstructure and micro-scale
features.
1. Determination of constituent particle location with respect to crack initiation point using XCT and SEM back scatter imaging
2. Characterization of the local geometry of the corrosion surface using XCT and white light interferometer
3. Identification of grain orientation effect on crack growth by overlaying marker bands on the EBSD images of the fracture surface.
The broadly corroded surface are divided intosmaller areas. Individual root mean squares ofthe divisions are obtained to represent ameasure of surface roughness. Neither theroot mean square, nor peak density, maximumvalley depth, nor a combination of thesemetrics control the location of the crackinitiation.
Crack growth converge to comparable values away from the corrosion damage.
Combination of 2D and 3D imaging techniques allows the determination of
the exact crack initiation location.
Fissure depths were obtained using x-ray computed tomography. Fissure depths,total fissure length per plane, and the number of fissures per plane, as well as thecombination of their interaction do not dictate the location of the crack initiation.
Initiation life is strongly reduced tonear constant values after littlecorrosion damage but there is still asmall decrease in total life for thesurface recession.
Surface Recession
This project is funded by the Office of Naval Research (grant number N00014-14-1-0012) with Mr. William Nickerson as the project officer. Special thanks to my adviser, Dr. James T. Burns, and to the Center for Electrochemical Science and Engineering in UVA.
Macro-scale features for different corrosion morphologies:Corrosion morphologies effect on fatigue:
1. G.A. Shoales, S.A. Fawaz, M.R. Walters, in: M. Bos (Ed.) ICAF 2009 - Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Operational Practice, Springer, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2009, pp. 187-207.2. Burns, J. T., Larsen, J. M. & Gangloff, R. P. Driving forces for localized corrosion-to-fatigue crack transition in Al-Zn-Mg-Cu. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 34, 745–773 (2011).3. Sankaran, K. K., Perez, R. & Jata, K. V. Effects of pitting corrosion on the fatigue behavior of aluminum alloy 7075-T6: modeling and experimental studies. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 297, 223–229 (2001).4. Gruenberg, K. M., Craig, B. a., Hillberry, B. M., Bucci, R. J. & Hinkle, a. J. Predicting fatigue life of pre-corroded 2024-T3 aluminum. Int. J. Fatigue 26, 629–640 (2004).5. Burns, J. T., Larsen, J. M. & Gangloff, R. P. Effect of initiation feature on microstructure-scale fatigue crack propagation in Al-Zn-Mg-Cu. Int. J. Fatigue 42, 104–121 (2012).6. Spear, A. D., Li, S. F., Lind, J. F., Suter, R. M. & Ingraffea, A. R. Three-dimensional characterization of microstructurally small fatigue-crack evolution using quantitative fractography combined with post-mortem X-ray
The influence of damage size plateaus after a sharp initial decrease.
The starting size of the crack is much larger for corrosion damage with greater depths leading to the slightly lower lives for surface recession
Different corrosion morphologies areobtained by exposing the surface todifferent electrochemical conditions.
0.1 mm
µm
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Discrete Pit, 1.5 H Discrete Pit, 5 H Surface Recession, 72 H IGC, 168 H
Macro-scale features represented by the metrics above do not control the location of crack initiation.
*Dots on the graphs represent crack formation location
Root Mean Square
0 50 100 150 200 250
Peak D
ensity
0
50
100
150
200
250
R1
R1 Initiation
R2
R2 Initiation
R3
R3 Initiation
Dis
cret
e P
its
Surf
ace
Rec
essi
on
IGC
*53 μm
*165 μm*216 μm
*633 μm
*Average depth where primary crack initiates
Pit depths are obtained using the white light interferometer. Crack does not initiateat the deepest pit (or largest area or largest volume). Pit densities represent themeasure of probability of pit interaction. Crack does not initiate at the location ofthe densest area.