GAL-INT-6 The safety and efficacy of galantamine in patients with Vascular dementia or AD with cerebrovascular disease Sean Lilienfeld MD, FCP, MMed Janssen Research Foundation
Dec 22, 2015
GAL-INT-6 The safety and efficacy of galantamine in
patients with Vascular dementia orAD with cerebrovascular disease
Sean Lilienfeld MD, FCP, MMedJanssen Research Foundation
VaDVaD ADADMixed
Erkinjuntti T
Interactions between vascular dementia and Alzheimer’s disease
Reminyl in vascular and mixed dementia: trial inclusion criteria
Patients with dementia secondary to cerebrovascular disease (CVD) with or without AD
– Probable Vascular dementia according to NINDS-AIREN criteria
– Mixed dementia according to NINCDS-ADRDA criteria of possible Alzheimer’s disease with CVD and NINDS-AIREN criteria of possible VaD
– MMSE at screening 10–25 and ADAS-Cog score at screening 12
– Positive radiology per NINDS-AIREN criteria
Inclusion Criteria Probable Vascular Dementia (NINDS-AIREN)
A. Dementia (decline from previous higher level of functioning):
– established by clinical examination and confirmed by neuropsychological test
– deficits in two or more areas of cognition
– no disturbance of consciousness, delirium, psychosis, severe aphasia, or major sensorimotor impairment precluding neuropsychological testing
– absence of systemic disorders or other brain diseases such as Alzheimer’s Disease (EXCEPT CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE) that could account for the dementia
Inclusion Criteria Probable Vascular Dementia (NINDS-AIREN)
B. Cerebrovascular disease:
– focal neurologic signs consistent with previous stroke (even with negative stroke history)
– evidence of relevant cerebrovascular disease by CT or MRI scan
Inclusion Criteria Probable Vascular Dementia (NINDS-AIREN)
C. A relationship must exist between the dementia and the cerebrovascular disease:
– onset of dementia within 3 months of a recognised stroke
– abrupt deterioration in cognitive functions
– fluctuating, stepwise progression of cognitive deficits
Inclusion Criteria Mixed Dementia (Possible AD with CVD)
• NINCDS-ADRDA criteria for possible Alzheimer's disease and NINDS-AIREN criteria for possible Vascular Dementia
– Dementia established by clinical examination and confirmed by neuropsychological test
– Deficits in two or more areas of cognition
– Progressive worsening of memory and other cognitive functions no disturbance of consciousness
– Absence of systemic disorders or other brain diseases (EXCEPT AD and CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE) that could account for the dementia
Inclusion Criteria Mixed Dementia (Possible AD with CVD)
• Radiologic evidence (satisfying the NINDS-AIREN radiologic criteria) as documented on a CT or MRI scan less than 12 months old of:
– Multiple (2 or more) basal ganglion/white matter infarcts or lacunes and/or
– Single strategically placed infarct in angular gyrus/thalamus/basal forebrain/Anterior Cerebral Artery or Posterior Cerebral Artery territory and/or
– Extensive periventricular white matter lesions.
Exclusion Criteria
• Other neurodegenerative disorders
• Other causes of cognitive impairment
• Relevant medical conditions eg. ulcers, bladder obstruction, severe hepatic, renal, pulmonary, cardiac diseases
NINDS-AIREN Radiology
• multiple large-vessel infarcts
• single strategically placed infarct [angular
gyrus, thalamus, basal forebrain, posterior or
anterior cerebral artery territory]
• multiple basal ganglia and white matter
lacunes• extensive periventricular white matter lesions• combinations of these
Patient characteristics
Placebo Reminyl 24 mg/day
(n = 196) (n = 396)
Female 46% 48%
Mean age (years) 75.2 75.0
Mean MMSE score 20.2 20.7
Diagnosis
Mixed dementia 50% 48%
Vascular dementia 41% 43%
Uncertain per MD 9% 9%
ADAS-cog Scores: Placebo patients Over 6 Months
-1
-2
Mean change +/- SE in
ADAS-cog/11
Baseline
2
1
0
-3
Time (months)
Combined Placebo (n = 162)
1 2 3 4 65
Deteriorated
Treatment group
Improved
Mixed D Placebo (n = 87)
Probable VaD Placebo (n = 67)
ADAS-cog Scores: Placebo patients Over 6 Months
1
-1
Baseline
3
2
0
-2
Time (months)
Mixed D Placebo (n = 87)
1 2 3 4 65
Deteriorated
Mean change +/- SE in
ADAS-cog/11
Treatment group
Improved
Probable VaD Placebo (n = 67)
= 2.2
p = 0.013
NPI Scores: Placebo patients Over 6 Months
-1
Mean change (+/- SE) in total NPI
Baseline
2
1
0
-2
Time (months)
Placebo
1 2 3 4 65
Deteriorated
Treatment group
Improved
Probable VaD PlaceboMixed D Placebo
NPI Scores: Placebo patients Over 6 Months
-1
Mean change (+/- SE) in total NPI
Baseline
2
1
0
-2
Time (months)
1 2 3 4 65
Deteriorated
Treatment group
Improved
Probable VaD PlaceboMixed D Placebo
= 0.4
p = 0.43
DAD Scores: Placebo patients Over 6 Months
-1
-4
Baseline
2
1
0
-6
Time (months)
Placebo
1 2 3 4 65
Improved
Mean change (+/- SE) in total DAD
Treatment group
-2
-3
-5 Deteriorated
Mixed D Placebo
Probable VaD Placebo
DAD Scores: Placebo patients Over 6 Months
-1
-4
Baseline
1
0
-8
Time (months)
Mixed D Placebo
1 2 3 4 65
Improved
Mean change (+/- SE) in total DAD
Treatment group
-2
-3
-7
-6
-5
Deteriorated
Probable VaD Placebo
= 4.7
p = 0.032
Efficacy results
• ADAS-cog positive
• CIBIC-plus positive
• NPI positive
• DAD positive
Conclusions
• Using NINDS-AIREN criteria physicians were able to differentiate patients with “probable” vascular dementia and “mixed” dementia
• Observed rates of deterioration in a cognitive scale, a neuropsychiatric scale and a functional scale, are different in the 2 placebo groups, thus these patients are indeed different clinical populations
Conclusions
• Patients with “mixed” dementia deteriorate at rates similar to those seen in clinical trials in patients with probable AD over 6 months whereas patients with probable VaD remain essentially at baseline over 6 months
Galantamine Significantly Improved Both Primary Endpoints and Both Secondary
Endpoints
• The current efficacy tools are able to detect differences between actively treated and placebo treated patients with a magnitude similar to that seen in trials in patients with AD