Top Banner
24-27 th June, 2014 Uncertainty in a Flattening World: CHALLENGES FOR IHRM
55

Gaining altitude on gpm a multilevel approach office 2010 version

Oct 20, 2014

Download

global performance management
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

24-27th June, 2014

Uncertainty in a Flattening World: CHALLENGES FOR IHRM

Page 2: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

24-27th June, 2014

Uncertainty in a Flattening World: CHALLENGES FOR IHRM

Page 3: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

Allen D. Engle, Sr.

Marion Festing

Peter J. Dowling

Gaining Altitude on Global Performance Management:

A Multilevel Analysis

Page 4: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version
Page 5: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version
Page 6: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version
Page 7: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version
Page 8: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version
Page 9: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version
Page 10: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version
Page 11: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version
Page 12: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version
Page 13: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version
Page 14: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version
Page 15: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version
Page 16: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version
Page 17: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version
Page 18: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version
Page 19: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version
Page 20: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

■ Context – a 4 stage process model

■ Little research on stage four: Systems Evaluation

■ Going from Micro to Macro – Individual appraisal to MNE evaluation and use

■ Aggregation via 4 processes:

■ Implications, Conclusions

Overview

FUNNELING SUMMATION CONVERSION SHARPENING, HONING

Page 21: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

GPM: Demand Meets Supply

Demand due to:■ Advanced Competitive Markets – Drive for Performance■ Global Human Capital Mobility & Accountability

Supply due to:■ Oracle Based HR Decision Support System Platforms■ Advanced HR Metrics

Page 22: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

Engle, Festing and Dowling, 2014

Four-Stage Model of GPM Systems Context

Systems Design

Systems Operations

Systems Evaluation

Macro strategy• Strategic interest:

- multidomestic - global - transnational

• Heritage – OriginScope of the system• Actors• Roles• Information sourcesPurpose of the systemDevelopment, rewards

• Clarify major responsibilities

• Develop performance standards

• Select performance constructs

• Createconceptual equivalence

• Determine method of measurement

• Decide how to assess• Define measures• Define performance

• Giveperiodic feedback

• Dialogue & coach

• Facilitate performance:−Eliminate roadblocks−Provide resources,

ongoing basis

• Evaluate individual formal performance:- Review overall

performance- Encourage

performance

• Aggregate unit performance profiles

• Evaluate- Validity- Acceptanceof the GPM system in process (Reaction)

LACK OF EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE

Design parameters >>• Frequency• Formalization• Feedback capability• Explicit Implicit• Focus:

- traits- behaviors- outcomes

Trainsystems users >>

Page 23: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

A Paucity of ResearchOn how MNEs

■ Aggregate individual GPM results

■ Use these results for strategic purposes

We want✓ To gain altitude

✓ A higher perspective

Page 24: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

GPM as individual level feedback and employee consequences, the micro cycle ...

But how do MNEs use GPM to assess macro strategy activities?

We have studied:

Page 25: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

Gaining Altitude on GPM

Page 26: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

4 Transformation Alternatives

Page 27: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

1st Transformation Alternative

Ron Yoder
Cracow Wieliczka Salt Mine
Page 28: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

1st Transformation Alternative

Page 29: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

■ Transformation via Funneling–Identifying high performers to higher levels of the MNE

■ Elitist vs. Inclusive Funnels–see Festing, Schaefer and Scullion, 2013

■ Talent Management Applications

1st Transformation Alternative

Page 30: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

2nd Transformation Alternative

Page 31: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

2nd Transformation Alternative

Page 32: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

Transformation via SummationApplying a set of uniformed, common performance metricsat all levels

■ Balanced Scorecard

■ MNE Performance Dashboard

2nd Transformation Alternative

Page 33: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

Summation of:

■ Past Performance–Financial Targets

■ Present Performance–Work Flow Processes and Performance Cycles

■ Future Performance–Human Capital Investments

2nd Transformation Alternative

Page 34: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

3rd Transformation Alternative

Page 35: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

3rd Transformation Alternative

Page 36: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

3rd Transformation Alternative

Conversion – The form of performance information .Is altered with the level in the MNE.

Dimensions, Scales, Levels, Vocabulary

performance information

Page 37: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

An Example of Conversion:

Distinction BetweenStrategic Performance Measurement Systems (SPMS)

and

Performance Measurement Systems(PMS)

in a sample of Spanish firmsby Gimbert, Bisbe and Mendoza (2010)

3rd Transformation Alternative

Page 38: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

A Second Example From SAP America:

■Tier One –Business Results (4 indicators)

■Tier Two –Key Performance Drivers (4 indicators)

■Tier Three –Human Capital Capabilities (7 indicators)

■Tier Four –Human Capital Processes (13 indicators)

Cantrell, et al., 2006

3rd Transformation Alternative

Page 39: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

4th Transformation Alternative

Page 40: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

4th Transformation Alternative

Page 41: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

■ Sharpening –Strategy whets and sharpens (modifies) GPM

■ GPM systems● Act as feedback

● Sharpen (modify) strategic configuration

4th Transformation Alternative

Page 42: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

Macro to Micro

1. Corporate level strategic indicators“down to” operational level units

2. Operational units modify to capturelocal conditions and priorities –approved by corporate officers

3. GPM system activated and captures performance dimension information, “sent up”

4. Results are used to modify both:

● Strategic directions, pace, and goals; and

● Local performance metrics, weights, etc.,in the light of systems results evaluation

4th Transformation Alternative

Page 43: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

■ Sharpening as “organizational change capacity”

–Shipton, Budhwar and Crawshaw, 2012

■ Elements of sharpening as acomplex, spanning, flexible approach in DynCorp’s “strategic performance measurement system”

–Kolehmainen, 2010

4th Transformation Alternative

Page 44: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

How many vertical levels?

Corporate

Strategic Business Unit

Regional, Divisional

Local

Page 45: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

Multiple Intersections to Gain Altitude

Corporate

Strategic Business Unit

Regional, Divisional

Local

Page 46: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

As if this wasn’t enough ...

Page 47: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

A Combination of Approaches

Using transformation activities

at MNE levelsdiffe

ring

Page 48: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

A Combination Approach Example6-Step Ladder of Analytical HR Applications

Conversion or Sharpening

Conversion or Sharpening

Funneling

Funneling

Funneling

Summation

Talent Supply Chain

Workforce Planning

Customize EVP

Focus HR Investments

Critical Talent Management

Employee Database

Harris, Craig, and Light (2011)

Page 49: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

Conclusions

Page 50: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

■ Build Multilevel Vocabularies –Bridge the divide

■ Macro –International strategy literature, models, vocabularies

■ Micro –IHRM Literature, models, vocabularies

■ More …Multilevel reading, research designs, theorizing

Conclusions: A Proposed Agenda

Page 51: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

■ Repeat Lawler’s call for a balanced, but

● essentially centralized,

● strategically customized bundled systemof IHRM culture and technology

■ A GPM With four qualities:

1. Parsimonious use ofperformance dimensions, weights, and levels

2. Thoroughly understood by participants

3. Widely shared

4. Locally interpreted

Lawler, Benson and McDermott, 2012 .

Conclusion

Page 52: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version
Page 53: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version
Page 54: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version
Page 55: Gaining altitude on gpm   a  multilevel approach office 2010 version

Thank you.for your kind attention.

Any questions?