Top Banner
GETCHUR GAME ON! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!
56

G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

Dec 14, 2015

Download

Documents

Shamar Pouncy
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

GETCHUR GAME ON!

Jason A. Engerman

LDT PhD CandidateGame Day 2014!

Page 2: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

Hello Everyone

Page 3: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

THE HUMAN CONDITION

Page 4: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

THE HUMAN CONDITION

Page 5: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

THE HUMAN CONDITION

Page 6: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

THE HUMAN CONDITION

Page 7: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

EDUCATION’S CONDITION

• “I’m am here to teach, not entertain!”

• “Boredom is not a problem for the best students. If students tried

harder or learned better they wouldn’t be bored.”

• “All these kids want to do is play, not learn.”

Page 8: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

MY RESPONSE

• Since when did we decide that institutions of “Learning”

were allergic to Fun?

Page 9: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

GAMES AND LEARNING

• “If games are ‘possibility spaces,’ then researchers

need to account for how players inhabit them and

the mechanisms by which meanings become

interpreted from these experiences” (Squire, 2006)

Jessie Schell, The Art of Game Design, 2008

Page 10: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

GAMES AND LEARNING

• There is no reason to think about games simply as “fun.” At the same time, there is no reason to equate learning with being “serious.” … (Gee, 2009)

Page 11: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

OUTLINE

• EconU for the Masses

– Part I

– Part II

• Boys and Their Toys: Video Games and the Common

Core

Page 12: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

ECONU

Page 13: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

ECONU PLAY

• EconU

Page 14: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

STUDY OVERVIEW

Part I• 2 Professors for Econ 102• 3 Classes (SP13-FA13)• Approximately 1626 Survey Responses

Part II• 1 Professor for Econ 102• Revised Survey• Approximately 310 Survey Responses

Page 15: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

METHODOLOGY FOR PART I

Garden Variety Thematic Analysis (Braun & Clark,

2006)– Textalyser and Textisbeautiful (General Codes)– Parsed out Likes and Dislikes (Revised Codes)– Textalyser and Textisbeautiful (General Themes)– Take a deeper look (Refined Themes)– {notes, inquiry, bracketing, reflexive}

Page 16: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

CLASS 1 GENERAL FINDINGS (831 RESPONSES)Likes• Concept, interesting, clever• Control, Freedom, Game• Different style of teaching• Relation to Economics,

Realistic, Application

• Enjoyed and Fun!

Responses• “It is very helpful to me to learn

about Economies. I have an interest in Econ through this EconU. It is very interesting!!!”

• “I really liked how EconU allowed me to bring my economics knowledge into a ‘real life’ setting. I enjoyed learning how these different concepts positively and negatively affected my campus.”

Page 17: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

CLASS 1 GENERAL FINDINGS (831 RESPONSES)Dislikes

• Lack of instructions • Difficulty and going

bankrupt• Unrealistic

Responses• “The lack of instructions about

basic components of the game was very frustrating”

• “I disliked how easily and quickly it was to go bankrupt”

• “It seemed a bit unrealistic that they were 100% without any food or housing on campus”

Page 18: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

“I thought it was very confusing. When the game started, people and cars are moving and it created anxiety. I had no idea what I was suppose to do. It was a fun game to play!”

TELLING RESPONSES

“Honestly, I am not very interested in the game. However, I like it because I can feel the real world so that I can practice the economic knowledge I have learned through EconU. I dislike nothing when I play EconU.”

Page 19: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

TELLING RESPONSES

• “The game was really exciting and enjoyable. I love it so much. The ‘sims’ was too cute. It helps me making wise decisions. The problem is it is too hard for me at first because there is no instructions or tutorials to help me understand. The discussion was no help. Hiring a new workers (in the game) was useless for me because I do not understand the table below the game. I love it so much. Interesting.”

Page 20: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

It was hard to keep the game on every turn without any economic thought and decision. However, while the game was on, it intrigued me to think economically and I eventually enjoyed that game. I am so happy for that earning all of trophies which are 10!

PEOPLE ENJOYED THIS GAME

“I like the close relationship that it had to real life situations, and I disliked the complexity of buying a really expensive building. In addition, even when i purchased it I still did not receive my trophy. It was great! I really did enjoy it.”

Page 21: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

PEOPLE ENJOYED THIS GAME

• “I liked how challenging the game was. It involved more thinking then just clicking and placing buildings. It made you think back to all the concepts we have learned throughout the year to try and benefit the most. At first it took a little getting use to but other then that I liked it.”

Page 22: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

CRITICAL THINKING

“…I completely understand why it is as complex as it is though, which makes it extremely realistic and therefor educational. I also found it extremely hard to turn a profit later on in the game around turns 70-85 because of cuts in federal funding and an increase in food costs. I don't know how realistic those cuts and percentage increases would be.“

Page 23: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

CRITICAL THINKING

“It seemed to me that the demand didn't change at all (except when events happened). For example if I built a school of Liberal Arts, the demand for Liberal Arts was still the same, but the game didn't allow you to build multiple schools of a certain type.”

Page 24: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

CRITICAL THINKING

“The game ends as soon as I get bankrupt. I think I should have a chance to bring my school from debts to margins.”

Page 25: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

INTERESTING CRITIQUES

“…give some purpose to the dorms and other non-academic buildings. The dorms should've increased the population limit. The math and arts buildings can never pay themselves off, while buildings that should cost much more (due to research equipment) make a lot more money. Also, show the actual power/energy use, and make it a point to use the facilities.”

Page 26: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

INTERESTING CRITIQUES

• “I can't figure out what many of the buildings such as the student union did. Perhaps more explicit explanations could be added for these buildings? Additionally, for all intents and purposes, the only reason I knew to put coal plants in was 1) intuition and 2) trial & error through multiple runs. More explanations of what these in-game investments actually do! ”

Page 27: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

INTERESTING CRITIQUES

• “Also, when adjusting policy sliders, it was very hit-and-miss with effects on happiness. Maybe give a preview or a rough estimate based on the adviser level. Also, I'm still not sure what the maximum and minimum land value is, since there's no chart explaining it anywhere. “

“There was times where I made choices I did not like or did not realize how they would effect me and I would dig myself a hole in the game. I wish i could just start over and restart the game from scratch.”

Page 28: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

PART I MECHANICSLikes

• Turn based system• Ease of use

• (Aesthetics)

Dislikes

• Limited to no guidance• Turn limit• Certain buildings added no

value• Scrolling up and down• Navigating campus on

screen• Glitches (Firefox, stalling)

Page 29: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

REFINED FINDINGS (PART I) • Enjoyable:

• Provoked Curiosity “Interest, concept,

idea”

• Risk Free Environment “Game”• Related to the Content

Page 30: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

REFINED FINDINGS (PART I) • Guidance:

• Understanding “Frustration, Confused”

• Scaffolding “Guide, Instructions”– Game and Content– Class and Content

• Articulation of Learning

Page 31: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

PART II REVISED SURVEY (ENGERMAN/CLARIANA)

• 12 RESPONSE QUESTIONS – MALE/FEMALE– 2 YES/NO– 7 LIKERT– 2 OPEN RESPONSE

• 310 RESPONDENTS

Page 32: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

METHODOLOGY FOR PART II

• Factor Analysis • Discussed implications and possibilities

Page 33: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

PART II RESULTS (R=.53)

• How helpful do you feel EconU was, as an addition to your economics course?

• I felt that EconU was helpful in bringing microeconomics concepts “to life”.

• I enjoyed playing EconU more than other means of learning economics (textbooks, course lecture, exams, etc).

Page 34: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

PART II RESULTS (R=.48)

• How frequently did you consider economic concepts from Econ102 when playing EconU?

• How helpful do you feel EconU was as an addition to your economics course?

Page 35: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

PART II FINDINGS & IMPLICATIONS

• This survey reports out on how helpful students perceived EconU to be to their understanding of Economics 

• Overwhelmingly, enjoyment and helpfulness dominated their experiences.

Page 36: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

PART II FINDINGS & IMPLICATIONS

• Did it lead to more time on task ??? Deeper understanding of concepts???

• If we knew about scores then we could talk more about the learning impact of the enjoyment factor of the game.

Page 37: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

PART II NEXT STEPS

• Dig into open ended responses• Follow Enjoyment• Collaborative learning• Ask about particular elements in the game (Cultural

impacts).

Page 38: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

BOYS AND THEIR TOYS

Page 39: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

SO LET’S PLAY!

Page 40: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

TEXTALYSER ANALYSIS

Page 41: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

TEXTALYSER ANALYSIS

Page 42: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

TEXTALYSER ANALYSIS

Page 43: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

TEXTISBEAUTIFUL ANALYSIS GENERAL (CLOUD)

Page 44: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

TEXTISBEAUTIFUL ANALYSIS GENERAL (WEB)

Page 45: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

TEXTISBEAUTIFUL ANALYSIS LIKED (CLOUD)

Page 46: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

TEXTISBEAUTIFUL ANALYSIS LIKED (WEB)

Page 47: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

TEXTISBEAUTIFUL ANALYSIS DISLIKED

Page 48: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

TEXTISBEAUTIFUL ANALYSIS DISLIKED (WEB)

Page 49: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

REFINED FINDINGS (PART I)

“I liked the fact that it was an entertaining way of learning”; “I like that it is a creative way to utilize economic concepts”

“Lenses 2, 3 & 4” (Schell, 2008)

Page 50: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

REFINED FINDINGS (PART I)

“Learners can take risks in a space where real-world consequences are lowered. ” (Gee, 2007)

“It can always be reset so that I can try a lot of times to improve my performance.”

Page 51: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

REFINED FINDINGS (PART I)

That is taking words beyond verbal meanings and placing them into situated meanings through experiences towards gain understanding (“VGL”, 2013).

“I liked the fact that how EconU closely related to our microeconomics and learning basic of economics helps us to understand how a business is run.”

Page 52: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

REFINED FINDINGS (PART I)

“The learner gets ample opportunity to operate within, but at the outer edge of, his or her resources, so that at those points things are felt as challenging but not “undoable.” (Gee, 2007)

“I understood why when you went into debt, you had to start over- but I would have liked to have been able to bring myself out of debt”

Page 53: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

REFINED FINDINGS (PART I)

“I wish that there had been a bit more elaborations on the instructions because a lot of the game I had to figure out on my own and I'm still not sure how exactly I got everything to work correctly.”

“I disliked that there was a lack of explanations of economics concepts, either as pop-ups of "things to keep in mind" or just some general reference list of guidelines. “

Page 54: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

REFINED FINDINGS (PART I)

“it was fun to play and helped me think economically about situations in the business world”

“I think economics was used in making decisions on what to build and when to build”

“What I liked most about Econ U is that I can have an opportunity to apply and experience what I learn in Econ class for almost reality”

Page 55: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

FINAL THOUGHTS

“…Play and learning are primordial human urges. Unfortunately, we have come to take it for granted that adulthood will kill play and schools will kill learning as a human pleasure. These assumptions are particularly dangerous in the twenty-first century” (Gee, 2009)

Page 56: G ETCHUR G AME O N ! Jason A. Engerman LDT PhD Candidate Game Day 2014!

REFERENCESGee, J. P. (2009). Games, learning, and 21st century survival skills. Journal For Virtual Worlds Research, 2(1).Gee, J. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy: Revised and Updated Edition. Macmillan.Schell, J. (2008). The Art of Game Design: A book of lenses. CRC Press.Squire, K. (2006). From content to context: Videogames as designed experience. Educational researcher, 35(8), 19-29.Video Games & Learning (Coursera, 2013). Gee Principle 13 Meaning as Action.