Futuristic strategies for asthma management Jaideep A Gogtay MD Cipla Ltd Mumbai, India
Dec 19, 2015
Why do we need new weapons?
• No cure• Current therapy effective, but asthma control is
inadequate in majority of patients• Compliance poor with inhaled therapy• Fear about inhaled steroids• In 5% of patients current therapies do not work• Different asthma phenotypes ??
Strategies for new therapies
• Improved understanding of the disease process – Development of novel compounds
• Improvement of existing classes of drugs
• Enhancing outcomes with current therapies
Transcription factor NFkB
CytokineMonoclonal antibody
Cytokine receptor Antagonist
Inhibitor
mRNA
Antisenseoligonucleotide
Kinase inhibitor Signal transduction
Soluble cytokinereceptor
Inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokines
• IL-5 antibody – Mepolizumab reduces circulating and sputum eosinophils, but no effect on AHR
• Soluble IL-4 receptors – improved asrhma control;no further effects seen
• TNF inhibitors – etanercept, infliximab produce remarkable responses in patients unresponsive to steroids
IgE - Omalizumab
• Recombinant Humanised Monoclonal anti-IgE antibody
• Decreases response to both early and late allergen challenge
• Reduces exacerbations and improved quality of life
• Indicated in allergic asthma and allergic rhinitis• Steroid sparing• 10,000 $/year
PHOSPHODIESTERASE 4 INHIBITORS
Alveolar macrophage
PROTEASES
Alveolar wall destruction
(Emphysema)
Mucus hypersecretion
(Chronic bronchitis)
Neutrophil elastaseCathepsins
Matrix metalloproteinases
CD8+
lymphocyte
IL-8, LTB4PDE4
PDE4
PDE4
PDEPDE44 INHIBITORS INHIBITORS
(eg cilomilast, roflumilast(eg cilomilast, roflumilast))
?
Neutrophil
Inhaled steroids
• Beclomethasone/Triamcinolone
• Budesonide
• Fluticasone
• Mometasone
• Ciclesonide
Improvements in steroids
CiclesonideInactive compound
LungsActivated by esterases toDesisobutyrl ciclesonide
Systemic circulationInactive
Dissociated steroids
Steroids
Transactivation Transrepression
The different effects of steroids have been attributed to binding at different domains of the receptor
New bonchodilators
• New long acting bronchodilators used once daily – under development
• Chiral separation of isomers of bronchodilators viz. levosalbutamol, R,R-formoterol
Salbutamol exhibits chirality
S-Salbutamol Levosalbutamol
CH3
CH3
CH3
C NH
OH
OH
HO
C*
CH3
CH3
CH3
CNH
OH
OH
*Chiral carbon atom
HO
C*
Fundamental Biochemistry and chiral science
• The biological messenger molecules and cell
surface receptors that medicinal chemists try to target are chiral, so drug molecules must match their stereochemistry.
• The building blocks of nucleic acids, proteins and carbohydrates are single isomers
Epinephrine – Natural bronchodilator
• However all beta- agonist drugs including salbutamol, developed on the basis of epinephrine are racemates
Endogenous epinephrine produced by the adrenal glands responsible for bronchodilation is a single isomer – (R)-epinephrine
Mode of action of ß2-agonist
Activates Proteinkinase A
Decreases intracellular Ca2+
Smooth muscle cell relaxation
2-agonist
2-receptor
Smooth muscle cell
AC
Mean effect of inhaled (R)-salbutamol , (S)-salbutamol , (R,S)-salbutamol and placebo
on FEV1
3.4
3.2
3.0
2.8
2.6
2.4
Pre 6.25 12.5 2.5 50 100 200 400 800 1600Dose 12.5 25 50 100 200 400 800 1600 3200
(R)-/(S)-Salbutamol:(R,S)-Salbutamol:
Dose
(R)-Salbutamol
(R,S)-Salbutamol
(S)-Salbutamol
Placebo
FEV (L)1
Airway hyperresponsivenessChange in PD20 of methacholine
310243320225
850
1100
313340 392
158
906
400
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Racemic R-salbutamol S-salbutamol Placebo
Baseline 20 mins 180 mins
*
*
*p<0.05 Vs placebo & (S)
Effect of S and R salbutamol on intracellular calcium in bovine tracheal
smooth muscle cells
Mol Pharmacol 1998; 53: 347- 54
200
150
100
50
0
-50
-100
-150
-200
-12 -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3
Concentration, M
(S)-salbutamol
Dec
reas
e in
Ca
, nM
Inc
reas
e in
Ca
, nM
2+2+
(R)-salbutamol
Effect of R and S salbutamol on various inflammatory mediators
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
IL-13 IL-5 IFN-Gamma
JACI, 2002;109:449-54
R10-8Control R10-8 +S 10-8
R10-8 +S 10-6
Effect of enantiomers with steroid on GM-CSF production by human airway smooth muscle cells
-25
-37
-9
-46-50
-45
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
Dex Dex + Rsalbutamol
Dex + Ssalbutamol
Dex + R,R-Formoterol
JACI 2004; 113 (2): 159
Recognized by US FDA
“S-salbutamol not only fails to relax
airway smooth muscle but under certain
circumstances (absence of R
isomer;activated cells) may augment
bronchial constriction…increased
intracellular calcium and BHR….”
FDA Medical Reviewer, 1999
Pharmacokinetic data obtained in plasma after administration of a 4 mg tablet to healthy volunteers
S-salbutamol R-salbutamol
AUC 0-6 h ng.mL–1.hr 26.5 3.2
Cmax ng.mL–1 7.2 1.0
Repeated Inhalations lead to accumulation of (S)-isomer
Time after inhalation (hrs.)
2.5
1.5
0.5
2
1
03 hours 6 hours 9 hours
(S)-salbutamol
(R)-salbutamol **p<0.001
55
0
Pre 0 1 2 3
Time (hrs)4 5 6 7 8
5101520253035404550
Lev 1.25 (n=36)Lev 0.63 (n=32)Rac 2.5 (n=38)Rac 1.25 (n=26)PBO (n=37)
Mean % change in FEV1 after the first dose in a subgroup of patients with pretreatment FEV1 of < 60% of predicted
Day 0 (Week 0)
Nelson et al,
R-salbutamol 1.25 – 52%Racemic salbutamol 2.5 – 37%
JACI,1998
Me
an
ch
ang
es in
FE
V1 (
%)
-2
0
2
4
6
8
Placebo Lev 0.63 Racemic2.5
Day 0 Day 28
-0.3
-0.25
-0.2
-0.15
-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
Placebo Lev 0.63 Racemic2.5
Day 0 Day 28
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
Placebo Lev 0.63 Racemic2.5
Day 0
Day 28
Change in mean glucose Change in mean K+
Change in mean heart rate
Superior therapeutic index
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
The
rape
utic
Inde
xLevosalbutam ol
0.63 m g
Salbutam ol2.50 m g
13
45
56
82
34
78
56
95
6
43
14
46
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
LEV 0.63 LEV 1.25 LEV 2.5 LEV 5.0 RAC 2.5 RAC 5.0
Ist nebulization 60mins post doseAm J Emerg Med 2004; 22 (1): 29-36
Changes in FEV1 in the emergency department
Levosalbutamol Vs Salbutamol nebulization
41.8
62.9
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Racemicsalbutamol 1.25
mg
Levosalbutamol0.31mg
% of patients with > 15% change in FEV1
J Allergy Clin Immunol 2001; 108: 938-45N=338, 4-11 years
Mean change in heart rate 30 mins after dosing
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Placebo Lev 0.31 Lev 0.63 Rac 1.25 Rac 2.5
Day 0
Day 21
*#+ *#+
*#
*#
*#*#
* p<0.001 vs plac; #p< 0.02 vs lev 0.31;+p<0.002 vs rac 2.5 J Allergy Clin Immunol 2001; 108: 938-45
Enhancing outcomes with current therapies
•Inhaled steroids + LABAs
•Montelukast
•Treatment must be taken regularly even if there are no symptoms
•Inhaler technique must be correct