Top Banner

of 4

Futures Volume 3 Issue 3 1971 [Doi 10.1016%2F0016-3287%2871%2990023-1] I.F. Clarke -- The Pattern of Prediction- Forecasting- Facts and Fallibilities

Jun 03, 2018

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 8/11/2019 Futures Volume 3 Issue 3 1971 [Doi 10.1016%2F0016-3287%2871%2990023-1] I.F. Clarke -- The Pattern of Prediction- Forecasting- Facts and Fallibilities

    1/4

  • 8/11/2019 Futures Volume 3 Issue 3 1971 [Doi 10.1016%2F0016-3287%2871%2990023-1] I.F. Clarke -- The Pattern of Prediction- Forecasting- Facts and Fallibilities

    2/4

    Figure 1. The Flying City: one of the earliest fantasies that sprang from the first balloon ascents was the notion of

    vast balloons that would transport thousands through the skies

  • 8/11/2019 Futures Volume 3 Issue 3 1971 [Doi 10.1016%2F0016-3287%2871%2990023-1] I.F. Clarke -- The Pattern of Prediction- Forecasting- Facts and Fallibilities

    3/4

    Figure 2. The coal-burning car: another source of amused prophecy was the

    development of the early steam engines. It seemed a short step in 1831-from the

    steam engine to the steam-car.

    Figure 3. As the inventions overtook the prophecies forecasts in the 1920s

    looked ahead to ocean liners and vast airships on the trans-Atlantic routes.

    FUTURES September WH

  • 8/11/2019 Futures Volume 3 Issue 3 1971 [Doi 10.1016%2F0016-3287%2871%2990023-1] I.F. Clarke -- The Pattern of Prediction- Forecasting- Facts and Fallibilities

    4/4

    The Pattern of Prediction 305

    emergence of technological forecasting

    in the 1960s. For example, the US

    Presidents Materials Policy Commis-

    sion produced in 1952 a five-volume

    survey, Resources for Freedom, which

    examined the prospects of vital com-

    modities, energy sources and major

    technologies. The analysts and the

    pattern-recognisers of the world had

    begun to unite. In 1955 the British

    Government received from the Lord

    President of the Council the Pro-

    gramme of nuclear power; and in that

    same year the United Nations organised

    an international conference in Geneva

    on

    The peaceful uses of atomic

    energy.

    At all times the achievements and

    the opportunities of modern technology

    have decided the pace of development;

    and on many occasions the social con-

    sequences of human inventiveness have

    thrown up problems that must find

    right answers in the future. In the un-

    paralleled outpouring of programmes

    and propositions there were certain

    clearly discernible factors at work. After

    1945 governments throughout the world

    had to decide on the most effective

    means of restoring national econo-

    mies. And here political considerations

    often affected decisions, since the end-

    ing of vast colonial empires, when

    added to the Communist victory in

    China,

    changed

    strategic balances

    throughout the world. But in all places

    the most pervasive and powerful in-

    fluence has been the increasing power

    of governments to control national

    and international economies; and that

    power derives directly from the growth

    in communications and transportation.

    During the 50s the main influence

    remained with the governmental com-

    mittees,

    especially those working on

    long-term economic and military plans.

    By the early 6Os, however, it had

    become apparent that the nations do

    not live by the plan alone; and one of

    the first signs of a widening in the range

    of enquiry was the conference organised

    by CIBA in 1963 on Man and his

    Future. The institutes and the founda-

    tions followed: in Austria Robert

    Jungk established the Institute fur

    Zukunftsfragen; in Paris Bertrand de

    Jouvenel started the Futuribles research

    association; in the United Kingdom the

    Social Research Council set up the

    Committee on the next Thirty Years;

    and the American Academy of Arts

    and Science has created the Commis-

    sion on the Year 2000 in the USA.

    Out of the new institutes and the world

    conferences has come a second wave of

    publications, more specialist and often

    more practical than the predictions of

    the immediate post-war period. From

    the Hudson Institute has come a classic

    in the new field-Kahn and Wiener,

    The Tear 2000; from the Institut fur

    Zukunftsfragen has come a series of

    forecasts under the general title of

    Modelle fiir eine neue Welt; and presum-

    ably the proceedings of the Science

    Policy Foundation symposium (London,

    April 197 1) will soon appear in print.

    At present technological forecasting

    looks rather like a political party in its

    first year of office : expectations are high,

    but the achievements are still to come.

    Will they ever come ? In the areas where

    quantitative techniques can operate

    successfully, the forecasts will un-

    doubtedly become more and more

    accurate. But how do the computers

    begin to assess the impact of ideas on a

    society? In the last 100 years the physi-

    cal sciences and the technologies have

    reached their predicted goals: sub-

    marines, flying

    machines,

    atomic

    energy, space rockets all belong to the

    ancient history of forecasting. And yet

    the great social objectives are still with

    us. World peace, universal prosperity,

    the reign of law, the brotherhood of

    man-these aspirations make up the

    unfinished business of the human race.

    And these aspirations are central to

    many of the issues that emerge from

    the forecasting of alternative futures.

    To plan is to choose; and in order to

    make the best choice, it is essential that

    we should know what we want. But

    are we certain that the human race

    knows what it wants?

    FUTURES September 97