Future Directions under the Convention - CBD · Ø Follow up (Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2021-2030?) Vision “By 2050, biodiversity is valued, conserved ... c 2030 d g n o t

2020 and Beyond: Future Directions under the Convention

Keep the focus on 2020,

implementation, and achieving the Aichi Biodiversity Targets!

2050 Vision of the Strategic Plan

2020 Aichi Biodiversity Targets

2010 Adoption of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity

MYPOW – Multi-year programme of work of the Conference of the Parties

COP-13 (2016)

Ø  Interim review of progress to Aichi targets

Ø  Implications of SDGs and climate agreement

Ø  6th NR guidelines & modalities for GBO-5

COP-14 (2018)

Ø  Interim review of progress to Aichi targets

Ø  long-term strategic directions to the 2050 Vision

COP-15 (2020)

Ø  Final review of the implementation of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 and achievement of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets

Ø  Follow up (Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2021-2030?)

Vision“By2050,biodiversityisvalued,conserved,restoredand wisely used, maintaining ecosystem services,sustainingahealthyplanetanddeliveringbenefitsessen=alforallpeople”

FiveGoals,TwentyAichiBiodiversityTargets

Mechanismsforimplementa8onandreview

StrategicPlanforBiodiversity2011-2020:GlobalFrameworkforAc8on

StrategicPlanforBiodiversity2011-2020

The Aichi Biodiversity Targets

Goal A

Goal B

Goal C

Goal D

Goal E

TheAichiTargetsarereflectedinseveralSDGs:

www.preventionweb.net/go/[email protected]

Chart of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030

Targets

Guiding Principles

Goal

Expected outcome

Scope and purpose

The present framework will apply to the risk of small-scale and large-scale, frequent and infrequent, sudden and slow-onset disasters, caused by natural or manmade hazards as well as related environmental, technological

and biological hazards and risks. It aims to guide the multi-hazard management of disaster risk indevelopment at all levels as well as within and across all sectors

The substantial reduction of disaster risk and losses in lives, livelihoods and health and in the economic, physical, social, cultural and environmental assets of persons, businesses, communities and countries

Prevent new and reduce existing disaster risk through the implementation of integrated and inclusive economic, structural, legal, social, health, cultural, educational, environmental, technological, political and institutional measures that prevent and reduce hazard exposure and vulnerability to disaster, increase preparedness for

response and recovery, and thus strengthen resilience

Substantially reduce global disaster mortality by 2030, aiming to lower average per 100,000 global mortality between 2020-2030 compared to 2005-2015

Primary responsibility of States to prevent and reduce disaster risk, including through cooperation

Substantially reduce the number of affected people globally by 2030, aiming to lower the average global figure per 100,000 between 2020-2030 compared to 2005-2015

Shared responsibility between central Government and national authorities, sectors and stakeholders as appropriate to national circumstances

Coherence of disaster risk reduction and sustainable development policies, plans, practices and mechanisms, across different sectors

Reduce direct disaster economic loss in relation to global gross domestic product (GDP) by 2030

Protection of persons and their assets while promoting and protecting all human rights including the right to development

Accounting of local and specific characteristics of disaster risks when determining measures to reduce risk

Substantially reduce disaster damage to critical infrastructure and disruption of basic services, among them health and educational facilities, including through developing their resilience by 2030

Engagement from all of society

Addressing underlying risk factors cost-effectively through investment versus relying primarly on post-disaster response and recovery

Substantially increase the number of countries with national and local disaster risk reduction strategies by 2020

Full engagement of all State institutions of an executive and legislative nature at national and local levels

«Build Back Better» for preventing the creation of, and reducing existing, disaster risk

Substantially enhance international cooperation to developing countriesthrough adequate and sustainable support to complement their national actions for implementation of this framework by 2030

Empowerment of local authorities and communities through resources, incentives and decision-making responsibilities as appropriate

The quality of global partnership and international cooperation to be effective, meaningful and strong

Support from developed countries and partners to developing countries to be tailored according to needs and priorities as identified by them

Substantially increase the availability of and access to multi-hazard early warning systems and disaster risk information and assessments to people by 2030

Decision-making to be inclusive and risk-informed while using a multi-hazard approach

Priorities for Action

Priority 1Understanding disaster risk

Priority 2Strengthening disaster risk governance

to manage disaster risk

Priority 3Investing in disaster risk reduction

for resilience

Priority 4Enhancing disaster preparedness for effective

response, and to «Build Back Better» in recovery, rehabilitation and reconstruction

There is a need for focused action within and across sectors by States at local, national, regional and global levels in the following four priority areas.

Disaster risk management needs to be based on an understanding of disaster risk in all its dimensions of vulnerability, capacity, exposure of persons and assets, hazard characteristics and the environment

Disaster risk governance at the national, regional and global levels is vital to the management of disaster risk reduction in all sectors and ensuring the coherence of national and local frameworks of laws, regulations and public policies that, by defining roles and responsibilities, guide, encourage and incentivize the public and private sectors to take action and address disaster risk

Public and private investment in disaster risk prevention and reduction through structural and non-structural measures are essential to enhance the economic, social, health and cultural resilience of persons, communities, countries and their assets, as well as the environment. These can be drivers of innovation, growth and job creation. Such measures are cost-effective and instrumental to save lives, prevent and reduce losses and ensure effective recovery and rehabilitation

Experience indicates that disaster preparedness needs to be strengthened for more effective response and ensure capacities are in place for effective recovery. Disasters have also demonstrated that the recovery, rehabilitation and reconstruction phase, which needs to be prepared ahead of the disaster, is an opportunity to «Build Back Better» through integrating disaster risk reduction measures. Women and persons with disabilities should publicly lead and promote gender-equitable and universally accessible approaches during the response and reconstruction phases

2030AgendaforSustainableDevelopment

Sendaiframeworkfordisasterriskreduc8on

ParisClimateAgreement

Landdegrada8onneutralitytarget

2050 Vision of the Strategic Plan

2020 Aichi Biodiversity Targets

2010 Adoption of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity

2030 SDGs 2030 Biodiversity Targets

UpdatedStrategicPlanandrelateddecisions

GBO-5

IPBESGlobalAssessment

NBSAPimplement-

a=on

na=onalscope

globalscope

2018-

2019-

2020

BIP/GEO-BON

Literature

Data,methods,capacity

6thNa=onalReports

IPBESThema=cAssessments

IPBESSubregional/Regional

Assessments

Informa=on

Notevaluated

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Notevaluated

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

Notevaluated

Overviewofthe“Dashboard”fortheAichiTargetsElementsofthetargets Elementsofthetargets

Perspectives mondiales de la diversité biologique 4 137

des biocombustibles est évitée. Des changements climatiques marqués d’ici à 2050 et au-delà sont déjà prévus à cause d’importants décalages dans le système climatique de la planète, et par conséquent, des plans d’adaptation pour la biodiversité sont nécessaires. Par exemple, l’adaptation exigera de prévoir les change-ments climatiques lors de la conception des systèmes d’aires protégées.

• Systèmes alimentaires – Une transformation radicale des systèmes alimentaires compte parmi les champs d’action clés pour réaliser la durabilité. En premier lieu, le gaspillage des denrées alimentaires doit être réduit : environ le tiers des aliments récoltés est perdu, soit durant le transport ou la transformation (principalement dans les pays en développement), soit dans les foyers (surtout dans les pays développés). Deuxièmement, divers régimes alimentaires combinés à une convergence mondiale pour modérer la consom-mation de calories et de viande améliorerait la santé et la sécurité alimentaire dans de nombreuses régions

et réduirait aussi substantiellement les impacts sur la biodiversité. Troisièmement, il convient d’améliorer la gestion de l’agriculture, de l’aquaculture et de la pêche de capture sauvage. Des changements réalistes dans la gestion des cultures et du bétail pourraient réduire substantiellement autant la consommation d’eau que la pollution. Une réduction importante des pressions exercées par la pêche et des changements dans les techniques de pêche dans la plupart des pêcheries marines entraîneraient un rétablissement des pêcheries au cours des dix ou vingt prochaines années.

L’analyse souligne l’importance cruciale des change-ments majeurs à apporter à nos systèmes de production, de distribution et de consommation alimentaires, ainsi qu’à la consommation d’énergie, si nous voulons créer une relation plus équilibrée et durable entre les aspirations humaines et les capacités de la planète de les concrétiser. La réalisation de ces changements profonds nécessitera donc l’engagement de secteurs économiques clés (encadré 21.2).

61%

59%

63%

65%

67%

69%

Objectif

Référence

20502040203020202010

Restaurer les terres abandonnées

Réduire les émissions d’azote

Atténuer les changements climatiques

Réduire la fragmentation des milieux naturels

Réduire l’expansion des infrastructures

Élargir les zones protégées

Réduire la consommation et le gaspillage

Productivité agricole accrue

Changement dans les modes

de consommation

Solutions décentralisés

Technologie mondiale

}Figure 21.5. Voies alternatives pour réaliser la durabilité au moyen des scénarios socio-économiques de Rio+20. Les scénarios illustrés ici permettraient, d’ici à 2050, de ralentir puis arrêter le rythme de la perte de biodiversité, tout en maintenant les augmentations moyennes de la température mondiale sous les 2o Celsius, et de réaliser un ensemble d’objectifs de développement socio-économique, dont éradiquer la faim, fournir l’accès universel à de l’eau potable saine, à des installations sanitaires de base et à des sources d’énergie modernes. Ces objectifs peuvent être réalisés par le biais de trois voies différentes (encadré 21.1).

«RoadsfromRio»Scenarios(PBL)•  Slowthenhaltbiodiversityloss(2050Vision)•  Keepclimatechangewithin2°Climit•  Achieveotherhumandevelopmentgoals=SustainableDevelopmentGoals

Restoreecosystems

Reduceemissions

Protectedareas

Reduceconsump8on&wasteIncreaseagriculturalproduc8vity

• Maintainingthe2050Vision;• Maintainingoradjus8ngthefivegoals;• Developingnewtargets,preferably“SMART”,for2030,byupda=ngtheAichi Biodiversity Targets and/or replacing them, (process/outcome; levelofambi=on)

• Fillinganygaps?(species,over-hun8ng,inlandwaters)?• Maintaining and upda8ng provisions onmeans for implementa8on,includingresourcemobiliza=on.

• Maintainingandupda8ngprovisionsonreviewofimplementa8on.• IncludingtheBiosafetywithinthescopeofthePlan,• Enhancingrelevancetotheotherbiodiversity-relatedconven8ons.

• Enhancethelinkswiththe2030AgendaforSustainableDevelopmentandtheSDGsandotherrelevantmajorglobalagendassuchastheSendaiFramework,theParisAgreementUNCCD,Degrada=onNeutralityGoal,etc.

“StrategicPlanforBiodiversity2021-2030”?

Ecosystemrestora8on

Growthinpopula8on,consump8on

ClimateChange

Behavioralchange,ins8tu8ons

Newthreatsandopportuni8es?

Source:LeadleyandPereiraetal2010

Áreadebosques

Newboldetal(2015)Globaleffectsoflanduseonlocalterrestrialbiodiversity.Nature.

Figure 1. The IPBES Conceptual Framework. In the central panel, delimited in grey, boxes and arrows denote the elements of nature and society thatare at the main focus of the Platform. In each of the boxes, the headlines in black are inclusive categories that should be intelligible and relevant to allstakeholders involved in IPBES and embrace the categories of western science (in green) and equivalent or similar categories according to otherknowledge systems (in blue). The blue and green categories mentioned here are illustrative, not exhaustive, and are further explained in the main text.Solid arrows in the main panel denote influence between elements; the dotted arrows denote links that are acknowledged as important, but are not themain focus of the Platform. The thick, coloured arrows below and to the right of the central panel indicate that the interactions between the elementschange over time (horizontal bottom arrow) and occur at various scales in space (vertical arrow). Interactions across scales [8], including cross-scalemismatches [19], occur often. The vertical lines to the right of the spatial scale arrow indicate that, although IPBES assessments will be at thesupranational—subregional to global—geographical scales (scope), they will in part build on properties and relationships acting at finer—national andsubnational—scales (resolution, in the sense of minimum discernible unit). The resolution line does not extend all the way to the global level because, dueto the heterogeneous and spatially aggregated nature of biodiversity, even the broadest global assessments will be most useful if they retain finerresolution. This figure is a simplified version of that adopted by the Second Plenary of IPBES [21]; it retains all its essential elements but some of thedetailed wording explaining each of the elements has been eliminated within the boxes to improve readability. A full description of all elements andlinkages in the CF, together with examples, are given in [20].

doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002040.g001

PLOS Biology | DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002040 January 13, 2015 3 / 8

SecretariatoftheConventiononBiologicalDiversityWorldTradeCentre413St.Jacquesstreet,Suite800Montreal,Quebec,CanadaH2Y1N9Tel.1(514)[email protected]