Brief Title Calibri 49 (Align Fuse - Centre for Translaonal Research in Public Health A partnership of public health researchers across the five universies in North East England Working with policy makers and pracce partners to improve health and wellbeing and tackle inequalies A founding member of the NIHR School for Public Health Research (SPHR) How should we measure physical acvity and sedentary behaviour of pre-school aged children? This project aimed to determine which tools are most valid (accurately measures the behaviour), reliable (is consistent at measuring the behaviour), and feasible (can be successfully used) for measuring physical acvity and sedentary behaviour of pre-school aged children. To do this we conducted extensive searches of the available research on this topic (a systemac review) and combined the results of these exisng studies. These methods allowed us to determine which tools are most useful for which outcome measures. There are many different ways in which the physical acvity (PA) and sedentary behaviour (SB) of pre-school aged children can be measured, these include: Diaries and quesonnaires – Parents or carers report the PA and SB of their children using prescribed quesons. Devices – There are a range of different devices used to measure PA and SB. Here, we focus on accelerometers which measure movement and somemes include integrated heart rate monitors. Pictured is a young child wearing a model called the ‘Acgraph GT3X’. Direct observaon – Children are observed for a period of me, usually at nursery, and their movement behaviours recorded. Calorimetry – Idenfies how much energy a child expends during various acvies. This can be through several methods, including a controlled room called a calorimeter chamber, through portable machines or doubly labelled water (a technique used to measure the energy a child burns based on the carbon dioxide they breathe out). Key findings Quesonnaires show some (but limited) evidence of validity and reliability. However, much more research focusing on development (in parcular with parents and carers of pre-school aged children) and evaluaon of diaries and quesonnaires is needed. Accelerometers, including the ‘Acgraph’ (pictured), can provide valid measures of movement-related behaviours that would be of interest in a range of research. However, different makes of accelerometers can produce different outcomes and should not be used interchangeably. Frequently worn acvity devices such as ‘Fitbits’ also demonstrated promising results for a range of outcomes, and were shown to be reliable, but there was very lile research on these tools in this age group. Although most accelerometers were feasible, high proporons of missing data from devices malfunconing and breaking or from children not wearing the monitors was reported. The ‘AcvPAL’, aached to the thigh using an adhesive dressing, had some feasibility concerns due to irritaon to the skin. Direct observaon and calorimetry may be suitable for small-scale structured measurement, but are not feasible for assessing everyday acvity for public health/ populaon level research. Using an accelerometer alongside a quesonnaire/diary, may be most useful for a range of outcome measures. Findings support the need for more qualitave research, such as focus groups and interviews, to understand acceptability and feasibility of the tools from the perspecve of parcipants, to determine reasons for missing data, non-compleon, and overall enjoyment. Physical acvity and sedentary behaviour are linked to the health and development of young children. Accurate measurement of these behaviours underpins research and pracce in this area. Here we present key findings from our review examining the measurement tools used to assess physical acvity and sedentary behaviour of pre- school children (aged 3-7 years).
2
Embed
Fuse A partnership of public health researchers across the ...
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Brief Title Calibri 49 (Align Text Left)...
Main body Calibri 10 Black (Align Text Left)… Key Findings
Calibri 10 Black (Large Bullets)...
Intro Calibri 15 (Align Text Left)...
Fuse - Centre for Translational Research in Public Health
A partnership of public health researchers across the five universities in North East England
Working with policy makers and practice partners to improve health and wellbeing and tackle inequalities
A founding member of the NIHR School for Public Health Research (SPHR)
How should we measure physical activity and sedentary behaviour of pre-school aged children?
This project aimed to determine which tools are most valid
(accurately measures the behaviour), reliable (is consistent at
measuring the behaviour), and feasible (can be successfully
used) for measuring physical activity and sedentary behaviour
of pre-school aged children. To do this we conducted
extensive searches of the available research on this topic (a
systematic review) and combined the results of these existing
studies. These methods allowed us to determine which tools
are most useful for which outcome measures.
There are many different ways in which the physical activity
(PA) and sedentary behaviour (SB) of pre-school aged children
can be measured, these include:
Diaries and questionnaires – Parents or carers report the PA
and SB of their children using prescribed questions.
Devices – There are a range of different devices used to
measure PA and SB. Here, we focus on accelerometers which
measure movement and sometimes include integrated heart
rate monitors. Pictured is a young child wearing a model
called the ‘Actigraph GT3X’.
Direct observation – Children are observed for a period of
time, usually at nursery, and their movement behaviours
recorded.
Calorimetry – Identifies how much energy a child expends
during various activities. This can be through several
methods, including a controlled room called a calorimeter
chamber, through portable machines or doubly labelled
water (a technique used to measure the energy a child burns
based on the carbon dioxide they breathe out).
Key findings
Questionnaires show some (but limited) evidence of
validity and reliability. However, much more research
focusing on development (in particular with parents and
carers of pre-school aged children) and evaluation of
diaries and questionnaires is needed.
Accelerometers, including the
‘Actigraph’ (pictured), can
provide valid measures of
movement-related behaviours
that would be of interest in a
range of research. However,
different makes of
accelerometers can produce
different outcomes and should
not be used interchangeably.
Frequently worn activity devices such as ‘Fitbits’ also
demonstrated promising results for a range of
outcomes, and were shown to be reliable, but there was
very little research on these tools in this age group.
Although most accelerometers were feasible, high
proportions of missing data from devices malfunctioning
and breaking or from children not wearing the monitors
was reported. The ‘ActivPAL’, attached to the thigh
using an adhesive dressing, had some feasibility
concerns due to irritation to the skin.
Direct observation and calorimetry may be suitable for
small-scale structured measurement, but are not
feasible for assessing everyday activity for public health/
population level research.
Using an accelerometer alongside a questionnaire/diary,
may be most useful for a range of outcome measures.
Findings support the need for more qualitative research,
such as focus groups and interviews, to understand
acceptability and feasibility of the tools from the
perspective of participants, to determine reasons for
missing data, non-completion, and overall enjoyment.
Physical activity and sedentary behaviour are linked to the health and development of young children. Accurate measurement of these behaviours underpins research and practice in this area. Here we present key findings from our review examining the measurement tools used to assess physical activity and sedentary behaviour of pre-school children (aged 3-7 years).
Calibri 10 Black… (please include reference and hyperlink
to full report / more information)
fusebrief
Quote from text Calibri 15 Italic (Align
Text Left)...
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE RESEARCH
Title... / Name… (Calibri 10 Black)
Email: ... Telephone: ...
Fuse, the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, is a collaboration of the 5 North East Universities of Durham, Newcastle, Northumbria, Sunderland & Teesside.
All Fuse briefs produced by Mark Welford, Fuse Communications Manager, in conjunction with the academics involved in the research. Email: [email protected] or Tel: 01642 342987 for details.
Policy relevance and implications
Research suggests that using different tools to record
physical activity and sedentary behaviour of pre-school
children (aged 3-7 years) can impact substantially on
measurement outcomes.
Consideration is needed when interpreting and
understanding the results of research/data that are
used to inform policy and practice, based on the
measurement tools used.
Using tools with good validity, reliability, and feasibility
is important to develop appropriate policies and
programmes to change behaviours. As well as for
conducting evaluations, to identify if there are any
changes as a result of the policies/programmes in place.
New tools developed to measure the physical activity
and sedentary behaviour of pre-school children should
be thoroughly evaluated in the group of interest (e.g.
based on geographical location, specific age group)
prior to use, to ensure validity, reliability and feasibility.
This Fuse research brief presents key findings from a
systematic review to examine the validity, reliability, and
feasibility of measurement tools used to assess physical
activity and sedentary behaviour of pre-school aged children.
The research was led by Sophie Phillips, Fuse and NIHR School
for Public Health Research (SPHR) funded PhD Researcher.
Phillips, S.M. et al. (2021). A systematic review of the validity,
reliability, and feasibility of measurement tools used to assess
the physical activity and sedentary behaviour of pre-school
aged children. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition
and Physical Activity.
Web: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01132-9
Review team: Fuse - Sophie Phillips (Durham University), Dr
Frances Hillier-Brown (Newcastle University), Professor
Carolyn Summerbell (Durham University) and Cassey Muir
(Newcastle University); Professor Sonia Saxena (Imperial
College London); Dr Kathryn Hesketh (University College
London); Dr Matthew Hobbs (University of Canterbury).
Fuse, the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, is a collaboration of the 5 North East Universities of Durham, Newcastle, Northumbria, Sunderland & Teesside.
All Fuse briefs produced by Mark Welford, Fuse Communications Manager, in conjunction with the academics involved in the research. Email: [email protected] or Tel: 01642 342987 for details.
This project is funded by/ supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) School for Public Health Research (Grant
Reference Number PD-SPH-2015-10025). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the