Fundamentals of Cognitive Radio Technology Seminari Fondazione Ugo Bordoni New Frontiers in the Management of Radio Spectrum June 2009 Dr. Joseph Mitola III Distinguished Professor, School of Engineering and Science, Distinguished Professor, School of Systems and Enterprises, and Vice President for the Research Enterprise Stevens Institute of Technology
59
Embed
Fundamentals of Cognitive Radio Technology of Cognitive Radio Technology ... (Dr. Mark McHenry) ... Conceptual. Clustering. Set Cover Using. Generalization &
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Fundamentals of Cognitive Radio Technology
Seminari Fondazione Ugo BordoniNew Frontiers in the Management of Radio Spectrum
June 2009
Dr. Joseph Mitola IIIDistinguished Professor, School of Engineering and Science,
Distinguished Professor, School of Systems and Enterprises, andVice President for the Research Enterprise
Stevens Institute of Technology
Domain-Independent Systems Engineering
http://www.stevens.edu/sit/2
Overview• Foundations
– Saturated Commercial Peak Loading– Low Average Spectrum Occupancy
• Dynamic Spectrum Research and Rule Making– WiFi – Fiber Proliferation– Regulatory Perspectives: European Workshops– FCC R&O
• Innovation in Spectrum Management– Advanced Services: 3D, Multisensory– Key Challenge: Rule Complexity and Cost
3
GSM, UMTS Saturated
Spectrum Fully Allocated, Saturated at Off-Peak Hours
• Web Database Access– Database indicates prohibitions– Whitespace devices must access database– Daily access for use– No access (to database) ⇒ No access (to spectrum)
19
IEEE P1900.5 Policy Language
[ XG Policy Language R. Krishnan et al, BBN]
20
Innovation in Spectrum Management
Policies, Policy Languages, and Behavior Modeling for Autonomous
Conformance to Policy Intent
Cognitive Radio Evolution
• Cognitive Radio Foundation Era (1990-2005)– New radio spectrum with new RF technology– Grow markets via services (GSM) and products (WiFi)– Cognitive radio introduced as far term idea (1998)– Cognitive radio R&D: DySPAN, CROWNcom, XG…
• Cognitive Radio Evolution Era (2005-2020)– Dynamic spectrum approved for low power devices– Behavioral policy languages for spectrum management– Cost of conforming to policies/exceptions is growing– Sentient spaces paradigm establishes expectations[J. Mitola III, “Evolution of Cognitive Radio Architecture” Proceedings of the IEEE, 2009]
22
Use Case Evolution
Use Case Parameters Foundation era (1990-2005) Evolution era (2005-2020) Core wireless use cases Towards ubiquitous access Towards integrated services Profit margins High (handsets-infrastructure)
then handset profits declining Low (handsets-infrastructure) to high for differentiated services
Value proposition QoS (Connectivity, data rate) QoI (User is the 8th OSI layer) PSTN integration SS7[1], SDH[2] IP-SIP [3], Mobile IP, or IPv6[4] Reconfigurable HW Not worth the cost vs chipset Transitioning to mainstream? Location awareness Niche applications Ubiquitous Multimedia Infeasible to feasible Strong differentiator Spectrum awareness Within allocated band Across multiple bands Spectrum Auctions Large blocks for long term Small space-time holes short term Public safety Distinct markets Integration with agility Data rate framework Stationary, walking, vehicle Hot spot, traveling, emergency Sentient Spaces Video surveillance markets Elder care and home robotics
23
Interactive TV
HDTV
Computing: Moore’s Law
Cognitive Radio Domains
Wireless 1G, 2G GSM-PHS, 3G CDMA, B3G OFDM
Wireless Web
WiFi, WiMAX, OFDM
Land Mobile, Emergency, TETRA …
B3G
MIMO
> 100 Mbps
???
Security, Privacy
Broadcast TV
Cognitive Radio
Dynamic Spectrum
Blue tooth
time
complexity
24
Transportation Domain View
Wireless 1G, 2G GSM-PHS, 3G CDMA, B3G OFDM
Wireless Web WiFi
Land Mobile TETRA …
B3G
MIMO
> 100 Mbps
???Cognitive Radio Networks and Users
Blue tooth
Highways
EZ-Pass Tolls
Vehicle Enablers
- As Base Station
Interactive TVHDTV
Security, Privacy
Emergencies
Law Enforcement
Vehicular Enablers
- Integration
- As Base Station
Ports
Container ID
Shipboard AIS
- Robotic Ports
OnStar
25
Security Often Comes Last• Radio Security Research @ Stevens
– Compromising emanations, weak codes and ciphers• Radio biometrics (turning TX nuances into trustable IFF)
– Inherently Trustable Comput-ications Technology– Post-quantum Cryptography– Password-reset Guessing from Google & Psychology
• Evaluate military operations security (OPSEC)• Foundations
– Discrete mathematics, Galois fields, problems– Cryptographic algorithms (AES) and systems (Kerberos)– Attacks fall mainly outside of “crypto” per se– Large scale cybersecurity (Secure Systems curriculum)
s GeneticAlgorithmsBlind Learning, RobustSlow, Massively ParallelConstrained by the Coding of Chromosomes
Case-BasedStorage of ExamplesMemory BasedNearest-NeighborInductive RetrievalAdapt Pre-StoredSolutions to CurrentSituation(Does not requirea-priori model of the solution space)
Knowledge-BasedStructure backgroundknowledge in Rule BaseAcquires New RulesMay Use Certainty Calculus
1. In Dyirbal culture, the concepts male and female cannot be combined
Lakoff Basic Categories
41
Cognitive Linguistics Metaphors• Things [Lakoff-Jackendoff]
– Body experience of physical things: touch, eat, don’t eat, don’t touch• Mind metaphor: ideas, good ideas, bad ideas
• Places [Sensorimotor interaction with a Thing] Video Game– Body is container: eat/ defecate, drink/ urinate, feel good, get sick– Room is a container in which we are contained
• Activity is a place: goodness, success, failure, consequences– Non-visual space continues to exist: [certain] abstractions are real
• Paths [partially ordered (<) set of Places] [Lakoff-Jackendoff]– Physical movement experience
• Activation is motion metaphor; Activity is journey (plan) metaphor• Actions [Thing moving down a Path] [Mitola]
– Anger as burden, dangerous animal, opponent, fire, heat• Causes [Thing.Action that initiates or modulates Action] [Mitola]
– Some Thing initiates {some [other] thing to move down a path}• Reason via metaphor: bodily experience => internal experience => expertise
=> abstraction => logic, language as shared experience
42
LJM Basic Types for Radio
43
Cognitive Linguistics for Dynamic Spectrum
• Lakoff[1], Jackendoff[8], Ziemke[2], Mitola[6]– Language: pointer to sensorimotor behavior– Reasoning: metaphor (bindings) not logic
• LJM Cognitive Linguistics Orthogonalization– <Thing/> The most common entities in a domain– <Place/> Named vector fields for <Thing/>– <Path/> Associated <Places/> (sequence, hierarchy)– <Action/> Motion of <Thing/> on <Path/>– <Cause/> <Thing/> initiates-constrains <Action/>
44
Cognitive Linguistic Modeling of Radio
Things “Everybody knows”
CLA first identifies the few universally common Things of a domain
Places are the vector fields that characterize interaction possibilities for each Thing
Places “Near Field, BLOS”designate subspaces
Paths are sequences of places through which action may occur
Paths “Multipath, MIMO”Basis for actions
45
Modeling Radio DynamicsAction is the movement of a Thing along a Path
Actions“TX, RX”Induces
What happened
Transmit: Signal-In-Space = Thing.new(Tower)
Cause is the Thing that initiates an Action
Causes“ETSI”
ConstrainsWho to fine
Air Interface * Channel State
46
Genetic Programming [7]
• Specialized form of Genetic Algorithm (GA)• Population of Individuals
– Genome: Set of software components {+,-,if …}– GP Gene: Program tree or script per individual– Random initialization of [working] programs
• Iteration of populations to enhance fitness– Run programs on problems to evaluate fitness– Propagate, procreate, prune, cross-over, [mutate]– 1000 individuals/ 100 populations vs 20/10
47
SWR, SDR, DySPAN, and CR Domains
PHY
MAC
Network
…
Application
User
Location
Health…
Context
HW FW SWTX/RX
SWR Band
Ideal Cognitive Radio (iCR)Cognitive WirelessNetworks (CWN)QoI
• Economics of Spectrum Management– Minimize Capital Expense for Infrastructure– Minimize Operating Expense for Services– Sustains social contracts
50
References1. George Lakoff, Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things ()19872. Ray Jackendoff, Semantics and Cognition, volume 8 of Current Studies in
Linguistics Series. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts 1983. 3. John R. Bender. 2001. Connecting language and vision using a conceptual
semantics, Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.4. Keith Bonawitz, Anthony Kim, and Seth Tardiff, An Architecture for Word
Learning using Bidirectional Multimodal Structural Alignment Report for NSF Award IIS-0218861 W03-0605.pdf (Cambridge, MA: MIT) 2003
5. Peter Gärdenfors, “Representing actions and functional properties in conceptual spaces,” Body, Language, Mind: Embodiment T. Ziemke et al, Editors (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter) 2007
6. M. Johnson and T. Rohrer “We are live creatures: Embodiment, American Pragmatism” in T. Ziemke, Ibid
7. John Koza, www.genetic-programming.org; Genetic Programming (Volumes 1 [92, MIT Press] through IV [Kluwer, 2003])
8. Jing Liu et al, “Moving Block Sequence and Organizational Evolutionary Algorithm for General Floorplanning with Arbitrarily Shaped Rectilinear Blocks” IEEE Trans Evolutionary Computation (NY: IEEE Press) Oct 08
Spatial Context Plane CharacteristicsLevel Plane Members Space Time Contexts1 Global Regions 10,000 km year Itinerary2 Regional Cities 1000 km week Plan3 Metro Districts 100 km day Commuting4 Local Buildings 1-10 km hour Lunch5 Immediate Rooms meters minutes Dead reckoning6 Fine Scale Furniture wavelengths µsec Habit7 Internal HW, SW microns ns Architecture
Resource Description Framework (RDF)/Schema DARPA Agent Markup Language (DAML) Ontology Web Language (OWL)“Semantic Web” – Slow to Catch On