Top Banner
Printing, Packaging, and Protecting Food Tom Dunn, Flexpacknology LLC packaging safety & solutions℠ February 6, 2015, 1
41
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: FSFPrinting

1

Printing, Packaging, and Protecting Food

Tom Dunn, Flexpacknology LLCpackaging safety & solutions℠

February 6, 2015,

Page 2: FSFPrinting

2

THOMAS DUNN: BACKGROUNDFlexible Packaging Association / Printpack Inc

BA; MS Yale

Flexible Packaging Product Development & Regulatory Compliance (35 yrs)... Processes:

flexo, gravure, adhesive & extrusion laminations, metalizing, barrier & cohesive coating

Products:Salted snacks, confectionery, RTE cereal, processed meat, thermally sterilized foods

Page 3: FSFPrinting

3

THOMAS DUNN: CURRENT

Product development; expert witness; food safety; HACCP/GMP gap analysis

Life time Achievement Awards:• Polymers & Laminations Division (Tech. Assn. Pulp and Paper Industry)• Food Packaging Division (Inst. Food technologists)• Packaging Hall of Fame (Packaging Machinery Manufacturers Inst.)

Author:MANUFACTURING FLEXIBLE PACKAGING: Materials, Machinery, and Techniques (Elsevier, 2015)

Page 4: FSFPrinting

4

PRINTING, PACKAGING, AND PROTECTING FOOD- AN OverviewA proactive response to the market recall of millions of Euros worth of packaged goods now mitigates what was an underrated risk to packaged foods. This webinar reviews new expectations that the response established for food packaging manufacturers and the procedures that they should follow to assure food safety.

Page 5: FSFPrinting

5

PRINTING, PACKAGING, AND PROTECTING FOOD- LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Page 6: FSFPrinting

6

PRINTING, PACKAGING, AND PROTECTING FOOD- LEARNING OBJECTIVES

•Place food packaging inks in context of HAACP-based risk assessment process

•Recognize risks represented by food packaging inks

•Understand GMPs for formulating food packaging inks

•Understand GMPs for printing with food packaging inks

Page 7: FSFPrinting

7

PRINTING, PACKAGING, AND PROTECTING FOOD- LEARNING OBJECTIVES

•Place food packaging inks in context of HAACP-based risk assessment process

•Recognize risks represented by food packaging inks

•Understand GMPs for formulating food packaging inks

•Understand GMPs for printing with food packaging inks

Page 8: FSFPrinting

8

PRINTING, PACKAGING, AND PROTECTING FOOD- LEARNING OBJECTIVES

•Place food packaging inks in context of HAACP-based risk assessment process

•Recognize risks represented by food packaging inks

•Understand GMPs for formulating food packaging inks

•Understand GMPs for printing with food packaging inks

Page 9: FSFPrinting

9

PRINTING, PACKAGING, AND PROTECTING FOOD- LEARNING OBJECTIVES

•Place food packaging inks in context of HAACP-based risk assessment process

•Recognize risks represented by food packaging inks

•Understand GMPs for formulating food packaging inks

•Understand GMPs for printing with food packaging inks

Page 10: FSFPrinting

10

INKS ON FOOD PACKAGING: HAACP-BASED RISK ASSESSMENT

The HACCP-process systematically reveals significant food hazards from biological, chemical, and physical contamination. It identifies what hazards must be mitigated and how to do so dependably.

Page 11: FSFPrinting

11

What is HACCP?

• Hazard Analysis/Critical Control Point> Prevent hazards rather than test for their presence

in finished products> Identify biological, chemical, and physical hazards

in food supply chain that cause unsafe food products

> Design, implement, verify measurements to reduce hazards to a safe level. - Critical Control Points- Prerequisite programs

Page 12: FSFPrinting

12

How does HACCP process proceed?HACCP PRELIMINARY STEPS

1. Assemble HACCP Team2. Describe Product3. Identify Intended Use4. Construct Flow Diagram5. Verify Flow Diagram

HACCP PRINCIPLES

6. Conduct a hazard analysis7. Identify control points/critical control points (CP/CCPs)8. Establish critical limits for each CCP9. Establish CCP monitoring requirements10. Establish corrective actions11. Validate that HACCP system works as intended12. Establish record keeping procedures

Page 13: FSFPrinting

13

Process Flow Diagram

Receiving In-Plant Transfers

Add value• Step 1• Step 2…• Step n

Shipping

Page 14: FSFPrinting

14

Hazard AnalysisSTEP Biological Chemical Physical

Receiving

transfers

VA Step 1

VA Step 2…

VA Step n

Shipping

Page 15: FSFPrinting

15

Control & Critical Control Points STEP Biological Chemical Physical

Receiving

Transfers

VA Step 1

VA Step 2…

VA Step n

Shipping

Page 16: FSFPrinting

16

Mitigating Risks

• Control Points• GMPs (PRPs)• Critical Control Points• Establish control limits• Choose monitoring method• Validate and verify

• Management System for CPs and CCPs

Page 17: FSFPrinting

17

INKS ON FOOD PACKAGINGREPRESENT RISKS

Ink chemistry is typically the most complex in packaging systems. Its interactions with other packaging materials has caused product adulteration and significant market disruption. The HACCP-process confirms that inks used for printed packaging materials may present a significant chemical food contamination risk.

Page 18: FSFPrinting

18

Packaging: guilty as charged

• November, 2005 – March, 2009*– Italy seizes 30 million liters of children’s milk with traces of

a chemical used in manufacturing packaging inks

– Precautionary withdrawals in France, Spain and Portugal

– Food Processor and packager ordered to pay damages, and legal costs, to the parents of two

* www.repubblica.it (1 March 2009)

Page 19: FSFPrinting

19

Motive, means, and opportunity

Page 20: FSFPrinting

20

Murphy’s Law

Page 21: FSFPrinting

21

Research Continues

Valeria Guazzotti, et al.; Migration kinetics of mineral oil hydrocarbons from recycled paperboard to dry food: monitoring of two real cases. Food Packaging and Shelf Life. 11/2014; 3:9-18

MOSH: Mineral Oil-Saturated Hydrocarbons a: inside boxesMOAH: Mineral Oil-Aromatic Hydrocarbons b: piled packsDIPN: Diisopropyl Naphthalenes C: free standing packs

Page 22: FSFPrinting

22

GMPS FOR FORMULATING FOOD PACKAGING INKS

Use of good practices while manufacturing inks can greatly mitigate the potential chemical contamination risk to food from printed packaging materials

Page 23: FSFPrinting

23

Good practices-Farm to Fork

Agricultural

Manufacturing

Storage-Distribution

Merchandising

Page 24: FSFPrinting

24

GFSA: Codex General Standard for Food Additives

Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) for food additives:• All food additives subject to the provisions of this Standard shall

be used under conditions of good manufacturing practice, which include the following: – the quantity of the additive added to food shall be limited to the

lowest possible level necessary to accomplish its desired effect;– the quantity of the additive that becomes a component of food as a

result of its use in the manufacturing, processing or packaging of a food and which is not intended to accomplish any physical, or other technical effect in the food itself, is reduced to the extent reasonably possible; and,

– the additive is prepared and handled in the same way as a food ingredient.

Page 25: FSFPrinting

25

PRIMARY PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL HYGIENE HYGIENIC PRODUCTION OF FOOD SOURCES HANDLING, STORAGE AND TRANSPORT CLEANING, MAINTENANCE & PERSONNEL HYGIENE AT

PRODUCTIONESTABLISHMENT: DESIGN AND FACILITIES

LOCATIONPREMISES AND ROOMS EQUIPMENT FACILITIES

CONTROL OF OPERATION CONTROL OF FOOD HAZARDS KEY ASPECTS OF HYGIENE CONTROL SYSTEMS INCOMING MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS PACKAGING WATER MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISION DOCUMENTATION AND RECORDSRECALL PROCEDURES

ESTABLISHMENT: MAINTENANCE AND SANITATION MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING CLEANING PROGRAMMES PEST CONTROL SYSTEMS WASTE MANAGEMENT MONITORING EFFECTIVENESS

ESTABLISHMENT: PERSONAL HYGIENE HEALTH STATUS ILLNESS AND INJURIES PERSONAL CLEANLINESS PERSONAL BEHAVIOUR VISITORS

TRANSPORTATION GENERAL REQUIREMENTS USE AND MAINTENANCE

GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF FOOD HYGIENECODEX FOOD HYGIENE (BASIC TEXTS); 4th edition; 2009

Page 26: FSFPrinting

26

EuPIA* Compliance Strategy“In summary it can be concluded that the ink manufacturer does not have an independent responsibility for the formulation and application of the inks, but this remains ultimately with the downstream partners. To allow shared and final responsibilities to be met there needs to be cooperation between ink manufacturer and the rest of the supply chain. The cooperation between ink manufacturer and converter is best managed by requirement specifications, e.g. by detailed information about the substrate, type of food packed, printing and converting process parameters, storage and treatment conditions. When provided with this information the ink manufacturer is enabled to formulate inks that comply with the Regulation, if they are correctly used.”

• European Printing Ink Association

Page 27: FSFPrinting

27

EuPIA Good Manufacturing Practices for the Production of Packaging

Inks non-food-contact surfaces of food packaging

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMEU requirement!

PERSONNEL AND TRAINING All levels trained /Committed

FORMULATIONCritical Control Point

RAW MATERIAL CONTROLSSpecifications/CoAs/FIFO inventory

PRODUCTIONMfg. instructions/Controls/Calibrate/ QC tests

QUALITY CONTROLSample, test, adjust, approve, calibrate

PRODUCT INFORMATIONTrade name, CoA, Composition,

PACKAGINGPerformance/ legal requirements

STORAGEPrevent deterioration, contamination

DELIVERYClean, clearly labeled

TRACEABILITYDelivery-Batch reference levels

Page 28: FSFPrinting

28

EuPIA Formulation Control

• EuPIA Guideline on Printing Inks (2011)• Exclusion Criteria:• “CMR”• “Toxic” or “Very toxic”• Sb, As, Cd, Cr(VI),Pb, Hg, Se colorants/compounds • REACH “SVHC”

• Purity requirements• MW 1000 Dalton• Migration considerations

Page 29: FSFPrinting

29

EuPIA Formulation Decision Tree

Page 30: FSFPrinting

30

GMPS FOR PRINTING WITH FOOD PACKAGING INKS

Use of good practices while printing packaging materials can mitigate remaining potential chemical contamination risk to food from printed packaging.

Page 31: FSFPrinting

31

Safe Inks used safely safe packaging

• EU system evolved quickly to protect food supply• Member States• Scientific community• Industry groups

• US law unchanged: • If no migration into food, the US FDA has no regulatory

authority • If migration into food, migrant must have clearance for

food type/use.• GMP use is mandatory for manufacturing food packaging

Page 32: FSFPrinting

32

Safe packaging by safely printing ink

• Global priority on the integrity of the food supply chain:• consensus standards for safe manufacture of food

packaging generated• ISO Technical Specification (ISO/TS 22002-4):

Prerequisite programs on food safety—Part 4: Food packaging manufacturing

Page 33: FSFPrinting

33

ISO/TS 22002-4 on printing!

• A hazard analysis shall be carried out. If applicable, measures to prevent microbiological, physical and chemical contamination shall be implemented 1.• Chemical contamination from ink migration applies:

Printed and coated materials shall be handled and stored in their intermediate and finished states in such a manner that transfer of substances to the food contact side via set-off or other mechanism is reduced to a safe level appropriate for these materials as defined by hazard analysis 2

1 4.7.1 General requirements2 4.7.4 Chemical contamination

Page 34: FSFPrinting

34

Hazard AnalysisInk migration / offset

• EuPIA guidelines describe “safe inks”• German Printing Ordinance in 2016?• a positive list of evaluated substances • Overall migration limit of 10 mg/dm2

• Specific migration limits• Non-evaluated substances limited to detectable

level of 10 ppb.

Page 35: FSFPrinting

35

Printers’ CCP Management

1. Use ink meeting EuPIA selection criteria2. Print with on target/in control drying/curing

process3. Validate Migration levels4. Verify drying/curing process in process• Rub resistance• Solvent resistance• etc.

5. Prepare Corrective Action Plan

Page 36: FSFPrinting

36

PRINTING, PACKAGING, AND PROTECTING FOOD- SUMMARY•A HAACP-based risk assessment

process reveals packaging hazardsBest practice for food chain safety

Page 37: FSFPrinting

37

PRINTING, PACKAGING, AND PROTECTING FOOD- SUMMARY

• Food packaging inks primarily represent chemical riskMigration to and set-off onto contact side

Page 38: FSFPrinting

38

PRINTING, PACKAGING, AND PROTECTING FOOD- SUMMARY• Formulating food packaging inks

requires using GMPsMW, heavy metal, toxicity, genotoxicity

Page 39: FSFPrinting

39

PRINTING, PACKAGING, AND PROTECTING FOOD- Summary

•Printing with food packaging inks requires GMP use

ISO GMP-PRP and CP approach available

Page 40: FSFPrinting

40

PRINTING, PACKAGING, AND PROTECTING FOOD- Summary•A HAACP-based risk assessment

process reveals packaging hazards• Food packaging inks primarily represent

chemical risks• Formulating food packaging inks

requires using GMPs•Printing with food packaging inks

requires GMP use

Page 41: FSFPrinting

41

PRINTING, PACKAGING, AND PROTECTING FOOD- Thank you!

[email protected] www.flexpacknlogy.com