Top Banner
From Nationalism to Sectionalism Chapter 3
14

From Nationalism to Sectionalism Chapter 3. James Monroe and the “Era of Good Feelings” 1815 – 1824.

Dec 15, 2015

Download

Documents

Alycia Copass
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: From Nationalism to Sectionalism Chapter 3. James Monroe and the “Era of Good Feelings” 1815 – 1824.

From Nationalism to SectionalismChapter 3

Page 2: From Nationalism to Sectionalism Chapter 3. James Monroe and the “Era of Good Feelings” 1815 – 1824.

James Monroe and the

“Era of Good Feelings”

1815 – 1824

Page 3: From Nationalism to Sectionalism Chapter 3. James Monroe and the “Era of Good Feelings” 1815 – 1824.

Guiding Questions1.Why was there a surge of nationalism

after the War of 1812?2.Is the title “Era of Good Feelings”

appropriate? Who would be more inclined to like this title: a federalist or an antifederalist? Why?

3. Would antifederalists look to the Supreme Court rulings in McCulloch v. Maryland and Gibbons v. Ogden as positive or negative?

Page 4: From Nationalism to Sectionalism Chapter 3. James Monroe and the “Era of Good Feelings” 1815 – 1824.

The Election of 1816

Page 5: From Nationalism to Sectionalism Chapter 3. James Monroe and the “Era of Good Feelings” 1815 – 1824.

Convention of 1818 & Adams-Onís Treaty, 1819

RUSH-BAGOT AGREEMENT,

1817

Page 6: From Nationalism to Sectionalism Chapter 3. James Monroe and the “Era of Good Feelings” 1815 – 1824.

The Monroe Doctrine, 1823(more appropriately – the John Quincy

Adams Doctrine)

• It was declared in a few paragraphs of President James Monroe's seventh annual message to Congress on December 2, 1823.

• Monroe warned European countries not to interfere in the Western Hemisphere, stating "that the American continents. . .are henceforth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers."

• The Monroe Doctrine became a cornerstone of future U.S. foreign policy.

Page 7: From Nationalism to Sectionalism Chapter 3. James Monroe and the “Era of Good Feelings” 1815 – 1824.

The Key Elements of “America’s Self-Defense

Doctrine”

•Non-colonization•Non-intervention

Page 8: From Nationalism to Sectionalism Chapter 3. James Monroe and the “Era of Good Feelings” 1815 – 1824.

The Infamous “Peculiar Institution”

Strikes Again

Slavery and the rise of

Sectionalism

Page 9: From Nationalism to Sectionalism Chapter 3. James Monroe and the “Era of Good Feelings” 1815 – 1824.

As Thomas Jefferson remarked…

“The Missouri question…is the most portentous [crucial or ominous] one which ever yet threatened our Union. In the gloomiest moment of the revolutionary war I never had any apprehensions equal to what I feel from this source…[The] question, "like a firebell in the night, awakened and filled me with terror…[With slavery] we have a wolf by the ears, and we can neither hold him nor safely let him go.”

- April 22, 1820

Why does Jefferson equate slavery with a wolf?

Page 11: From Nationalism to Sectionalism Chapter 3. James Monroe and the “Era of Good Feelings” 1815 – 1824.

The Tallmadge & Thomas Amendments

• The Tallmadge Amendment was a bill which would have admitted Missouri with its existing slave population, but would forbid the introduction of additional slaves and free all slave children at age 25.

• The Thomas Amendment was a bill which would have admitted Missouri as a slave state but forbid slavery north of the 36°30" latitude in the Louisiana Purchase region. Neither bill was put into effect.

Page 12: From Nationalism to Sectionalism Chapter 3. James Monroe and the “Era of Good Feelings” 1815 – 1824.

Henry Clay

“The Great Compromis

er”

Page 13: From Nationalism to Sectionalism Chapter 3. James Monroe and the “Era of Good Feelings” 1815 – 1824.

The Missouri Compromise, 1820

Page 14: From Nationalism to Sectionalism Chapter 3. James Monroe and the “Era of Good Feelings” 1815 – 1824.

The Missouri Compromise, 1820

• It admitted Missouri as a slave state and at the same time admitted Maine as a free state.

• Declared that all territory north of the 36°30" latitude would become FREE states, and all territory south of that latitude would become SLAVE states.

In what ways does the Missouri Compromise highlight American disunity?