Top Banner
Kevin Hollins Principal Knutsford Academy and Studio School Cheshire FROM ITT TO CPD Research as a process for school improvement
19
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: From ITT to CPD: research as a process for school improvement - Kevin Hollins

Kevin Hollins

Principal

Knutsford Academy and Studio School

Cheshire

FROM ITT TO CPDResearch as a process for school improvement

Page 2: From ITT to CPD: research as a process for school improvement - Kevin Hollins

Size

Intake

Ability profile

Staffing

Innovation

Knutsford Academy

Page 3: From ITT to CPD: research as a process for school improvement - Kevin Hollins

A Royal College of Teaching

Royal College of Surgeons

An evidence (and therefore research-based)profession

80% of teachers agree!

Page 4: From ITT to CPD: research as a process for school improvement - Kevin Hollins

Extent of research : Secondary Headteacher‟s Digest, November 2013

Assisted places

Educational attainment

English grading

Exercise

„Facilitating‟ subjects

Subject study

Top jobs

Page 5: From ITT to CPD: research as a process for school improvement - Kevin Hollins

What should schools and teachers be researching?

A. School effectiveness

School effectiveness research confirms the need to focus on processes that touch directly on teaching and learning. This may be expressed in terms of the greater important of “proximal” as opposed to “distal” factors influencing achievement, as in:

Page 6: From ITT to CPD: research as a process for school improvement - Kevin Hollins

B. School improvement

Source: Hopkins, D. et al. (2011), “School and System Improvement: State of the art review”, www.icsei.net/icsei2011/State_of_the_art/State_of_the_art_Session_C.pdf.

Phase of School and System Improvement

Key Features of each Phase

Phase 1 – Understanding theorganisational culture of theschool

• The legacy of the organisational development research

• The culture of the school and the problem of change

Phase 2 – Action research andindividual initiatives

• Teacher research and school review• The OECD International School Improvement

Project

Phase 3 – Managing change and theemphasis on leadership

• Comprehensive approaches to school reform• Recognising the importance of leadership

Phase 4 – Building capacity for learningat the local level

• Professional learning communities and networks

• Making the shift from teaching to learning

Phase 5 – Towards systematicapproach

• The influence of the knowledge base and impact of international benchmarking studies

• Differentiated approaches to school and system reform

Page 7: From ITT to CPD: research as a process for school improvement - Kevin Hollins

C. A learning approach

A natural point of departure with school improvement research is in approaches promoting what are seen as desirable ways of organising learning to achieve what are seen as desirable learning outcomes. This implies both a clear and broad vision of learning outcomes and of processes through which these may be achieved. A “learning approach” may be understood as a patterned set of generalised ingredients and relationships that are promoted as desirable for the learner and the learning outcomes. It defines what the teacher role should be, the content of the learning, pedagogical approaches, ways of grouping learners, educational aims and conceptions of the child, and other key matters, all to be interpreted in specific circumstances according to the general precepts.

‘Innovative learning environments’ OECD (2013)

Page 8: From ITT to CPD: research as a process for school improvement - Kevin Hollins

D.Learning environments

Our understanding of a “learning environment” is as an organic, holistic concept that embraces the learning taking place as well as the setting: an eco-system of learning that includes the activity and outcomes of the learning. It recognises that context is essential in the contemporary understanding of learning (De Corte, 2010). A “learning environment” already defines the immediate context in which the learning takes place. More broadly, instead of context being understood as necessarily external, context can usefully be viewed as integral to the main environment players and variables, most obviously the learners who enter in already with particular social profiles, family experiences, knowledge and expectations, and cultural experience in values. These are all importantly formed in wider family, community and social settings but they are made manifest within the educational setting.

Page 9: From ITT to CPD: research as a process for school improvement - Kevin Hollins

The notion of “environment” also importantly stresses time –interplay and interaction take time as does learning that does not happen in instantaneous episodes. The holistic cumulative perspective allows mix to come to the fore – the mix of learning approaches, experiences, and settings. This enable avoidance of dualistic simplifications such as the supposed contrasting choice between direct instruction and discovery as if everything will be done in one way or not at all. The organic “eco-system” that is a learning environment means that blended approaches and mixes are understood to be the norm. Endorsement of mixed approaches and repertoires is also supported by the most recent OECD/TALIS report (Vieluf, S., et al. (2012).

‘Innovative learning environments’ OECD (2013)

Page 10: From ITT to CPD: research as a process for school improvement - Kevin Hollins

The elements of the pedagogical core

‘Innovative learning environments’ OECD (2013)

Page 11: From ITT to CPD: research as a process for school improvement - Kevin Hollins

‘Innovative learning environments’ OECD (2013)

Page 12: From ITT to CPD: research as a process for school improvement - Kevin Hollins

From what perspectives

Whole school

Classroom

Leaders

Teachers

Students

Or all?

Page 13: From ITT to CPD: research as a process for school improvement - Kevin Hollins

Some views from the classroom

Teacher 1 - My Masters programme has involved two research projects:

· the use of blended learning to raise achievement

· identifying and addressing the barriers to girls progressing to A-level physics

From the blended learning research I gained a deeper understanding of current thinking regarding the use of the Internet and email to support students and enhance classroom teaching. This linked well with the on-going development of how we use our VLE to support students and provide access to resources.

The most noticeable impact of the project so far has been the increasing amount of use of email by A-level students to ask for help with work outside of normal school hours.

I started my „girls in physics‟ project this academic year and hence there are no conclusions yet. However, the detailed literature review has been eye-opening and has helped me gain a thorough understanding of the range of factors that influence girls in progressing to A-level physics. The project has helped me understand different research methods in more detail and the theory behind designing and running multi-method research projects. Furthermore, the research has helped me develop my awareness of the ethical issues when undertaking research.

Page 14: From ITT to CPD: research as a process for school improvement - Kevin Hollins

Some views from the classroom

Teacher 2 - I thoroughly enjoyed the fact my masters study gave me the opportunity to discuss/chat educational aspects with staff from other learning centres. I found this very inspiring and I took a lot of this inspiration and encouragement into my classroom practice.

The masters programme also allowed me to study for a coaching award from which I should receive merits. I have found the skills I developed on my coaching classes very useful when mentoring my sixth form students in my role as form tutor.

I am currently working on my thesis and am looking at Number Acuity. I am interested in doing an investigation /survey with our students to see how strong the correlation is between number acuity and maths ability.

The masters programme has opened me up to studying and reading about aspects of education I would never had time to discover during a busy school week.

Page 15: From ITT to CPD: research as a process for school improvement - Kevin Hollins

Some views from the classroom

Teacher 3 - With the exception of some early credits due to my

experiences gained in teaching, I aimed to combine the academic research with real issues I face in my professional role.

In my research and consultation with other colleagues, I was able to consider wider thinking than my own, reflect on previous practice and find alternative and innovative solutions to problems my own and other schools face in the 21st century.

I also tried where possible to link my work to my own developmental plan and that of the team I manage. In my role, it is possible to suggest that the outcomes of the research and actions taken can have a positive effect on results for the school and individual students outlook on their school experience.

Page 16: From ITT to CPD: research as a process for school improvement - Kevin Hollins

Some views from the classroom

Teacher 4 - I thoroughly enjoyed the rigour of Masters level study

and it made me question my own preconceptions and beliefs about teaching, learning and leadership and empowered me to innovate and try new ideas, all of which directly benefits the Music department. The conclusions of my research and activities I have developed through my research projects have become embedded within the practice of the Music department.

Teacher 5 - The research I undertook was to find out whether the

teaching of pupils by gender had a positive impact on the achievement of boys in secondary schools. This was of particular interest as at the time of the research I was teaching a group of year 11 boys, who were on track to achieve considerably higher than their predicted grade and was interested in whether the fact that it was solely a group of boys was a contributory factor.

Page 17: From ITT to CPD: research as a process for school improvement - Kevin Hollins

Some practical issues – a personal perspective

Time

Resourcing

Confidentiality

Ethics

Utility

Dissemination

Link with school priorities?

The place of professional judgement?

Page 18: From ITT to CPD: research as a process for school improvement - Kevin Hollins

Value of research-based practice – based on no research evidence!

Breadth of perspective

Promotes innovation

Quality of pedagogy

Quality of leadership

Page 19: From ITT to CPD: research as a process for school improvement - Kevin Hollins

Research principles

Understand research methods

Clarify the focus and approach

Provide time

Determine a dissemination strategy

Promote development

Promote career progression