Top Banner
Genaro C. Reyes III, RN Master in Public Health
18

Friedman two way analysis of variance by

Jul 02, 2015

Download

Documents

Iybaro Reyes
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Friedman two way analysis of  variance by

Genaro C. Reyes III, RNMaster in Public Health

Page 2: Friedman two way analysis of  variance by

Friedman two way ANOVA By Rank is a test for comparing three or more related samples

and which makes no assumptions about the underlying distribution of the data. The data is set out in a table comprising n rows and k columns.

The data is ranked horizontally or across the rows and the mean rank for each column is compared.

This test is very useful when the data are ordinal (i.e., ranked)

Page 3: Friedman two way analysis of  variance by

History Friedman test is a non parametric statistical method

developed by Dr. Milton Friedman

Page 4: Friedman two way analysis of  variance by

History Friedman test is a non parametric statistical method

developed by Dr. Milton Friedman

Page 5: Friedman two way analysis of  variance by

Friedman Formula

Page 6: Friedman two way analysis of  variance by

Friedman Formula2

2

1

12 ( 1)

( 1) 2

k

r j

j

b kR

bk k

2 2

1

123 ( 1)

( 1)

k

r j

j

R b kbk k

EQUATION 1

EQUATION 2

EQUATION 3

Page 7: Friedman two way analysis of  variance by

Friedman Formula

Page 8: Friedman two way analysis of  variance by

Example A water company sought evidence the measures taken to

clean up a river were effective. Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) at 12 sites on the river were compared before clean up, 1 month later and a year after clean up.

Aqualytic sensor system AL606

Page 9: Friedman two way analysis of  variance by

Hypothesis Testing Steps

1. Data

Site BOD (biological oxygen demand)

Before After 1month

After 1 year

1 17.4 13.6 13.2

2 15.7 10.1 9.8

3 12.9 9.7 9.7

4 9.8 9.2 9.0

5 13.4 11.1 10.7

6 18.7 20.4 19.6

7 13.9 10.4 10.2

8 11 11.4 11.5

9 5.4 4.9 5.2

10 10.4 8.9 9.2

11 16.4 11.2 11.0

12 5.6 4.8 4.6

Page 10: Friedman two way analysis of  variance by

Hypothesis Testing Steps

1. Data

Site BOD (biological oxygen demand)

Before After 1month

After 1 year

1 17.4 13.6 13.2

2 15.7 10.1 9.8

3 12.9 10.3 9.7

4 9.8 9.2 9.0

5 13.4 11.1 10.7

6 18.7 20.4 19.6

7 13.9 10.4 10.2

8 11 11.4 11.5

9 5.4 4.9 5.2

10 10.4 8.9 9.2

11 16.4 11.2 11.0

12 5.6 4.8 4.6

Site BOD (biological oxygen demand)

Before After 1month

After 1 year

1 17.4 3 13.6 2 13.2 1

2 15.7 3 10.1 2 9.8 1

3 12.9 3 9.7 1.5 9.7 1.5

4 9.8 3 9.2 2 9.0 1

5 13.4 3 11.1 2 10.7 1

6 18.7 1 20.4 3 19.6 2

7 13.9 3 10.4 2 10.2 1

8 11 1 11.4 2 11.5 3

9 5.4 3 4.9 1 5.2 2

10 10.4 3 8.9 1 9.2 2

11 16.4 3 11.2 2 11.0 1

12 5.6 3 4.8 2 4.6 1

Rj 32 22.5 17.5

Page 11: Friedman two way analysis of  variance by

Hypothesis Testing Steps

1. Data 2. Assumption

The observations appearing in a given block are independent of the observations appearing in each of the other blocks, and within each block measurement on at least an ordinal scale is achieved.

3. Hypothesis

H0 : The clean up procedure has had no effect on the BOD.HA : The clean up procedure has affected the BOD.

4. Decision Rule: Reject H0 if M > critical value at 5% level of significance

5. Calculation of Test Statistic

Page 12: Friedman two way analysis of  variance by

Calculating of test statistic……

Friedman’s magic formula!!!!

Where, k = number of columns (treatments)

n = number of rows (blocks)

Rj = sum of the ranks

Page 13: Friedman two way analysis of  variance by

BOD (biological oxygen demand)

Site Before After 1 month After 1 year

Sum of ranks 32 22.5 17.5

2

(sum of ranks) 1024 506.25 306.25

Number of columns, k 3

Solution: Number of rows, n 12

1836.5 = (1024 + 506.25 + 306.25)

__12__nk(k+1)

0.083 = ___12___12 x 3 x 4

3n(k+1) 144 = 3 x 12 x 4

Test Statistic M 8.43 = 0.083 x 1836.5 - 144

Page 14: Friedman two way analysis of  variance by

6. Statistical decision

Compare computed M value to critical value at 5% level of significance.

M(computed value) = 8.43

critical value at 5% level of significance is = 6.17

• 7. Conclusion M is > than critical value

Reject the null hypothesis

Alternative hypothesis:

HA : The clean up procedure has affected the BOD.

Page 15: Friedman two way analysis of  variance by

Critical Values for Friedman’s two way ANOVA by Ranks

k n =0.10 =0.05 =0.1

3 3 6.00 6.00 ---

4 6.00 6.50 8.00

5 5.20 6.40 8.40

6 5.33 7.00 9.00

7 5.43 7.14 8.86

8 5.25 6.25 9.00

9 5.56 6.22 8.67

10 5.00 6.20 9.60

11 4.91 6.54 8.91

12 5.17 6.17 8.67

13 4.77 6.00 9.39

-- 4.61 5.99 9.21

Page 16: Friedman two way analysis of  variance by

Friedman test online calculator!

Page 18: Friedman two way analysis of  variance by