Top Banner
Frequency Table Descriptive Statistics Descriptive statistics generally show basic data, such as frequencies, means, mode, median to summarize the findings. Moreover, it shows the dispersion/ range of data by using minimum, maximum, range, variance and standard deviation (Allen.P, Bennett.K, 2012). The result of descriptive statistics will be portraying in charts. Frequencies Frequency tools provide information about frequency count and percentage of the research sample for selected variable and suitable for nominal and ordinal data (Allen.P, Bennett.K, 2012). In the descriptive table that SPSS generate, it might shows missing values or it might not, depends on the result of the questionnaire that has been distributed. To put into consideration about the missing value, it will be best to use the valid percentage to analyse the result rather than the percentage. Survey on body image 1. How would you rate your overall physical appearance? Physical Appearance Frequen cy Percen t Valid Percent Cumulativ e Percent Vali d Very Unattracti ve 2 .7 .7 .7 Unattracti ve 18 6.2 6.2 6.8 Average 172 58.9 58.9 65.8 Attractive 86 29.5 29.5 95.2
63

Frequency Table

Feb 02, 2023

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Frequency Table

Frequency TableDescriptive Statistics

Descriptive statistics generally show basic data, such asfrequencies, means, mode, median to summarize the findings.Moreover, it shows the dispersion/ range of data by usingminimum, maximum, range, variance and standard deviation(Allen.P, Bennett.K, 2012). The result of descriptive statisticswill be portraying in charts.

Frequencies

Frequency tools provide information about frequency countand percentage of the research sample for selected variable andsuitable for nominal and ordinal data (Allen.P, Bennett.K, 2012).

In the descriptive table that SPSS generate, it might showsmissing values or it might not, depends on the result of thequestionnaire that has been distributed. To put intoconsideration about the missing value, it will be best to use thevalid percentage to analyse the result rather than thepercentage.

Survey on body image

1. How would you rate your overall physical appearance?

Physical AppearanceFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

VeryUnattractive

2 .7 .7 .7

Unattractive

18 6.2 6.2 6.8

Average 172 58.9 58.9 65.8Attractive 86 29.5 29.5 95.2

Page 2: Frequency Table

VeryAttractive

14 4.8 4.8 100.0

Total 292 100.0 100.0

Following the table above, it illustrates the rating overallphysical appearance of 292 people. Most of participant (58.9%)has average ‘s body result, 29.5% participants have their bodyare attractive, and 6.2% participants have their body are beenunattractive. In addition, quit few people or participant havebeen very attractive such as only 0.7% who have body veryunattractive, and people who have body very attractive, only4.8%.

2. How would you rate your physical appearance when compared tothe physical appearance of your immediate/ close friends?

Physical Appearance Comparison to PeersFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid VeryUnattractive

2 .7 .7 .7

Page 3: Frequency Table

Unattractive

24 8.2 8.2 8.9

Average 170 58.2 58.4 67.4Attractive 83 28.4 28.5 95.9VeryAttractive

12 4.1 4.1 100.0

Total 291 99.7 100.0Missing System 1 .3

Total 292 100.0

Leading to question 2, looking through the valid percentage, itcould be seen that people who have been participate in fillingthe questionnaire is someone who is confident with their body.Similarity with question 1, when compared to the physicalappearance of their immediate or their close friends, the precentof average and attractive are also high, accounting for 58.2% and28.4%. On the other hand, in this survey has 1 person missing.

3. How would you rate your physical appearance when compared tothe physical appearance of your co-worker/ classmates?

Physical Appearance Comparison to Co-WorkersFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Page 4: Frequency Table

Valid

VeryUnattractive

3 1.0 1.0 1.0

Unattractive

21 7.2 7.2 8.2

Average 169 57.9 57.9 66.1Attractive 82 28.1 28.1 94.2VeryAttractive

17 5.8 5.8 100.0

Total 292 100.0 100.0For co-worker, when compared to the physical appearance, 57.9% ofaverage body and 28.1% of attractive body are the highest in thistable. However, noticeably increasing of the very attractive bodyis 5.8% and decreasing of the unattractive body is 7.2%. It isbecause of depending on their different workplace. In KFC,example, when they compares with their staff, absolutely theythink their body are more attractive than their co-worker. On theother hand, in fitness club, they think their body areunattractive.

4. Using the following scale, could you please rate each of thefollowing attributes that you desire (want) to improve(change) about yourself?

Attribute - WeightFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

GreatlyImprove

33 11.3 11.5 11.5

Improve 98 33.6 34.3 45.8PossiblyChange

65 22.3 22.7 68.5

No Change 58 19.9 20.3 88.8Definitely NoChange

32 11.0 11.2 100.0

Total 286 97.9 100.0Missing System 6 2.1

Total 292 100.0

Page 5: Frequency Table

This table illustrate about the rating weight attribute. Themajority of the respondents (34.3%) are their desire to improvethemselves. Following this, 22.7% of the respondents are possiblychanged. The phenomenon has demonstrated the respondent who theirdesiring to improve and possibly change have more than 50%concern about changing and improving their weight. However, thetable above could be seen that participants (11.5%) who greatlywant to improve and 11.2% has definitely no change their weight.

Attribute – Nose

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

GreatlyImprove

10 3.4 3.5 3.5

Improve 30 10.3 10.5 14.0PossiblyChange

42 14.4 14.7 28.7

No Change 124 42.5 43.4 72.0Definitely NoChange

80 27.4 28.0 100.0

Total 286 97.9 100.0Missing System 6 2.1

Total 292 100.0

Showing in this table, which illustrates about nose attribute.Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen thatpeople who do not want to change their nose have 43.4%. Also morethan a few respondents (28%) who definitely does not want tochange. On the other hand, only 3.5% participants have greatlyimproved their nose.

Attribute - EyesFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid GreatlyImprove

4 1.4 1.4 1.4

Page 6: Frequency Table

Improve 20 6.8 7.0 8.4PossiblyChange

26 8.9 9.1 17.5

No Change 116 39.7 40.6 58.0Definitely NoChange

120 41.1 42.0 100.0

Total 286 97.9 100.0Missing System 6 2.1

Total 292 100.0For the eyes attribute table, it could be seen that the biggestprecent of respondents about no change and definitely no changehave been showed more than 82%. In addition, quite few people orparticipants have ideas want to change and greatly improve suchas only 7% and 1.4%.

Attribute - Breast/PenisFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

GreatlyImprove

7 2.4 2.5 2.5

Improve 27 9.2 9.5 12.0PossiblyChange

45 15.4 15.8 27.8

No Change 112 38.4 39.4 67.3Definitely NoChange

93 31.8 32.7 100.0

Total 284 97.3 100.0Missing System 8 2.7

Total 292 100.0

The attribute of breast/penis table is also similar with thenose. Most of participant has no change and definitely no change,according for 39.4% and 32.7%. The pie chart above could be seenthat participants (9.5%) who desire to improve their breast orpenis, as well as 2.5% has really wanted to improve.Attribute - Waist

Page 7: Frequency Table

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

GreatlyImprove

21 7.2 7.4 7.4

Improve 72 24.7 25.3 32.6PossiblyChange

63 21.6 22.1 54.7

No Change 84 28.8 29.5 84.2Definitely NoChange

45 15.4 15.8 100.0

Total 285 97.6 100.0Missing System 7 2.4

Total 292 100.0

Another aim for the researchers is to analyse participants basedon their waist. The majority of the respondent has showed 29.5%that is the highest precent of no change. Also, the precent ofimproving and possibly change their waist are quietly similar,according for 25.3% and 22.1%. On the other hand, only 7.4%participants have greatly improved their waist.

Attribute - AbdominalFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

GreatlyImprove

37 12.7 12.9 12.9

Improve 77 26.4 26.9 39.9PossiblyChange

66 22.6 23.1 62.9

No Change 77 26.4 26.9 89.9Definitely NoChange

29 9.9 10.1 100.0

Total 286 97.9 100.0Missing System 6 2.1

Total 292 100.0Showing in this table, which illustrates about abdominalattribute. Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen

Page 8: Frequency Table

that similarity between people who do not want to change and wantto improve their abdominal have 26.9%. On the other hand, only10.1% participants have definitely no change their nose.

Attribute - HipsFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

GreatlyImprove

23 7.9 8.0 8.0

Improve 54 18.5 18.9 26.9PossiblyChange

46 15.8 16.1 43.0

No Change 121 41.4 42.3 85.3Definitely NoChange

42 14.4 14.7 100.0

Total 286 97.9 100.0Missing System 6 2.1

Total 292 100.0

Showing in this table, which illustrates about nose attribute.Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen thatpeople who do not want to change their hips have 42.3%. Also morethan a few respondents (18.9%) who want to improve. On the otherhand, only 8% participants have greatly improved their hips.

Attribute - HeightFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

GreatlyImprove

18 6.2 6.3 6.3

Improve 44 15.1 15.4 21.7PossiblyChange

42 14.4 14.7 36.4

No Change 111 38.0 38.8 75.2Definitely NoChange

71 24.3 24.8 100.0

Total 286 97.9 100.0

Page 9: Frequency Table

Missing System 6 2.1

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 38.8% ofthem think they don’t need to change. However, 6.3% ofrespondents think they greatly improve.

Attribute - ButtocksFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

GreatlyImprove

22 7.5 7.7 7.7

Improve 49 16.8 17.2 24.9PossiblyChange

49 16.8 17.2 42.1

No Change 116 39.7 40.7 82.8Definitely NoChange

49 16.8 17.2 100.0

Total 285 97.6 100.0Missing System 7 2.4

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 40.7% ofthem think they don’t need to change. However, 7.7% ofrespondents think they greatly improve.

Attribute - LegsFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid GreatlyImprove

15 5.1 5.2 5.2

Improve 54 18.5 18.9 24.1PossiblyChange

68 23.3 23.8 47.9

No Change 95 32.5 33.2 81.1

Page 10: Frequency Table

Definitely NoChange

54 18.5 18.9 100.0

Total 286 97.9 100.0Missing System 6 2.1

Total 292 100.0

Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 33.2% ofthem think they don’t need to change. However, 5.2% ofrespondents think they greatly improve.

Attribute - ArmsFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

GreatlyImprove

12 4.1 4.2 4.2

Improve 55 18.8 19.3 23.5PossiblyChange

57 19.5 20.0 43.5

No Change 113 38.7 39.6 83.2Definitely NoChange

48 16.4 16.8 100.0

Total 285 97.6 100.0Missing System 7 2.4

Total 292 100.0

Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 39.6% ofthem think they don’t need to change. However, 4.2% ofrespondents think they greatly improve.

Attribute - StomachFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid GreatlyImprove

33 11.3 11.5 11.5

Improve 72 24.7 25.2 36.7

Page 11: Frequency Table

PossiblyChange

65 22.3 22.7 59.4

No Change 80 27.4 28.0 87.4Definitely NoChange

36 12.3 12.6 100.0

Total 286 97.9 100.0Missing System 6 2.1

Total 292 100.0

Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 28% ofthem think they don’t need to change. However, 11.5% ofrespondents think they greatly improve.

Attribute - HandsFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

GreatlyImprove

8 2.7 2.8 2.8

Improve 20 6.8 7.0 9.8PossiblyChange

34 11.6 11.9 21.7

No Change 141 48.3 49.3 71.0Definitely NoChange

83 28.4 29.0 100.0

Total 286 97.9 100.0Missing System 6 2.1

Total 292 100.0

Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 49.3% ofthem think they don’t need to change. However, 2.8% ofrespondents think they greatly improve.

Attribute - PectoralsFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Page 12: Frequency Table

Valid

GreatlyImprove

8 2.7 2.9 2.9

Improve 26 8.9 9.4 12.3PossiblyChange

53 18.2 19.2 31.5

No Change 123 42.1 44.6 76.1Definitely NoChange

66 22.6 23.9 100.0

Total 276 94.5 100.0Missing System 16 5.5

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 44.6% ofthem think they don’t need to change. However, 2.9% ofrespondents think they greatly improve.

Attribute - AcneFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

GreatlyImprove

16 5.5 5.7 5.7

Improve 51 17.5 18.2 23.9PossiblyChange

44 15.1 15.7 39.6

No Change 83 28.4 29.6 69.3Definitely NoChange

86 29.5 30.7 100.0

Total 280 95.9 100.0Missing System 12 4.1

Total 292 100.0

Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 30.7% ofthem think they definitely don’t need to change their acne.However, 5.7% of respondents think they greatly improve.

Attribute - Scars

Page 13: Frequency Table

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

GreatlyImprove

18 6.2 6.4 6.4

Improve 41 14.0 14.5 20.8PossiblyChange

53 18.2 18.7 39.6

No Change 95 32.5 33.6 73.1Definitely NoChange

76 26.0 26.9 100.0

Total 283 96.9 100.0Missing System 9 3.1

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 33.6% ofthem think they don’t need to change their scars. However, 6.4%of respondents think they greatly improve.

Attribute - HairFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

GreatlyImprove

13 4.5 4.5 4.5

Improve 50 17.1 17.5 22.0PossiblyChange

57 19.5 19.9 42.0

No Change 98 33.6 34.3 76.2Definitely NoChange

68 23.3 23.8 100.0

Total 286 97.9 100.0Missing System 6 2.1

Total 292 100.0

Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 34.3% ofthem think they don’t need to change their hair. However, 4.5% ofrespondents think they greatly improve.

Page 14: Frequency Table

Attribute - EarsFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

GreatlyImprove

6 2.1 2.1 2.1

Improve 15 5.1 5.2 7.3PossiblyChange

12 4.1 4.2 11.5

No Change 142 48.6 49.7 61.2Definitely NoChange

111 38.0 38.8 100.0

Total 286 97.9 100.0Missing System 6 2.1

Total 292 100.0

Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 49.7% ofthem think they don’t need to change. However, 2.1% ofrespondents think they greatly improve.

Attribute - JawFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

GreatlyImprove

8 2.7 2.8 2.8

Improve 10 3.4 3.5 6.3PossiblyChange

31 10.6 10.9 17.2

No Change 143 49.0 50.2 67.4Definitely NoChange

93 31.8 32.6 100.0

Total 285 97.6 100.0Missing System 7 2.4

Total 292 100.0

Page 15: Frequency Table

Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 50.2% ofthem think they don’t need to change. However, 2.8% ofrespondents think they greatly improve.

Attribute - Face ShapeFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

GreatlyImprove

7 2.4 2.4 2.4

Improve 20 6.8 7.0 9.4PossiblyChange

55 18.8 19.2 28.7

No Change 119 40.8 41.6 70.3Definitely NoChange

85 29.1 29.7 100.0

Total 286 97.9 100.0Missing System 6 2.1

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 41.6% ofthem think they don’t need to change. However, 2.4% ofrespondents think they greatly improve.

5. How often do you feel that you have handled yourself will ata social gathering?

Frequency at which you are happy with the way youhandle yourself at social gatherings?

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid GreatlyImprove

7 2.4 2.4 2.4

Improve 19 6.5 6.6 9.0PossiblyChange

85 29.1 29.3 38.3

No Change 150 51.4 51.7 90.0Definitely NoChange

29 9.9 10.0 100.0

Page 16: Frequency Table

Total 290 99.3 100.0Missing System 2 .7

Total 292 100.0

This research is specifically aims to identify how confident ofparticipant and used descriptive statistic to analyse. The datainformation was collected to make a frequency table as shown inTable above and it represent the percentage or number of peoplewho have handle themselves will at a social gathering. Mostrespondents are sometimes which occupy 45.5%, as well as 37.3% ofthe respondent are fairly often they feel that they have handlethemselves at a social gathering. On the other hand, only 1.7% ofpeople who are practically never happy with the way they handlethemselves at social gatherings

6. How often do you have the feeling that you can doeverything well?

Confidence in doing things wellFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

PracticallyNever

5 1.7 1.7 1.7

Once in aGreat While

24 8.2 8.2 9.9

Sometimes 133 45.5 45.5 55.5Fairly Often 109 37.3 37.3 92.8Very Often 21 7.2 7.2 100.0Total 292 100.0 100.0

This pie chart illustrates about level confidence of participantwho is self-possessed do something well in public. Lookingthrough the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is also the

Page 17: Frequency Table

answer of sometimes and fairly often, accounting for 45.5% and37.3%. However, 1.7% has practically never confidence in doingsomething well in public.

7. When you talk in front of a class or group of people yourown age, how pleased are you with your performance?

Confidence in your performance in speaking in front ofclass

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

PracticallyNever

10 3.4 3.4 3.4

Once in aGreat While

42 14.4 14.4 17.9

Sometimes 113 38.7 38.8 56.7Fairly Often 103 35.3 35.4 92.1Very Often 23 7.9 7.9 100.0Total 291 99.7 100.0

Missing System 1 .3

Total 292 100.0For Confidence in your performance in speaking in front of class,this table demonstrates the majority of the respondent (38.8%) issometimes, also nearly 36% of the respondents is fairly often,while the precent of practically never is also the lowestconfidence, accounting for 3.4%.

8. How comfortable are you when starting a conversation withpeople whom you don’t know?

Comfort in initiating conversation with strangersFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

PracticallyNever

9 3.1 3.1 3.1

Once in aGreat While

48 16.4 16.4 19.5

Sometimes 87 29.8 29.8 49.3Fairly Often 117 40.1 40.1 89.4

Page 18: Frequency Table

Very Often 31 10.6 10.6 100.0Total 292 100.0 100.0

When starting a conversation with strangers, the highest precentof sometimes is switched to fairly often. That is showing theconfidence and friendly through 40.1%. Also nearly 30% therespondents who say sometime they are comfortable in initiatingconversation with strangers. The pie chart above could be seen that participants (3.1%) whoare practically never comfortable when starting a conversationwith people whom they don’t know.

9. How often do you feel that you are a successful person?Confidence in being successful

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

PracticallyNever

6 2.1 2.1 2.1

Once in aGreat While

39 13.4 13.4 15.4

Sometimes 134 45.9 45.9 61.3Fairly Often 99 33.9 33.9 95.2Very Often 14 4.8 4.8 100.0Total 292 100.0 100.0

According to table 9, it shows the confidence in beingsuccessful. The majority of the respondent (45.9%) is sometimes.This phenomenon has demonstrated the respondents who are veryconfident themselves. Following this, nearly 34% of therespondents are fairly often. Just only 2.1% have practicallynever confident in being successful.

10. How confident are you that your success in your futurejob or career is assured?

Confidence that your future job/career is assuredFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid PracticallyNever

9 3.1 3.1 3.1

Once in aGreat While

33 11.3 11.3 14.4

Sometimes 110 37.7 37.8 52.2

Page 19: Frequency Table

Fairly Often 108 37.0 37.1 89.3Very Often 31 10.6 10.7 100.0Total 291 99.7 100.0

Missing System 1 .3

Total 292 100.0When the question asks about their confidence are that success inyour future job or career is assured. A quite similarity precentbetween the answers of sometimes and fairly often is presented inthis table, accounting for 37.8% and 37.1%. However, still therespondent of practically never is the lowest precent through3.1%.

11. When you speak in a class discussion, how sure ofyourself do you fell?

Confidence in speaking within a group/classFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

PracticallyNever

8 2.7 2.7 2.7

Once in aGreat While

22 7.5 7.6 10.3

Sometimes 110 37.7 37.8 48.1Fairly Often 115 39.4 39.5 87.6Very Often 36 12.3 12.4 100.0Total 291 99.7 100.0

Missing System 1 .3

Total 292 100.0Similarity with question 10, the largest precent of therespondents (39.5%) are fairly often as well as 37.8% the answeris sometimes, when someone speaks in a class discussion. On theother hand, the pie chart above could be seen that participants(2.7%) has lass confidence in speaking within a group/class.

12. How sure of yourself do you feel among strangers?Confidence amongst strangers

Frequency

Precent

ValidPrecent

Cumulative Precent

Page 20: Frequency Table

Valid

PracticallyNever

7 2.4 2.4 2.4

Once in aGreat While

32 11.0 11.0 13.4

Sometimes 121 41.4 41.6 55.0Fairly Often 110 37.7 37.8 92.8Very Often 21 7.2 7.2 100.0Total 291 99.7 100.0

Missing System 1 .3

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 41.6% ofthem about sometimes feeling confidence amongst strangers, while7.2% of respondents is very often confident to talk withstrangers, in addition 2.4% are practically never dare to talkwith strangers.

13. How confident do you feel that some day the people youknow will look up to you and respect you?

Confidence that some day the people you know will lookup to you and respect you

Frequency

Precent

ValidPrecent

Cumulative Precent

Valid

PracticallyNever

13 4.5 4.5 4.5

Once in aGreat While

26 8.9 8.9 13.4

Sometimes 105 36.0 36.1 49.5Fairly Often 124 42.5 42.6 92.1Very Often 23 7.9 7.9 100.0Total 291 99.7 100.0

Missing System 1 .3

Total 292 100.0Another aim for the researchers is to analyse participants basedon their feeling. A descriptive analysis was used to analyseConfidence that some day the people you know will look up to youand respect you. The data information was collected to make afrequency table as shown in this table and it represents the

Page 21: Frequency Table

valid percentage of respondents and a pie chart for betterunderstanding. Furthermore, 42.6% of respondents is fairly often;also 36.1% of the answers are sometimes. Only 4.5% is practicallynever feel that.

14. In general, how confident do you feel about youabilities?

Confidence in abilitiesFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

PracticallyNever

4 1.4 1.4 1.4

Once in aGreat While

9 3.1 3.1 4.5

Sometimes 99 33.9 34.1 38.6Fairly Often 150 51.4 51.7 90.3Very Often 28 9.6 9.7 100.0Total 290 99.3 100.0

Missing System 2 .7

Total 292 100.0When someone interviews the job they really want, they areabsolutely very confident. It is showed though 51.7% of therespondents are fairly often about their abilities. However, only1.4% of them who don’t confident themselves.

15. How often do you have the feeling that there is nothingyou can do well?

Feeling that you can nothing wellFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Very Often 5 1.7 1.7 1.7Fairly Often 14 4.8 4.8 6.5Sometimes 77 26.4 26.5 33.0Once in aGreat While

137 46.9 47.1 80.1

PracticallyNever

58 19.9 19.9 100.0

Total 291 99.7 100.0Missing System 1 .3

Page 22: Frequency Table

Total 292 100.0Everyone has their own skills, and absolutely they have somemistake. So mostly the respondents are once in a great while, by47.1%. on the other hand, only 1.7% they feel that they cannot doanything well.

16. When your have to talk in front of a class or group ofpeople your own age, how often do you feel worried orafraid?

Feeling worried/afraid when talking amongstgroup/class of similar age

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Very Often 14 4.8 4.8 4.8Fairly Often 44 15.1 15.2 20.0Sometimes 119 40.8 41.0 61.0Once in aGreat While

88 30.1 30.3 91.4

PracticallyNever

25 8.6 8.6 100.0

Total 290 99.3 100.0Missing System 2 .7

Total 292 100.0This table demonstrates about feeling worried or afraidparticipant who are same ages. The most answers are sometimes,which carries 41% of total. Only 4.8% someone who is very oftenfeel worried/afraid when talking amongst group/class of similarage.

17. How often do you worry about whether other people liketo be with you?

Feeling worried about whether or not other people likeout be with you

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Very Often 6 2.1 2.1 2.1Fairly Often 31 10.6 10.7 12.8Sometimes 97 33.2 33.4 46.2

Page 23: Frequency Table

Once in aGreat While

106 36.3 36.6 82.8

PracticallyNever

50 17.1 17.2 100.0

Total 290 99.3 100.0Missing System 2 .7

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire are 33.4%ofthe answer about sometimes and 36.6% of the respondent is once ina great while. However, just 2.1% people always feel worriedabout whether or not other people like out are with you.

18. How often do you feel self-conscious?Feeling self-conscious

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Very Often 20 6.8 6.9 6.9Fairly Often 67 22.9 23.1 30.0Sometimes 120 41.1 41.4 71.4Once in aGreat While

71 24.3 24.5 95.9

PracticallyNever

12 4.1 4.1 100.0

Total 290 99.3 100.0Missing System 2 .7

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire are 41.4% ofthem think sometimes. However, nearly 7% people always feel self-conscious.

19. How often are you troubled with shyness?Feeling shy

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Very Often 15 5.1 5.2 5.2

Page 24: Frequency Table

Fairly Often 30 10.3 10.4 15.6Sometimes 105 36.0 36.3 51.9Once in aGreat While

97 33.2 33.6 85.5

PracticallyNever

42 14.4 14.5 100.0

Total 289 99.0 100.0Missing System 3 1.0

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire are 36.3%ofthe answer about sometimes and 33.6% of the respondent is once ina great while. However, just 5.1% people always troubled withtheir shyness.

20. How often do you feel inferior to most of the peoplewho know you?

Feeling inferior when compared to peersFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Very Often 5 1.7 1.7 1.7Fairly Often 19 6.5 6.6 8.3Sometimes 97 33.2 33.4 41.7Once in aGreat While

108 37.0 37.2 79.0

PracticallyNever

61 20.9 21.0 100.0

Total 290 99.3 100.0Missing System 2 .7

Total 292 100.0This pie chart demonstrates about feel inferior to most of thepeople who know you. The majority of the respondent is once in agreat while, accounting for 37.2%. The pie chart above also couldbe seen that participants 1.7% is very often Feeling inferiorwhen compared to peers.

21. Do you ever think you are a worthless individual?Feeling worthless

Page 25: Frequency Table

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Very Often 4 1.4 1.4 1.4Fairly Often 8 2.7 2.8 4.1Sometimes 38 13.0 13.1 17.2Once in aGreat While

102 34.9 35.2 52.4

PracticallyNever

138 47.3 47.6 100.0

Total 290 99.3 100.0Missing System 2 .7

Total 292 100.0This table illustrates about thinking you are a worthlessindividual. The majority of the respondent is practically never,accounting for 47.6%. The pie chart above also could be seen thatparticipants 1.4% are very often feeling worthless themselves.

22. How often do you worry about how well you get alongwith other people?

Worrying about how well you get along with peopleFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Very Often 7 2.4 2.4 2.4Fairly Often 17 5.8 5.9 8.3Sometimes 93 31.8 32.1 40.3Once in aGreat While

117 40.1 40.3 80.7

PracticallyNever

56 19.2 19.3 100.0

Total 290 99.3 100.0Missing System 2 .7

Total 292 100.0This table illustrates about worrying about how well you getalong with other people. The majority of the respondent is oncein a great while, accounting for up to 40.3%. The pie chart abovealso could be seen that participants 2.4% are very often worryingabout how well you get along with people.

Page 26: Frequency Table

23. How often do you feel that you dislike yourself?Feeling dislike for oneself

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Very Often 5 1.7 1.7 1.7Fairly Often 17 5.8 5.9 7.6Sometimes 52 17.8 17.9 25.5Once in aGreat While

112 38.4 38.6 64.1

PracticallyNever

104 35.6 35.9 100.0

Total 290 99.3 100.0Missing System 2 .7

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire are 38.6%ofthe answer about once in a great while and nearly 36% of therespondent is practically never. However, just 1.7% people alwaysfelling dislike for themselves.

24. Do you ever feel so discouraged with yourself that youwonder whether anything is worthwhile?

Feeling so discouraged that you wonder if anything isworthwhile

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Very Often 4 1.4 1.4 1.4Fairly Often 11 3.8 3.8 5.2Sometimes 64 21.9 22.1 27.2Once in aGreat While

100 34.2 34.5 61.7

PracticallyNever

111 38.0 38.3 100.0

Total 290 99.3 100.0Missing System 2 .7

Page 27: Frequency Table

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire are 34.5%ofthe answer about once in a great while and 38.3% of therespondent is practically never. However, just 1.4% people alwaysfeeling so discouraged that you wonder if anything is worthwhile.

25. Of the following forms of media, which do you considerthey most enjoyable?

Most enjoyable form of mediaFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

TV 203 69.5 71.7 71.7Internet

45 15.4 15.9 87.6

PrintMedia

35 12.0 12.4 100.0

Total 283 96.9 100.0Missing System 9 3.1

Total 292 100.0

Another aim for the researchers is to analyse participants basedon most enjoyable form of media. The data information wascollected to make a frequency table as shown in this table and itrepresents the valid percentage of respondents and a pie chartfor better understanding. The majority of the respondent (71.1%)

Page 28: Frequency Table

is Television. The reason is that Television allows consumers tosee and hear a product in operation; also the average TV vieweris in a relaxed state of mind when watching. They are ready to beentertained and learn new things. However, only 12.4% of therespondent is print media.

26. Of the following forms of media, which do you considerthey most reliable?

Most reliable form of mediaFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

TV 101 34.6 36.6 36.6Internet

31 10.6 11.2 47.8

PrintMedia

144 49.3 52.2 100.0

Total 276 94.5 100.0Missing System 16 5.5

Total 292 100.0Nevertheless, the most reliable form of media is not TV media.The most reliable is print media- strong traditional media,through 52.2% of total. The table above could be seen thatparticipants (11.2%) is internet media.

27. On average, how much television would you view daily?Average daily television viewing

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid 0-2Hours

125 42.8 43.7 43.7

2-4hours

105 36.0 36.7 80.4

4-6Hours

46 15.8 16.1 96.5

6-8Hours

6 2.1 2.1 98.6

>8Hours

4 1.4 1.4 100.0

Page 29: Frequency Table

Total 286 97.9 100.0Missing System 6 2.1

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 43.7% ofthem watch TV around 0-2hours per day, also 36.7% people watch TVaround 2to 4 hours daily. However, 1.4% of respondents are morethan 8 hours per day.

28. How many hours would you spend online weekly?Hours spent online weekly

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

0-2Hours

108 37.0 37.2 37.2

2-4hours

71 24.3 24.5 61.7

4-6Hours

52 17.8 17.9 79.7

6-8Hours

26 8.9 9.0 88.6

>8Hours

33 11.3 11.4 100.0

Total 290 99.3 100.0Missing System 2 .7

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 37.2% ofthem spend around 0-2hours per day for online. However, 9% ofrespondents is between 6 to 8 hours per day. In addition, someaudiences spend more than 8 hours per day for watching movies andplaying games, accounting for 11.4%.

29. How often do you read the newspapers?How often do you read newspaper

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Page 30: Frequency Table

Valid

<Fortnighlty

35 12.0 12.1 12.1

Weekly 45 15.4 15.5 27.6Every fewdays

76 26.0 26.2 53.8

EverySecond Day

19 6.5 6.6 60.3

Daily 115 39.4 39.7 100.0Total 290 99.3 100.0

Missing System 2 .7

Total 292 100.0For spending time reading newspapers, looking through the validpercentage, it could be seen that the participant who have beenfilling the questionnaire is nearly 40% of them read newspapersdaily, also 26.2% people read it every few days. However, 6.6% ofrespondents is every second day, because of limited timing.

30. How often do you purchase magazines?How often do you purchase a magazine

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Every twoMonths

100 34.2 35.1 35.1

Once a Month 86 29.5 30.2 65.3Bi-Monthly 35 12.0 12.3 77.5Weekly 54 18.5 18.9 96.5More than oncea Week

10 3.4 3.5 100.0

Total 285 97.6 100.0Missing System 7 2.4

Total 292 100.0Nowadays, social networking is developing more and more. Everyonecan read news and everything from online, so they don’t buymagazine much. Through the valid percentage, it could be seenthat the participant the purchasing magazines have been fillingthe questionnaire is 35.1% for every two months, also 30.2%

Page 31: Frequency Table

purchasing for once a month. Just only 3.5% of respondents arepurchased magazine more than once a week.

31. Do you consider television advertising to be quite orloud?

Television Advertising - Quite or LoudFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Quite 4 1.4 1.4 1.4Quiteish

11 3.8 3.8 5.2

Neutral

116 39.7 40.4 45.6

Loudish

102 34.9 35.5 81.2

Loud 54 18.5 18.8 100.0Total 287 98.3 100.0

Missing

System

5 1.7

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 40.4% ofthem consider television advertising to be neutral, also 35.5%people want TV ads to be loudish. However, 1.4% of respondentsconsider TV ads to be quiet.

Do you consider television advertising to be soft or hard?Television Advertising - Soft or Hard

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Soft 3 1.0 1.0 1.0Softish

28 9.6 9.8 10.8

Neutral

152 52.1 53.0 63.8

Hardish

84 28.8 29.3 93.0

Hard 20 6.8 7.0 100.0Total 287 98.3 100.0

Page 32: Frequency Table

Missing

System

5 1.7

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 53% ofthem consider television advertising to be neutral. However, only1% of respondents consider TV ads to be soft.

Do you consider television advertising to be feminine ormasculine?

Television Advertising - Feminine or MasculineFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Feminine 9 3.1 3.2 3.2SlightlyFeminine

40 13.7 14.0 17.2

Neutral 193 66.1 67.7 84.9SlighltlyMasculine

31 10.6 10.9 95.8

Masculine 12 4.1 4.2 100.0Total 285 97.6 100.0

Missing System 7 2.4

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 67.7% ofthem consider television advertising to be neutral. However, 3.2%of respondents consider TV ads to be feminine.

32. Do you consider Internet advertising to be quiet orloud?

Internet Advertising - Quiet or LoudFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Quite 35 12.0 12.4 12.4Quietist

54 18.5 19.1 31.4

Page 33: Frequency Table

Neutral

112 38.4 39.6 71.0

Loudish

57 19.5 20.1 91.2

Loud 25 8.6 8.8 100.0Total 283 96.9 100.0

Missing

System

9 3.1

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 39.6% ofthem consider Internet advertising to be neutral, also similaritybetween people want Internet ads to be loudish and to bequietist, accounting for 20.1% and 19.1%. However, 8.8% ofrespondents consider Internet ads to be loud.

Do you consider Internet advertising to be soft or hard?Internet Advertising - Soft or Hard

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Soft 20 6.8 7.1 7.1Softish

39 13.4 13.8 20.9

Neutral

147 50.3 52.1 73.0

Hardish

52 17.8 18.4 91.5

Hard 24 8.2 8.5 100.0Total 282 96.6 100.0

Missing

System

10 3.4

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 52.1% ofthem consider Internet advertising to be neutral. However, 7.1%of respondents consider Internet ads to be soft.

Page 34: Frequency Table

Do you consider Internet advertising to be feminine ormasculine?Internet Advertising - Feminine or Masculine

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Feminine 12 4.1 4.3 4.3SlightlyFeminine

19 6.5 6.8 11.0

Neutral 183 62.7 65.1 76.2SlightlyMasculine

52 17.8 18.5 94.7

Masculine 15 5.1 5.3 100.0Total 281 96.2 100.0

Missing System 11 3.8

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 65.1% ofthem consider Internet advertising to be neutral. However,similarities between people want Internet ads to be feminine andto be masculine, accounting for 4.3% and 5.3%.

33. Do you consider magazine advertising to be quite orloud?

Magazine Advertising - Quite or LoudFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Quite 28 9.6 9.8 9.8Quiteish

43 14.7 15.0 24.8

Neutral

138 47.3 48.3 73.1

Loudish

60 20.5 21.0 94.1

Loud 17 5.8 5.9 100.0Total 286 97.9 100.0

Missing

System

6 2.1

Total 292 100.0

Page 35: Frequency Table

Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 48.3% ofthem consider magazines advertising to be neutral. However, 5.9%of respondents consider magazines ads to be loud.

Do you consider magazine advertising to be soft or hard?Magazine Advertising - Soft or Hard

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Soft 22 7.5 7.7 7.7Softish

63 21.6 22.0 29.6

Neutral

151 51.7 52.6 82.2

Hardish

42 14.4 14.6 96.9

Hard 9 3.1 3.1 100.0Total 287 98.3 100.0

Missing

System

5 1.7

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 52.6% ofthem consider magazines advertising to be neutral. However, 3.1%of respondents consider magazines ads to be hard.

Do you consider magazine advertising to be feminine ormasculine?Magazine Advertising - Feminine or Masculine

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Feminine 27 9.2 9.5 9.5SlightlyFeminine

69 23.6 24.3 33.8

Neutral 162 55.5 57.0 90.8SlighltlyMasculine

21 7.2 7.4 98.2

Masculine 5 1.7 1.8 100.0Total 284 97.3 100.0

Page 36: Frequency Table

Missing System 8 2.7

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 57% ofthem consider magazines advertising to be neutral. However, 1.8%of respondents consider magazines ads to be masculine.

Please answer the following questions, using the following scaleby circling your response:If you divide television viewing into two categories:

1. Shows that represent reality; and2. Show that present scripted fantasy

34. How often do you feel shows that fall in the category1

Reality Scripted TV - Pressure you to question yourappearance

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Very Often 43 14.7 15.1 15.1Often 79 27.1 27.7 42.8Sometimes 116 39.7 40.7 83.5Once in aWhile

35 12.0 12.3 95.8

Practically Never

12 4.1 4.2 100.0

Total 285 97.6 100.0Missing System 7 2.4

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 40.7% ofthem feel sometimes they can appear in reality scripted TV.However, 4.2% of respondents say practically never.

35. How often do you feel shows that fall in the category1

Page 37: Frequency Table

Reality Scripted TV - Present Reliable informationFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Very Often 6 2.1 2.1 2.1Often 45 15.4 15.7 17.8Sometimes 119 40.8 41.6 59.4Once in aWhile

96 32.9 33.6 93.0

Practically Never

20 6.8 7.0 100.0

Total 286 97.9 100.0Missing System 6 2.1

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 41.6% ofthem think sometimes TV show reliable information. However, 2.1%of respondents think it is very often.

36. Are more reliable then show from category 2?Reality Scripted TV - Are more reliable thanscripted fantasy

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Very Often 8 2.7 2.8 2.8Often 19 6.5 6.6 9.4Sometimes 106 36.3 36.9 46.3Once in aWhile

108 37.0 37.6 84.0

Practically Never

46 15.8 16.0 100.0

Total 287 98.3 100.0Missing System 5 1.7

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 37.6% ofthem think the reality scripted TV is once in a while more

Page 38: Frequency Table

reliable than scripted fantasy. However, 2.8% of respondents sayit is very often.

37. How often do you feel shows that fall in the category2

Fantasy Scripted TV - Pressure you to question yourappearance

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Very Often 51 17.5 17.9 17.9Often 65 22.3 22.8 40.7Sometimes 96 32.9 33.7 74.4Once in aWhile

50 17.1 17.5 91.9

Practically Never

23 7.9 8.1 100.0

Total 285 97.6 100.0Missing System 7 2.4

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 33.7% ofthem feel sometimes they can appear in fantasy scripted TV.However, 8.1% of respondents say practically never.

38. How often do you feel shows that fall in the category1

Fantasy Scripted TV - Present Reliable informationFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Very Often 61 20.9 21.4 21.4Often 106 36.3 37.2 58.6Sometimes 105 36.0 36.8 95.4Once in aWhile

10 3.4 3.5 98.9

Page 39: Frequency Table

Practically Never

3 1.0 1.1 100.0

Total 285 97.6 100.0Missing System 7 2.4

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 37.2% ofthem think Fantasy Scripted TV often shows reliable information.However, 1.1% of respondents think it is practically never.

39. Are more reliable than shows from category 1Fantasy Scripted TV - Are more reliable thanreality scripted TV

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Very Often 92 31.5 32.5 32.5Often 108 37.0 38.2 70.7Sometimes 70 24.0 24.7 95.4Once in aWhile

11 3.8 3.9 99.3

Practically Never

2 .7 .7 100.0

Total 283 96.9 100.0Missing System 9 3.1

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 38.2% ofthem think the fantasy scripted TV is often more reliable thanreality scripted TV. However, 0.7% of respondents say it ispractically never.

Please answer the following questions, using the following scaleby circling your response:If you divide Internet viewing into two categories:

3. Shows that represent reality; and4. Show that present scripted fantasy

Page 40: Frequency Table

40. Pressure you to question your appearanceReality Based Websites - Pressure you to questionyour appearance

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Very Often 82 28.1 29.4 29.4Often 74 25.3 26.5 55.9Sometimes 89 30.5 31.9 87.8Once in aWhile

30 10.3 10.8 98.6

Practically Never

4 1.4 1.4 100.0

Total 279 95.5 100.0Missing System 13 4.5

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 31.9% ofthem feel sometimes they can appear in Reality Based Websites.However, 1.4% of respondents say practically never.

41. Present reliable informationReality Based Websites - Present Relibaleinformation

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Very Often 16 5.5 5.7 5.7Often 49 16.8 17.4 23.1Sometimes 123 42.1 43.8 66.9Once in aWhile

79 27.1 28.1 95.0

Practically Never

14 4.8 5.0 100.0

Total 281 96.2 100.0Missing System 11 3.8

Total 292 100.0

Page 41: Frequency Table

Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 43.8% ofthem think Reality Based Websites sometimes shows reliableinformation. However, 5% of respondents think it is practicallynever.

42. Are more reliable informationReality Based Websites - Are more reliable thanfantasy based sites

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Very Often 21 7.2 7.5 7.5Often 29 9.9 10.4 17.9Sometimes 108 37.0 38.7 56.6Once in aWhile

83 28.4 29.7 86.4

Practically Never

38 13.0 13.6 100.0

Total 279 95.5 100.0Missing System 13 4.5

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 38.7% ofthem think the Reality Based Websites is often more reliable thanfantasy based websites. However, 7.5% of respondents say it isvery often.

How often do you feel shows that fall in the category 243. Pressure you to question you appearance

Fantasy Based Websites - Pressure you to questionyour appearance

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Very Often 74 25.3 26.5 26.5Often 59 20.2 21.1 47.7Sometimes 87 29.8 31.2 78.9

Page 42: Frequency Table

Once in aWhile

46 15.8 16.5 95.3

Practically Never

13 4.5 4.7 100.0

Total 279 95.5 100.0Missing System 13 4.5

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 31.2% ofthem feel sometimes they can appear in Fantasy Based Websites.However, 4.7% of respondents say it is practically never.

44. Present reliable informationFantasy Based Websites - Present Relibaleinformation

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Very Often 56 19.2 20.1 20.1Often 98 33.6 35.1 55.2Sometimes 106 36.3 38.0 93.2Once in aWhile

16 5.5 5.7 98.9

Practically Never

3 1.0 1.1 100.0

Total 279 95.5 100.0Missing System 13 4.5

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 38% ofthem think Fantasy Based Websites often shows reliableinformation. However, 1.1% of respondents think it is practicallynever.

45. Are more reliable than sites from category 1Fantasy Based Websites - Are more reliable thanreality based sites

Page 43: Frequency Table

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Very Often 91 31.2 32.6 32.6Often 82 28.1 29.4 62.0Sometimes 89 30.5 31.9 93.9Once in aWhile

12 4.1 4.3 98.2

Practically Never

5 1.7 1.8 100.0

Total 279 95.5 100.0Missing System 13 4.5

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 32.6% ofthem think the fantasy based websites is very often more reliablethan reality based sites. However, 1.8% of respondents say it ispractically never.

If you divide print media into two categories:5. Newspapers6. Magazines

How often do you feel newspapers?

46. Pressure your to question your appearance Newspapers - Pressure you to question yourappearance

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Very Often 90 30.8 31.5 31.5Often 89 30.5 31.1 62.6Sometimes 78 26.7 27.3 89.9Once in aWhile

24 8.2 8.4 98.3

Practically Never

5 1.7 1.7 100.0

Total 286 97.9 100.0

Page 44: Frequency Table

Missing System 6 2.1

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 31.5% ofthem feel very often they can appear in Newspapers. However, 1.7%of respondents say practically never.

47. Present reliable informationNewspapers - Present Reliable information

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Very Often 11 3.8 3.8 3.8Often 26 8.9 9.1 12.9Sometimes 75 25.7 26.2 39.2Once in aWhile

122 41.8 42.7 81.8

Practically Never

52 17.8 18.2 100.0

Total 286 97.9 100.0Missing System 6 2.1

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 42.7% ofthem think Newspapers once in a while shows reliable information.However, 3.8% of respondents think it is very often.

48. Are more interesting than magazines?Newspapers - Are more reliable than magazines

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Very Often 19 6.5 6.7 6.7Often 67 22.9 23.5 30.2Sometimes 131 44.9 46.0 76.1

Page 45: Frequency Table

Once in aWhile

48 16.4 16.8 93.0

Practically Never

20 6.8 7.0 100.0

Total 285 97.6 100.0Missing System 7 2.4

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 46% ofthem think the Newspapers is often more reliable than magazines.However, 6.7% of respondents say it is very often.

How often do you feel magazines?49. Pressure you to question your appearance

Magazines - Pressure you to question yourappearance

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Very Often 32 11.0 11.3 11.3Often 51 17.5 18.1 29.4Sometimes 103 35.3 36.5 66.0Once in aWhile

62 21.2 22.0 87.9

Practically Never

34 11.6 12.1 100.0

Total 282 96.6 100.0Missing System 10 3.4

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 36.5% ofthem feel sometimes they can appear in Magazines. However, 11.3%of respondents say very often.

50. Present reliable information

Page 46: Frequency Table

Magazines - Present Reliable informationFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Very Often 16 5.5 5.7 5.7Often 77 26.4 27.2 32.9Sometimes 126 43.2 44.5 77.4Once in aWhile

58 19.9 20.5 97.9

Practically Never

6 2.1 2.1 100.0

Total 283 96.9 100.0Missing System 9 3.1

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 44.5% ofthem think Magazines often show reliable information. However,2.1% of respondents think it is practically never.

51. Are more reliable than newspapers?Magazines - Are more reliable than newspapers

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Very Often 50 17.1 17.7 17.7Often 87 29.8 30.9 48.6Sometimes 109 37.3 38.7 87.2Once in aWhile

32 11.0 11.3 98.6

Practically Never

4 1.4 1.4 100.0

Total 282 96.6 100.0Missing System 10 3.4

Total 292 100.0Looking through the valid percentage, it could be seen that theparticipant who have been filling the questionnaire is 38.7% ofthem think Magazines are often more reliable than Newspapers.However, 1.4% of respondents say it is practically never.

Page 47: Frequency Table

52. I have more self-confidence than mostpeople

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

StronglyDisagree

8 2.7 2.8 2.8

Disagree 58 19.9 20.1 22.9Undecided 94 32.2 32.6 55.6Agree 108 37.0 37.5 93.1StronglyAgree

20 6.8 6.9 100.0

Total 288 98.6 100.0Missing System 4 1.4

Total 292 100.0This table illustrates the level of confidence participants. Mostof participant (37.5%) agree that they have more self-confidencethan most people. In addition, 32.6% of them are undecided therespondents. However, quite few people or participants havestrongly disagree that they are not more confident then someone,only 2.8%

53. More independent than most people

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

StronglyDisagree

5 1.7 1.7 1.7

Disagree 33 11.3 11.5 13.2Undecided 78 26.7 27.1 40.3Agree 146 50.0 50.7 91.0StronglyAgree

26 8.9 9.0 100.0

Total 288 98.6 100.0Missing System 4 1.4

Total 292 100.0

Page 48: Frequency Table

This table illustrates the level of independent than most people.Most of participant (50.7%) agrees that they have moreindependent than most people. In addition, 27.1% of them areundecided the respondents. However, quite few people orparticipants have strongly disagree that they are not moreindependent than someone, only 1.7 %

54. Have a lot of personal ability

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Disagree 17 5.8 5.9 5.9Undecided 79 27.1 27.4 33.3Agree 158 54.1 54.9 88.2StronglyAgree

34 11.6 11.8 100.0

Total 288 98.6 100.0Missing System 4 1.4

Total 292 100.0

This table illustrates the level of personal ability. Most ofparticipant (54.9%) agrees that they have a lot of personalability than most people. In addition, 27.4% of them areundecided the respondents. However, quite few people orparticipants have disagreed that they don’t have a lot ofpersonal ability then someone, only 5.9%

55. Considered a leader

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid StronglyDisagree

10 3.4 3.5 3.5

Disagree 45 15.4 15.6 19.0Undecided 103 35.3 35.6 54.7Agree 106 36.3 36.7 91.3

Page 49: Frequency Table

StronglyAgree

25 8.6 8.7 100.0

Total 289 99.0 100.0Missing System 3 1.0

Total 292 100.0

This table illustrates the level of considered a leader. Most ofparticipant (36.7%) agrees that they considered a leader thanmost people. In addition, 35.6% of them are undecided therespondents. However, quite few people or participants havestrongly disagree that they did not consider a leader thensomeone, only 3.5%

56. Make decisions independentlyFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

StronglyDisagree

2 .7 .7 .7

Disagree 54 18.5 18.7 19.4Undecided 86 29.5 29.8 49.1Agree 115 39.4 39.8 88.9StronglyAgree

32 11.0 11.1 100.0

Total 289 99.0 100.0Missing System 3 1.0

Total 292 100.0

This table illustrates making decisions independently. Most ofparticipant (39.8%) agree that they make decisions independentlythan most people. In addition, 29.8% of them are undecided therespondents. However, quite few people or participants havestrongly disagree that they do not make decisions independentlythen someone, only 0.7%

57. When you go out, i look good for me, no oneelse

Page 50: Frequency Table

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

StronglyDisagree

13 4.5 4.5 4.5

Disagree 67 22.9 23.3 27.8Undecided 74 25.3 25.7 53.5Agree 103 35.3 35.8 89.2StronglyAgree

31 10.6 10.8 100.0

Total 288 98.6 100.0Missing System 4 1.4

Total 292 100.0This table illustrates that when you go out, I look good for me,no one else. Most of participant (35.8%) agrees that they thinkno one else look better than most people. In addition, 25.7% ofthem are undecided the respondents. However, quite few people orparticipants have strongly disagree that they think one of themlook good then someone, only 4.5%

58. Most happy in a relationship

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

StronglyAgree

38 13.0 13.2 13.2

Agree 101 34.6 35.2 48.4Undecided 87 29.8 30.3 78.7Disagree 52 17.8 18.1 96.9StronglyDisagree

9 3.1 3.1 100.0

Total 287 98.3 100.0Missing System 5 1.7

Total 292 100.0This table illustrates most happy in a relationship. Most ofparticipant (35.2%) agrees that they are happy in a relationshipthan most people. In addition, 30.3% of them are undecided therespondents. However, quite few people or participants have

Page 51: Frequency Table

strongly disagree that they do not happy in a relationship, only3.1%

59. Rely on the strength of others

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

StronglyAgree

5 1.7 1.7 1.7

Agree 63 21.6 21.9 23.6Undecided 75 25.7 26.0 49.7Disagree 122 41.8 42.4 92.0StronglyDisagree

23 7.9 8.0 100.0

Total 288 98.6 100.0Missing System 4 1.4

Total 292 100.0

This table illustrates the level of Rely on the strength ofothers. Most of participant (42.4%) disagrees that they don’trely on the strength of others than most people. In addition, 26%of them are undecided the respondents. However, quite few peopleor participants have strongly agreed that they reply on thestrength of others then someone, only 1.7%

60. Never been outstanding at anything

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

StronglyAgree

5 1.7 1.7 1.7

Agree 40 13.7 13.9 15.6Undecided 61 20.9 21.2 36.8Disagree 136 46.6 47.2 84.0StronglyDisagree

46 15.8 16.0 100.0

Total 288 98.6 100.0

Page 52: Frequency Table

Missing System 4 1.4

Total 292 100.0This table illustrates the level of been outstanding at anything.Most of participant (47.2%) disagrees that they have beenoutstanding at anything than most people. In addition, 21.2% ofthem are undecided the respondents. However, quite few people orparticipants have strongly agreed that they have never beenoutstanding at anything then someone, only 1.7%

61. Often talked into doing what others want

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

StronglyAgree

9 3.1 3.1 3.1

Agree 47 16.1 16.3 19.4Undecided 75 25.7 26.0 45.5Disagree 121 41.4 42.0 87.5StronglyDisagree

36 12.3 12.5 100.0

Total 288 98.6 100.0Missing System 4 1.4

Total 292 100.0

This table illustrates the levels of Often talked into doing whatothers want. Most of participant (42%) disagrees that they don’toften talk into doing what other want than most people. Inaddition, 26% of them are undecided the respondents. However,quite few people or participants have strongly agreed that theyoften talk into doing what other want then someone, only 3.1%

62. Prefer to go with the flow

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Page 53: Frequency Table

Valid

StronglyAgree

17 5.8 5.9 5.9

Agree 69 23.6 24.0 29.9Undecided 74 25.3 25.7 55.6Disagree 102 34.9 35.4 91.0StronglyDisagree

26 8.9 9.0 100.0

Total 288 98.6 100.0Missing System 4 1.4

Total 292 100.0This table illustrates the level of Prefer to go with the flow.Most of participant (35.4%) disagrees that they are not prefer togo with the flow than most people. In addition, 25.7% of them areundecided the respondents. However, quite few people orparticipants have strongly sagree that they do not prefer to gowith the flow then someone, only 5.9%

63. Cosmetic Surgery is Acceptable inSociety

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

ValidYes 46 15.8 16.0 16.0No 242 82.9 84.0 100.0Total 288 98.6 100.0

Missing

System

4 1.4

Total 292 100.0This table illustrates Cosmetic Surgery is Acceptable in Society.Most of participant (84%) agrees that cosmetic surgery isacceptable in society. However, quite few people or participantshave strongly disagree that cosmetic surgery is not acceptable insociety, only 16%

64. Favourable attitude towards cosmeticsurgery

Page 54: Frequency Table

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

ValidYes 181 62.0 62.8 62.8No 107 36.6 37.2 100.0Total 288 98.6 100.0

Missing

System

4 1.4

Total 292 100.0

This table illustrates the level of Favourable attitude towardscosmetic surgery. Most of participant (62.8%) agrees that theyhave favourable attitude towards cosmetic surgery. However, quitefew people or participants have strongly disagree that they don’thave favourable attitude towards cosmetic surgery, only 37.2%

65. Would undergo cosmetic surgery tobetter myself

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

ValidYes 239 81.8 83.0 83.0No 49 16.8 17.0 100.0Total 288 98.6 100.0

Missing

System

4 1.4

Total 292 100.0This table shows someone undergone cosmetic surgery to betterthan another one. Most of participant (83%) agrees that theywould undergo cosmetic surgery to better themselves. However,quite few people or participants have strongly disagree that theydon’t would undergo cosmetic surgery to better themselves, only17%

66. Have any family members undergonecosmetic surgery

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Page 55: Frequency Table

ValidYes 250 85.6 86.8 86.8No 38 13.0 13.2 100.0Total 288 98.6 100.0

Missing

System

4 1.4

Total 292 100.0

This table asks about any family members have undergone cosmeticsurgery. Most of participant (86.8%) agrees that they have theirfamily members undergone cosmetic surgery. However, quite fewpeople or participants have strongly disagree that they don’thave any family members undergo cosmetic surgery, only 13.2%

67. How would your rate the surgeryundertaken on family members

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Unfavourable

1 .3 2.9 2.9

BelowAverage

1 .3 2.9 5.9

Average 13 4.5 38.2 44.1AboveAverage

14 4.8 41.2 85.3

Favourable

5 1.7 14.7 100.0

Total 34 11.6 100.0Missing System 258 88.4

Total 292 100.0This table illustrates the rate the surgery undertaken on familymembers. Most of participant (41%) is above average that showsthe surgery undertaken on family members. In addition, 38.2% ofthem are average the respondents. However, quite few people orparticipants have unfavourable and below average that about theirrate surgery undertaken on family members, only 2.9%

Page 56: Frequency Table

68. Have any friends undergone cosmeticsurgery

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

ValidYes 224 76.7 78.3 78.3No 62 21.2 21.7 100.0Total 286 97.9 100.0

Missing

System

6 2.1

Total 292 100.0

This table illustrates the level of confidence participants. Mostof participant (78.3%) agree that they have any friends undergonecosmetic surgery. However, quite few people or participants havestrongly disagree that they don’t have any friends undergonecosmetic surgery, only 21.7%

69. How would your rate the surgeryundertaken on friends

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Unfavourable

3 1.0 4.9 4.9

BelowAverage

2 .7 3.3 8.2

Average 21 7.2 34.4 42.6AboveAverage

19 6.5 31.1 73.8

Favourable

16 5.5 26.2 100.0

Total 61 20.9 100.0Missing System 231 79.1

Total 292 100.0

Page 57: Frequency Table

This table illustrates their rate the surgery undertaken onfriends. Most of participant (34.4%) is average that their ratethe surgery have undertaken on friends. In addition, 31.1% ofthem are above average the respondents. However, quite few peopleor participants have strongly below average that how would yourrate the surgery undertaken on friends, only 3.3%

70. Have you ever undergone cosmeticsurgery

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

ValidYes 270 92.5 95.7 95.7No 12 4.1 4.3 100.0Total 282 96.6 100.0

Missing

System

10 3.4

Total 292 100.0

This table ask about have everyone ever undergone cosmeticsurgery. Most of participant (95.7%) agrees that they haveundergone cosmetic surgery. However, quite few people orparticipants have strongly disagree that they don’t they haveundergone cosmetic surgery, only 4.3%

71. How would your rate the surgeryundertaken on yourself

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Unfavourable

1 .3 8.3 8.3

BelowAverage

1 .3 8.3 16.7

Average 2 .7 16.7 33.3AboveAverage

4 1.4 33.3 66.7

Favourable

4 1.4 33.3 100.0

Page 58: Frequency Table

Total 12 4.1 100.0Missing System 280 95.9

Total 292 100.0This table illustrates about rating the surgery undertaken.Similarities between the above average and favourable respondentsare 33.3% that showing how would their rate the surgeryundertaken on them. However, quite few people or participantshave strongly unfavourable and below average, accounting for 8.3%

72. SexFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

ValidM 172 58.9 59.5 59.5F 117 40.1 40.5 100.0Total 289 99.0 100.0

Missing

System

3 1.0

Total 292 100.0Another aim for the researchers is to analyse participants basedon their gender. A descriptive analysis was used to analyse thegender of participant. Looking at valid percentages, most ofparticipant (59.5%) is male. However, only 40.5% is female.

73. BMI

Frequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Underweight

38 13.0 14.3 14.3

Healthy 189 64.7 71.3 85.7

Page 59: Frequency Table

Overweight

38 13.0 14.3 100.0

Total 265 90.8 100.0Missing System 27 9.2

Total 292 100.0This table illustrates about BMI. One measure commonly used tomeasure overweight and obesity is the Body Mass Index (BMI). TheBMI is a relationship between weight and height that isassociated with body fat, nutritional status and health risk.Through valid percentages, similarities between the underweightand overweight are 14.3%. However, the majority of the respondent( 71.3%) is healthy.

74. Weight CategoriesFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

<55kg 75 25.7 27.3 27.355kg-65kg

83 28.4 30.2 57.5

65kg-75kg

69 23.6 25.1 82.5

>75kg 48 16.4 17.5 100.0Total 275 94.2 100.0

Missing System 17 5.8

Total 292 100.0Another aim for the researchers is to analyse participants basedon their weight categories. Looking through the valid percentage,

Page 60: Frequency Table

it could be seen that most of people is from 55kg to 65kg,accounting for 30.2%, while only 17.5% of people who is over75kg.

75. Age CategoriesFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

<20 49 16.8 17.3 17.320-25 148 50.7 52.3 69.625-39 36 12.3 12.7 82.330+ 50 17.1 17.7 100.0Total 283 96.9 100.0

Missing

System

9 3.1

Total 292 100.0

Page 61: Frequency Table

Another aim for the researchers is to analyse participants basedon their age categories. Looking through the valid percentage, itcould be seen that most of people is from 20 to 25 years old,accounting for 52.3%, while only 12.7% of people who is from 25to 39 years old.

76. Height CategoriesFrequency

Percent

ValidPercent

Cumulative Percent

Valid <160cm 62 21.2 22.3 22.3160-170cm

111 38.0 39.9 62.2

170-180cm

78 26.7 28.1 90.3

180cm+ 27 9.2 9.7 100.0

Page 62: Frequency Table

Total 278 95.2 100.0Missing System 14 4.8

Total 292 100.0Another aim for the researchers is to analyse participants basedon their height categories. Looking through the valid percentage,it could be seen that most of people height from 160cm to 170cm,accounting for 39.9%, while only 9.7% of people who is heightover 180cm.

Page 63: Frequency Table