The Framework of Materials and Methods GROUP IV: 1. LINA SIRINGO-RINGO 2. NOVA ANGELIA SIRAIT 3. DENTY SIMANJUNTAK 4. MENTARI MALAU 5. ROMA TOGATOROP 6. ELLIN SINAGA
The Framework of Materials and Methods
GROUP IV:1. LINA SIRINGO-RINGO2. NOVA ANGELIA SIRAIT3. DENTY SIMANJUNTAK4. MENTARI MALAU5. ROMA TOGATOROP6. ELLIN SINAGA
Introduction : Setting the scene
As Richards (1985) says, “the current status of English has turned a significant percentage of the world’s population into part-time users or learners of English”
Special Problems
Difficulties
Teacher
Geographical isolation
Different Country have widely different
educational systems and philosophies
Setting the scene
context
syllabus
1.the various wide-ranging criteria on
which decisions about language teaching
proggrammes are based
2. The pedagogical principles according to which materials and methods are actually designed
framework
The Framework : Context & Syllabus
The reason why a group of learners in a particular environment needs to learn English
A Language Teaching Programme
The Framework learners
Context Implementations of goals
Educational settings Syllabus construction
Materials, classroom methods,(lessons,tests…..)
Fundamental Concept of Language teaching (Stern.1983)
1.Views of the nature of language
2.Views of the learner and of language learning
3.Views of teaching and the language teacher
4.The whole context
The Chief characteristics of the model
Comprehensive
Interdependent
Multidisciplinary
1.
2.
3.
Contextual Factors1. Learners
1.Age2.Interest3.Level of proficiency4.Aptitude5.Mother tongue6.Academic and educational level
7.Attitudes 8.Motivation9.Reasons for learning10.Preferred learning styles
11.Personality
2. SettingThe whole teaching and learning environment that will determine whether the aims of a language programme, defined with reference to the learner’s needs and characteristics,
are actually feasible and realistic
1.The role of English in the country
2.The role of English in the school
3.The teachers4.Management and administration
5.Resources available6.Support personnel
7. The number of pupil8. Time9. Physical environment10. The socio-cultural environment11.The types of tests used12. Procedures for monitoring and evaluating
The Syllabus
1. Approach
Richard and Rogers (2001) have proposed a useful framework for the comparison of language teaching methods that illustrates the place of the syllabus in programme planning
2. Design
3.Procedure
Three distinct Levels
We can identify 6 broad types of syllabus:
1. Grammatical or structural
2. Functional-notional
3. Situational4. Skill based5. Topic-based6. Task-based
DESIGN OF MATERIALS AND METHODSSimple past;
irregular verbs the passive. (1) Formation of adverbs
type 3 conditionals Gerunds and infinitives.
In the restaurant At the hotel,
(3) In the post office,
At a garage.
TSpace travel,
(5) Intelligence tests, Smoking, The weather.
2a). Making suggestions asking for directions, Giving advice, Introducing yourself.2b). Location,
Duration, Ability.
Making notes from a talk,
Reading for information,(4) Using a dictionary,
Writing an exam answerLanguage focus: question
forms, Vocabulary: meeting people,
Skills: speaking, listening, (6) Task preparation: listen to the people meeting,
Task: interviews Task follow-up.
1. Grammatical or structural
2. Functional-notional
3. Situational 4. Skill based
5.Topic-based
6. Task-based
Two explanatory points :
1. Most syllabuses are based on a combination of two or more of the types we have illustrated.
2. To bear in the mind here is the need to distinguish between the syllabuses itself, and what we might calls a ‘syllabus inventory’. The inventory is simply a list of the contents to be covered in the language programme whether that is a list of functional or grammatical items, or of skills, or of topics and situations.
The ‘syllabus’ is the way in which that content is organized and broken down into a set of teachable and learnable units, and will include consideration of pacing, sequencing and grading of items, methods of presentations and practice and so on.