Courtney Stevens, PhD Brain Development Laboratory University of Oregon & Sarah Lawrence College From risk to resilience in human brain development: A framework for planning early childhood interventions World Bank May 2008
Courtney Stevens, PhD
Brain Development Laboratory
University of Oregon &
Sarah Lawrence College
From risk to resilience in human brain development: A framework for planning early childhood interventions
World Bank May 2008
Broad Framework
1.! Some neural systems and subsystems are highly modifiable (neuroplastic), with the potential for either enhancement or vulnerability.
2.! The most plastic neural systems are also vulnerable among individuals from lower socioeconomic backgrounds.
3.! Early environmental enrichment in the form of interventions can protect and enhance the plastic and thus potentially vulnerable neurocognitive systems in children with, or at risk for, developmental deficits.
Neville, H., & Bavelier, D. (2000), Specificity and Plasticity in Neurocognitive Development in Humans, in The New Cognitive Neurosciences Stevens, C., & Neville, H. (2006). Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
A Human Brain
Birth! 6 years! 14 years"
Old!
Human Brain Development Conel (1939~1963)
Synapse Development Human Brain
Adapted from P. Huttenlocher et. al. (1979-1997)
Motor
control!
Vision!
Faces!Social skills!
Emotions!
Language!
Hearing!
Approaches to studying brain plasticity
Specialized Adult Brain
Retrospective studies: adults with different sensory or language experience
Prospective studies: Children of different ages
Structure Function Connectivity
MRI Images
Event-related Brain Potentials (ERPs)
1.!Constrained
2.!Modifiable by and dependent on experience during particular time periods (multiple)
3. Modifiable throughout life
Different Profiles of Plasticity
Low High
Low
High
CUBA
SWE
NL,G
CAN
US
IRE
GB NZ NI
Language
Literacy Numeracy
Health Longevity
Western Society Socio-economic status (SES) gradients
SES (parents’ education and occupation)
Pakulak E, Harris AM, Yamada Y, Coch D, Schachter J & Neville H (2002) Cognitive Neuroscience Society
Vulnerability of Syntax: Adults with lower language proficiency
Vulnerability of Syntax: Adults from lower SES backgrounds
Pakulak E, Harris AM, Yamada Y, Coch D, Schachter J & Neville H (2002) Cognitive Neuroscience Society
Sanders, L., Stevens, C., Coch, D., & Neville, H. (2006). Neuropsychologia
Attention in typically developing children
Story 1unattended! Story 2 attended!
ba! buzz ! buzz! buzz! ba! buzz!
Blue Kangaroo !Harry the Dog!
ERP to probes in Blue Kangaroo story!
Attend Blue Kangaroo Story!
Attend Harry the Dog Story!
Attention vulnerability: Children from lower SES backgrounds
Stevens, C., Lauinger, L., & Neville, H. (In press). Developmental Science
Difficulty suppressing response to unattended stimuli.
High SES*
Low SES*
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
Attended UnattendedMean
am
pli
tud
e,
10
0-2
00
msec (
in m
icro
vo
lts)
High SES
Low SES
Unpacking SES
Prenatal care Nutrition
Depression Nurturance/neglect
$ SCHOOLS!
Cortisol Perception of inequality
Parental Attitudes/education
Social support Books
not
talkative
moderately
talkative
talkative
Differences in Amount of Language from Parent to Child
Hart B & Risley T (1995) Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience
of Young American Children
children talkative families
children moderately talkative families
children families not talkative
Differences in Growth of Child Language
Hart B & Risley T (1995) Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience
of Young American Children
Sorting Out Genes and Environment
Correlation ! Causation
Attention only modulated early sensorineural processing in the TD group
(group x attn, P < .005; see figure) TD SLI
P > .4
Specific Language Impairment (SLI)
Stevens, Sanders, & Neville (2006). Brain Research
Stevens C, Fanning J, Coch, D., Sanders L & Neville H (2008) Brain Research
Building an intervention framework
•! Using neuroimaging techniques, we observe differences in brain function among children and adults from different socioeconomic backgrounds
•! However, vulnerable neural systems can also be enhanced
•! Could an early intervention serve to buffer and protect these vulnerable neural systems?
Neville, H. & Lawson, D. (1987). Brain Research Roder, B.,Teder-Salejarvi, W., Sterr, A., Rosler, F., Hillyard, S., & Neville, H. (2001). Nature Stevens, C., Fanning, J., Coch, D., Sanders, L., Neville, H. (2008). Brain Research
Intervention Overview: Collaborations with Head Start
•! All children living at or below the poverty level
•! Participating families randomly assigned to a control group or one of several training programs
•! Over 100 participants to date
Today’s focus: Parent training model
Parent Training
Fanning, J., Sundborg, S., Neville, H. (2007). Cognitive Neuroscience Society Fanning, J. (2007). Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon.
•! Identified known risk factors for children –!Stress
–! Language
–!Behavioral control/ emotional regulation
•! Identified evidence-based strategies / approaches for targeting each domain
•! Examined literature for existing programs using these strategies / approaches
Reduce child stress: Patterson et al., 1975; Deater-Deckard, 2005; Kazden & Whitley, 2003
Enhance language: Bruner, 1983; Maccoby & Martin, 1983; Hart & Risley, 1995
Support behavioral control / emotional regulation: Patterson et al., 1973, 1982
Success in Parenting: Fischer et al, 1997
INteREActive Language training program (INREAL): Weiss et al, 1981
Parent Training
Reduce family stress
Enhance language &
cognitive development
Promote pro-social
behavior & self-regulation
!!Eight weekly, 2 hour sessions
!!Food, childcare, transportation, and prizes provided as attendance and participation incentives
Fanning, J., Sundborg, S., Neville, H. (2007). Cognitive Neuroscience Society Fanning, J. (2007). Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon.
Adapted elements of existing programs to target parents of typically developing preschool children.
Parent Training: Key Components
•! Provide high levels of positive reinforcement and specific praise
•! Use consistent discipline with clear expectations
& natural consequences
•! Use language differently to encourage high-
quality interactions
•! Provide frequent opportunities for the children to
Choose, Think, Solve Problems
Fanning, J., Sundborg, S., Neville, H. (2007). Cognitive Neuroscience Society Fanning, J. (2007). Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon.
Hypothesis
Training parents in these strategies will change their parenting behaviors and stress levels.
These parenting changes will have a “trickle down” effect on children such that children’s increased emotional regulation & decreased stress " will lead to improved cognition, language, & brain
organization
Fanning, J., Sundborg, S., Neville, H. (2007). Cognitive Neuroscience Society Fanning, J. (2007). Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon.
Participants
•! 28 children, randomly assigned –! 14 children’s parents receive training
–! 14 children in control group
•! No differences between groups in: –! Children’s age, gender, receptive language, or nonverbal
intelligence
–! Parents’ age, marital/partnered status, or education level
–! Family’s socioeconomic background
Fanning, J., Sundborg, S., Neville, H. (2007). Cognitive Neuroscience Society Fanning, J. (2007). Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon.
•! Primary caregiver’s language use and interaction behaviors during 10-minute free-play with child (SALT-8 transcription)
•! Primary caregiver’s self-reported parenting stress levels
(Parent Daily Report)
•! Child’s language and cognition (standardized
assessments)
All testers/raters blind to intervention condition
Fanning, J., Sundborg, S., Neville, H. (2007). Cognitive Neuroscience Society Fanning, J. (2007). Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon.
Changes in Parent Interaction Behaviors
Parent Interaction Behaviors (SALT-8)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Bal. Trn. Bal. Trn. Ch. Dir. Ch. Dir. Lang. Mod. Lang. Mod.
TX CTL TX CTL TX CTL
Per
cen
tage
Occ
ure
nce
*
*
Direction: Optimal
Therapeutic Gain
*
Balanced Turn Taking Language Modeling
Parent Interaction Behaviors (SALT-8)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Bal. Trn. Bal. Trn. Ch. Dir. Ch. Dir. Lang. Mod. Lang. Mod.
TX CTL TX CTL TX CTL
Per
cen
tage
Occ
ure
nce
Parent Interaction Behaviors (SALT-8)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Bal. Trn. Bal. Trn. Ch. Dir. Ch. Dir. Lang. Mod. Lang. Mod.
TX CTL TX CTL TX CTL
Per
cen
tage
Occ
ure
nce
*
*
Fanning, J., Sundborg, S., Neville, H. (2007). Cognitive Neuroscience Society Fanning, J. (2007). Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon.
Changes in Parent Stress
*
*
Direction: Optimal
Therapeutic Gain
Perceived Stress
Fanning, J., Sundborg, S., Neville, H. (2007). Cognitive Neuroscience Society Fanning, J. (2007). Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon.
Changes in Child Conduct Problems
*
*
Direction: Optimal
Therapeutic Gain
Conduct Problems
Fanning, J., Sundborg, S., Neville, H. (2007). Cognitive Neuroscience Society Fanning, J. (2007). Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon.
Changes in Child Language
* *
Receptive Language Direction: Optimal
Therapeutic Gain
Fanning, J., Sundborg, S., Neville, H. (2007). Cognitive Neuroscience Society Fanning, J. (2007). Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon.
Changes in Child Nonverbal IQ
* *
Nonverbal IQ Direction: Optimal
Therapeutic Gain
Fanning, J., Sundborg, S., Neville, H. (2007). Cognitive Neuroscience Society Fanning, J. (2007). Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon.
Changes in Child Attention
*
*
Sustained Attention Direction: Optimal
Therapeutic Gain
Fanning, J., Sundborg, S., Neville, H. (2007). Cognitive Neuroscience Society Fanning, J. (2007). Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon.
Changes in Child Memory
*
*
Associative Memory Direction: Optimal
Therapeutic Gain
Fanning, J., Sundborg, S., Neville, H. (2007). Cognitive Neuroscience Society Fanning, J. (2007). Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon.
•! Following short-term parent training,
#! Parents changed their behaviors
#! Parents reported reduced stress
#! Children’s language, cognition, and attention improved
•! Ongoing studies #! Examining effects on electrophysiological measures of brain
organization
#! Following children longitudinally as they enter the K-12 school system
#! Replicating study with a larger sample
#! Contrasting parent-focused training with child-focused, pull-out training during the school day
Future Research
1. Determine time periods of plasticity of other brain systems.
2. Determine the mechanisms that confer plasticity.
3. Determine the interventions that can enhance plasticity.
**4. Convince the public and policy makers to be guided by evidence from brain research.
5. Design and implement evidence-based educational and support programs that optimize human development.
Research Associates Ted Bell Jessica Fanning Christina Karns Courtney Stevens Yoshiko Yamada
Graduate Students Annika Andersson Jeff Currin Justin Hulbert Eric Pakulak Stephanie Sundborg
Collaborators Bavelier, Daphne (U of Rochester) Coch, Donna (Dartmouth) Corina, David (UC Davis) Mills, Debra (Emory University) Roeder, Brigitte (U of Hamburg, Germany) Sanders, Lisa (U Mass Amherst) Weber-Fox, Chris (Purdue)
Research Assistants Olivia Bagdade Mark Dow Scott Klein David Paulsen
Technical Staff Paul Compton Linda Heidenreich Ray Vukcevich
Funding: NIH, IES