FOURTH QUARTER 2019 GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT Southside Facility #26463 8816 Fingerboard Road Frederick, MD 21704 MDE Case No. 2006-0245-FR Prepared For: Mr. Nick Psenicnik Oil Control Program Maryland Department of the Environment 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore, Maryland 21230 Mr. Michael Lindeman Sunoco, LP/Evergreen Resources Group, LLC 2 Righter Parkway, Suite 120 Wilmington, DE 19803 Prepared By: EnviroTrac LTD 155 Riverbend Drive, Suite A Charlottesville, Virginia 22911 Phone: (434) 202-7808 January 23, 2020
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
FOURTH QUARTER 2019 GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT
Southside Facility #26463 8816 Fingerboard Road
Frederick, MD 21704 MDE Case No. 2006-0245-FR
Prepared For:
Mr. Nick Psenicnik Oil Control Program
Maryland Department of the Environment 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore, Maryland 21230
Mr. Michael Lindeman
Sunoco, LP/Evergreen Resources Group, LLC 2 Righter Parkway, Suite 120
Wilmington, DE 19803
Prepared By:
EnviroTrac LTD 155 Riverbend Drive, Suite A Charlottesville, Virginia 22911
Phone: (434) 202-7808
January 23, 2020
GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT
Site Name: Southside Facility #26463 Site Address: 8816 Fingerboard Road Frederick, MD 21704 (Figure 1)
Client Contact: Mr. Michael Lindeman Regulatory Contacts: Mr. Nick Psenicnik – Maryland Department of the Environment Field Activities: Groundwater Gauging and Sampling Monitoring Period: October 1, 2019 – December 31, 2019 Gauging Activities: Monitoring wells MW-2, MW-5, MW-9, MW-14, and tank field wells
TF-1R, TF-2R, and TF-3R were gauged on December 17, 2019. Wells were gauged using an electronic interface probe capable of measuring Light Non-Aqueous Phase Liquids (LNAPL) to 0.01 foot. LNAPL was not detected in the monitoring well network on December 17, 2019. Depth to water measurements ranged from approximately 25.53 feet (MW-5) to 31.96 (MW-9) below the top of the well casing. Prior to gauging the wells, the headspace of the well was screened using a photoionization detector (PID) immediately after removing the well cap. PID readings are presented below.
Well ID PID Reading (ppm) MW-2 250.9 MW-5 0.0 MW-9 330.3 W-14 261.0 TF-1R 247.9 TF-2R 293.4 TF-3R 207.0
Historic water gauging data are summarized in Table 1. Gauging locations are depicted on Figure 2 and a potentiometric surface map based on the December 17, 2019 gauging data is provided as Figure 3. Groundwater flow direction was determined to be towards the north at a gradient of approximately 5.7%.
Groundwater Sampling: On December 17, 2019, monitoring wells MW-2, MW-5, MW-9, and
MW-14 were purged of approximately three well volumes of
groundwater using an electric purge pump and then sampled using dedicated polyethylene tubing. Groundwater samples were then transferred into laboratory supplied containers, and immediately placed on ice. To minimize the potential for cross contamination during sample collection, all reusable equipment was decontaminated prior to use. Decontamination procedures consisted of using distilled water and Liquinox soap solution wash, a distilled water rinse, a final distilled water rinse, and air drying. Monitoring well samples were shipped under standard chain of custody procedures to Pace Analytical Services, National Center for Testing and Analysis (Pace) in Mount Juliet, Tennessee for analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) fuel oxygenates and naphthalene in accordance with EPA Method 8260, and total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) gasoline range organics (GRO) and diesel range organics (DRO) in accordance with EPA Method 8015. On December 17, 2019, EnviroTrac also collected a potable water sample from the onsite drinking water supply well designated as PW-1. The sample was transferred into laboratory supplied containers, and immediately placed on ice. The potable water sample was shipped to Pace for analysis of VOCs fuel oxygenates in accordance with EPA Method 524.2.
Groundwater Analytical Summary: The results of the December 17, 2019, groundwater sampling event
remained relatively consistent with the results of the previous sampling events. A summary of the results is present below.
Concentrations of compounds of concern (COCs) were
below laboratory detection limits (BDL) in wells MW-5; Concentrations of benzene were reported at 69.30
micrograms per liter (µg/L) in well MW-2 and at 6.10 µg/L in well MW-14;
Concentrations of toluene were reported at 36.90 µg/L in well MW-2 and BDL in wells MW-5, MW-9, and MW-14;
Concentrations of ethylbenzene were BDL in all wells sampled;
Concentrations of total xylenes were reported at 19.80 µg/L in well MW-2 and BDL in wells MW-5, MW-9, and MW-14.
Concentrations of methyl tert butyl ether (MTBE) were reported at 600 µg/L in well MW-2 and at 264 µg/L in well MW-14;
Concentrations of tert butyl alcohol (TBA) were at a concentration of 624 µg/L in well MW-2 and at 25.5 µg/L in well MW-14;
Concentrations of tert amyl methyl ether (TAME) were reported at 170 µg/L in well MW-2 and at 89.9 µg/L in well MW-14;
Concentrations of ethyl tert butyl ether (ETBE) were BDL in all wells sampled;
Concentrations of di-isopropyl ether (DIPE) were reported at 2,800 µg/L in well MW-2 and at 1,800 µg/L in well MW-14;
Concentrations of naphthalene were BDL in all wells sampled;
Concentrations of TPH GRO were reported at 5.98 milligrams per liter (mg/L) in well MW-2, at 0.136 mg/L in well MW-9, and at 3.27 mg/L in well MW-14;
Concentrations of TPH DRO were reported at 4.83 mg/L in well MW-2 and at 0.246 mg/L in well MW-14; and
Concentrations of each COC in the potable well sample (PW-1) were BDL, except for MTBE, which had a reported concentration of 1.27 µg/L.
A copy of the laboratory analytical report is included in Appendix A;
historic groundwater analytical data are summarized in Table 1; a geographic distribution of the groundwater analytical data is provided as Figure 4.
Conclusions: Concentrations of COCs in the groundwater samples collected
during the 4th Quarter 2019 remained consistent with previous sampling events. Samples collected from monitoring wells directly downgradient of the tank field (MW-2 and MW-14) exhibited the highest dissolved petroleum impact, while concentrations of COCs in the up- to cross-gradient wells (MW-5 and MW-9) were BDL or just above laboratory detection limits. The analytical results of the sample collected from the onsite potable well (PW-1) are consistent with previous years reporting a concentration of MTBE less than 2 ug/l (Table 2).
Future Site Activities: EnviroTrac recommends monitoring and sampling of the monitoring
well network during first quarter 2020 in accordance with High-Risk Groundwater Use Area (HRGUA) guidelines. Following the sampling event, a quarterly groundwater monitoring and sampling report will be prepared and submitted to MDE that includes a dissolved hydrocarbon trend analysis for evaluation of continued sampling frequency.
Attachments: Table 1: Monitoring Well Gauging Data and Historical Groundwater Analytical Summary
Table 2: Potable Well Historical Analytical Summary
Figure 1: Site Location Map Figure 2: Site Plan Figure 3: Potentiometric Surface Map Figure 4: Groundwater Analytical Results Map Appendix A: Analytical Laboratory Report
TABLES
Sample ID Date
Top of Casing Elevation
Depth to Water(feet)
Depth to Hydro‐carbon
(feet)
Hydro‐carbon Thickness(feet)
Corrected GW Elevation(feet)
Benzene(µg/L)
Toluene(µg/L)
Ethyl‐ benzene(µg/L)
Total Xylenes(µg/L)
Total BTEX(µg/L)
MTBE(µg/L)
TBA(µg/L)
TAME(µg/L)
ETBE(µg/L)
DIPE(µg/L)
Naph‐ thalene(µg/L)
TPH GRO (mg/L)
TPH DRO (mg/L)
04/01/2010 97.37 28.58 ND ND 68.79 ND(1.0) ND(1.0) ND(1.0) ND(1.0) BRL 6.1 ND(25) ND(5.0) ND(5.0) ND(5.0) ND(5.0) NA NA
08/30/2010 97.37 30.97 ND ND 66.40 ND(5) ND(5) ND(5) ND(5) BRL 530 ND(80) 11 ND(5) 8 ND(5) NA NA
02/21/2014 97.37 29.22 ND ND 68.15 ND(5) ND(5) ND(5) ND(5) BRL ND(5) ND(80) ND(5) ND(5) ND(5) ND(5) NA NA
08/01/2016 97.37 30.06 ND ND 67.31 ND(1) ND(1) ND(1) ND(1) BRL ND(1) ND(20) ND(1) ND(1) ND(1) ND(5) NA NA
08/15/2017 97.37 32.11 ND ND 65.26 ND(1) ND(1) ND(1) ND(1) BRL 2 ND(20) ND(1) ND(1) 39 ND(5) NA NA
10/30/2018 97.37 26.55 ND ND 70.82 370 24 ND(1) 15 409 120 ND(25) 75 ND(1) 760 ND(10) NA NA
01/29/2019 97.37 25.27 ND ND 72.10 500 4 ND(1) 6 510 140 370 100 ND(1) 620 ND(10) NA NA
03/14/2019 97.37 25.42 ND ND 71.95 210 1 ND(1) ND(5) 211 110 320 64 ND(1) 390 ND(10) NA NA
BRL - Below laboratory reporting limits NA - Not analyzed
BTEX - Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes ND(5.0) - Not detected at or above the laboratory reporting limit, laboratory reporting limit included.
J - Indicates an estimated value TBA - Tertiary Butyl Alcohol
* MDE standards referenced from the State of Maryland Department of the Environment Cleanup Standards for Soil and Groundwater dated October 2018, Interim Final Guidance (Update No. 3)
BTEX ‐ Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenesDIPE ‐ Di‐Isopropyl EtherETBE ‐ Ethyl Tertiary Butyl EtherJ ‐ Indicates an estimated valueMTBE ‐ Methyl Tert Butyl EtherNA ‐ Not analyzedND(5.0) ‐ Not detected at or above the laboratory reporting limit, laboratory reporting limit included.NS ‐ Not sampled
TAME ‐ Tertiary Amyl Methyl EtherTBA ‐ Tertiary Butyl Alcohol
Frederick, Maryland
TABLE 2
Potable Well (On‐site) Analytical DataSouthside Facility #264638816 Fingerboard Road
Page 1 of 1
erics
Sticky Note
remove comments column
FIGURES
APPENDIX A
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
ANALYTICAL REPORTDecember 26, 2019
EnviroTrac Ltd. - Sunoco
Sample Delivery Group: L1172207
Samples Received: 12/18/2019
Project Number: 07923998
Description: Fingerboard Road
Site: 0792-3998
Report To: Eric Shertzer
155 Riverbend Drive
Suite A
Charlottesville, VA 22911
Entire Report Reviewed By:
December 26, 2019
[Preliminary Report]
Olivia StudebakerPro ject Manager
Results relate only to the items tested or calibrated and are reported as rounded values. This test report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. Where applicable, sampling conducted by Pace Analytical National is performed per guidance provided in laboratory standard operating procedures ENV-SOP-MTJL-0067 and ENV-SOP-MTJL-0068. Where sampling conducted by the customer, results relate to the accuracy of the information provided, and as the samples are received.
12065 Lebanon Rd Mount Jul iet , TN 37122 615-758-5858 800-767-5859 www.pacenational .com
All sample aliquots were received at the correct temperature, in the proper containers, with the appropriate preservatives, and within method specified holding times, unless qualified or notated withinthe report. Where applicable, all MDL (LOD) and RDL (LOQ) values reported for environmental sampleshave been corrected for the dilution factor used in the analysis. All Method and Batch Quality Control are within established criteria except where addressed in this case narrative, a non-conformance form or properly qualified within the sample results. By my digital signature below, I affirm to the best of my knowledge, all problems/anomalies observed by the laboratory as having the potential to affect the quality of the data have been identified by the laboratory, and no information or data have been knowingly withheld that would affect the quality of the data.
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARYWG1399177V o l a t i l e O r g a n i c C o m p o u n d s ( G C ) b y M e t h o d 8 0 1 5 D / G R O L 1 1 7 2 2 0 7 - 0 2 , 0 3 , 0 4 , 0 5
Method Blank (MB)
(MB) R3485333-2 12/18/19 23:20
MB Result MB Qualifier MB MDL MB RDL
Analyte ug/l ug/l ug/l
TPH (GC/FID) Low Fraction 32.4 J 31.4 100
(S) a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene(FID) 111 78.0-120
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
(LCS) R3485333-1 12/18/19 20:38
Spike Amount LCS Result LCS Rec. Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARYWG1401765V o l a t i l e O r g a n i c C o m p o u n d s ( G C / M S ) b y M e t h o d 5 2 4 . 2 L 1 1 7 2 2 0 7 - 0 1
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARYWG1401765V o l a t i l e O r g a n i c C o m p o u n d s ( G C / M S ) b y M e t h o d 5 2 4 . 2 L 1 1 7 2 2 0 7 - 0 1
Method Blank (MB)
(MB) R3485710-2 12/24/19 12:31
MB Result MB Qualifier MB MDL MB RDL
Analyte ug/l ug/l ug/l
1,2,3-Trichloropropane U 0.0720 0.500
Methyl tert-butyl ether U 0.0530 0.500
(S) 4-Bromofluorobenzene 96.0 70.0-130
(S) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 92.3 70.0-130
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
(LCS) R3485710-1 12/24/19 11:40
Spike Amount LCS Result LCS Rec. Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARYWG1401765V o l a t i l e O r g a n i c C o m p o u n d s ( G C / M S ) b y M e t h o d 5 2 4 . 2 L 1 1 7 2 2 0 7 - 0 1
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
(LCS) R3485710-1 12/24/19 11:40
Spike Amount LCS Result LCS Rec. Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARYWG1399343V o l a t i l e O r g a n i c C o m p o u n d s ( G C / M S ) b y M e t h o d 8 2 6 0 B L 1 1 7 2 2 0 7 - 0 2 , 0 3 , 0 4 , 0 5
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARYWG1399343V o l a t i l e O r g a n i c C o m p o u n d s ( G C / M S ) b y M e t h o d 8 2 6 0 B L 1 1 7 2 2 0 7 - 0 2 , 0 3 , 0 4 , 0 5
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARYWG1399343V o l a t i l e O r g a n i c C o m p o u n d s ( G C / M S ) b y M e t h o d 8 2 6 0 B L 1 1 7 2 2 0 7 - 0 2 , 0 3 , 0 4 , 0 5
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
(LCS) R3484451-1 12/19/19 07:57
Spike Amount LCS Result LCS Rec. Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARYWG1399343V o l a t i l e O r g a n i c C o m p o u n d s ( G C / M S ) b y M e t h o d 8 2 6 0 B L 1 1 7 2 2 0 7 - 0 2 , 0 3 , 0 4 , 0 5
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
(LCS) R3484451-1 12/19/19 07:57
Spike Amount LCS Result LCS Rec. Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARYWG1400186V o l a t i l e O r g a n i c C o m p o u n d s ( G C / M S ) b y M e t h o d 8 2 6 0 B L 1 1 7 2 2 0 7 - 0 2 , 0 3 , 0 4 , 0 5
Method Blank (MB)
(MB) R3484828-3 12/20/19 11:17
MB Result MB Qualifier MB MDL MB RDL
Analyte ug/l ug/l ug/l
Di-isopropyl ether U 0.320 1.00
2-Hexanone U 3.82 10.0
Methyl tert-butyl ether U 0.367 1.00
t-Amyl Alcohol U 4.90 50.0
(S) Toluene-d8 100 80.0-120
(S) 4-Bromofluorobenzene 92.9 77.0-126
(S) 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 98.7 70.0-130
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
(LCS) R3484828-2 12/20/19 09:41
Spike Amount LCS Result LCS Rec. Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARYWG1400917V o l a t i l e O r g a n i c C o m p o u n d s ( G C / M S ) b y M e t h o d 8 2 6 0 B L 1 1 7 2 2 0 7 - 0 2 , 0 4 , 0 5
Method Blank (MB)
(MB) R3485394-2 12/21/19 18:41
MB Result MB Qualifier MB MDL MB RDL
Analyte ug/l ug/l ug/l
t-Amyl Alcohol U 4.90 50.0
(S) Toluene-d8 102 80.0-120
(S) 4-Bromofluorobenzene 96.6 77.0-126
(S) 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 105 70.0-130
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
(LCS) R3485394-1 12/21/19 18:02
Spike Amount LCS Result LCS Rec. Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARYWG1399216S e m i - V o l a t i l e O r g a n i c C o m p o u n d s ( G C ) b y M e t h o d 3 5 1 1 / 8 0 1 5 L 1 1 7 2 2 0 7 - 0 2
Method Blank (MB)
(MB) R3484528-1 12/20/19 01:28
MB Result MB Qualifier MB MDL MB RDL
Analyte ug/l ug/l ug/l
TPH (GC/FID) High Fraction U 24.7 100
(S) o-Terphenyl 83.5 31.0-160
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) • Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (LCSD)
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARYWG1400876S e m i - V o l a t i l e O r g a n i c C o m p o u n d s ( G C ) b y M e t h o d 3 5 1 1 / 8 0 1 5 L 1 1 7 2 2 0 7 - 0 3 , 0 4 , 0 5
Method Blank (MB)
(MB) R3485062-1 12/22/19 11:30
MB Result MB Qualifier MB MDL MB RDL
Analyte ug/l ug/l ug/l
TPH (GC/FID) High Fraction U 24.7 100
(S) o-Terphenyl 79.5 31.0-160
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) • Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (LCSD)
Guide to Reading and Understanding Your Laboratory Report
The information below is designed to better explain the various terms used in your report of analytical results from the Laboratory. This is not intended as a comprehensive explanation, and if you have additional questions please contact your project representative.
Results Disclaimer - Information that may be provided by the customer, and contained within this report, include Permit Limits, Project Name, Sample ID, Sample Matrix, Sample Preservation, Field Blanks, Field Spikes, Field Duplicates, On-Site Data, Sampling Collection Dates/Times, and Sampling Location. Results relate to the accuracy of this information provided, and as the samples are received.
Abbreviations and Definitions
MDL Method Detection Limit.
ND Not detected at the Reporting Limit (or MDL where applicable).
RDL Reported Detection Limit.
Rec. Recovery.
RPD Relative Percent Difference.
SDG Sample Delivery Group.
(S)Surrogate (Surrogate Standard) - Analytes added to every blank, sample, Laboratory Control Sample/Duplicate and Matrix Spike/Duplicate; used to evaluate analytical efficiency by measuring recovery. Surrogates are not expected to be detected in all environmental media.
U Not detected at the Reporting Limit (or MDL where applicable).
Analyte The name of the particular compound or analysis performed. Some Analyses and Methods will have multiple analytes reported.
Dilution
If the sample matrix contains an interfering material, the sample preparation volume or weight values differ from the standard, or if concentrations of analytes in the sample are higher than the highest limit of concentration that the laboratory can accurately report, the sample may be diluted for analysis. If a value different than 1 is used in this field, the result reported has already been corrected for this factor.
LimitsThese are the target % recovery ranges or % difference value that the laboratory has historically determined as normal for the method and analyte being reported. Successful QC Sample analysis will target all analytes recovered or duplicated within these ranges.
QualifierThis column provides a letter and/or number designation that corresponds to additional information concerning the resultreported. If a Qualifier is present, a definition per Qualifier is provided within the Glossary and Definitions page and potentially a discussion of possible implications of the Qualifier in the Case Narrative if applicable.
Result
The actual analytical final result (corrected for any sample specific characteristics) reported for your sample. If there was no measurable result returned for a specific analyte, the result in this column may state “ND” (Not Detected) or “BDL” (Below Detectable Levels). The information in the results column should always be accompanied by either an MDL (Method Detection Limit) or RDL (Reporting Detection Limit) that defines the lowest value that the laboratory could detect or report for this analyte.
Uncertainty (Radiochemistry) Confidence level of 2 sigma.
Case Narrative (Cn)A brief discussion about the included sample results, including a discussion of any non-conformances to protocol observed either at sample receipt by the laboratory from the field or during the analytical process. If present, there will be a section in the Case Narrative to discuss the meaning of any data qualifiers used in the report.
Quality Control Summary (Qc)
This section of the report includes the results of the laboratory quality control analyses required by procedure or analytical methods to assist in evaluating the validity of the results reported for your samples. These analyses are not being performed on your samples typically, but on laboratory generated material.
Sample Chain of Custody (Sc)
This is the document created in the field when your samples were initially collected. This is used to verify the time and date of collection, the person collecting the samples, and the analyses that the laboratory is requested to perform. This chain of custody also documents all persons (excluding commercial shippers) that have had control or possession of the samples from the time of collection until delivery to the laboratory for analysis.
Sample Results (Sr)This section of your report will provide the results of all testing performed on your samples. These results are provided by sample ID and are separated by the analyses performed on each sample. The header line of each analysis section foreach sample will provide the name and method number for the analysis reported.
Sample Summary (Ss) This section of the Analytical Report defines the specific analyses performed for each sample ID, including the dates andtimes of preparation and/or analysis.
Qualifier Description
B The same analyte is found in the associated blank.
J The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
J4 The associated batch QC was outside the established quality control range for accuracy.
Pace National is the only environmental laboratory accredited/certified to support your work nationwide from one location. One phone call, one point of contact, one laboratory. No other lab is as accessible or prepared to handle your needs throughout the country. Our capacity and capability from our single location laboratory is comparable to the collective totals of the network laboratories in our industry. The most significant benefit to our one location design is the design of our laboratory campus. The model is conducive to accelerated productivity, decreasing turn-around time, and preventing cross contamination, thus protecting sample integrity. Our focus on premium quality and prompt service allows us to be YOUR LAB OF CHOICE. * Not all certifications held by the laboratory are applicable to the results reported in the attached report. * Accreditation is only applicable to the test methods specified on each scope of accreditation held by Pace National.
State AccreditationsAlabama 40660 Nebraska NE-OS-15-05
Alaska 17-026 Nevada TN-03-2002-34
Arizona AZ0612 New Hampshire 2975
Arkansas 88-0469 New Jersey–NELAP TN002
California 2932 New Mexico ¹ n/a
Colorado TN00003 New York 11742
Connecticut PH-0197 North Carolina Env375
Florida E87487 North Carolina ¹ DW21704
Georgia NELAP North Carolina ³ 41
Georgia ¹ 923 North Dakota R-140
Idaho TN00003 Ohio–VAP CL0069
Illinois 200008 Oklahoma 9915
Indiana C-TN-01 Oregon TN200002
Iowa 364 Pennsylvania 68-02979
Kansas E-10277 Rhode Island LAO00356
Kentucky ¹ ⁶ 90010 South Carolina 84004
Kentucky ² 16 South Dakota n/a
Louisiana AI30792 Tennessee ¹ ⁴ 2006
Louisiana ¹ LA180010 Texas T104704245-18-15
Maine TN0002 Texas ⁵ LAB0152
Maryland 324 Utah TN00003
Massachusetts M-TN003 Vermont VT2006
Michigan 9958 Virginia 460132
Minnesota 047-999-395 Washington C847
Mississippi TN00003 West Virginia 233
Missouri 340 Wisconsin 9980939910
Montana CERT0086 Wyoming A2LA
Third Party Federal AccreditationsA2LA – ISO 17025 1461.01 AIHA-LAP,LLC EMLAP 100789
A2LA – ISO 17025 ⁵ 1461.02 DOD 1461.01
Canada 1461.01 USDA P330-15-00234
EPA–Crypto TN00003
ACCREDITATIONS & LOCATIONS
¹ Drinking Water ² Underground Storage Tanks ³ Aquatic Toxicity ⁴ Chemical/Microbiological ⁵ Mold ⁶ Wastewater n/a Accreditation not applicable
Our LocationsPace National has sixty-four client support centers that provide sample pickup and/or the delivery of sampling supplies. If you would like assistance from one of our support offices, please contactour main office. Pace National performs all testing at our central laboratory.