Top Banner
Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
37

Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Dec 22, 2015

Download

Documents

Winifred Glenn
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Foundations of Employee Motivation

McGraw-Hill/IrwinMcShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 2: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Employee Motivation and Engagement at Rackspace

Rackspace hosting has a highly motivated and engaged workforce by rewarding performance, fulfilling personal needs, and providing strengths-based feedback.

5-2

Page 3: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Motivation Defined

The forces within a person that affect the direction, intensity, and persistence of voluntary behavior

Exerting particular effort level (intensity), for a certain amount of time (persistence), toward a particular goal (direction).

5-3

Page 4: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Employee Engagement

Emotional and cognitive motivation, self-efficacy to perform the job, a clear understanding of one’s role in the organization’s vision and a belief that one has the resources to perform the job

5-4

Page 5: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Drives and Needs

Drives (aka-primary needs, fundamental needs, innate motives)• Neural states that energize individuals to correct deficiencies

or maintain an internal equilibrium• Prime movers of behavior by activating emotions

Self-concept, social norms,and past experience

Drives(primary needs)

NeedsDecisions

and Behavior

5-5

Page 6: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Drives and Needs

Needs• Goal-directed forces that people experience. • Drive-generated emotions directed toward goals• Goals formed by self-concept, social norms, and experience

Self-concept, social norms,and past experience

Drives(primary needs)

NeedsDecisions

and Behavior

5-6

Page 7: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Self-Self-actual-actual-izationization

PhysiologicalPhysiological

SafetySafety

BelongingnessBelongingness

EsteemEsteem

Seven categories capture most needs

Five categories placed in a hierarchy

Need toNeed toknowknow

Need for Need for beautybeauty

Maslow’s Needs Hierarchy Theory

5-7

Page 8: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Maslow’s Needs Hierarchy Theory

Lowest unmet need has strongest effect

When lower need is satisfied, next higher need becomes the primary motivator

Self-actualization -- a growth need because people desire more rather than less of it when satisfied

Self-Self-actual-actual-izationization

PhysiologicalPhysiological

SafetySafety

BelongingnessBelongingness

EsteemEsteem

Need toNeed toknowknow

Need for Need for beautybeauty

5-8

Page 9: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Evaluating Maslow’s Theory

Lack of support for theory

People have different hierarchies – don’t progress through needs in the same order

Needs change more rapidly than Maslow stated

Self-Self-actual-actual-izationization

PhysiologicalPhysiological

SafetySafety

BelongingnessBelongingness

EsteemEsteem

Need toNeed toknowknow

Need for Need for beautybeauty

5-9

Page 10: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

What Maslow Contributed to Motivation Theory

More holistic• Integrative view of needs

More humanistic• Influence of social

dynamics, not just instinct

More positivistic• Pay attention to strengths,

not just deficiencies

5-10

Page 11: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

What’s Wrong with Needs Hierarchy Models?

Wrongly assume that everyone has the same needs hierarchy (i.e. universal)

Instead, likely that each person has a unique needs hierarchy• Shaped by our self-concept --

values and social identity

5-11

Page 12: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Learned Needs Theory

Needs are amplified or suppressed through self-concept, social norms, and past experience

Therefore, needs can be “learned” (i.e. strengthened or weakened through training)

5-12

Page 13: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Three Learned Needs

Need for achievement• Need to reach goals, take responsibility • Want reasonably challenging goals

Need for affiliation• Desire to seek approval, conform to others wishes,

avoid conflict• Effective executives have lower need for social approval

Need for power• Desire to control one’s environment• Personalized versus socialized power

5-13

Page 14: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Four-Drive Theory

Drive to BondDrive to Bond

Drive to LearnDrive to Learn

• Drive to form relationships and social commitments• Basis of social identity

• Drive to satisfy curiosity and resolve conflicting information

Drive to DefendDrive to Defend• Need to protect ourselves• Reactive (not proactive) drive• Basis of fight or flight

Drive to AcquireDrive to Acquire• Drive to take/keep objects and experiences• Basis of hierarchy and status

5-14

Page 15: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Features of Four Drives

Innate and hardwired• everyone has them

Independent of each other• no hierarchy of drives

Complete set• no drives are excluded from the model

5-15

Page 16: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

How Four Drives Affect Motivation

1. Four drives determine which emotions are automatically tagged to incoming information

2. Drives generate independent and often competing emotions that demand our attention

3. Mental skill set relies on social norms, personal values, and experience to transform drive-based emotions into goal-directed choice and effort

5-16

Page 17: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Four Drive Theory of Motivation

Social norms, personal values, and experience transform drive-based emotions into goal-directed choice and effort

Drive to Acquire

Social norms

Drive to Bond

Drive to Learn

Drive to Defend

Personal values

Past experience

Mental skill set resolves competing drive demandsMental skill set resolves

competing drive demandsGoal-directed

choice and effortGoal-directed

choice and effort

5-17

Page 18: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Implications of Four Drive Theory

Provide a balanced opportunity for employees to fulfil all four drives

• employees continually seek fulfilment of drives• avoid having conditions support one drive more

than others

5-18

Page 19: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

E-to-PExpectancy

P-to-OExpectancy

Outcomes& Valences

Outcome 1Outcome 1+ or -+ or -

EffortEffort PerformancePerformance

Outcome 3Outcome 3+ or -+ or -

Outcome 2Outcome 2+ or -+ or -

Expectancy Theory of Motivation

5-19

Page 20: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Increasing E-to-P and P-to-O Expectancies

Increasing E-to-P Expectancies• Assuring employees they have competencies• Person-job matching • Provide role clarification and sufficient resources• Behavioral modeling

Increasing P-to-O Expectancies• Measure performance accurately• More rewards for good performance• Explain how rewards are linked to performance

5-20

Page 21: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Increasing Outcome Valences

Ensure that rewards are valued

Individualize rewards

Minimize countervalent outcomes

5-21

Page 22: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Making Every Day Count in NYC

New York City mayor Michael

Bloomberg has challenging goals

to accomplish, and he doesn’t

want any of his remaining tenure

wasted. Bloomberg had special

clocks installed in a dozen city

government offices that count

down how many days remain in

his mayoral term.

5-22

Page 23: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Goal Setting

The process of motivating

employees and clarifying their role

perceptions by establishing

performance objectives

5-23

Page 24: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Effective Goal Setting CharacteristicsSpecific -- measureable change within a time frame

Relevant – within employee’s control and responsibilities

Challenging – raise level of effort

Accepted (commitment) – motivated to accomplish the goal

Participative (sometimes) – improves acceptance and goal quality

Feedback – information available about progress toward goal

5-24

Page 25: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Characteristics of Effective Feedback

1. Specific – connected to goal details

2. Relevant – Relates to person’s behavior

3. Timely – to improve link from behavior to outcomes

4. Sufficiently frequent• Employee’s knowledge/experience• task cycle

5. Credible – trustworthy source

5-25

Page 26: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Feedback Through Strengths-Based Coaching

Maximizing the person’s potential by focusing on their strengths rather than weaknesses

Motivational because:• people inherently seek feedback about their

strengths, not their flaws• person’s interests, preferences, and competencies

stabilize over time

5-26

Page 27: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Multisource Feedback

Received from a full circle of people around the employee

Provides more complete and accurate information

Several challenges

5-27

Page 28: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Evaluating Goal Setting and Feedback Goal setting has high validity and

usefulness Goal setting/feedback limitations:

• Focuses employees on measurable performance

• Motivates employees to set easy goals (when tied to pay)

• Goal setting interferes with learning process in new, complex jobs

5-28

Page 29: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Keeping Pay Equitable at Costco

Costco Wholesale CEO Jim Sinegal

(shown in this photo) thinks the large

wage gap between many executives

and employees is blatantly unfair.

“Having an individual who is making

100 or 200 or 300 times more than

the average person working on the

floor is wrong,” says Sinegal, whose

salary and bonus are a much smaller

multiple of what his staff earn.

5-29

Page 30: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Organizational Justice

Distributive justice• Perceived fairness in

outcomes we receive relative to our contributions and the outcomes and contributions of others

Procedural justice• Perceived fairness of the

procedures used to decide the distribution of resources

5-30

Page 31: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

• • EmotionsEmotions

• • AttitudesAttitudes

• • BehaviorsBehaviors

DistributionPrinciples Distributive Distributive

JusticeJusticePerceptionsPerceptions

Procedural Procedural JusticeJustice

PerceptionsPerceptions

StructuralRules

SocialRules

Organizational Justice Components

5-31

Page 32: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Elements of Equity Theory

Outcome/input ratio • inputs -- what employee contributes (e.g., skill)• outcomes -- what employee receives (e.g., pay)

Comparison other• person/people against whom we compare our ratio• not easily identifiable

Equity evaluation• compare outcome/input ratio with the comparison

other

5-32

Page 33: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Correcting Inequity Feelings

Reduce our inputs Less organizational citizenship

Increase our outcomes Ask for pay increase

Increase other’s inputs Ask coworker to work harder

Reduce other’s outputsAsk boss to stop giving other preferred treatment

Change our perceptionsStart thinking that other’s perks aren’t really so valuable

Change comparison otherCompare self to someone closer to your situation

Leave the field Quit job

Actions to correct inequity Example

5-33

Page 34: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Equity Sensitivity

Outcome/input preferences and reaction to various outcome/input ratios

Benevolents• tolerant of being underrewarded

Equity Sensitives• want ratio to be equal to the comparison other

Entitleds• prefer proportionately more than others

5-34

Page 35: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Evaluating Equity Theory

Good at predicting situations unfair distribution of pay/rewards

Difficult to put into practice• doesn’t identify comparison other• doesn’t indicate relevant inputs or outcomes

Equity theory explains only some feelings of fairness • procedural justice is as important as distributive

justice

5-35

Page 36: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Procedural Justice

Perceived fairness of procedures used to decide the distribution of resources

Higher procedural fairness with:• Voice• Unbiased decision maker • Decision based on all information• Existing policies consistently• Decision maker listened to all sides• Those who complain are treated respectfully • Those who complain are given full explanation

5-36

Page 37: Foundations of Employee Motivation McGraw-Hill/Irwin McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Foundations of Employee Motivation

5-37McGraw-Hill/IrwinMcShane/Von Glinow OB 5e Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.