Formulation/Statement of the problems Slip boundary conditions on thermal viscous incompressible flows Luisa Consiglieri Department of Mathematics and CMAF Existence results and open problems
Jan 10, 2016
Formulation/Statement of the problems
Slip boundary conditionson thermal viscous incompressible flows
Luisa Consiglieri
Department of Mathematics and CMAF
Existence results and open problems
Governing equations
)3,2( nIRboundedOpen n
gDeee
)(:)](),([1
uau
fluid velocity:
deviator stress tensor:
internal energy: eniiu ,...,1)( u
jiij ,)( pressure
D
u)uu T
2/(
u inx
un
i i
i
10INCOMPRESSIBILITY
MOTION EQUATIONS
ENERGY EQUATION
fuu
)(1
No-slip boundary conditions
outin
domain
in
inflowout
outflow
0)( 00 measLipschitz
0: u On conditionDirichlet
Navier slip boundary condition (1823)
On
u On
:
0:0
conditionDirichlet
The fluid cannot penetrate the solid wall
,0: nuNu
vectornormal
outwardunitN
n
nT
:
and the inadequacy of the adherence condition
TT u ,0
Slip boundary conditions
On
u On
:
0:0
conditionDirichlet
TTT
TT
u ||
u ||
,0),(
0),(
e
e
conditionCoulombfrictionntwisePoi
FRICTIONAL BOUNDARY CONDITION
sN eu ||),(,0: TT u nu
[C. le Roux, 1999] … fluids with slip boundary conditions [Jager & Mikelic, 2001] On the roughness-induced effective boundary conditions …
s=2, linear Navier laws=3, Chezy-Manning laws=1:
Energy boundary conditions
On
On
:
0:0
econditionDirichlet
EXAMPLE (convective-radiation coefficient)
l=1: h= convective heat transfer coefficient
l=4: h= Stefan-Boltzmann constant
eeehe l 1||)},({),(
TT una ),()(),( eee
Constitutive law for the heat flux
heat capacity
FOURIER LAW (q=2)
EXAMPLE
2||)( qa
e
cp )(
tyconductiviheat
pce
q )()(,
Assumptions
ENERGY-DEPENDENT PARAMETERS
#
##
),(0,:
),(0:
eIRIR
eIRIR
:friction ryCarathéodo
, :diffusity ryCarathéodo
1),1|(||),(
||)(),(,:#
#
lee
eesigneIRIRl
l
|
:radiation-convective ryCarathéodo
IReesigne ,,0)()),(),((
THEOREM for Navier-Stokes-Fourier flows
Under the assumptions
then there exists a weak solution
to the coupled system
)(),( 12 Lg Lf
11
n
nr
)(),( a uDe
otherwise and if , ,1)1(
1
snppn
nps
## ),(0: eIRIR , :viscosity ryCarathéodo
0,1
01
0:)()(
0v,0,0:)(
onLWe
ononinlr
N
vvHvu
0|)(||)(|
)()()()( u if
u
uu D
D
DeDeI
)( plasticityofthreshold
[Duvaut & Lions, 1972] Transfert de chaleur dans un fluide de Bingham ... (constant plasticity threshold, without convective terms, and DIRICHLET condition for fluid motion)
Bingham fluid
Vvuvfuv|
uv
uvuuvu
TT
)(|||)(
|)(||)(|)(
)(:)()()(:
DD
DDD
inesourceheatandn
econditionNeumannsHomogeneou
g
0
The asymptotic limit case of a high diffusity
Taking
|)(|)(|)(|)(|| 2 uu DD
[Ladyzhenskaya, 1970] New equation for description of motion ...[J.F. Rodrigues and i, 2003 & 2005] On stationary flows ...
And so many other models …
Taking the asymptotic limit of a high diffusity when
it follows
u T
insourceheatand
een
econditionFourier
0g
||)(
||)(|)(|)(|)(|)(|| 2
Tuuu DD
Fluids with shear thinning behaviour
]2,1[|)|1(
)(1
0
pDD
eIp
u u
p =3/2
p =2
non-Newtonian fluids
uDDfeI II )()(
POWER LAWS (Ostwald & de Waele)
p>2: dilatant fluid1<p<2: pseudo-plastic fluid p=1: Bingham fluid p=2: Navier-Stokes fluid
pddF
ddF
)(
)(
2
21
|)](|)()(|),([ 21 u,|u DFeDFeItensorstressdeviator
fabledifferentiF obtain we ||
(p-q) ASSUMPTIONS
)(),( 1' Lgp Lf
conditions F-S-N satisfy ,,,
uuu u DDDDFe :|||)],(|),([ 2
)1()(: ##0 pp ddFdIRIRF :convex strictly
)1|(||)(|0)())()((
)(,||)(:1#
1#
q
qnn LIRIR
a aa
a :continuous a
(p-q) relations
,
npn
q
npn
n
nnp
pnq
21
2
3,
)1(
)12(
under Dirichlet boundary conditionand without Joule effect
[2006] Math. Mod. and Meth. in Apppl. Sci. 16 :12, 2013--2027. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218202506001790
n=3
Theorem
Under the above assumptionsthen there exists a weak solution
to the coupled system
npjiij
nnp
lr
Np
LL
onLWe
ononin
))((,:))((
0:)()(
0v,0,0:)(
''
0,1
0,1
:Y
vvWvu
p'
1
)1(1
n
qnr
[2008] J. Math. Anal. Appl. 340 :1 (2008), 183--196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.07.080
Open problem
under the assumptions
then there exists a weak solution? i believe YES!
)(),( uDe
:continuous
0)())()((
)1|(||)(|
)(,||)(
:
1#
1#
p
p
nnnn
L
MM
Greater range of (p-q) exponents ?
as in the Dirichlet boundary value problem:
)(),(
)1(2
3
1
2
)(,
)2(
2
2
3
0
1
CC
nnp
pnq
n
np
n
n
LW
nnp
pnqnp
n
n
lqp
div0,v functionstest
Vv functionstest
The non-stationary case
Existence result holds provided that
Strong monotone property for the motion and heat fluxes
for some (p-q) relationship
and convective exponent: l=1
2,||)())()((
2,||)())()((
q
pAAq
p
if aa
if
|)](|),([)(),( uu DFeDAe
[2008] Annali Mat. Pura Appl. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10231-007-0060-3
Present goal
domains unbounded in fluids rotating
[...]
regularity
Acknowledgement:
Université de Pau et des Pays de L’Adour