Top Banner
1 FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION Prepared for: Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence and Aeronautical Systems Center
18

FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

Feb 01, 2016

Download

Documents

ornice

FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION. Prepared for: Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence and Aeronautical Systems Center. PURPOSE FOR MIP AND PDB TECHNOLOGY. Characterize lateral/vertical extent of cl-VOCs in soil and ground water - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

1

FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

Prepared for:

Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence and Aeronautical Systems

Center

Page 2: FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

2

PURPOSE FOR MIP AND PDB TECHNOLOGY

• Characterize lateral/vertical extent of cl-VOCs in soil and ground water

• Evaluate vertical distribution of cl-VOCs in ground water

• Provide real-time data on lithology and contaminant distribution

Page 3: FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

3

HISTORY AND STATUS OFCORRECTIVE ACTION AT GEAE

• GEAE buys AFP 36 in 1989

• Corrective action begins in 1990

• Numerous investigations/interim measures performed

• Approximately 150 monitoring wells on/off site

• TCE and TCA in ground water remaining corrective measure

• Investigate source of TCE/TCA at AF Plant 36

Page 4: FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

4

Page 5: FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

5

BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

• Determine Source of TCE/TCA in groundwater – 1. Sampling Design– 2. Sampling Locations– 3. Methodology

• MIP Survey– 1. Sensor and Detector Outputs (Fig. 2.2-3)– 2. Sampling Area (Fig. 3.1-2)– 3. EC and ECD Results (Fig. 3.1-3)

• Direct Push Results– 1. Soil (Fig. 3.1-7)– 2. Groundwater (Fig. 3.1-9)– 3. MIP/Direct Push Comparison (Fig. 3.1-11)

• Groundwater Monitoring Results • Passive Diffusion Bag Results (Fig. 3.1-13)

Page 6: FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

6

BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

• MIP Survey

1. Sampling Design – 2. Sampling Area (Fig. 3.1-2)

– 3. EC and ECD Results (Fig. 3.1-3)

Page 7: FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

7

Page 8: FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

8

BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

• MIP Survey

– 1. Sensor and Detector Outputs (Fig. 2.2-3)

– 2. Sampling Area (Fig. 3.1-2)

– 3. EC and ECD Results (Fig. 3.1-3)

Page 9: FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

9

Page 10: FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

10

BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

• MIP Survey

– 1. Sensor and Detector Outputs (Fig. 2.2-3)

– 2. Sampling Area (Fig. 3.1-2)

– 3. EC and ECD Results (Fig. 3.1-3)

Page 11: FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

11

Page 12: FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

12

BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

• Direct Push Results

– 1. Soil (Fig. 3.1-7)

– 2. Groundwater (Fig. 3.1-9)

– 3. MIP/Direct Push Comparison (Fig. 3.1-11)

Page 13: FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

13

Page 14: FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

14

BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

• Direct Push Results

– 1. Soil (Fig. 3.1-7)

– 2. Groundwater (Fig. 3.1-9)

– 3. MIP/Direct Push Comparison (Fig. 3.1-11)

Page 15: FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

15

Page 16: FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

16

Page 17: FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

17

BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

• Groundwater Monitoring Results • Passive Diffusion Bag Results (Fig. 3.1-13)

Page 18: FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

18