Shang Liu 1 , Lynn M. Russell 1 , Douglas A. Day 1,2 , Yunliang Zhao 3 , Allen H. Goldstein 3 , Robin Weber 3 Formation of biogenic and anthropogenic secondary organic aerosols at Bakersfield, California 1. Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego. 2. Now at: Cooperative Institute for Research in the Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder. 3. Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley.
13
Embed
Formation of biogenic and anthropogenic secondary organic ...cires.colorado.edu/jimenez-group/UsrMtgs/UsersMtg1...Shang Liu1, Lynn M. Russell1, Douglas A. Day1,2, Yunliang Zhao3, Allen
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Shang Liu1, Lynn M. Russell1, Douglas A. Day1,2, Yunliang Zhao3, Allen H. Goldstein3, Robin Weber3
Formation of biogenic and anthropogenic secondary organic aerosols at Bakersfield, California
1. Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego. 2. Now at: Cooperative Institute for Research in the Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder. 3. Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley.
COMPARING METHODS (WITH GRAPHICS INSPIRED BY MANJULA’S PRESENTATION)
Agreement of orthogonal methods could suggests accuracy
Disagreement of orthogonal methods can provide additional information
Agreement of similar methods can provide additional confidence
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)
Aromatic Alkene
Hydroxyl
Alkane
Carboxylic acid
Carbonyl
Amine
CONTRIBUTIONS OF THREE ORGANIC SOURCE TYPES
PMF FACTORS FOR 12 FTIR AEROSOL MEASUREMENT
CAMPAIGNS*
aMaria et al. (2002); bMaria et al. (2003) and Quinn et al. (2003); cMari and Russell (2005); dGilardoni et al. (2007) and Bahadur et al. (2010); eGilardoni et al. (2009) and Liu et al. (2009); fDay et al. (2009); gRussell et al. (2009); hRussell et al. (2010); iHawkins and Russell (2010) and Day et al. (2010); jSchwartz et al. (2010); kHawkins et al. (2010); lShaw et al. (2010);
High O/C Low O/C
Biogenic Biomass Burning
Marine Polluted Marine
SOURCES FOR 12 FTIR AEROSOL MEASUREMENT CAMPAIGNS*
*1368 atmospheric aerosol par3cle spectra from urban, remote, and marine loca3ons.
aMaria et al. (2002); bMaria et al. (2003) and Quinn et al. (2003); cMaria and Russell (2005); dGilardoni et al. (2007) and Bahadur et al. (2010); eGilardoni et al. (2009) and Liu et al. (2009); fDay et al. (2009); gRussell et al. (2009); hRussell et al. (2010); iHawkins and Russell (2010) and Day et al. (2010); jSchwartz et al. (2010); kHawkins et al. (2010); lShaw et al. (2010);
PM2.5 00:00 - 23:00 Note: Teflon filters are very poor at adsorbing (or absorbing) gases – just like Teflon tubing…back filters are consistently below detection. (Cf. OC measured by EGA can have back filters with 2 to 10 times the mass of the front filters, significantly reducing accuracy.
PAST COMPARISONS OF AMS AND FTIR “ORGANIC MASS (OM)”
Marine/dust: AMS < FTIR
BiomassBurning: AMS~FTIR
Biogenic: AMS~FTIR
Urban: AMS > FTIR
Russell et al., 2009, Atmos. Env.
Time Series of Organic Functional Group Concentrations
2010
35%
21%
22% 9% 11%
2%
(ON)
Components Identified from the AMS Measurements Factor Identification