Top Banner
Forest Tenure Reform: New Community Rights in the Age of Climate Change Anne M Larson Senior Associate, CIFOR Workshop: Taking Stock of Smallholder and Community Forestry Montpellier, France March 24-26, 2010
11

Forest tenure reform: New community rights in the age of climate change

Jun 21, 2015

Download

Education

Anne M. Larson

Presentation for the conference on
Taking stock of smallholders and community forestry
Montpellier France
March 24-26, 2010
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Forest tenure reform: New community rights in the age of climate change

Forest Tenure Reform:New Community Rights

in the Age of Climate Change

Anne M LarsonSenior Associate, CIFOR

Workshop: Taking Stock of Smallholder and Community Forestry

Montpellier, FranceMarch 24-26, 2010

Page 2: Forest tenure reform: New community rights in the age of climate change

Outline of presentation

I. Intro to REDD & communities

II. Research and methods

III. Obstacles to reforms– Statutory rights– Implementation– Access to benefits

IV. Lessons for REDD & communities

Page 3: Forest tenure reform: New community rights in the age of climate change

I. Intro to REDD & communities

• What is REDD(+)? (strategies for reducing emissions from DD and enhancing C stocks)

• REDD & communities: (1) could leave out, (2) have positive effects on communities or (3) have negative effects

• Right to forests, rights to Carbon, decision-making (rules) about forests

Tenure rights: • REDD is likely to require secure tenure (PES experience, logic of

international markets/ investments)– If communities do not have secure tenure, who will get rights?– If rights are “secured”, who will get them?

Rule-making: • Who makes the rules for meeting REDD requirements?

Page 4: Forest tenure reform: New community rights in the age of climate change

• Comparative case study, policy advocacy research in over 30 sites in 10 countries

• Countries and sites chosen: – Where a statutory tenure change in favour of communities had

recently occurred or was about to occur– Where there was potential to influence policy

• Rights-based approach in the sense that “local people” were (usually) advocating for tenure rights

• Dynamic study of reform processes• Highly contextualized at various scales: local (single

community), groups of communities, regional, national

II. Research and methods

Page 5: Forest tenure reform: New community rights in the age of climate change

III. Obstacles to reformA. Statutory rights

• Extent, permanence and security of rights (through what legal mechanisms?)

• Quality and quantity of forests granted

• Rules for resource use• Rights for some may

exclude others with customary claims

Page 6: Forest tenure reform: New community rights in the age of climate change

III. Obstacles to reformB. Implementation processes

• Foot-dragging by the state (state interest in the resources on those lands?)

• Logistical difficulties (ex. demarcation)• Competing claims (legitimate and not, the role of

the state)• Governance challenges (elite capture,

unaccountable authority)• Time…

Page 7: Forest tenure reform: New community rights in the age of climate change

III. Obstacles to reform C. Access to benefits

• Accompanying measures (capacity building, access to markets)

• Licenses and permits, complex bureaucracies

• Discretionary powers of forest officers

• Costs, lack of credit• Markets

Page 8: Forest tenure reform: New community rights in the age of climate change

III. Obstacles for reform: Summary

Page 9: Forest tenure reform: New community rights in the age of climate change

IV. Lessons: Communities & REDD

Attention to tenure in REDD to date• ‘… many R-PINs suggest a very limited analysis (and in some cases

understanding) of the existing situation with regards to conflicts over tenure and potential obstacles to reform and implementation. Issues such as … the nature of customary practices and indigenous rights are not consistently addressed. Furthermore, few countries address the need to clarify carbon rights within existing tenure systems.’

• ‘Given the strong consensus amongst participating countries that improving tenure security is critical for REDD, a deeper and more practical discussion of how these issues may be resolved will be needed….’ (Davis et al. 2009).

Page 10: Forest tenure reform: New community rights in the age of climate change

IV. Lessons: Communities & REDD

REDD risks for communities

Tenure rights

• without secure rights, increased risk of REDD failure

• risk of elite capture • risk of conflict• risk of inequity in benefits• with or without secure rights,

who benefits?

…Failure of the state to defend and secure rights for communities

Rules for forest use

• who makes the rules• who enforces them• how do they restrict livelihood

activities• are losses adequately

compensated• who is affected most

…Tendency to centralize decisions, top-down rules

Page 11: Forest tenure reform: New community rights in the age of climate change

IV. Lessons: Communities & REDD

Questions…• Will states share REDD benefits with

communities? • Will they facilitate community participation?• Will states defend communities against

competing interests? Against elite capture?• Will states protect community livelihoods over

potential national income from C sales?• Will states simply make the rules and expect, or

force, communities to follow them?