Forest Preferences & Urbanization Perspective from four Sacred Groves in India’s National Capital Region By David S. Grace Dr. Dean Urban, Advisor Dr. Marc Jeuland, Advisor Masters project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Masters of Environmental Management degree in the Nicholas School of the Environment Duke University May 2017
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
in India’s National Capital Region By David S. Grace Dr. Dean Urban, Advisor Dr. Marc Jeuland, Advisor requirements for the Masters of Environmental Management degree in the Nicholas School of the Environment Duke University May 2017 Executive Summary Within its institutional setting, the sacred grove is understood as the forested abode of a deity or multiple deities. However, the relationship between the forest and its divine host/s is expressed in many ways, often in ways which seem incompatible to ‘rational-legal’ discourse and policy. Yet, sacred groves are not confined to the most remote geographies or the most mythic theologies. In fact, the sacred grove is entangled in very ‘modern’ ways of thinking, and bureaucratic governance regimes, in places which are experiencing rapid urban growth and cultural change. Thus, the sacred grove is not easily defined, and its relationship to state protection is complicated. The megacity extending from Delhi, India is formally administered as the National Capital Territory, but is even more broadly conceived as the National Capital Region. The sacred groves in this context have become increasingly characterized by urbanization and related culture change. These conditions present rich theoretical opportunities to analyze changes in preferences among residents in the institutional setting of the sacred forest, empirically, and to interpret implications of any such changes in terms of demand for forest conservation as well as continued collective action potential. To accomplish this task, this present study offers a survey of residents (n=198) within four sacred grove sites in the NCR. This study analyzes the sacred grove as a socio-ecological system situated within a wider landscape consisting of non-sacred forest – with the exception of one site – as well as alternate worship sites outside of sacred forests – here called temple sites. These three site types are important markers in the landscape and are associated with differing types of values and are ascribed different magnitudes of importance. The survey approach seeks to characterize willingness to pay (WTP) for visits to these sites to better understand marginal preferences by site type and characteristic. Details are collected on respondent’s actual visits, and Revealed Preference models infer the characteristics of the visitors to each site type. In specifying these characteristics, this study seeks to determine the impact of important cultural evolution variables and urbanization on preference. Cultural evolution proxy variables utilized include education level, percent calories purchased, and primary worship of native deity. A measure of urbanization is provided by classification of ‘urban’ households based on land-use, land-cover classification as built-up environment. Cultural evolution is analyzed in this Indian context, through the theoretical perspective of Sanskritization, which has been proposed as the cause of institutional decline in the sacred grove. My study contributes to this literature by testing for a Sanskritization effect on forest preferences in a landscape perspective, while controlling for important socio-economic variables in addition to distance to sacred grove and travel cost to nearest sacred grove and temple sites. The Revealed Preference models provide evidence of use-values for the sites, describing actual visits, as well as a baseline for non-use values which may be present. However, Stated Preference survey methods are also utilized to better characterize the range of values present for these sites, by offering hypothetical visits which 1) isolate the sacred vs. non-sacred forest effect on preference, controlling for forest characteristics, and 2) derive relative preference for important forest characteristics – size, temple presence, natural or planted quality, extraction level, and distance from home – as well as marginal preferences among these characteristics by observing trade-offs between varying levels of these attributes. The first item is accomplished with a Contingent Valuation (CV) exercise, which first asks WTP questions for non-sacred forest and then offers the hypothetical choice of a sacred forest visit rather than a non-sacred forest visit, in terms of explicitly additional WTP. The second item is accomplished with a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) which offers a series of choice tasks to each respondent, who choose one of two forests described by the attributes above specified at varying levels arranged in a blocked fractional factorial design. This study finds greater WTP for sacred forest than non-sacred forest among residents of the setting of the institutional setting of the sacred grove, in both revealed and stated preference measures. However, a trade-off between sacred forest and temple site visits was observed among those of ‘higher’ urbanization and Sanskritization characteristics. Primary worship of a global deity rather than native deity is one predictor of temple preference, which accords with Sanskritization expectations. However, proximity to sacred grove, holding a professional or vocational degree, or living in an urban environment seem to be better predictors. Overall, relative to the other forest characteristics described, the temple appears more important for visit choice by a factor of two. In this marginal preference context, large forest size and zero extraction level appear to be traded off, suggesting some concern regarding the relation of temple preference and forest conservation demand. Yet, the implications of this temple preference may not be antagonistic to conservation motives. Perhaps unexpected to Sanskritization literature, temple preference seems to correspond with conservation-oriented forest preferences for non-sacred forests. These conservation preferences are suggested by a perception of non-sacred forests as more useful for ecosystem services among temple visitors. An increase in non-use values for non-sacred forest may also be evident in the observation of a greater willingness to pay an entrance fee for non-sacred forest by those who do not worship a native deity primarily. Taken together, these suggest a potential increase in perception of non-sacred forest value and a potential willingness to pay for its non-use ecosystem services. The development of these conservationist preferences for non-sacred forests may yield positive collective action results for community forests facing urbanization threats in which land-use is increasingly contested and alternate uses become feasible tradeoffs with the status quo landscape. Sanskritization, as a transfer from local to global deity worship within the tradition of Hinduism, accords with cultural evolution studies on the relation of complex societies and ‘big Gods.’ The enabling and constraining impacts of these changes for collective action within the institutional setting of the sacred grove are considered to lead to two options: 1). a wider cosmological and social world which creates the enabling conditions for multi-scale governance linkages or 2) a shift in the locus of significance from the forest to the temple, suggestive of a transition from commons to open-access land subject to degradation in the absence of enforcement external to the institutional setting of the sacred grove. This study finds evidence in both directions, and recommends further study of collective action in community forest settings sensitive to cultural evolution. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……….1 BACKGROUND………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..3 RESULTS…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….….…………….34 o Visits to Sacred Forest, Non-Sacred Forest, & Alternate Worship Sites Stated Preferences…………………………………………….……………………………………………………41 DISCUSSION…………………………………………………………………………………………….……..……………………48 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….61 REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….62 APPENDICIES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………65 HINDI/REGIONAL TRANSLATIONS NCR- National Capital Region, includes Delhi, Faridabad, and Gurgaon in my study area and other areas. Perhaps is also inclusive of Hodal based railroad and commuter connection between Delhi and Hodal. Bani – common designator for sacred forest in the region. Chameli Van – Forest Flower Gummat Mandir – ‘Gummat’ Temple Jharna Mandir – Waterfall Temple 1 INTRODUCTION URBANIZATION Urbanization is correlated with cultural change, and possibly a driving factor in social change processes. The twin developments of a global urban majority population and the concentration of population growth in cities calls attention to these processes. While the global population was approximately 70-30 percent rural-to-urban in 1950, projections suggest a near reversal of this distribution by 2050, with a 34-66 percent rural-to-urban population (UN 2014, p.7). Global urbanization comes after the rapid development in the west since the industrial revolution followed by the offset, though not equivalent, growth in the ‘developing’ countries. Shifts in life expectancy, yielding an older aged population with lower fertility, the ‘demographic transition’ is also underway (Lee 2003). It is in the ‘developing’ country context where urban population growth will be concentrated in the future. India features prominently in this trend and is projected to become the most populous country within half a decade. The urban agglomeration of Delhi, India, now administered as the National Capital Region (NCR), is the second most populous city in the world with recent population growth exceeding that of Sao Paulo, Tokyo, Mexico City, and New York City combined (UN 2014). Recent remote land-use, land-cover research in Delhi and Southwest Delhi in the period of 1977- 2015 shows clear conversions of cultivated area to built-up area and from dense forest to scrub and degraded forest (Jain et. al 2016). Within this geographic context of rapid change, forested areas that hold long-standing spiritual significance among forest-dependent communities – termed sacred groves – are confronted with novel cultural and ecological threats to their persistence. The plight of sacred groves amidst urbanization is a collective action problem and has not been adequately studied in terms of the cultural and ecological variables which have allowed the religious and ecological relationships of forest-dependent communities and sacred groves to persist. It is precisely this knowledge gap that I examine in my work. The implicit conception of sacred groves in conservation discourse, the canonical model, has been critiqued as a falsely homogenous and idealistically ahistorical entity (Gajula 2007). Certainly heterogeneity is evident in beliefs related to the sacred grove, property ownership type, and management style. Nonetheless, I define the sacred grove as a socio-ecological system where religious valuation is coextensive with a geographically-bounded forest area. As coarsely 2 defined, the canonical sacred grove exists as a geographically-bounded forest located centrally within a mythic social geography. The sacred grove is located in a physical geography and social geography. Stated differently the sacred grove exists in a domain of being, with physical boundaries, in addition to domains of knowing and thinking with social boundaries. While the social is informed by and mapped onto the physical, it is not a direct, linear relationship. The mind is not a tabula rasa, or blank slate, solely conditioned by sense perception of the physical environment. Rather, the social is conditioned by the historical, and the historical is conditioned by the narratives in which it is understood. These narratives develop as a consequence of cultural evolution with increasing social complexity (Mayer 2014 p.9). These operating conditions comprise the majority of cognition processes and occur before rationalization, which argues against a narrow view of the human species as primarily rational, utility maximizers and instead suggest a view of the human species as “efficient complexity manager” (Levine et. al. 2015). This is not to displace the rational actor theory, but to highlight the bulk of cognitive mechanisms obscured in its appropriation as the sole behavioral logic. This study argues that what is obscured in this narrow behavioral logic is actually of central importance in understanding how preferences are shaped in the long-run and therefore in prediction of how preferences will change with future cultural and ecological change. Within this perspective, rational actor theory becomes more useful for understanding collective action settings sensitive to cultural evolution. Until very recently, collective action problems have been conceived primarily in the narrow terms of rational actor theory and, in an extended formulation, in an institutionalism which bounds these actors’ rationality within constraints of norms and values. The noteworthy work of Garrett Hardin’s Tragedy of the Commons, pointing toward collective action failure, can be seen as prompting investigation of ‘success stories’ of the commons, most notably in Elinor Ostrom’s Nobel Prize winning research. However, though the work of these authors is different in orientation, both belong to the domain of rational actor theory and institutionalism. This domain of study, however, does not provide an adequate understanding of the cognitive mechanisms driving behavior, as it is constrained by the behavioral logic ascribed in the underlying rational actor model. Chiefly, it does not address cognitive processes identified in cultural evolution theory. For this reason, it is particularly unable to address systems which are 3 defined primarily in their relation to cultural valuation, such as the sacred grove. It is arguable that this is a more general fault, as culture is basic to behavior and thus to collective action problems generally. Empirical data from highly controlled settings in economic games makes this suggestion (Heinrich 2000). Therefore, a lurking problem in sacred grove conservation initiatives, which depend on cultural protection mechanisms, is the hallmark quality of culture: change, or, more precisely, cultural evolution. Does urbanization in the physical environment of sacred groves lead to ‘urbanization’ of cultural and psychological states, seen as an increase in relative temple-to- forest preference, decreased forest conservation preferences, or decreased forest worship mode choices? I address these questions in my study. Main Questions: 1) Does forest conservation preference and worship mode choice vary with urbanization level? 2) Does forest conservation preference and worship mode choice depend on distance to sacred groves? 3) Does forest conservation preference depend on worship mode choice, forest type (i.e. sacred or non-sacred), or other factors indirectly related to urbanization? BACKGROUND: This study attempts to isolate the effect of urbanization on land use from cognitive processes relating to land use preferences. It is important to analytically disaggregate physical and social geography in my study, as culture matters for both cognition and behavior. Culture has been demonstrated to impact spatial cognition (Haun et al. 2006). Additionally, Joseph Heinrich has led a series of cross cultural studies, demonstrating cultural variation of behaviors in economic games (Heinrich 2000; Heinrich et al 2005; Heinrich et al 2010). Using group-level averages of percent calories purchased, rather than grown, hunted, or gathered, Heinrich et al. (2005) found market integration and payoffs to cooperation to significantly explain much of the variation in ultimatum game offers. In a follow-up study, Heinrich et al. (2010) found market integration and participation in a world religion, as opposed to a tribal religion or no religion, to predict increased offer size in both dictator and ultimatum games, which is suggested as increased cooperation. 4 These economic games allow a highly controlled setting in which to analyze motivations for economic behavior, largely based on game theory. Dictator and Ultimatum games are two of the most common. A dictator game is typically played between two individuals and involves one individual starting with funds given to them – an endowment – and they are simply instructed that they can keep the money or they can choose how much they give to the other individual. That is the end of the game. Any offer by the dictator is a violation of the self-interested, utility- maximizing assumptions of rational actor theory, which predicts the dictator to give nothing. This violation has been found consistently across many populations. Additionally, offer size distributions have been found to vary with culture (Heinrich 2000). An ultimatum game is an extension of the dictator game, where the individual who receives the offer can choose whether to accept or reject the offer. In the choice to reject the offer, the individual forfeits their offer but also ‘punishes’ the offeror by cancelling their funds as well. Interpretation of behavior in these games is suggestive for behavioral logics in behavioral economics. The ultimatum game offers insight into ‘conditional cooperation’ where offers may be made on the basis of reciprocation or other concerns, since the giver is aware that their ultimatum can be rejected. The ultimatum game also provides insight into willingness to enforce ‘fairness’ norms, as the recipient can reject the ultimatum, punishing the offeror, but at the personal cost of losing the offered funds. Cooperation and motives other than simple self-interest, such as fairness norms, are suggested in these games, because in the first instance the ‘dictator’ can simply keep the money, without personal cost, and in the second, the ‘ultimatum’ can be rejected, punishment inflicted at personal expense of the opportunity cost of keeping the offered funds. The study of Purzycki et al. 2016, utilizing economic game settings, advances this research in specifying the positive effect of belief in supernatural punishment from the God/s of the world religions, as opposed to local traditions, on cooperation between co-religionists, suggested to support a cultural evolution theory of expanding prosociality alongside increasing social complexity. This study finds that deities of the world religions are thought of as more knowledgeable and moralistic, with greater supernatural punishment, corresponding with greater offer sizes. This, in turn, is interpreted functionally as providing a panoptic means of promoting cooperation in the absence of face-to-face monitoring and enforcement possible in small group sizes. 5 These global, cross-cultural studies are helpful in charting a direction in cultural evolution theory. Chiefly, they empirically support aspects of the classical linear development theories of late 19th and early 20th C. anthropology and sociology after the implications of Social Darwinism made these theories taboo in their own fields. The tendency of understanding cultural evolution as a linear development process, often yielded an interpretation of Europeans as the pinnacle of development, but this arguably reflects the mobilization of theory in service of colonial interests. Further, an absence of long-range studies linking culture and environment, in terms of directional cultural evolution framing, has not stayed the persistence of such theories – explicit or implicit – in popular perception, academia, or in public policy application. Addressing this knowledge gap, empirical research in cultural evolution has suggested directionality in key factors of cultural evolution and proxies for their measurement, such as market integration, measured as percent calories purchased, and world religion, measured as local or global deity type worshipped. From linear models to non-linear interpretations Recent scholars have rejected a simple linear ascent of ‘development,’ but have also suggested the possibility of retaining empirical truths in cultural evolution theory while discarding its normative biases (Bellah 2011). Additionally, the non-western world, particularly Asia, is experiencing rapid industrial development alongside novel cultural changes, leading some commentators to suggest the possibility of ‘multiple modernities.’ The concept of modernity is proposed as a social result of structural physical changes, marked by industrialization, and the degree of western influence is a subject of some debate. Prasenjiit Duara’s The Crisis of Global Modernity outlines the migration of western historical imagination, particularly in a loss of authoritative sources of transcendence, to the rest of the world in the late 19th C. This western historical imagination, often recently theorized as one of secularization, has been linked to modernity, industrialization, and consumerism, and resultant ecological problems by contemporary scholars (Northcott 1996, p.105, Wirzba 2015, p.5).i However, the theory of secularization has also been nuanced. Duara provides the term ‘traffic’ as descriptor of the migration of religious ideas into ‘non-religious’ spheres with effects that are hard to predict (p.16). In this way, Duara highlights the possibility of sacred groves in a modern sphere as offering a re-enchantment of the commons, or a subversion of the tragedy of the commons, in his 6 identification of the “embryonic idea of treating commons as a new area of inviolability, sacredness and transcendence” (p.17). This introduction of non-linear schemes of cultural evolution provide a more nuanced understanding of the ways that a change from local to global deity worship, or Sanskritization, may introduce constraining and enabling behavior for collective action around forests – sacred and non-sacred – amidst urbanization. Sanskritization The organizing center of my study is the theory of Sanskritization. Malhotra et al. (2001) have provided a concise definition of the theory in relation to the sacred grove: “In many places, local folk deities have been, and continue to be, replaced with Hindu gods and goddesses. This has resulted in the erection of a temple in the sacred grove.”ii It is a shortcoming of the research on Sanskritization that it has mostly been considered historically and anecdotally and without reference to the cultural evolution research which analyzes the…