Top Banner
Specialty Fluids Update on Formate Fluids and Field Update on Formate Fluids and Field Applications Applications AADE Houston Chapter Fluids Management Group Meeting AADE Houston Chapter Fluids Management Group Meeting October 11, 2006 October 11, 2006
28
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: For Mate Fluids

Specialty Fluids

Update on Formate Fluids and Field Update on Formate Fluids and Field ApplicationsApplications

AADE Houston Chapter Fluids Management Group MeetingAADE Houston Chapter Fluids Management Group Meeting

October 11, 2006October 11, 2006

Page 2: For Mate Fluids

Aerial Photo of TANCO Mine Pollucite:-Originally discovered: 1846 - San Piero, Campo, Elba, Livorno Province, Tuscany, ItalyNamed after Pollux, a figure from Greek mythology, brother of Castor, for its common association with “Castorite”(petalite)Chemical makeup: Cs0.7Na0.2Rb0.04Al0.9Si2.1O6·(H20)

Found in many places including:

– Bikita, Masvingo, Zimbabwe

– Shigar Mine, Skardu, Pakistan

– Varuträsk, Västerbotten, Sweden

– Kunar Province, Afghanistan

– Oxford, Maine, USA

– Ray Mica Mine, North Carolina, USA

Most abundant source ofMost abundant source of PollucitePollucite, , containing around 15 containing around 15 –– 22%22%CesiumCesium Oxide is found at Bernic Lake, Manitoba, CanadaOxide is found at Bernic Lake, Manitoba, Canada

Page 3: For Mate Fluids

keV109876543210

Cou

nts

4,000

3,500

3,000

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

0

C

O

Na

Al

Si

CsCs

Cs

Cs

CsCs

Converting Converting CesiumCesium Oxide to Oxide to CesiumCesium FormateFormate

Pollucite mineral is classified as a Pegmatite, a class of old volcanic hard rock where specialized machinery is used in the mining process.Pollucite is first mined by blasting and crushing. The crushed pollucite is then milled at surface.Cesium oxide is then extracted by digestion in sulphuric acid to form a cesium alum.

The GiraffeThe Giraffe

The BreakerThe BreakerThe JumboThe Jumbo

Page 4: For Mate Fluids

Converting Converting CesiumCesium Oxide to Oxide to CesiumCesium FormateFormate

Cesium Alum is used as the base to manufacture the alkali metal salt - Cesium Formate - which has a saturation density of 2.3Cesium Formate is a high density, thermally stable, environmentally friendly heavy fluid used for:

– Drilling, completing and workovers of high pressure high temperature (HPHT) oil and gas wells

– Safely overcoming the hydrostatic pressure while drilling, completing, suspending or workovers

– Minimizing formation damage while drilling to optimize productivity of hydrocarbons

Page 5: For Mate Fluids

Monovalent Monovalent Ion SeriesIon Series

Li = LithiumNa = SodiumK = PotassiumRb = RubidiumCs = CesiumFr = Francium

= Hydration layer around ionN.B. hydration layer decreases with increasing atomic number of ion

Page 6: For Mate Fluids

Monovalent Ion Organic Alkali Metal Salts (Formate)Monovalent Ion Organic Alkali Metal Salts (Formate)

NaCOOH KCOOH CsCOOH1.0 S.G.8.3 ppg

1.3 S.G.10.8 ppg

1.57 S.G.13.1 ppg

2.3 S.G.19.2 ppg

O Cs+ / K+ / Na+

OH-C

Page 7: For Mate Fluids

Basic Properties and Attributes of Formate Fluids

Saturated formate fluids:– Na Formate 45% 10.8 ppg– K Formate 75% 13.1 ppg– Cs Formate 80% 19.2 ppg

Saturated formate fluids are polar ionic fluids

– Inherently low viscosity– Biodegradable– Environmentally benign– Non-Toxic– Non-Corrosive– Non-Damaging– Safe to handle, pH 9.0 – 10.5– Protect polymers– Reclaimable and recyclable

O Cs/K/Na

OH-C

Formate fluids and Cabot Specialty Fluids have an excellent HS&E record

Page 8: For Mate Fluids

Differences in basic properties between Formates and HalidesDifferences in basic properties between Formates and Halides

Formates– Monovalent– Organic– Bufferable– More alkaline (pH 8 – 11)– Densities up to 19.2 ppg– Applicable to higher

temperatures – Solubility of polymers– Biodegradable– Less corrosive (wider AOE)– Simple drill-in fluids

Halides– Divalent– Inorganic– Unbufferable– More acidic (pH 3 – 6)– Densities up to 19.2 ppg– Less applicable at higher

temperatures– Polymers less soluble– Non-biodegradable– More corrosive (Lesser AOE)– Difficult to formulate drill-in fluids

Page 9: For Mate Fluids

Typical formulation of Base Formate Fluid (1.52 s.g.)Typical formulation of Base Formate Fluid (1.52 s.g.)with Optimization of Crystallization Temperature and Pressurewith Optimization of Crystallization Temperature and Pressure

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

wt% CsFwt% KFwt% DI water

Cs Formate = 2.2 s.g, K Formate = 1.57 s.g., H20 = 1.0 s.g

TCT = -20 °C

TCT = -1.1 °C

{RULE-of-THUMB for PCT: 1.0 °F per 1000 psi}

Page 10: For Mate Fluids

Rheology of Formate Base FluidsRheology of Formate Base Fluids

Density and Viscosity vs Temperature12 ppg (1.44 s.g.) Na/K Formate Blend

0.7

2.7

4.7

6.7

8.7

10.7

12.7

14.7

16.7

18.7

20.7

0 50 100 150 200 250Temperature (°F)

Visc

osity

(mm

2/s)

1.37

1.38

1.39

1.40

1.41

1.42

1.43

1.44

1.45

Den

sity

(g/c

m3)

cP g/cm3

Page 11: For Mate Fluids

Viscosity & Density, s.g. (73°F) for Blends of Saturated Potassium and Cesium Formate

y = -3E-05x2 - 0.0344x + 10.52R2 = 0.9954

y = 3E-05x2 + 0.0055x + 1.6032R2 = 0.9998

7.00

7.50

8.00

8.50

9.00

9.50

10.00

10.50

11.00

0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00 90.00

% Cesium Formate (2.286 s.g.)

Visc

osity

(cps

)

1.50

1.60

1.70

1.80

1.90

2.00

2.10

2.20

2.30

2.40

Den

sity

(s.g

.)

Viscosity (cps)Density S.G.Poly. (Viscosity (cps))Poly. (Density S.G.)

Rheology of Formate Base FluidsRheology of Formate Base Fluids

Page 12: For Mate Fluids

Cesium Acetate applicable as XHPHT Fluid ?Cesium Acetate applicable as XHPHT Fluid ?

Cesium Acetate behaves similarly to Cesium Formate but stable tohigher temperatures.

– Cesium Acetate tested to 600°F in titanium cell with no degradation observed– Eutectic blending with K Acetate for saturated fluid over similar density

range– Buffered pH for control and maintenance with carbonate/bicarbonate– Low solids drill-in fluids formulated with synthetic high temperature stable

polymers for rheology and fluid loss– Non-damaging as completion fluid– Non-corrosive to C-276 type and titanium tubulars– Resistant to CO2 and H2S in similar manner as formate based fluids– Passivating film formation with carbon steel and CO2– High productivity as with Cesium Formate based fluids

Page 13: For Mate Fluids

Autoclave pressure buildAutoclave pressure build--up of Cesium acetate up of Cesium acetate compared to steam pressurecompared to steam pressure

Page 14: For Mate Fluids

Improved well control:

Reduced Risk of Stuck Pipe - Differential and Mechanical

Barite Sag Eliminated - i.e. very low solids content

Excellent Shale Inhibition/Stabilization

Reduced Risk of Tool/ Pump Failures

Thermal Equilibrium Reached Quickly - Reduces Flow-Check Time

Easier Kick Detection and Well Kill

High Dissociation Constant gives Excellent Hydrate Inhibition

Cleaner Completions

All of the above result in Reduced Rig Spread Costs

Reduced Risk of Common Drilling HazardsReduced Risk of Common Drilling Hazards

Page 15: For Mate Fluids

Formulating a FormateFormulating a Formate--Based Reservoir DrillBased Reservoir Drill--In FluidIn Fluid

Particle Diameter (µm.)

Volume (%)

0

10

20

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0 1000.0

Na/K Formate Drilling/Drill-In FormulationDensity 10.8 ppg (Na + K Formate)Viscosifier - 1.0 lb/bblFL-1 0.5 lb/bblFL-2 1.5 lb/bblSoluble Carbonate/Bicarbonate * as pH buffer (4 - 10 lb/bbl)CaCO3 - 15 lb/bbl (PSD is pore throat matched to porosity)

Very stable fluids can be made using commonly available oilfield additives

*Monovalent formate fluids are alkaline buffered pH 10.0 – 10.5 to enhance fluid stability, mitigate influx of acid gases and to minimize corrosion

Page 16: For Mate Fluids

Drilling and Coring with Formate FluidsDrilling and Coring with Formate Fluids

Drilling Operational Behavior - PV, YP and 100 rpm

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

11/2

3/20

03

11/2

5/20

03

11/2

7/20

03

11/2

9/20

03

12/1

/200

3

12/3

/200

3

12/5

/200

3

12/7

/200

3

12/9

/200

3

12/1

1/20

03

12/1

3/20

03

12/1

5/20

03

12/1

7/20

03

12/1

9/20

03

12/2

1/20

03

12/2

3/20

03

12/2

5/20

03

12/2

7/20

03

12/2

9/20

03

12/3

1/20

03

1/2/

2004

1/4/

2004

1/6/

2004

1/8/

2004

1/10

/200

4

1/12

/200

4

1/14

/200

4

1/16

/200

4

1/18

/200

4

1/20

/200

4

1/22

/200

4

1/24

/200

4

PVYP100 RPM

Typical Fluid Properties (Kristin)

Density s.g./ppg 2.09/17.4MD, m. 5249Temp. °C/°F 162/324600 rpm 36300 rpm 21200 rpm 16100 rpm 106 rpm 43 rpm 3Gels 10s/10m 2/4Plastic Viscosity 15Yield Pt. 6pH (9:1) 10.4HPHT, ml 15.8

Formate fluids are easily maintained and show consistency with only small additions necessary over a drill-in campaign

65 day drilling operation

Page 17: For Mate Fluids

Minimize Differential Sticking and Lower Formation DamageMinimize Differential Sticking and Lower Formation Damage

Low Solids significantly reduces the risk of pore plugging

Monovalent base fluid enables drilling of calcium sensitive reservoirs without the risk of precipitation induced impairment.

Extremely low permeability filter cakes minimize filtrate invasion once formed

Extremely thin filter cakes are easily removed during back-flow

LCM pills formulated of more robust drill-in formulation on-the-fly, i.e. increase PSD of CaCO3 and polymer fluid loss additives. Also weighted solids free ‘wall building’ LCM pill

All Case Histories have reported substantial gains (up to 300 %) in well productivity compared to previous wells drilled with other fluids.

Page 18: For Mate Fluids

Improved Hydraulics with Formate FluidsImproved Hydraulics with Formate Fluids

Lower Surge and Swab Pressures– Faster tripping times

Lower Transient Pressure Changes– Reduced risk of hole instability or well control incidents

Lower System Pressure Losses– More available power for motor - higher ROP

Lower ECDs’– Drill in narrower window between pore and fracture pressure gradients– Less chance of fracturing well and causing lost circulation

Low Coefficient of Friction of Base Formate Fluid Higher Flow Rates

– Higher annular velocities give better hole cleaning

Page 19: For Mate Fluids

Coefficient of Friction and Inherent Lubricity of Saturated Coefficient of Friction and Inherent Lubricity of Saturated Formate FluidsFormate Fluids

The more saturated a formate fluid the lower the coefficient of friction and the better the lubricityIf a more lubricious fluid is needed, such as for ER and horizontal wells, formate compatible, non-formation damaging lubricants with COF as low as 0.04 are available

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

Coe

ffici

ent o

f Fri

ctio

n

Metal-to-Metal Metal-to-Sandstone Metal-to-Shale

Coefficient of Friction for Various Densities of Formate Fluids compared to Water at 200°F

Water 200

CsFormate 2.3 S.G. 200

KFormate 1.57 S.G. 200

Cs/K Formate 1.9 S.G. 200

Page 20: For Mate Fluids

Green Canyon Shale Swelling with Formate FluidsGreen Canyon Shale Swelling with Formate FluidsShale Swellmeter Testing

GC 782 No 1 ST3 Shale Exposed toDeionized Water, 10.8, 11.5, and 12.0 lb/gal

Sodium Formate/Potassium Formate Fluids

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100

Time, Hours

Shal

e Sw

ellin

g, %

D.I. Water (58.6% at 96 hrs)

10.8 lb/gal NaF/KF (1.53% at 96 hrs)

11.5 lb/gal NaF/KF (-0.31% at 96 hrs)

12.0 lb/gal NaF/KF (1.19% at 96 hrs)

Reconstituted Shale Plug

Page 21: For Mate Fluids

Diffusion of methane into wellbore => trip gas, kick, degradation of mud properties, increased sagDiffusion of methane into wellbore much reduced with formates compared to OBM

– Reduced diffusion rate– Reduced concentration of methane– Particularly important for horizontal and high angle HPHT wells

Solubility of methane in drilling fluids: T = 300°F (149°C), P = 10,000 psi (690 bar)

Fluid Solubility (kg/m3) Diffusion Coefficient (m2/sec x 108)

Diffusion Flux** (kg/m2s x 106)

Oil Based Mud 164 1.1500 53.3000

Water Based Mud 4.8 2.9260 3.9800

Formate Fluid 1.0926 0.8072 0.2494

** Diffusion fluxes vary more than diffusion coefficients becaus** Diffusion fluxes vary more than diffusion coefficients because they are affected by the increase in e they are affected by the increase in solubility solubility –– formate > water > oilformate > water > oil

Well Control during DrillWell Control during Drill--In Phase In Phase -- DiffusionDiffusion

Page 22: For Mate Fluids

No SwappingNo Swapping--Out of Base Fluid with Formate FluidsOut of Base Fluid with Formate Fluids

Much simpler completion operationVery simple displacement operationCleanout/Sweep pills are also formate based and hence same density and compatibility between drilling/drill-in fluid and completion fluidRun screens in fluid (fluid run over 300 – 400 mesh)Expandable screens have been run in formate fluidVery limited, if any, UB exposure (no UB fluids, pills needed) High heat transfer rate extends life of tools in HT wellsLess tripping = rig-time saved = less $$$$$

Formate FluidFormate FluidFormate FluidWell Control Well Control

during during CompletionCompletion

Drilling/Reservoir Drilling/Reservoir

DrillDrill--In FluidIn Fluid

Page 23: For Mate Fluids

Formation Evaluation - Return Permeability

Difference in clean-up behavior between OBM and Formate MudParticle Size Distribution (PSD) optimized to permeability and pore throat sizeFiltrate invasion can be higher than OBM –needed for thin filtercake depositionWeak Acid wash can provide improved return perm (even > than 100%)

100 %

50 %

12 2416 2084Time (hrs)

% ReturnPermeability

(S)OBMFormate FluidFormate Fluid + Weak Acid

Page 24: For Mate Fluids

Selected Field Experience with Formate Based FluidsSelected Field Experience with Formate Based Fluids

Statoil Kvitebjørn

Statoil Kristin

BP High Island

A-5

Devon West

Cameron 165 A-7, A-8

Devon West

Cameron 165 A-7, A-

8

Walter O&G Mobile Bay

862

No. of wells 7 to date 6 to date 1 1 1 1

Hydrocarbon Gas condensate

Gas condensate Gas Gas

condensate Gas Gas

°C 150 171 163 149 163 216 Max. temp

°F 302 340 325 300 325 420 Completion material CRA S13Cr S13Cr S13Cr 13Cr 13Cr G-3

Liner material CRA 13Cr S13Cr S13Cr 13Cr 13Cr G-3

Brine density g/cm2 2.00 - 2.06 2.09 - 2.13 2.11 1.03 1.14 2.06

CO2 % 2-3 3.5 5 3 3 10

H2S ppm Max 10 12 - 17 12 5 5 100

Exposure time days 57 57 4 3 yrs packer 240 and 270 120 16

325 packer

Application

Drilling Completion /

Screens / Liners

Drilling Completion

Well kill Completion

Packer Packer Packer

Well kill Completion

Packer

HPHT Field Experience with formate fluids over the past twelve years. No corrosion problems have been reported in buffered formate fluids without added corrosion inhibitor.

References:•SPE 98391 “Taking Nondamaging Fluids to New extremes: Formate Based Drilling Fluids for High-Temperature Reservoirs in Pakistan” R.J. Oswald, Petrom SA and D.A. Knox and M.R. Monem, M-I Swaco•IADC/SPE 99068 “Drilling and Completing HP/HT Wells with the Aid of Cesium Formate Brines – A Performance Review” J.D. Downs, M. Blaszczynski, J. Turner, M. Harris, Cabot Specialty Fluids

Page 25: For Mate Fluids

Selected Field Experience with Formate Based FluidsSelected Field Experience with Formate Based Fluids

BP Rhum 3/29a

Shell Shearwater

Marathon Braemar

BP Devenick

Total Elgin/Franklin

Statoil Huldra

No. of wells 3 6 1 1 10 6

Hydrocarbon Gas condensate

Gas condensate

Gas condensate

Gas condensate

Gas Condensate

Gas Condensate

°C 149 182 135 146 204 149 Max. temp

°F 300 360 275 295 400 300 Completion material CRA S13Cr 25Cr 13Cr 13Cr 25Cr S13Cr Liner material CRA S13Cr 25Cr 22Cr VM110 P110 S13Cr Brine density g/cm2 2.00-2.20 2.05-2.20 1.80-1.85 1.60-1.65 2.10-2.20 1.85-1.95

CO2 % 5 3 6.5 3.5 4 4

H2S ppm 5 - 10 20 2.5 5 20 – 50 10 - 14

Exposure time Days 250 65 7 90 450 45

Application PerforationCompletion Workover

Well kill CT

Workover Perforation

Workover Perforation

Drill Completion

Workover Completion CT / Well kill Perforation

Drilling / Completion

Screens

HPHT Field Experience with formate fluids over the past twelve years. No corrosion problems have been reported in buffered formate fluids without added corrosion inhibitor.

Page 26: For Mate Fluids

Workover – Total Elgin/Franklin F7 well has been suspended with 2.15 s.g. (17.92 ppg) Cesium Formate open hole at full temperature (400 °F) for 18 months – awaiting rig availability, possibly Jan 2007

– Well is being continuously monitored for gases, changes in fluid properties, none detected to-date

– Plan thorough inspection and analysis of metals for corrosion and fluid for changes after project is complete (and this will be published)

March 2006 Total E&P UK plc – Development well Glenelg 22/30c-G10Y Satellite from Elgin/Franklin, drilled 24,229’ Highly Deviated Inclination 16.34° -> 64°

– Brought on production after completion and UB perforation through 7” liner with 1.78 s.g.(14.84 ppg) Cesium/Potassium formate

– Reservoir Temperature – 195 °F (383 °F) @ 5,859 m TVDPressure – 1,126 bar (16,331 psi) @ 5,539 m TVD

– Total Depth – 7,383 m MD, TVD – 5,815 m TVD, Gas Condensate– Perforation Losses – 2.0 m3 (12.58 bbl)– Production potential – 30,000 boe per day – Well test has been performed - Actual

production – n/a

Selected 2006 Field Experience with Formate Based FluidsSelected 2006 Field Experience with Formate Based Fluids

Page 27: For Mate Fluids

Petrobras Petrobras EnergiaEnergia –– El El CampamentoCampamento, , Santa Cruz, ArgentinaSanta Cruz, Argentina

Exploratory/Appraisal well - drilling with Cs/K formate Drilled a ‘gage’ hole to 3000 mFound gas in section above target zone – 575 bar (8340 psi), 1.93 s.g. (16 ppg)No indication of gas from offset P&A’d wellWell being cased and cemented and then perforated through formate fluid

Page 28: For Mate Fluids

Thank You for your attention

Specialty Fluids