Information Produced by Research and Statistics Team For Adults & Older People Information Produced by Research and Information Section Community, Health and Social Care Directorate Crompton House PAF Indicators Performance Family Group Comparison Report 2006/7
PAF Indicators Performance Family Group Comparison Report 2006/7. For Adults & Older People. Information Produced by Research and Information Section Community, Health and Social Care Directorate Crompton House. Sheffield. Darlington UA. Gateshead. Newcastle upon Tyne. Wolverhampton. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Information Produced by Research and Statistics Team
For Adults & Older People
Information Produced by Research and Information Section Community, Health and Social Care Directorate
Crompton House
PAF Indicators Performance Family Group Comparison
Report 2006/7
Information Produced by Research and Statistics Team
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Sandwell
Coventry
Bristol UA
Rochdale
Plymouth UA
Tameside
Kingston upon Hull UA
Oldham
Salford
North Tyneside
Walsall
Wolverhampton
Newcastle upon Tyne
Gateshead
Darlington UA
Sheffield
A80 – Drug Misusers sustained in Treatment – Number of drug misusers triaged into treatment beyond a 12 week period as a percentage of those planned.
Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7England 97.14Metropolitan 97.67Family 96.89SALFORD 97.89
Information Produced by Research and Statistics Team
B11 – Intensive Home Care as a percentage of Intensive Residential Care – The number of households receiving intensive home help/care as a percentage of all adults and older people in residential and nursing care and households receiving intensive home help/care.
*Note: Darlington, Gateshead, Kingston upon Hull, Newcastle upon Tyne, North Tyneside, Plymouth and Sheffield are Group 1 Authorities
B12 – Cost of Intensive Social Care for Adults and Older People – Average gross weekly expenditure per person on supporting adults and older people in residential and nursing care and providing intensive home care.
C29 – Adults with physical disabilities helped to live at home – Adults with physical disabilities helped to live at home per 1,000 population aged 18-64.
Information Produced by Research and Statistics Team
C30 – Adults with learning disabilities helped to live at home – Adults with learning disabilities helped to live at home per 1,000 population aged 18-64.
Information Produced by Research and Statistics Team
C31 – Adults with mental health problems helped to live at home – Adults with mental health problems helped to live at home per 1,000 population aged 18-64.
C51 – Direct payments – Adults and Older People receiving direct payments at 31st March per 100,000 population aged 18 or over (age standardised). – (BVPI 201) - Key Threshold
Information Produced by Research and Statistics Team
C72 – Admissions of supported residents aged 65 or over to residential/nursing care The number of Older people aged 65 or over admitted on a permanent basis in the year to residential or nursing care
l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l - - - - <90 90<100 100<110 110<120 120+
Low High
New Definition C72 replaced C26 in 2005/6
Information Produced by Research and Statistics Team
C73 – Admissions of supported residents aged 18-64 to residential/nursing care - Adults aged 18-64 admitted on a permanent basis in the year to residential or nursing care per 10,000 population aged 18-64.
l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l - - - - <1.5 1.5<2.5 2.5<3.5 3.5<4.5 4.5+
Information Produced by Research and Statistics Team
D37 – Availability of single rooms – The percentage of single adults and older people going into permanent residential and nursing care who were allocated single rooms.
Information Produced by Research and Statistics Team
D39 – Percentage of people receiving a statement of their needs and how they will be met – The percentage of adults and older people receiving a statement of their needs and how they will be met.
l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l - - - - 0<20.12 20.12<39.78 39.78<73.28 73.28<106.48 106.48+
Low High
Information Produced by Research and Statistics Team
D54 – % of items of equipment delivered within 7 working days – Percentage of items of equipment and adaptations delivered within 7 working days (BVPI 56) – Key Threshold
D55 – Acceptable waiting times for assessments – For new older clients, the average of (I) the percentage where the time from referral to first contact with client is less than or equal to 48 hours, and (ii) the percentage where the time from first contact to completion of assessment is less than or equal to four weeks. (BVPI 195) – Key Threshold
Information Produced by Research and Statistics Team
D56 – Acceptable waiting times for care packages – For new older clients, the percentage for whom the time from completion of assessment to provision of all services in the care package is less than or equal to 4 weeks. (BVPI 196) – Key Threshold
Information Produced by Research and Statistics Team
MR/D75 – Practice learning – The number of assessed social work practice learning days per whole time equivalent social worker. (Adult practice learning only)
Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7England 15.95Metropolitan 15.97Family 17.88SALFORD 18.03
The practice learning indicator previously included adult and children
Information Produced by Research and Statistics Team
E47 – Ethnicity of older people receiving assessment – The percentage of older service users receiving an assessment or review that are from minority ethnic groups, divided by the percentage of older people in the local population that are from minority ethnic groups.
l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l - 0<1 1<2 - - - - 2+ -
Low High
Information Produced by Research and Statistics Team
E48 – Ethnicity of older people receiving services following an assessment – The percentage of older service users receiving services following an assessment or review that are from a minority ethnic group, divided by the percentage of older service users assessed or reviewed that are from a minority ethnic group.