T he Vedanta Mining case in Odisha has taken another turn after the historic judgment of the Supreme Court on 18 th April 2013. The Odisha government had is- sued notices on 27 th May 2013 to Gram Sabhas in 12 villages in the Niyamgiri Hills (7 in Ray- agada and 5 in Kalahandi Dis- trict), entrusting them to take a decision within three months (from 18 th April 2013) on whether the Vedanta group’s $1.7 billion bauxite mining pro- ject in the area can go forward or not. The decision of the government to call only 12 villages was met by criticism and resentment from the Niyamgiri Surakhya Samiti – NAPM, Forest Rights Campaign Groups and Cam- paign for Survival and Dignity. Prafulla Samantara, National Convener, NAPM opposed it, saying, “the Odisha sarkar has chosen only 12 villages out of more than 100 villages that will be affected by the mining, thereby keeping away a large number of Dongria, Kutia and Jharnia Kondh tribals against the judgment of the Supreme Court”. He added that the state government is taking advantage of the loopholes to manipulate future mining decisions in the area. Facing such protests and oppo- sition, the Odisha Chief Secre- tary, B K Patnaik sent a letter to the Ministry of Tribal Affairs (MoTA) Secretary Vibha Puri Das on 1 st June, explaining the deci- sion to consult Gram Sabhas of only 12 villages in the Niyamgiri Hills. He said that the decision was based on the affidavit filed by it in the Supreme Court of India on 7th January 2013, as per Su- preme Court’s direction in its prior order on 6th December 2012 asking the Government of Odisha “to file affidavit on the Status of the proceeding under Section 6 of the FRA (Forest Rights Act) before the Gram Sabha for the villages on the slopes of Niyamgiri Hill that are likely to be affected by the pro- posed project and the mining operations on the top of the Hill”. The Government of Odisha (GoO) justified it by saying that neither the MoEF (Ministry of Environment and Forests) nor the MoTA had raised the issue of coverage of these 12 villages be- fore the Supreme Court during Violations of Forest Rights in Niyamgiri despite SC order 16th June 2013 Footprints NATIONAL ALLIANCE OF PEOPLE’S MOVEMENTS Volume 1, Issue 1 Protest Updates 7 Events 9 Policy Watch 11 Editorial 11 Inside this issue: Inside this issue: Top Stories:- Vedanta Mining Case: Forest Rights violations con- tinue despite SC order NREGA Minimum Wages: Struggle continues across states Policy Watch: Food Security Bill
Footprints is an NAPM initiative towards providing our friends and supporters updated news of National Alliance for People's Movements and its associates activities, analysis, views and interviews. The newsletter will run on a fort-nightly basis and will be issued on the 1st and 16th each month. We encourage you to send in press re-leases, photographs, articles, situation updates to be featured in Footprints.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
T he Vedanta Mining case in Odisha has taken another
turn after the historic judgment
of the Supreme Court on 18th
April 2013.
The Odisha government had is-
sued notices on 27th May 2013 to Gram Sabhas in 12 villages
in the Niyamgiri Hills (7 in Ray-agada and 5 in Kalahandi Dis-trict), entrusting them to take a
decision within three months (from 18th April 2013) on whether the Vedanta group’s
$1.7 billion bauxite mining pro-ject in the area can go forward
or not. The decision of the government to call only 12 villages was met
by criticism and resentment from the Niyamgiri Surakhya
Samiti – NAPM, Forest Rights Campaign Groups and Cam-paign for Survival and Dignity.
Prafulla Samantara, National Convener, NAPM opposed it, saying, “the Odisha sarkar has
chosen only 12 villages out of more than 100 villages that will
be affected by the mining, thereby keeping away a large number of Dongria, Kutia and
Jharnia Kondh tribals against the judgment of the Supreme
Court”. He added that the state government is taking advantage of the loopholes to manipulate
future mining decisions in the area. Facing such protests and oppo-
sition, the Odisha Chief Secre-tary, B K Patnaik sent a letter
to the Ministry of Tribal Affairs
(MoTA) Secretary Vibha Puri Das on 1st June, explaining the deci-sion to consult Gram Sabhas of
only 12 villages in the Niyamgiri Hills. He said that the decision was
based on the affidavit filed by it in the Supreme Court of India on
7th January 2013, as per Su-preme Court’s direction in its prior order on 6th December
2012 asking the Government of Odisha “to file affidavit on the Status of the proceeding under
Section 6 of the FRA (Forest Rights Act) before the Gram
Sabha for the villages on the slopes of Niyamgiri Hill that are likely to be affected by the pro-
posed project and the mining operations on the top of the
Hill”. The Government of Odisha (GoO) justified it by saying that neither the MoEF (Ministry of
Environment and Forests) nor the MoTA had raised the issue of coverage of these 12 villages be-
fore the Supreme Court during
Violations of Forest Rights in Niyamgiri despite SC order
16th June 2013
Footp
rin
ts
NA
TI
ON
AL
A
LL
IA
NC
E
OF
P
EO
PL
E’
S
MO
VE
ME
NT
S
Volume 1, Issue 1
Protest Updates 7
Events 9
Policy Watch 11
Editorial 11
Inside this issue:Inside this issue:
Top Stories:-
Vedanta Mining Case: Forest Rights violations con-
tinue despite SC order
NREGA Minimum Wages: Struggle continues across
states
Policy Watch: Food Security Bill
the hearing.
The MoTA is vocally opposed to the deci-sion of consulting only 12 Gram Sabhas, and has made it’s stand clear to the Od-
isha government. It had written to the Chief Secretary of the state on 7th June, directing it to ensure the exact number of
villages that would be affected by bauxite mining, and reminding it of the Supreme
Court’s orders which stated that Gram Sabhas of all affected villages are to be consulted. The MoTA even offered it’s as-
sistance, should the government require it, in ensuring that “the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court are complied with
in both letter and spirit.”
The Supreme Court had given onus to the
more than 100 Gram Sabhas of all af-fected villages, together representing
around 10,000
Dongaria Kondh tribals who call
the Niyamgiri Hill their home, to decide on the fu-
ture of the min-ing project. Lead-ers of the Kutiya
Kondh and Ni-yamgiri Dongaria
tribes reportedly approached Gov-ernor S C Jamir
on 12th June, re-questing him to
intervene and prevent this bla-tant suppression
of tribal voices by the state govern-
ment. They emphasised upon the Gover-
nor the sanctity of the proposed mining site and the dependency of the tribes on
the hills, stating that the damage caused to the hills, forests and water bodies by bauxite mining would effectively spell “the
end of our tribe as a community.”
The biggest weapon in the hands of the
tribals is the Forest Rights Act, which
guarantees PTG (Primitive Tribal Group)
Habitat and cultural and religious rights
to the two tribes in question. This fact
has been acknowledged and pointed out
by the MoTA in some among the series
of letters it has written to the Odisha
government. A number of tribal rights
groups is also pressurising the govern-
ment on the same grounds. With the
lives and livelihood of 10,000 tribals on
the one hand and bauxite requirements
of Vedanta on the other depending on
the same 660.749 hectares of land, a
just solution is yet to be reached. But
can there ever be a just solution to
this?
Page 2 FOOTPRINTS
tribal leaders had
approached
Odisha Governor
S C Jamir on 12th
June, requesting
him to intervene
and prevent this
blatant
suppression of
tribal voices by
the state
government
Page 3 FOOTPRINTS
Minimum wages for MGNREGA workers across states – Struggle Continues
there are six states in the country where
MNREGA wages are less than the mini-mum wages for unskilled agricultural
workers prescribed by state.
The Karnataka High Court ruling- now upheld by the Supreme Court- has
obligated the Central Government to pay arrears to all its workers in Andhra
Pradesh, Rajasthan, Karnataka, Kerala, Goa and Mizoram. The arrears alone are estimated to cost the Centre Rs. 1,800
crore for 2009-10 and 2010- 11, ac-cording to a statement made by Rural
Affairs Minister Jairam Ramesh to The Hindu. However, the minister also stated that he was in favour of paying mini-
mum wages to MNREGA labourers. UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi and the Na-
tional Advisory Council (NAC) had also pres-
surised Prime M i n i s t e r
M a n m o h a n Singh to ad-h e r e t o
m i n i m u m wages under t h e
M G N R E G A . Sonia Gandhi,
in her position as chairper-son of NAC,
had written to the Prime Minister as early as in 2010, urging him to treat the matter as “urgent”, and to bring
MGNREGA wages at par with minimum
wages guaranteed by State governments.
However, that remains on paper till date.
The battle recently won by daily wage labourers in Bihar, had begun years ago
in 2009 when the wage rate of MGNREGA was frozen at Rs. 100 by the
Central government. Numerous states have increased their minimum wage rates above Rs. 100 since then. The first
O n May 15, the Patna High Court ruled
against the Bihar government's deci-sion to reduce wages of workers under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Em-
ployment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) to Rs. 138 from Rs. 144 per day. The peti-tioner in the case - Jan Jagaran Shakti
Sangathan (JJSS), an union of NREGA workers - hailed the High Court’s decision,
and is now working to ensure for workers at least Rs. 168 daily wage - the minimum wage guaranteed to labourers by Bihar
under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948.
The Supreme Court of India had sent out
the same message in January 2012, when it had refused to stay an order by the
Karnataka High court that directed the Central government to pay MNREGA work-ers in Karnataka according to the mini-
mum wages decided by the state govern-ment. Senior Advocate Anil Divan, arguing
against the Union of India at the Supreme Court hearing, had pointed out that non- payment of minimum wages to workers for
the past 27 years is akin to forced labour. This statement has since been cited by numerous activists and people’s rights or-
ganisations in different states in their ar-guments for minimum wages to MNREGA
workers by the Central government.
The main contention of activists and or-
ganisatons like Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS), National Alliance for
People’s Movements (NAPM) and Peo-ple’s Action for Employment Guarantee (PAEG) is Section 6(1) of MGNREGA. The
section empowers the Central government to decide and revise wages in MNREGA projects, “Notwithstanding anything con-
tained in the MWA, 1948”. Thus, a la-bourer working under the MGNREGA is
paid wages determined by the Centre, regardless of the safety net of minimum wage for unskilled agricultural workers
that has been decided by the state where he/she resides and works. At present,
Labourers working
under the MGNREGA is
paid wages determined
by the Centre,
regardless of the safety
net of minimum wage
for unskilled agricultural
workers decided by the
state.
Page 4 FOOTPRINTS
matter as “urgent”, and to bring
MGNREGA wages at par with minimum wages guaranteed by State governments.
However, that remains on paper till date.
The battle recently won by daily wage la-bourers in Bihar, had begun years ago in 2009 when the wage rate of MGNREGA
was frozen at Rs. 100 by the Central gov-ernment. Numerous states have increased
their minimum wage rates above Rs. 100 since then. The first voices of protests against frozen wage rates were raised in
Andhra Pradesh that very year, and the Andhra Pradesh High Court had ruled pay-
ment of wages below minimum wage as
“unconstitutional” in July 2009.
Though labourers in the State of Bihar are
yet to be granted this right, the recent
government decision to benchmark wage
rates against inflation is expected to pro-
vide some boost. In the meantime, it is
hoped that the Centre and States among
themselves may soon reach a compromise
and take responsibility for the anticipated
rise in wages.
O n April 25 afternoon, a mob of Pattali
Makkal Katchi (PMK) workers, all of them caste Hindu Vanniyars, burnt down houses, hit, and terrorized people of the
Dalit colony in Marakkanam and Kooni-medu areas in the East Coast Road
(ECR), Tamil Nadu, on their way to the
Chithirai Thiruvizha (a festival) at M a m a l l a p u r a m
beach. The PMK cadres
were reported set-ting fire to homes of
the dalits, govern-ment and private buses, cars, ration
shops and liquor outlets, damaging
culverts, cutting down trees, looting valuables worth lakhs of rupees and so on. They also targeted the
ruling All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) legislators’ homes and offices.
The police have booked cases of rioting,
among other charges, under the IPC, be-sides Section 3 of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against 1,512 unidentified
persons for torching the buses, police
vehicles, ransacking the toll plaza at Anu-
manthai, and setting fire to tenements. On April 29, Chief Minister Jayalalithaa
declared in the Assembly that “action will be taken, as per law, against anyone who, for selfish ends, instigates the innocent
public on the basis of caste and religion and those who take part in violence and
endanger law and order”. She ordered an arrest of Ramadoss, PMK
chief. The police also arrested PMK presi-dent G.K. Mani,former Union Health Minister and Ramadoss’ son Dr Anbumani
Ramadoss, party legislator Kaduvetti J. Guru, former legislator Tirukachchur K.
Arumugam and former Union Minister A.K. Moorthy.
The arrests led to further violence by PMK cadre. They burned down 17 private vehi-
cles including lories and damaged about 800 public transport buses by hurling pet-rol bombs. PMK called for a bandh on May
3rd in Puducherry, which has a sizable population of Vanniyars, and threatened to block trains in order to highlight its de-
mand for the release of the party’s leaders. Other districts where dalits form a large
part of the population also got affected. Representatives of National Alliance of Peo-
ple’s Movements visited the affected areas
Tribal leaders had
approached
Odisha Governor
S C Jamir on 12th
June, requesting
him to intervene
and prevent this
blatant
suppression of
tribal voices by
the state
government.
Atrocities against Dalits in Marakkanam
Page 5 FOOTPRINTS
on May 23rd and spoke with the members of the community who were affected by the
violence. Mr. Natarajan and Mr. Muthan were two of the victims. They reported that about 400 men, few of them who were
drunk, attacked their settlement with per-trol bombs, bringing down about 11 homes. They molested their women, insult-
ing and abusing them. The people didn’t feel secure even after the incident was over
as there was no immediate response from the police and there was no police station
nearby.
The PMK and Dalit conflict has been linger-
ing for quite some time now. The PMK
claims that Dalits marry Vanniyar women
for money, and they misuse the Scheduled
Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of
Atrocities Act), 1989. In November 2012,
the party was accused of large-scale vio-
lence in Dharmapuri, western Tamil Nadu,
where three Dalit villages were devastated
over an inter-caste marriage. PMK leaders
have been noted instigating hate speeches
against inter-caste marriages and support-
ing honour killings.
NAPM writes to NHRC asking for inter-
vention in the matter
T he unimaginable hatred and actions of
the Vanniyar community and PMK
party is violating the value and principle of
equity, enshrined in the Indian Constitu-
tion. It causes infringement upon the fun-
damentals of rights and dignity of dalit
communities, including Right to Life, un-
der Article 21 of the constitution. It is ab-
solutely necessary that the strictest possi-
ble legal action be taken against the
casteist force of PMK , their leaders and
identified local leaders who led the vandal-
ism, arson and loot. Since PMK is a party
that is also encouraging strong political al-
liance and open campaigning during elec-
tions, it is further infesting on politics,
against the framework of the Representa-
tion of People’s Act. All this has caused, is
causing and will lead to brutal and inhu-
man atrocities against dalits, shattering
the social fabric of Tamil and Indian soci-
ety, and therefore can’t be tolerated, with-
out the strictest possible action. It, being
an act of criminal offence against the dalit
communities, we demand the following ac-
tions to be taken with utmost priority and
promptness.
1. A team of senior most members of
the Commission should visit Marakkanam
and other places where atrocities have
been committed against dalits during last
two years (at least). Also, undertake an in
depth inquiry into
all casteist actions
of PMK/VS as a so-
cial political organi-
zation. Its result
may be submitted to
the citizens of this
country, the Presi-
dent of India, the
Governor of Tamil
Nadu, the Ministry
of Social Justice and
empowerment, and
the Chief Minister,
the Opposition
leader and the legislature (both houses) of
the Tamil Nadu Assembly and the Parlia-
ment, within next three months.
2. The state government of Tamil Nadu may be directed to file cases under the
Prevention of atrocities against SC/ST Act, 1989 and Rule 1995.
3. The state government of Tamil Nadu may be directed to provide full security and compensation including medical
About 400 men, few
of them who were
drunk, attacked their
settlement with
pertrol bombs,
bringing down about
11 homes. They
molested their
women, insulting and
abusing them.
Page 6 FOOTPRINTS
treatment, replacement of lost and burnt
belongings and rebuilding of all houses that were set on fire, within next one
month, beyond whatever compensation is already paid to them.
4. The dalit families in Marakkanam are salt pan workers and other manual la-bourers without any protective measures
granted under the Social Security Act, without any benefits under various social
economic schemes. The state government and local authorities should be directed to extend all possible benefits to them, alto-
gether about 10000 families in Marak-kanam, we are told and report be submit-
ted to your honourable commission. 5. The dalit community we visited (under attack) don’t have even proper drinking
supply which the state government should be directed to immediately provide to them.
5. The state government should be di-
rected to take appropriate action consult-ing the Election Commission of India, against the casteism in politics promoted
by the PMK, at the earliest, to have reper-cussions as their role in 2014 elections. Hon. Governor of Tamil Nadu may be rec-
ommended to intervene as per his power under Schedule II of the Constitution and
take action to protect SCs in Tamil Nadu.
On May 23rd when our team along with Medha Patkar tried to reach the dalit
community affected, we were stopped by the state police, referring to orders against
our entry under section 144 CrPC. On be-ing asked to show us a copy of the order, the authorities present were unable to
produce one. Our team managed to reach the violence affected area but there too the policemen present made attempts to
stop us from talking and interviewing the
people and photographing the place
We, therefore, demand that orders under section 144 should be withdrawn as
the enclosed order, (Annexe 3) as seen from only page 3 furnished to us by the po-
lice at the end of our visit, is absolutely
discriminatory against social activists. The order equates us with the political leaders
spreading casteist venom, insulting and impinging upon our Right to Information, Right to Expression of solidarity with the
dalits facing atrocities and isolating the dalits who continue to live in fear. The state of Tamil Nadu should be recom-
mended to distinguish between the casteist, violent politicians and non violent
social and human rights activists and al-
low latter to visit any dalit community.
We are hoping a prompt response and ac-
tion towards fulfilment of our demands
mentioned above at the earliest possible,
with a promise to be of help and support in
the investigative work by the Commission.
Page 7 FOOTPRINTS
Protest Updates GBGB: Struggle of Urban Poor in Mumbai in full swing
Since the 10 – day fast involving thousands
of slum dwellers in April 2013, the Ghar Bachao Ghar Banao Andolan has received
committed support from many citizens, or-ganizations & movements across the coun-try. Many positive developments have
taken place since then.
The process of enquiry by the Principal
Secretary - Housing into 6 large SRA pro-jects, that was approved by the Chief Min-
ister in January 2013 has progressed fur-ther. Hearing sessions, which began in February, resumed in full force on April
29th and were attended by all Ghar Bachao Ghar Banao activists with Medha
Patkar, Madhuri Shivkar, Sandeep Yeole, Sumit Wajale and also leaders and people from the six SRA projects. All the builders
too were present for their respective ses-
sions.
Post this hearing, each organization from the affected localities prepared a final writ-ten submission in response to the docu-
ments & arguments made by the builders. The report of the Principal Secretary, Mr. D. Chakravarty, is under preparation & we
hear that an extensive process of seeking replies from the officials implicated in the
statement by the complainants is also un-
derway.
Meanwhile a parallel process of the Jan-Ayog (People’s Commission of enquiry ap-
pointed by NAPM) was on. Public hearings
were held at the six projects sites under
the chairmanship of Justice Suresh with Prof. Amita Bhide (TISS), Shri Chandrasek-har D., Simpreet Singh and other mem-
bers. This Commission will release its re-
port on June 24th.
Our work in the undeclared slums was
successful in taking ahead the process of assessing amenities and getting the BMC
to provide those. There is a huge gap in the norms-based proportion of amenities and actual ground level situation. For thou-
sands of people, there are not even tens of toilet seats available. No water taps, no tanks have lead to a water mafia that reaps
huge benefits, causing severe deprivation to people. Malnourishment is another seri-
ous problem in 52% of the slums of Mum-bai. MCGM’s data on each is far from per-
fect.
We realize that contracts for toilet con-struction granted to certain NGOs are not
duly executed and there are many prob-lems. We have to take this further in the case of about 10 - 15 slums we work with,
following this monsoon as we now have
committees for each slum formed, who will
monitor & manage toilet, water supply and
such amenities.
Demolitions preceded the monsoon and
hence we had to be prepared. This year due to continuous protest the demolitions were limited, especially in the slums asso-
ciated with Ghar Banao Ghar Bachao An-dolan. There was a threat posed to hun-
dreds of houses in Adarsh Nagar and In-dira Nagar, Mankhurd. However after many long dialogues with Mr. Kishore Gan-
dhi, Assistant Municipal Commissioner and a thorough inspection conducted jointly by GBGB activists and BMC engi-
neers the demolition got limited to 150 houses and others were saved. Those
evicted stay and will be resettled, keeping
in mind the drainage requirement.
Rajiv Awas Yojana is a ‘RAY’ of hope for
slum dwellers in Mumbai, up against builder lobby, exploitation of land grab.
The Mandala pilot project is being taken
forward.
Page 8 FOOTPRINTS
Civil Society Members rubbish Modi’s accusations against activist Harsh
Mandar
Civil society members rallied together to
declare their support for activist and for-mer civil servant Harsh Mandar, yet an-
other target of Narender Modi’s divisive games. A jointly issued statement stated ,“It is shocking that ‘PM aspirant’ Narendra
Modi is calling him(Mandar) a Maoist thus trying to belittle his work and vilifying his
name in public.”
Modi labelled Mandar a ‘Maoist’ since the
latter hired Padma, a poor single woman estranged from her husband, as a care giver in a children’s institution. The NDA’s
Election Chief also accused Mandar of be-ing involved in the abduction of former
District Collector of Malkangiri, Vineel Krishna. This tactic isn’t new with Syeda
Hammed, Teesta Setalvad, Shabnam
Hashni and Dr. Binayak Sen, all having been made targets of Modi’s continuous
hate campaign.
Harsh Mandar resigned from the Civil Ser-
vices in 2002 and plunged himself in Guja-
rat and other parts of India in order to
quell communal fire from spreading and
working towards justice and rehabilitation
of the survivors.
“This absolutely absurd claim only exposes
his (Modi) brand of politics. It is steeped in the practices of the RSS, from where Mr. Modi has learnt to distort facts and spread
hate. It is vital for all to understand that the perils of allowing such politics to take centre stage where democratic rights of
12th June, New Delhi
Page 9 FOOTPRINTS
people are attacked and impacting their
right to work as they choose, amounts to an attack on the very basis of our country's
plural existence. We hope that such poli-tics will not be promoted by political par-
ties and the media so that people can con-
tinue to work freely for public good.”
Two workers die, Two injured in illegal sand mine in the Narmada Valley
NBA demands comprehensive inquiry: Complete halt to the illegal activity
In another shocking incident, two young
wage labourers Bhanu S/o Fathu and Jeevan S/o Vishram were crushed under
huge sand boulders and succumbed on the spot in the illegal sand mines in village Pendra, Badwani. Two other labourers
Mendubai, widow of Rajendra, and Gird-hari were seriously injured in a landslide caused by the erosion sinking them for
more than half an hour.
As per the brave and candid statement of
Mendubai, not less than 300 to 400 work-ers were working at the bottom of the 40 feet deep mining pit at the time of the inci-
dent. The rains had made the sand walls brittle on all four sides and suddenly there was a massive slide.
2nd June, Badwani
Page 10 FOOTPRINTS
The police inquiry into these deaths is ob-viously has not been thorough; the illegal
mining mafia is trying hook and crook to silence the matter. Reportedly, the main
contractor, Mr. Suresh Patel and his two sons from village Kundia, had paid lakhs of rupees to Raju Jalal for excavation of the
land for sand. Earlier in the day, Medha Patkar and a few activists visited the la-
bourers admitted at the hospital and also the spot at Village Pendra where the inci-dent had occurred. The adjacent land of
Champalal Awasya and his brothers (Raju’s cousins), other lands belonging to Mohan, Bherusing and his father Ruk-
hadiya have also been sold, while they are either yet to get land or have been entan-
gled in the fake registry scam. However, some of such land owner outstees, along with the politician-bureaucrat-contractors
nexus have earned lakhs of ruppes in this illegal mine game, that is going on in vil-
lages in the Narmada valley, in the very
lands that have been acquired for or are adjacent to the lands acquired for the
Sardar Sarovar Project by the Narmada Valley Development Authority.
The Rehabilitation Officer, SSP, Badwani, has clearly stated in his letter dated 14-05-
2013 that the NVDA has never given a No-Objection Certificate to the sand mining on
the lands acquired for the SSP. The entire mining activity is illegal since it violates the provisions of the Narmada Water Disputes
Tribunal Award that stipulate that the lands acquired can be used only for the purposes of submergence and not other-
wise. In spite of the fact that the Supreme Court has categorically directed that no
sand mining leases or renewal of leases can be given without approval of the Union Ministry of Environment and Forests, the
Badwani Collector has given an illegal three – month extension from the sand
mines, from April, 2013.
Page 11 FOOTPRINTS
NAPM YUVA SHIVIR—HYDERABAD
Jana Vigyana Vedika Office, Khairtabad, Hyderabad,
Andhra Pradesh
28th - 29th June
Contact: Sashank Rajwadi - 07842439062
Seela - 09818411417
When we are young, we are full of idealism,
visions and dreams of changing the world but we also have the pressures of career,
fulfilling parental and societal aspirations and with changing times dealing with new challenges. Yuva Shivir provides an oppor-
tunity to the yuva saathis to discuss con-temporary issues and know the dynamics
and challenges of organising at the grass-roots. Shivir will also be joined by Sandeep Pandey, Rajendra Singh, Suniti S R, and
others.
Please pass on the message to yuva saathis
in the andolan and even those in universi-ties and young professionals who want to