For internal use only Updated 11-2010 Food Safety Crisis Communication Response Plan Introduction A crisis is typically defined as any event that can disrupt a company’s operations and damage its brand, reputation, credibility and/or bottom line. Planning for a crisis allows an organization to define the potential impact of a crisis event on the company and affected stakeholder groups, and to identify subsequent damage to the brand, reputation and performance of the organization. The effect of a food-borne illness on the industry can be swift and staggering. This blueprint will help ensure that FFVA as an organization is as prepared as possible to respond in a responsible, concerted manner, and that we can assist our members as well. This Crisis Communication Response Plan is based on several fundamental communication principles: openness, honesty, accessibility, accommodation and accuracy. In addition, certain strategies are critical to the successful implementation of this plan: a prepared response team, visible involvement by top management, speed in handling the situation, and compassion and aid for those who are suffering. Philosophy and approach In the event of a public health threat in which consumers are worried about their safety, the best communication philosophy is, “Tell the truth, tell it all, and tell it quickly.” While that may go against our instincts to batten down the hatches in a crisis, the stark reality is that if you’re not talking, someone else will be, especially in today’s world of 24/7 news coverage, the Internet and social media. We should be armed with facts to ward off speculation and reduce fear. That said, the cornerstones for our response efforts should consist of the following: Demonstrate leadership and decisiveness by doing the right thing. Communicate honestly and in a timely manner. Doing so establishes credibility. Confirm what we can but do not speculate. Take action quickly to shorten the life cycle of the crisis to the extent possible.
32
Embed
Food Safety Crisis Communication Response Plan - ffva.com · Assist in logistics of satellite media tour or news conference if deemed necessary ... routing to another media spokesperson
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
For internal use only Updated 11-2010
Food Safety
Crisis Communication Response Plan
Introduction
A crisis is typically defined as any event that can disrupt a company’s operations and
damage its brand, reputation, credibility and/or bottom line. Planning for a crisis allows
an organization to define the potential impact of a crisis event on the company and
affected stakeholder groups, and to identify subsequent damage to the brand, reputation
and performance of the organization.
The effect of a food-borne illness on the industry can be swift and staggering. This
blueprint will help ensure that FFVA as an organization is as prepared as possible to
respond in a responsible, concerted manner, and that we can assist our members as well.
This Crisis Communication Response Plan is based on several fundamental
communication principles: openness, honesty, accessibility, accommodation and
accuracy. In addition, certain strategies are critical to the successful implementation of
this plan: a prepared response team, visible involvement by top management, speed in
handling the situation, and compassion and aid for those who are suffering.
Philosophy and approach
In the event of a public health threat in which consumers are worried about their safety,
the best communication philosophy is, “Tell the truth, tell it all, and tell it quickly.”
While that may go against our instincts to batten down the hatches in a crisis, the stark
reality is that if you’re not talking, someone else will be, especially in today’s world of
24/7 news coverage, the Internet and social media. We should be armed with facts to
ward off speculation and reduce fear. That said, the cornerstones for our response efforts
should consist of the following:
Demonstrate leadership and decisiveness by doing the right thing.
Communicate honestly and in a timely manner. Doing so establishes credibility.
Confirm what we can but do not speculate.
Take action quickly to shorten the life cycle of the crisis to the extent possible.
For internal use only Updated 11-2010
Objectives and strategies:
To protect public health.
To provide factual information as quickly as possible.
To be perceived as caring, concerned and reacting responsibly.
To ensure all communication is accurate, on message, timely and proactive to the
extent possible.
To humanize the industry and the involved company or companies through their
spokespersons and communications.
To focus on responsible actions, such as a recall, and changes made to ensure
safety.
To expedite recovery and return to normal operations as quickly as possible.
Conduct during a crisis should be:
Compassionate and caring
Honest and truthful
Give adversaries’ motives the benefit of the doubt
Open-minded, receptive to appropriate compromise
Restrained
Solution-driven
Poised
Perceptive
Professional
Tools (including but not limited to):
Written statements
News releases
Social media
E-blasts
Web site
Media interviews
Face-to-face meetings
Satellite media tour
Press conferences
Media monitoring
For internal use only Updated 11-2010
FFVA key audiences/stakeholders
Members of these groups should receive consistent, approved information simultaneously
whenever possible (or at least simultaneously within a particular stakeholder group). It is
critical to speak with one voice. Deviating from key messages will create confusion.
Internal:
Board of directors
Membership
Employees
External:
Media
FFVA members’ customers
Affected consumers and their families
General consuming public
Regulators
County health department(s)
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
Florida Department of Health
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (local, regional, D.C. offices)
Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Elected officials
Congressional
State
Local
Other industry groups/associations that may become involved and whom may have
similar interests on the issue, such as (but not limited to):
United Fresh Produce Association
Produce Marketing Association
Other state growers’ organizations
Florida Restaurant Association
National Restaurant Association
Food Marketing Institute
For internal use only Updated 11-2010
Crisis Response Team
The core group listed below should meet quarterly to discuss areas of vulnerability not
only on food safety but other risk areas, as well as any updates that should be made to the
communication plan:
Mike Stuart
Lisa Lochridge
Mike Aerts
Dan Botts
Kerry Kates
Mike Carlton
Dr. Martha Roberts
FFVA Board Chairman Drew Duda
In the event the Crisis Response Plan is activated, the following members may be added
to the team to assist in the plan’s execution, as well as any others deemed necessary:
Board of Directors Executive Committee representative
Representative(s) from other industry association(s)
Legal counsel
Barbara Wunder
Martha Tucker
Billi Butler
For internal use only Updated 11-2010
Crisis Response Team Responsibilities
Lisa Lochridge:
With Mike Stuart, Dan Botts and Martha Roberts, conduct initial fact-gathering
and crisis audit/analysis, and activate crisis response
Immediately assess media involvement (live TV trucks on site, calls coming in)
and news coverage to date
Assess member facilities to determine feasibility of setting up an on-site press
area if needed
Travel to location if necessary with media assistant (can be someone from the
company) to set up press area
Determine whether to interact personally with local reporter who will “own”
coverage
Handle response to all media calls, directing to the appropriate media
spokesperson(s)
Brief Crisis Response Team daily either by conference call or e-mail (or more
often as needed early on)
Develop and approve member alerts, news releases, media alerts and statements,
tweets, Facebook posts, blogs and other social media
Approve news releases, media alerts and statements, and member alerts
As spokesperson, participate in print and TV interviews
Media train key contact(s) at member company
Monitor/assess traditional news media coverage and social media for
communication of key messages and any changes in tone of coverage to see
whether messages should be adjusted
Assess need for satellite news conference or media tour; work with FDA or other
agencies on any joint news conferences
Review plan daily for the duration of the event and adjust as needed
Mike Stuart:
With Lisa Lochridge, Dan Botts and Martha Roberts, conduct initial fact-
gathering and crisis audit/analysis, and activate crisis response
Lead Crisis Response Team briefings
Communicate internally to employees to keep them apprised of response efforts
Communicate with other industry groups and elected state and federal officials
and their staffs.
Approve all news releases and media alerts (optional)
As spokesperson, participate in print and TV interviews
Dan Botts:
With Mike Stuart, Lisa Lochridge and Martha Roberts, conduct initial fact-
gathering and crisis audit/analysis
Provide technical background and expertise as needed for the development of key
messages and communication components such as news releases and media alerts
For internal use only Updated 11-2010
Communicate one-on-one with other industry groups and elected officials as
needed
Participate in Crisis Response Team briefings
Martha Roberts:
With Lisa Lochridge and Mike Stuart, conduct initial fact-gathering and crisis
audit/analysis, and activate crisis response
Serve as liaison with county health department(s), FDACS contacts, local and
regional FDA offices and CDC as they work to narrow the investigation. Provide
regular updates to Crisis Response Team
Review news releases, media alerts and statements as needed
Participate in Crisis Response Team briefings
As spokesperson, participate in print and TV interviews
Member contact(s):
Participate in Crisis Response Team briefings
Communicate media response policy to employees and ensure enforcement
Serve as point person for retail and food service customers
Participate in media training as needed
Participate in print and TV interviews as deemed necessary and/or appropriate
Follow procedures on crisis checklist for the facility
Barbara Wunder:
Develop “dark” page on Web site to serve as an online newsroom that can be
launched quickly. After it goes live, oversee online newsroom and post updates as
needed
Participate in Crisis Response Team briefings
Contact news service to monitor media and gather clips
Work with Lisa to develop news releases, media alerts and/or statements, social
media posts/updates, and member alerts
Distribute approved media materials and member alerts via e-mail, fax or hard
copy (on site)
Work with IT to ensure we can track number of hits to online newsroom
Monitor blogs and respond when necessary with correct, factual information
Assist in logistics of satellite media tour or news conference if deemed necessary
Billi Butler/ Martha Tucker/ Nell Brown:
Ensure all Crisis Response Team members have updated copy of plan (ongoing)
Set up control center (conference room) furnished with phone, functioning TV,
laptops, office supplies, white board and markers
Arrange conference calls as needed
Participate in Crisis Response Team briefings
Field incoming media calls, enter information on call log for callbacks, and
forward to Lisa
For internal use only Updated 11-2010
If necessary, set up an 800 phone line with recorded greeting for incoming calls to
affected member(s)
Distribute communication from Mike to rest of employees as needed (Sue
Lukasik)
Function as on-site media assistant in setting up press area
Initial Crisis Response Checklist
Completed
(date, time)
Task Person(s)
responsible
Conduct initial fact-gathering and crisis audit/analysis
(See Fact-Finding Questionnaire) and activate crisis
response
MS, LL, DB,
MR
Assess media involvement (live TV trucks on site, calls
coming in) and extent of news coverage
LL
Prepare conference room to be “control center”
BB
Alert Crisis Response Team members and notify them of
conference call time and call-in information. Set up call.
MT
Hold initial conference call/briefing with Crisis Response
Team. Goals will be to:
Discuss what we know
Review the Crisis Response Plan
Review/refine key messages
Develop initial statement and/or news release and
talking points
Map out next steps according to the Crisis
Response Plan and set time for next briefing
MS, LL
Entire CRT
Member(s) should communicate media response policy
to employees and activates their own emergency
protocols
Member(s)
Initiate procedure for handling incoming calls
Copy and distribute phone call log to all
Are additional phone lines needed/available?
Identify backup phone staff
Designate runner to pick up call log sheets at
regular intervals
LL
Ensure supplies are ready in the event we need to travel
to member location
BB
For internal use only Updated 11-2010
Assess member facilities to determine feasibility of
setting up an on-site press area. Travel to location if
necessary (potentially with media assistant)
LL
Determine whether to interact personally with local
reporter who will “own” coverage
LL
Communicate internally to employees either by e-mail or
in special called meeting to inform them of response
efforts
MS
Double-check content on “dark” newsroom page on Web
site and launch it live with statement or news release
BW
Check to see what “hold” message is on the phone
system. Change if needed.
BW
Communicate one-on-one with other industry groups,
regulators and elected officials as needed
MS, DB, MR
Review media training tips with key contact at member
company
LL
Monitor/assess news coverage for communication of key
messages and any changes in tone of coverage to see
whether messages should be adjusted
LL/BW
Ongoing activities
Monitoring the situation to determine when there is
sufficient new information to issue a new news release or
statement
LL, MS, MR
Relay media phone inquiries to Lisa for response or
routing to another media spokesperson
NB, others
Monitor/assess news coverage for communication of key
messages and any changes in tone to determine whether
messages should be adjusted
LL, BW
Advise/assist member(s) in communicating with
employees and media
LL
Participate in media interviews via phone as needed and
record them
LL, MS, MR
Communicate one-on-one (e-mail or phone) with other
industry groups, elected officials and regulators as
needed
MS, MR, LL
Conduct Crisis Response Team briefings LL, MS
For internal use only Updated 11-2010
Fact-Finding Questionnaire
This document is design to assist in fact-gathering as soon as it appears there is a crisis.
This initial information will form the basis for decisions moving forward.
Triggering events:
-- We hear from sources that PulseNet is showing clusters of a pathogen being reported
-- FDA issues an advisory for consumers to avoid a specific product
-- A voluntary recall is issued by a Florida producer or handler based on a routine
inspection/sample by FDA
Fact-finding goal: To determine the facts, who knows what and what has been said to
whom.
What can we learn from:
The affected member?
FDA contacts?
FDACS contacts?
Florida Department of Health?
County health department?
What is the FDA’s (or other agencies’) timing for announcing this to the public/media?
If a specific commodity has been named:
What are the known facts?
Is that crop in production in Florida right now?
Has anyone been hospitalized? Where and what is their condition?
If a pathogen is involved, has it been identified?
Has anyone died, and when? Has the family been notified?
Were there any injuries that did not require hospitalization?
Do any FFVA members have knowledge of the situation? If so, what do they
know?
If a Florida source has been named:
What are the known facts?
What is the defect?
What hazard does it present to consumers?
Is it related to raw food ingredients or packaging?
When and where was it grown?
How much was produced? What remains in the supply chain?
For internal use only Updated 11-2010
What has been shipped? How much is still in inventory?
Has the company been visited by investigators?
What has the company been given any details by investigators?
What, if anything, has been communicated to the company’s employees?
Have there been any media inquiries, either by phone or on site? If so, from
whom?
Has anyone spoken to the media? If so, what was asked/said?
Are other FFVA members aware of the situation and additional details?
Are any elected officials aware of the situation?
Are any other industry groups aware of the situation and any additional details?
Communication strategy questions to consider
Media:
Will the news media get information on the situation whether we give it to them or not?
Will our reputation with members and the public be affected unless we tell our story
aggressively through the news media?
Is the situation more appropriately handled by other industry groups?
Food safety and/or environmental regulators:
Are there legal requirements to be met?
Will outreach mitigate any regulatory actions?
Will regulators support the company’s actions?
Elected officials, community leaders:
Will they get constituent calls?
Will they be outspoken on the issue?
Do we have a positive history/relationship with them?
For internal use only Updated 11-2010
Issue analysis/ risk assessment
Define the issue: A food-borne illness (E. coli, salmonella, listeria, hepatitis A, etc.)
traced back to a Florida grower or handler.
Why is this issue a concern to FFVA? As the statewide trade association for Florida’s
producers of fruits, vegetables and other crops, our members will look to us to take the
lead in communicating with the media. As we saw in the case of California spinach being
linked to the illness of hundreds and the deaths of three people, any outbreak that is
determined to have originated in a field or packing/processing operation in Florida will
be devastating to the individual companies and the industry as a whole.
Who is responsible for handling media calls on this issue? Lisa Lochridge will handle
incoming calls once they have been screened by the receptionist, prioritize them and
direct them to the appropriate spokesperson, depending on the request and the expertise
needed to answer the questions.
What is the potential impact of this issue on FFVA operations and/or its reputation? As the leading organization representing the produce industry in Florida, a lot is at stake
for FFVA, both from a membership standpoint and a consumer standpoint. We must take
a leadership role in being responsible to our members and responsive to the public
through various channels.
Describe the level and intensity of potential media interest.
It will be extremely high and will occur at all levels – local, statewide and national – and
in both the mainstream media as well as the trade press.
What are the perceived and/or factual strengths and weaknesses in the controversy?
Strengths:
□ The relatively small number of outbreaks compared with produce consumed each
day in the United States:
□ Over a billion servings of fresh produce are eaten every day.
□ More than 5 million bags of salad are sold every day.
□ And, out of the hundreds of fruit and vegetables offered in a typical
supermarket, only a few have been implicated in illness outbreaks in recent years.
□ Few food-borne illness outbreaks have been traced to Florida producers
□ Florida producers – in particular the tomato industry – have led the nation in
proactively developing food safety standards for the growing and packing of fresh
product. The standards are law, and producers are inspected by government
inspectors.
□ Others?
For internal use only Updated 11-2010
Weaknesses
□ Additional GAPs and BMPs will not eliminate all risks of an outbreak
□ There is a continuing need for more science on which to base metrics
What do we know about public opinion on this issue?
Consumer confidence has been shaken by incidents in recent years. While consumers’
memories tend to be short, any new incidents of food-borne illness will bring fear quickly
back to the forefront. The cumulative effect of each outbreak that occurs will hurt
consumer opinion on the safety of fresh produce.
What are the geographic considerations for this issue?
Food-borne illness has risen to such an interest level that any outbreak, regardless of how
far it spreads, has the potential to gain national interest almost immediately.
□ Local/state focus: The particular farm, packinghouse or fresh-cut processing
plant where the contamination originated
□ Regional focus: Any other states where that grower or handler may operate
□ National focus:
- How widely has the contaminated produce been distributed?
- What does this mean for our food supply chain? Why can’t we ensure that it’s
safe?
- A stronger call for mandatory state or federal regulations
What are the key legal implications?
We can expect civil litigation against the company where the contamination occurred,
whether producer, packinghouse or processor. In some cases, criminal prosecution would
be a possibility.
How could the situation be perceived by:
□ Consumers: Another threat to their health – what can they be sure of anymore
when it comes to consuming fresh produce from the grocery store or in a
restaurant?
□ Industry partners: The food supply is only as strong as its weakest link, and a
single misstep has the potential to cripple an entire industry. With all of the
attention being paid to food safety these days, why does this still occur? Did the
company in question do all it could to reduce the risk of contamination? The
reputation of everyone in the industry will be affected – i.e., guilt by association.
□ Employees: They take great pride in their role in producing safe, healthy produce
and may feel personally responsible or be angry at their company for not doing all
it could to prevent the incident.
□ FFVA members: If this could happen to fellow member, it could happen to
them. They won’t want to be painted with the same brush, especially if the party
For internal use only Updated 11-2010
is one that is found to not to have followed recommended guidance that has been
established.
□ Media: Prior outbreaks will only add to the intensity of media scrutiny of the
agriculture industry.
□ Elected officials: Will add fuel to the argument that strict state or federal
regulations should be adopted to reduce/prevent risk of contamination.
□ Regulatory agencies: The level to which there is cooperation with an
investigation will come into play. Additionally, another outbreak – especially one
with serious illness or fatalities – will result in strengthened calls for mandatory
food safety regulations and federal oversight. We saw this occur with the
contamination of salmonella in peanuts and eggs in 2009 and 2010.
On a scale of 1-10 (10 being worst), what is the industry’s vulnerability to:
□ Negative local publicity: 10
□ Negative statewide publicity: 10
□ Negative national publicity: 10
□ Significant or potential lawsuits: 10
□ Employee morale problems: 8
□ Loss of existing customers: 8-10
□ Criminal penalties and fines: 8-10
□ Closure of facilities by regulatory agencies: ?
□ Loss of professional licenses or certifications: ?
What are the toughest questions we will be asked by key parties in this controversy
and their answers? (see attached Media Q&A)
What industry and non-industry resources can be made available to provide advice
and counsel on this issue?
Consumer and retail consultants
Name and contact info:
Strategy questions to consider
□ How might this issue be turned from a negative to a positive?
□ Are there opportunities for positioning?
□ What innovative and unexpected approaches might FFVA want to consider?
□ Who are other potential speakers on this issue other than the company
spokesperson?
For internal use only Updated 11-2010
FFVA and industry key messages
In the event an outbreak of food-borne illness becomes associated with Florida in general
or a specific operation within the state, we should concentrate first on dispelling
consumer fears by communicating facts about what has occurred and the actions that are
being taken in response. Depending on how the situation evolves, subsequent
communication may focus on educating the public (i.e., our food is safe and the chance
for contamination is slim; here is how it moves from field to plate, etc.) and doing as
much as possible to put the situation in perspective.
Key messages, which are subject to change depending on news developments and the
tone of media coverage, should form the basis of all communications to internal and
external audiences, whether they take the form of a news release, interview, e-mail blast,
written statement, or social media posts. Any time we communicate with our key
audiences, we should be hitting on these messages. Initial message points in a food safety
crisis would be:
We regret that Florida produce may have caused people to get sick. Even one case
of illness is too many.
FFVA and the company involved are working closely with investigators to
narrow the source as quickly as possible. The company’s records and operations
are open to investigators so they can determine if the contamination originated
here.
Safe production and handling of this crop is the producer’s top priority. Numerous
standards, procedures and safeguards in place to ensure our crops are safe,
including: (list them)
In determining any other key messages, these questions must be asked:
What must we say?
What will we say only if asked?
What would we rather not discuss?
What have we decided not to say at this time?
Additional messages would include:
Corrective measures
The company involved is taking the following steps to assess what, if anything,
went wrong: (list them)
The company also is instituting additional measures to ensure this doesn’t happen
again: (list them)
For internal use only Updated 11-2010
Extended message points may include:
The outbreak
-- The FDA is working with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, state
officials, and other health authorities to determine the cause and scope of the problem. As
the investigation progresses, the product/commodity will likely be identified, and then the
point of contamination may be determined. (If a commodity has been named but not
traced to a specific location or cause)
-- Public health authorities are investigating to determine exactly what happened. The
industry is waiting for an official assessment and will work with public health officials,
scientists and food safety experts to correct any problems that may be found.
-- The outbreak of illness from [pathogen] that has been linked to [commodity] in some
areas is of great concern to the fresh produce industry and the public. That said, it’s
important to distinguish between a food-borne illness outbreak linked to this commodity
and the safety of fresh fruits and vegetables in general.
-- We are all concerned about the recent FDA announcement involving [pathogen] linked
to [commodity], and we urge public health authorities to complete their investigation as
quickly as possible. At the same time, we want to see responsible information given to
consumers, not scare tactics about healthy foods that are not implicated.
General food safety messages
**NOTE: There should be discussion about which, if any, of these messages to use,
depending on the extent and nature of the outbreak. To talk about the food supply being
safe if people are falling ill, or if there are fatalities would be highly inappropriate.
-- Day in and day out, Americans should be confident that the risk of food-borne illness
from fresh produce is extremely rare. But even one is too many, and we are committed to
moving that number as close to zero as possible.
-- The safety and security of our food supply is the top priority of the fresh produce
industry. The industry is continually using the latest scientific information available to
improve food safety and security practices. We wholeheartedly support any information
or guidance based on sound science that can help enhance the safety of produce, maintain
and enhance consumer confidence, and increase consumption of fresh fruits and
vegetables.
-- Those involved in the growing and marketing of fresh produce voluntarily incorporate
food safety as part of their everyday business practices. The produce industry in Florida
uses Good Agricultural Practices, Best Management Practices, worker health/hygiene
programs, Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) programs, and more.
For internal use only Updated 11-2010
-- It is reckless for the media or public health authorities to use this problem with a single
food item to paint the entire produce industry with the same brush. Most of the hundreds
of fresh produce items offered for sale in the United States are not now and have never
been associated with food-borne illness.
-- The obesity epidemic in America is clear. The government recommends consumers eat
nine or more daily servings of fruits and vegetables for better health. Frightening
consumers away from nutritious products is irresponsible.
Background information on food-borne illness and fresh produce
-- The rise in produce-related illness can be linked to several factors:
Consumers are eating more fresh produce because they understand its health
benefits.
The technology available to detect outbreaks has improved and become more
sophisticated.
Our food distribution system has become more centralized, so produce from a
single region can be widely distributed across the country.
-- In general, produce growers and packers follow Good Agricultural Practices in the
growing, harvesting, and packing of fresh fruits and vegetables. That includes proper
management programs for water quality, additions to the soil, employee hygiene and
facility sanitation.
-- The best step consumers can take for staying healthy is to eat nine or more servings of
fruits and vegetables every day. In addition, they should wash their hands and rinse all
fresh produce thoroughly in running water before consuming. (Consumer food safety tips
are available at www.fightbac.org.)
For internal use only Updated 11-2010
Initial Media Holding Statement
Reporters on site should receive the holding statement first; the rest should receive it by
e-mail. This statement also can serve as an initial means of notifying employees about the
situation.
Introductory paragraph outlining the situation.
This is what we can confirm at this time:
1. Fact
2. Fact
3. Fact
At this point, we cannot provide any other details because our team is still assessing the
situation. Our primary goal is to work cooperatively with those who are investigating the
outbreak until a source is determined and to provide the most accurate information we
can as quickly as possible.
We will conduct a briefing or issue another statement as soon as possible to provide you
with more information. In the meantime, please bear with us.
For internal use only Updated 11-2010
Media Response Policy
FFVA members are encouraged to distribute to their employees the following Media
Response Policy, which outlines steps to take should they be contacted by a member of
the news media. Responsiveness is the key to building good will with the media. Make
sure that if a reporter has been promised a return phone call, he or she gets one.
From time to time, our industry finds itself the subject of news coverage. That means that
our employees may be approached in person or may get phone calls from newspaper or
television reporters about a particular topic. Our company policy calls for only designated
members of the senior management team to speak with reporters. If you are contacted
either by phone or in person, please follow these procedures:
1. Explain that you are not the person with whom they should speak but that you
will pass along their contact information to the correct individual.
2. Secure the following information:
Reporter’s name
Name of the news outlet
Phone number (cell and office)
Information being requested
Deadline
Ask for a business card if the encounter is face-to-face
3. Once you have gathered this information, explain that you will pass it along to the
appropriate person. Do not guarantee that a call will be made at a specific time.
4. Immediately contact _______________ and relay the information.
If a newspaper or television photographer comes onto the property (with or without a
reporter) to shoot video or still shots, inform him or her that this is private property and
that no one may come onto our property and take photographs without permission and an
escort for safety reasons. Then secure the above information from the photographer.
Remember at all times to be cordial and professional.