Food innovation answering consumers and societal demands SciCom symposium Lieve Herman
Food innovation answering consumersand societal demands
SciCom symposiumLieve Herman
• Increasing number of flexitarians in Europe– Increase turnover of vegetarian products with 25% in 2016 (Carrefour,
Mooijman, 2017), 6% in 2018, expected increase in 2019 with 8% (Menkveld, 2018)
• Innovation actions– Publications in literature– New insigts, new possibilities– New products
Consumption/market trends
Demands on alternative ingredients tobe used in novel products
• Supply
• Nutritional value
• Environmental impact
• Functional properties
• Taste and colour
• Regulatory aspects
Translation: haver, mungbonen, kikkererwten, linzen, lijnzaad, zonnebloempitten
Non meat protein sources used as ingredients in novel products
No grain family of spinach, red beet
Group of not related algae from sea
Group plants floating on water, duckweednot all yet
approved
as novel
food Only unprocessed Chlorella,Spirulia accepted in EU
A
A
A
A
A
A/B/C
A
A
(B)/C
B/C
B
AA
A
B/C
A: commercially available, B: still novel food approval needed; C scaling up phase needed
legumes
peas
Chickpeas
legumes
wheat
potatoes
Expectations for ingredient switch in food products
Lux Research, 2014
First generation products beingdeveloped
• First generation products: the traditional alternatives (from Aziantradition)
– Tofu: pressed soy milk
– Tempeh: pressed and fermented soy beans
– Seitan: dough of wheat gluten
Second generation products beingdeveloped
• Second generation products: composite plant derivedproducts (soy, heppep, quinoa etc.) in the form of burgers and sausages
Third generation products beingdeveloped
• Meat mimics; recently on the market• Texture and taste very close to meat products• Meat like structure obtained by high moisture extrusion• ‘The impossible burger’ with GMM produced soy leghemoglobine
(analogue to animal hemoglobine and myoglobin
Protein Fibration technology or High moisture extrusion (HMEC)
• To obtain from alternative protein sources meat-like fibre structures
Scheme and principle HMEC
Stage 2 Stage 1
Thermomechanical processing of proteins in screw-barrel assembly at high moisture content (50-70%) and temperatures above 140°C
Protein fibration in a long thermoregulateddie assembly
Fourth generation of developedproducts
• Cultivated meat alternatives– Biomasses: fungi (Quorn) and bacteriae– Cultivated meat: still need for growth factors derived
from calf serum or produced by GMM
Other ingredients: insects, algae, duckweed, hybrid meat products
bioactive compounts
Waste stream vegetablesand fruit
Processed meat products
• Motivation for hybrid meat products– Sustainability (eventually using plant derived rest straems)– Human health by incorporation of plant derived
antixodiants– Improved quality and extended shelf life
Nutritional benefits and drawbacks of a plant based diet
Low salt and fat contentMore unsaturated/less saturated fatHigh fibre, potassium, carotenoids, vit C
High content of arginin and glycin
Less methionin, alanin/more histidin, threonin; high arginin, glutamic acid
Low BMI and plasma cholesterol levels and lower risk for related diseasesBeneficial to skin, eye sensitivity, immunologic functions, improved absorption of iron
Low risk for atherosclerosisLinked with lower development cancer
Lowers blood pressure => lower risk heart failure and ischemic diseases
Low bio-availability iron, zincLow content vit B12, vit D (vegan)
Higher risk of e.g. anemia, demyelinisation, damage to children/foetusLow vitamin D linked to lower calcium absorption causing severe health problems
Most plant protein have an incomplete essential amino acid profile
Generally needed for basic metabolic functions
Food safety risks of a plant based diet
• Antinutrional factors (phytate, tannins, lectins, enzyme inhibitors, saponins)– will bind with nutrients such as protein, vitamins and
minerals, and will lower the absorption
• Toxic compounds e.g. mycotoxins• Allergenic compounds: meat is low allergenic
compared to plants/insects• Unexpected microbiological and chemical risks (e.g.
related to consumption pattern with less processedfood, technological processes as sprouting andfermentation, production in water environments)
Nutritional and food safety aspects as drivers for innovation
Removal of antinutritional factors by combination of:• Thermal processing, enzyme application, soaking, sprouting, irradiation and fermentation• Dehulling and milling: will also lead to loss of vitamins and minerals• High Pressure Processing, microwave and extrusion: researched
Processing influences allergenicityCereals containing gluten, nuts, peanuts, soybeans, lupin and sesame
Processing influences protein digestibility
Boiling in water improves protein qualityToasting and dry heating reduces protein quality
Supplementation with iron, zinc, vitD, vit B12
Vitamins can be produced by genetically modified microorganisms
Balancing products for providing essential amino acids
Amino acid profiling of different non-animal protein sources
Food safety risks linked to new food products and new consumption trends
• Intrinsic to the product (endogenous) and exogenous(due to cultivating environment)
• Examples– Alternative protein sources
• Microbial biomass of bacterial or fungal origin• Insects• Algae: microalgae and seaweed• Duckweed (‘eendenkroos’)• Components from Genetically modified microorganism (GMM)
– Super food – gojbes; edible flowers and self-harvestingspices/flowers
– Freezing vegetables consumed as ready to eat
Microbial biomass as alternative proteinsource
• Microbial biomass• High content of nucleic acids is considered• Bacterial origin also possible presence of lipopolysaccharides from Gram negative cell
walls• Fungal origin: possible presence of harmful secundary metabolites as mycotoxins
• Example: Quorn as fungal biomass– Quorn commercialized before 1997, therefore no novel food– Produced with fungal strain Fusarium venenatum A3/5 strain, genetically
equipped to produce several myctotoxins– Conditions of production process (exponential phase) would not induce
mycotoxin production– During production continuous follow up of presence of:
• nivalenol (NIV), deoxynivalenol (DON), 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol (3-AcDON), diacetoxyscirpenol (DAS), fusarenone X, neosolaniol
• fusarin mycotoxin• other secondary metabolites as enniatins, T-2
– Need for risk evaluation and risk management– Allergenicity: different reports on cross-reactive allergic reaction as a
consequence of quorn consumption (EFSA journal 2010: 8(7):1700)
Insects
• Growth substrate needs to be safe (animal feed legislation)• High microbial content due to presence of intestines;
heating before consumption is advised• Higher risk for people with allergy for shellfish and dust
mite (cross reactivity, tropomyosines)• Defensive secretions of certain insects could be toxinogenic
for human – evaluated conform the novel food legislation
http://www.favv.be/wetenschappelijkcomite/adviezen/_documents/ADVIES14-2014_NL_DOSSIER2014-04_002.pdf, http://www.health.belgium.be/internet2Prd/groups/public/@public/@shc/documents/ie2divers/19099421.pdf
http://www.favv.be/wetenschappelijkcomite/adviezen/_documents/ADVIES14-2014_NL_DOSSIER2014-04_002.pdfhttp://www.health.belgium.be/internet2Prd/groups/public/@public/@shc/documents/ie2divers/19099421.pdf
Algae: microalgae and seaweedDuckweed
• Microalgae– About 2% of 4000 varieties form neurotoxins and hepatotoxins– No toxins found in Spirulina and Chlorella (only genera accepted in EU); - some
extracts of Chlorella have been found cytotoxic and pheosafety evaluationalgae need to be performed at strain level phorbides, giving rise tophotosensibilization were detected
– Safety hazards include also allergens, pathogens, heavy metals and pesticides
• Seaweed– Iodine– Antinutrional factors as lectins, tannins, phytic acid– High levels of trypsin and amylase inhibitors– Heavy metals, ammonium, dioxins and pesticides
• Duckweed– Heavy metals, phenols, pesticides, dioxins and pathogens e.g. pathogenic E.
coli, Clostridium botulinum– Secondary metabolites produced by specific species of duckweed e.g. oxalic
acid
Components produced by Geneticallymodified microorganisms
• Leghemoglobin produced by the yeast Komagatella phaffii (previously Pichia pastoris) for production of the ‘impossible food burger’
• vitamin B12 and vitamin D • Safety evaluation needed by EFSA under the novel food legislation
– based on principle of QPS (Qualified Presumption of Safety)• QPS provides a safety status for microorganisms used in the food and feed chain, triggered by an EFSA
dossier• Microorganism with a QPS status – application may not need to provide specific toxicological test data
including animal tests
– QPS is also applicable for GMM in the case the genetic modification is not introducing a safety concern
– List available via link https://zenodo.org/record/2565996#.XOzrjXduKUk
https://zenodo.org/record/2565996#.XOzrjXduKUk
Gojibes, edible flowers and self-harvesting spices/flowers
• Gojibes– Increased use as (dried) berries in juices, muesly, tea; also
online sale is common– Literature concerns mostly the health-promoting effects– Safety hazards (gojibes belongs to family of Solanaceae as
patotoes and tomatoes)• High nicotine content – not known of exogenous or endogenous
origin• Plant toxins as alkaloids, anthroquinones could be present• Mycotoxins as aflatoxins, ochratoxin A• Possible interaction with human medication against blood
clotting, blood pressure, diabetes• Allergenic
• Edible flowers and self-harvesting spices/flowers– Increased use in restaurants/chefs, at home and online sale– Safety hazards
• Toxins; mainly due to misidentification flower species • Pesticides• Triggering allergies• Highly perishable; limited shelf life due to microbial growth
L. monocytogenes outbreak: frozenvegetables consumed without cooking
• Frozen corn, frozen vegetable mixes and frozen creamy spinach were considered by the producer tobe ‘non ready-to-eat’ food
• However, consumers have eaten these thawed products without having chooked them properly(e.g. microwave heating with still cold spots allowing survival) or not cooked at all (e.g. thawed cornand thawed vegetables in salads, smoothies)
• WGS allows to cluster human, food and environmental L. monocytogenes strains to trace back thecommon source of individual listerioses cases so that it can be considered as an outbreak
• Care has to be taken for food products not considered as ‘ready-to-eat’ where growth of L. monocytogenes is possible (tendency to eat more raw or undercooked products)
Growth of Listeria monocytogenes in thawed frozen corn at 4°C, 8°C, 12°C and 20°C (Kataoka et al., 2017); 48 hours = 2 days; 96 hours = 4 days
Thanks to
• ‘Eiwit-transitie Vlaanderen; Studie naar de status en het potentieel van (hoog-) technologische oplossingen om vleeseiwitten te vervangen in het dagelijks dieet’ Technopolis group and Blonk Consultants, December 2018
• Flyers ‘Eiwittransitie’ from Flanders’ FOOD
• Colleagues from ILVO:– Els Van Pamel– Johan Robbens– Keshia Broucke– Geert Van Royen– Marc Heyndrickx
Questions?Don’t hesitate to contact us
Institute for Agricultural, Fisheriesand Food Research
Brusselsesteenweg 3709090 Melle – BelgiumT + 32 (0)9 272 30 00F +32 (0)9 272 30 01
www.foodpilot.be
http://www.ilvo.vlaanderen.be/