Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the selected date. The documents are displayed in no particular order. However, all of these documents are searchable. To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f (Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac); 2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the form field provided and press Enter or Return. In most applications, the first appearance of the index number, the word, or the phrase in the document will be highlighted. Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications, including browsers and PDF viewers.
176
Embed
Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...€¦ · To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.
To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.
1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);
2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.
In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.
Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.
FILEDSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK OCT 1 9 2015
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S.Part 50(Moulton,P.)
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICENEW YORK
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190402/14
ELIPETROVITCHand ANTOINETTEPETROVITCH NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company
with prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: N v York
Jordan C. Fox,EBelluck& FoxI546 FifthAvenuNew York, NY
,2015
CeighDeCotiis, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant A. O. Smith WaterProducts Company88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005
__SO ORDERED,
Hon. Peter H.Moulton
2625624
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XWILLIAM C. BODDY, and FRED C. BODDYJR. as Co-Executors for the Estate of FRED C.BODDY,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.
INDEX NO. 190137/2015
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Neles-Jamesbury, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant Neles-Jamesbury, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto, it is hereby
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant Neles-Jamesbury, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
For purposes of this order, facsimile and PDF signatures shall be deemed binding as
originals.
Dated: New York, New YorkOctober ,2015
"SfcTT ?ois tmt.buAdam DrekslerWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C. v Drinker Bid'dle & Reath LLP700 Broadway ÿ 1177 Avenue of the Americas, 41st FloorNew York, NY 10003 W New York, New York 10036(212) 558-5500 ÿ 7%{212) 248-3140Attorneysfor Plaintiffs Attorneysfor DefendantWilliam C. Boddy, andFredC. Boddy Jr. as Neles-Jamesbury, Inc.Co-Executorsfor the Estate ofFredC. Boddy
SO ORDERED:oil Peter H. Moulton
F V 15
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
---- -—XMARGARET F. DUFFY, Individually and asExecutrix for the Estate of FRANK DUFFY,
Plaintiff,
-against-
A. C. AND S., INC., et al.,IncludingMAREMONT CORPORATION,
Defendants.
Index No. 107994/99
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
-X
WHEREFORE, defendant Maremont Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant Maremont Corporation withprejudice, and there beingno
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that uponnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Maremont Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs. FILEDOCT 19 2015Dated: New York, New York
August _,2015
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICÿ'NEW YORK
Matthew Mclntyre, EscWeitz and Luxenberg,P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
Jordan D. Bcltz, Esq.Kasowitz/Benson,Torres & Friedman,LLPAttorney/for Defendant MaremontCorporation1633 BroadwayNew York, New York 10019
(S D
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, ft)
This Document Relates to: Index No: 190034/2015
WALTER ANDREWS and GERALDINEANDREWS
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Lennox Industries, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Lennox Industries, Inc.with prejudice, and there beingno
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Lennox Industries, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
0CT I0 2015
.w-uv UfWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
JonatDARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for Lennox Industries, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,on. Peter H. Moulton "7
536 .13340/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
JACK KOGEN, Deceased,
Plaintiff ,
-against-
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al . ,
Defendants .
NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)
Index No. : 120898/97105231/98111071/98100665/00113687/02
(May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)
NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United
Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all afid clpops|jfej|imsagainst defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby
OCT lgdismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED : / £Jc f// 5East Hanover, New Jersey
ee«JNrvc,.i;RK,s
.At.MATTHEW MACINTYRE, ÿSQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
, MURPHY, GAROFALOSTEPFGARRITY, GF& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,norable Peter H. Moulton
536 .10045/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
ROBERT S. SABADASZ, Deceased,
Plaintiff ,
-against-
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al . ,
Defendants .
NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)
Index No.: 109782/00122191/99
(March 2014 FIFO Trial Group)
NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United
Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims
against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and thÿpsaÿe /preÿherebydismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED: /I'/ci/l[East Hanover, New Jersey
L.
MATTHEW MACINTYRE,WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Cou;
0ii 1-9 ?0]5
ÿWVoflK°FF/cE
, MURPHY, GAROFALOSTEPHIGARRITY, GF& FLINN 'Attorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,Honorable Peter H. Moulton
7o/jsj/b
536 .07933/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)
This document relates to:Index No.: 100029/99
HENRY MIKA,
Plaintiff , (May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)
-against - NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERUNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,
et al . ,
Defendants .
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United
Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims
against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED:
East Hanover, New Jersey
ÿ>L[ * 9 m
STEPHEN F. BALSAMO,"HSSQ . CCbGARRITY, GRAHAjtf, MURPHY, GAROFALO& FLINN /
COuKj 'y Cj
MATTHEW MACINTYRE, J3SQWEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Attorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,Honorable Peter H. Moulton
536 .07 8 8 9/AJM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
ROBERT BURNS KOBLER, Deceased,
Plaintiff ,
-against-
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,
et al.,
Defendants .
NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)
Index No.: 121894/98
(May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)
NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United
Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims
against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the game are hereby
F M Edismissed with prejudice and without costs. H - '
OCI 19 2015DATED: /ÿJC / / /
East Hanover, New JerseyUf/>5
MATTHEW MACINTYRE,WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
COu.N CLERK'S OFFlSiNEWjf&FlK
STEPHEGARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFAI.O& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,Honorable Peter H. Moulton lo/is/lS
536 .12675/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
NORBERT KACZ ,
Plaintiff ,
-against-
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al . ,
Defendants .
NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)
Index No. : 115543/02106709/02
(May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)
NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United
Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims
against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, bef111! t &eDre hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED :
East Hanover, New Jersey
MATTHEW MACINTYRE, YESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
OCT 19 2015
COUNTV CtEftR'8 OFFI6ENEW Y0RK
STEPHEN F. BALSAMO, ESQ.GARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED, /_ (oflSjfÿHonorable Peter H. Moulton
536 .21782/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
HOWARD A. HNISDO, Deceased,
Plaintiff ,
-against-
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al . ,
Defendants .
NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)
Index No. : 123989/94124013/94115996/95111074/98117232/07
(May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)
NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United
Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims
against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation,
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
nana
ar|d fthe |ÿam| Jÿre hereby
hk/J/riDATED :
East Hanover, New Jersey
//MATTHEW MACINTYREJ'ESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
OCT !9 i
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
STEPHfflSI F. BALEAMO, ESQ.GARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,onorable Peter H. Moulton
536 .09910/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
WILLIE J. HAMILTON, Deceased,
Plaintiff ,
-against-
UNITED CONVEYOR. CORPORATION,
et al . ,
Defendants .
NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)
Index No. : 121991/99106348/00n
(May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)
NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United
Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, allPlftiiBcrossclaims
against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the sarnif hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs. I9 20 15?
A A/'// 5er , New
!.Z£Jz
DATED: / <-- / /
East Hanover, New JerseyQ0ÿLEmS0PFlcsnew yqrk
MATTHEW MACINTYRE,.yESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERG "Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
STEPHEN F. BALÿAMOTeSQ:---GARRITY, GRAHÿ, MURPHY, GAROFALO& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,snorable Peter H. Moulton
joi &// S
536 .13370/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
RAYMOND MICHAEL WACHOWICZ,Deceased,
Plaintiff ,
-against-
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al . ,
Defendants .
NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)
Index No. : 107135/00125770/99
(March 2014 FIFO Trial Group)
NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United
Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims
against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be Bpÿd §thl SI*® O hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED : Jt/c!frEast Hanover, New Jersey
3
MATTHEW MACINTYRE, ESQ .WEITZ & LUXENBERG ÿ
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
ott » s
COUNiY ÿL'; JKS officeNEW YORK
STEPHEN F. BALSAMO, ES(£->I, MURPHY, GAROFALO
STEPH1;GARRITY, GF& FLINN
Attorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,Honora&le Peter H. Moulton
Mi€7/S
536 .10526/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)
This document relates to:
WILLIAM ANTON STOCKHAUSEN,Index No. : 108382/00
114791/00
Plaintiff , (March 2014 FIFO Trial Group)
-against- NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERUNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,
et al . ,
Defendants .
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United
Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims
against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED: /U/L / f/ÿ>East Hanover, New Jersey
MATTHEW MACINTYRE, E,
WEITZ & LUXENBERGSTEPHEN F.GARRITY, GI MURPHY, GAROFALO
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,
Honorable Peter H. Moulton
536 .22502/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)
This document relates to:Index No. : 190024/08
SEYMOUR SAMUELS, Deceased,
Plaintiff , (March 2014 FIFO Trial Group)
-against - NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERUNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,
et al . ,
Defendants .
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United
Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all cl
against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and
dismissed with prejudice and without costs. °C] 1 9 2(115
DATED :• / /
East Hanover, 'New Jersey
MATTHEW MACINTYRE HjZN F. BALSAM57 ESQÿITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALOWEITZ & LUXENBERG
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,Peter H. Moulton
536 .23105/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
WILLIAM NORTON,
Plaintiff ,
-against-
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,
et al . ,
Defendants .
NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)
Index No.: 190225/09190134/11
(March 2014 FIFO Trial Group)
NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United
Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants ,-,ÿ11 claims and crossclaims
against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, bes aJd Ifcjie&"£>re hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED: / /•' //5East Hanover, New Jersey
OCT 1
MATTHEW MACINTYRE, .WEITZ & LUXENBERG
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
9 2015county > n t.,
STEPHEN F. BaZs"SMD7 EfGARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO& FLINN
Attorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,Honorable Peter H. Moulton
s
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OFNEW YORK
INRE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONÿX NYCAL
I.A.S.Part 50ÿX (Moulton, f?)
FREDERICK W. EVANS,JR. AND JEANNE EVANS,IndexNo. 190109/2015
Plaintiffs,
-against-NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
3M COMPANY, etal.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant PFIZER INC. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-
entitled case, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant
PFIZER INC.only with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant PFIZER INC.only be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
81 Main Street, Suite 508360 LexingtonAvenue, 20th FloorNew York,NY 10017Telephone: (212) 986-2233Facsimile: (212) 986-2255Attorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Defendant
White Plains, NY 10601 0Telephone: (914) 285-0700Facsimile: (914) 285-1213gQuÿ
OCT 1g 20J5
ÿ ClEHft'g Qp
SO ORDERED, /1L-— —JOhi,j/sr''Hon. Peter H.Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE:NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JOSEPHLUCENT AND DOLORESLUCENT
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50
(Moulton, P.)
Index No: 109348/2011
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant The LincolnElectric Company ("Lincoln") hereby requests
summary judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Lincoln,with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Lincoln,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: Neiv-York, NevlolT .
New York2015
Janet CÿmshrEsqTLOCKS LAW FIRMPLLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 838-3333
BrianT. Murnane, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for The Lincoln Electric Company116 East 27th Street, 12thFloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
>or
F ÿ FQOct i9 2(115
SO ORDERED, /z,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
C°L7Vry(c£
I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION Index No.: 107400/2002
JORDAN JAMES BUTLER
WHEREFORE, defendant O'CONNOR CONSTRUCTORS, INC. f/k/a
THOMAS O'CONNOR & CO., INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant O'CONNOR CONSTRUCTORS, INC., be and the same are hereby
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
dismissed with prejudice and without cost.
Date: New York. New YorkJuly 1,2015. SC 7 I9 2015
By: Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.UNTILh»gomeg
By: Patrick T. Steinbauer, Esq.
700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003Attorneysfor the Plaintiffs
WEITZ & LUXENBERG LITCHFIELD CAVO LLP420 Lexington Avenue, Suite 2104New York, New York 10170Attorneyfor the DefendantO'Connor Constructors, Inc.
SO ORDERED: -4I& P//S//6Jfon. Sherry Klein Heitler.
HON:PETERH.MOULTON OCT 14 2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION Index No.: 122199/99
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
JAMES N. WALTERS and MARY M. WALTERS
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant O'CONNOR CONSTRUCTORS, INC. f/k/a
THOMAS O'CONNOR & CO., INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant O'CONNOR CONSTRUCTORS, INC., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without cost. A"/ iDate: New York. New York
July 1,2015.
HTJP.ZZ.MBy: Matthew MacIntyre/"Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003Attorneysfor the Plaintiffs
By: P'atrick T. SteiLITCHFIELD CAVO LLP ÿ ÿ
420 Lexington Avenue, Suite 2104New York, New York 10170Attorneyfor the DefendantO'Connor Constructors, Inc.
SO ORDERED:
"rion. Glioiiy KleinHoitier ÿ
HON.PETERH.MOULTON
/S//
i4 -U/5
.J)
;w L
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION Index No.: 122013/98
========================================== NO OPPOSITIONTHIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTIONAND ORDERTHOMAS MAGUIRE and MARIE MAGUIRE
WHEREFORE, defendant O'CONNOR CONSTRUCTORS, INC. f/k/a
THOMAS O'CONNOR & CO., INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant O'CONNOR CONSTRUCTORS, INC., be aig£tjie same are hereby
*dismissed with prejudice and without cost.
Date: New York. New YorkJuly 1,2015.
By:'Patrick T. Steinbauer, Eÿj>LITCHFIELD CAVO LLP420 Lexington Avenue, Suite 2104New York, New York 10170Attorneyfor the DefendantO 'Connor Constructors, Inc.
By:WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003Attorneysfor the Plaintiffs
O
SO ORDERED:
Tlun. Sherry Klein Heiiler
I.PETERH.MOULTON
/0//S.//2>
NYS
w
o
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK COUNTY -
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document relates to:
CONO AMILO MASCARELLAPlaintiffs,
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„
Defendants.
NYCAL u
I.A.S. PartÿS"O(Moulton, P.)
Index No. 121979/99
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Peerless Industries, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against defendant, Peerless Industries, Inc.,with prejudice inthis action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Peerless Industries, Inc.,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
11nqw
RebekafcKLee,Attorney for DefendantPeerless Industries, Inc.Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard& Smith LLP77 Water Street, 21st FloorNew York, New York 10005212.232.1300File No. 1863.20666
Phan Alvaracto? Esq.Attorney for Plaintiff(s)CONO AMILO MASCARELLÿt*WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C700 Broadway
New York,New York 10003(212)558-5500
%'C/vn
0
SO ORDERED, \°ion. Peter H. Moulton
OCT 14 2015
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
4832-4960-9000.1
«1 « - ÿ
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NEW-KeAttorney for DefendantThe Nash Engineering CompanyMcGivney & Ki.ajger, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P)
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190165/11
ARNOLD GORDONAND
Rl iODA GORDON NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, DAP, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above
entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs* complaint
against defendant, DAP, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, DAP, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Ycuk. New York,2015
OCT I9
COUNTY ci
Matthew Maclntyre, Lscg/ÿAttorney for Plaintiffs)Arnold Gordon and Rhoda GordonWeitz & Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
McGivney & Kluger.P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Attorney for DefendantDAP, Inc.
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter II. Moulton M/s/zs
MM-44S
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
SAM GULLAND
JOANNE DYER
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P)
Index No.: 190011/09,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Falk Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, The Falk Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, The Falk Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New YoykANew Yorkr"
2015ew YorkANcwfckU:
f01C,\4oWV-i> tÿovAc-Y-, Esj,Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Sam Gull and Joanne DyerLevy Konigsberg,LLP800 Third Avenue, 13th F1New York. New York 10022(212) 605-6200
kefeyatni-Gdok, Esq/ CÿAttorney for Del:endimlyThe Falk CorporationMcGivney & Klucer,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, johy/ÿon. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-x
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONx
This Document Relates To:
MARK V. SLEVIN, as Executor of the Estate ofPATRICK T. SLEVIN,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.W. CHESTERTON CO., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 5ÿ(Hnn Shi'iry KLin TT-itl-r)-
Index No.: 190406-10
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC. (f/k/a SQUARE D
COMPANY) ("SQUARE D") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against
defendant SQUARE D with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant SQUARE D be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
as Hercules Engine Components, be and the same are hereby dismis
without costs.
Dated: New Ywrk, New York0CT Id2015
l<o\ o\........• 2015 county clerk,s
Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Patrick T. SlevinLevy Konigsberg.LLP800 Third Avenue, 13lh F1New York, New York 10022(212) 605-6200
KmyaOJJ'C&ok, Esq.Attorney for DefendantD.W. Hercules, LLPMcGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter II.Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
X
Inre NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
GEORGE STRYCHALSKI and MARY STRYCHALSKI,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC, et al.
Defendants.
-X
NYCALIndex No.: 190155/2013
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant McKesson Corporation hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant McKesson Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
McKesson Corporation be and the samefijfe igsrdoy dismissed with prejudice and without costs.1L Eh
Dated: New York, New York *
September3% ,2015
LEVY KONIGSBERG, L.L.P.
By:mes M. Kramer
oc? * 9 m6QUNTY CLkR
NIX0NPEABODY LLP
mm,
800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, New York 10022Telephone: (212) 605-6200Facsimile: (212) 605-6290Attorneysfor Plaintiffs
KristinM. Jambcrdino
437 Madison AvenueNew York, New York 10022Telephone: (212) 940-3000Facsimile: (212)940-3111Attorneysfor DefendantMcKesson Corporation frf
SO ORDERED
•Horn Sheny Klein Ilcillci'
HON.PETERH.MOULTON
3 J 0 •' rall']
iSirf]—'L-i.' j
I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
ÿx
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
xCYNTHIA MAGILL, Individually and as an Administratrixto the Estate of OTIS CORTHELL,
Index No.: 190214/09
-against-Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„ I.A.S. Part 50Hon. Peter H. Moulton
Defendants.— x
WHEREFORE, Defendant GARDNER DENVER, INC. (hereinafter "GARDNER
DENVER"), hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant
GARDNER DENVER, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, GARDNER DENA 'with prejudice and
STas Novack, Esq.Levy Konigsberg, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff800 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10022(212)605-6200
without costs to either party.
Dated: New York, New York
ÿ Arulfefiy W.uDean, Esq.Segal McCaanbndge SiSegal McCaanbndge Singer & Mahoney, Ltd.Attorneys for Defendants850 Third Avenue, Ste 1100New York, New York 10022(212)651-7500
SO ORDERED,
£Rm. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
Index No.: 190413/11InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
FRANCIS GOES,
PIaintiff(s),NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION
- against -
AURORA PUMP COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY hereby requests Summary
Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Aurora Pump Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs to either party.
Dated: .p»0*>og.r z_q ,2015New York, New York
-kj'JNiu, ÿ —Katrina H. Murphy, EstpjCSEGAL McCAMm&®$SINGER & MAHONEY
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq. 1
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Attorneys for DefendantAurora Pump Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
Index No.: 190107/09InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
RALPH ARONE,
Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION- against -
WEIL-MCLAIN, et al„
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are herebv dismissed with nreiudice and without costs
4f-Matthew Maclntyre, {2sq.
to either party.
Dated: 1O/0S 2015New York, New York
Andrew P. Kates, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
SO ORDERED, _HÿrfTPetefH. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_
Index No.: 100387/08InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
CHARLES BAGGIANO,
Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
against - MOTION
WEIL-MCLAIN, et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs
to either party.
Dated: lo/®SNew York, New York
_, 2015 Fn
Matthew Maclntyre, tssq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
£o*9 2015
ÿAndrew P. Kates, Esq. nSEGAL McCAMBRIDGE ÿ
SINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, NY 10022(212)651-7500 f
SO ORDERED,on. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
Index No.: 190137/09InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
FRANKIE FUGATE,
Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION- against -
WEIL-MCLAIN, et ah,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs
to either party.
Dated: _ (Q/q3 _, 2015
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.
New York, New York
.ndrew P. Kates, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500 850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, NY 10022
SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain
SO ORDERED,Hortf Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_
Index No.: 190007/09InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
DOUG CHAPPLE,
Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
against - MOTION
WEIL-MCLAIN, et al„
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed.jwith prejudice and without costs
to either party.
Dated: 10/05 _, 2015
smissedwj
filedOCT 19 ZOfi
New York, New York
eoyN,yNg(ÿcrF'C- ./
Matthew Maclntyre, Eg
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Andrew P. Kates, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
SO ORDERED,Hgli.'p&erH"Moulton
WWS
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_
Index No.: 100234/03InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
WILLIAM C. ESPOSITO,
Plaintiffs), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
- against - MOTION
WEIL-MCLAIN, et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs
to either party.
Dated: 1Q /o 5 _, 2015New York, New York
Matthew Maclntyre, EsqCWEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
OCT 19 »
G0BNTY cl
Andrew P. KatdJs, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
SO ORDERED,. Peter H. Moulton
tej'sj/s
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_
Index No.: 111089/02InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
JAMES WILLIAM CARR,
Plaintiffs), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
- against - MOTION
WEIL-MCLAIN, et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed ejÿidice and without costs
to either party.
\d /obDated: 2015
£o0CTlÿm
New York, New York Cou"iy»--- ">.ÿ N't,/
Matthew Maclntyre,esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
*7
. s'-S'.. _c. Andrew P. ]<fates, Esq.
SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
SO ORDERED,Ham Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
Index No.: 101812/08InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
ROY F. SCHNETTLER,
Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION- against -
WEIL-MCLAIN, et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs
to either party.
Dated: 1 o Iq5 _, 2015New York. New York
Andrew P. Kates, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 0SWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
P~'
SO ORDERED,on. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_
Index No.: 100917/08InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
WALTER A. REILLY,
Plaintiffs), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
- against - MOTION
WEIL-MCLAIN, et al„
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs
to either party.
Dated: 10 lob 2015New York, New York
Matthew Maclntyre, EsWEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
FILEDOCT 19 2015
COUNTYNU
Andrew P. Kates, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTDAttorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
SO ORDERED,on. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_
Index No.: 190172/09InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
WILLIAM E. JOYCE,
Plaintiffs), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
- against - MOTION
WEIL-MCLAIN, et al„
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs
to either party.
Dated: 6/0$ 2015New York, New York
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
£*0COlJ°~yQ
to,
Andrew P. Kates, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
SO ORDERED, ÿ7
Hon. IJefer 6TMoultonMF//S
OCJ 14 ; ;!5
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
Index No.: 111218/01InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
JOSEPH SWIADOWSKY,
Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION- against -
WEIL-MCLAIN, et al„
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs
to either party.
Dated: _,20150Cr * ,9 2015New York, New York
Matthew Maclntyre,OFFICE
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter"on. Peter H. Moulton
(NEW YORK STATb SUPREME COURTCOUNTY OFNEW YORK
InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
-X NYCAL
NOOPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
This Document Applies to:
OCTOBER 2011EXTREMISTRIAL CLUSTER CASE:
AS FORTHE ESTATEOF CHUNGSOON, IndexNo.: 10-190371O'DWYER AND AS SPOUSE
Attorneys for DefendantCHUNG SOON O'DWYERÿH/ yQÿ°FF/C£ WASTE MANAGEMENT,INC
SO ORDERED.£ *PETERH.MOULTON
NYS StOK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :
This Document Relates To: :
ARTHUR LACHAPELLE AND BARBARA NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYLACHAPELLE, JUDGMENT MOTIONAS TO
FORD MOTOR COMPANYPlaintiff(s), :
- against - Index No.: 108749/97
A.C. & S, INC., ET AL., :
Defendant(s).-------- - x
WHEREFORE, defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby requests summary-judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant, FORD MOTOR COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkD
°\ \ V 1. ,2015
By: Frank M.Ortiz,UsqWEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003Counsel for: Arthur LaChapelle and BarbaraLaChapelle
COUNTY CLNE
y: Uded Burger, EsqSAARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN &DEUTSCH, LLPAttorneys for DefendantFordMotor Company600 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10016T: 212-593-6700F: 212-593-6970
SO ORDERED:HON. PETER H. MOULTON
/ 7/vA
{00865744.DOC }
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
RALPHN.BORELLIAND ANNE BORELLI
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)Index No: 108709/01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
_/Ojo ,2015 TW1*1
0C
Ik,Esq. Judith A. Yavotz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Union Carbide Corporation700 Broadway 116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10038 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,Iÿn.Peter H. Moulton
OCT 14 2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE:NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
RALPHN.BORELLIAND ANNE BORELLI
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No: 108709/01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc.,n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company,
n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. ("Amchem Products") hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Amchem Products, with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Amchem Products, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New/Yo/k.New York_ /m .2015
E DOCT 19 2015
COUNIY nl i!KS yff-FICENEW YORI)
Esq. f-loJMWEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavm, Esq.ÿ
DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,on. Peter H. Moulton
WKtSl4
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
RALPHN.BORELLIAND ANNE BORELLI
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)Index No: 115075/98
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
FILEDDated: New York, New York
/0/8 .2015OCT 1% 2015
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
Frank Ortiz, Esq. Judith A. Yajyitz, EsqWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500
DARGERERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for UnionCarbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12thFloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, (6/S//SJlonCPeler H. Moulton
CCi HjJ.j
J
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
RALPHN.BORELLIAND ANNE BORELLI
NYCALI.A.S.Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No: 115075/98
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc.,n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company,
n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. ("Amchem Products") hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Amchem Products, with prejudice, and there beingno
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Amchem Products, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New Y/rk, New York_/y8_,2015
LY|5
UCi:
Frank-Ortiz-, Esq. HÿcX-ATon?. Judith A. YaVftz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C. DARGER EÿRANTEYAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.700 Broadway 116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212)558-5500 (212)452-5300
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
!I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
-X
-XThis document relates to:
SANTIAGO MENDEZ
NYCALI.A. S. Part 50(Moulton, P)
Index No.: 115899/98
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
-X
WHEREAS, Defendant J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY ("J.H.
FRANCE") requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against J.H. FRANCE, without
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
J.H. FRANCE, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember
/V-NicholasNovack, Esq. fe,
LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLpf"" J I800 Third Avenue, 11th Floor ÿ
New York, NY 10022 rCounselfor Plaintiff ? I$ ?{]ÿ
Qoumlv C[
totw y-0ÿOFP'ce
Robert Malaby, Esq.Malaby & Bradley LLC150 BroadwaySuite 600New York, NY 10038Counselfor J.HFrance RefractoriesCompany
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
ÿli : i
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
-X
-XThis document relates to:
WESTON REED
NYCALI.A. S. Part 50(Moulton, ÿ.)
Index No.: 104333/99
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
-X
WHEREAS, Defendant J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY ("J.H.
FRANCE") requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against J.H. FRANCE, without
prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto, it is hereby
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
J.H. FRANCE, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember ff) ,2015
FOCT 19 2015
QUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
Nipiolas£Jeivack, Esq.LEVYÿONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11thFloorNew York, NY 10022Counselfor Plaintiff
ÿ9-Robert Malaby, Esq.Malaby & Bradley LLC150 BroadwaySuite 600New York, NY 10038Counselfor J.HFrance RefractoriesCompany
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
SALVATORE GRECO
-X
-X
NYCALI.A. S. Part 50(Moulton, f?)
Index No.: 116211/01
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
-X
WHEREAS, Defendant J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY ("J.H.
FRANCE") requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against J.H. FRANCE, without
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
J.H. FRANCE, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
olas Novack, Esq. Robert Malaby, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counselfor Plaintiff
Malaby & Bradley LLC
OCT 19 2015150 BroadwaySuite 600New York, NY 10038Counselfor J.H. France Refractories
MSW OfF/Cg C<">WC0ÿ'VC.B,
SO ORDERED,(V/v/s
/Hon. Peter H. Moulton
-*1-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
-X
-XThis document relates to:
HENRY DAWSON
NYCALI.A. S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 113467/98
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
-X
WHEREAS, Defendant J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY ("J.H.
FRANCE") requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against J.H. FRANCE, without
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
J.H. FRANCE, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember 3D ,2015
BNcholas-Novack. Esq. Mfobert Malaby, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP Malaby & Bradley LLC800 Third Avenue, 11thFloor I9 2015 150 BroadwayNew York, NY 10022 Suite 600Counselfor Plaintiff County c>( FRK'S QFFiPtv/ Y°rk, NY 10038
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Madsen & Howell, Inc.,with prejudice in this action, and
there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Madsen & Howell, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs. FDated: New York, New York
2015 0cr 1.9 ?015
COUNTY pL6T!K'f
Kush Shukla, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Vito Francis BlundaWilentz,Goldman& Spitzer,P.A.110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, New York 10038-3901(212) 267-3091
Nfty yj
SO ORDERED,Ion. Peter H. Moulton
Kerrya««Jÿj06ok, Esq.Attorney for DefendantMadsen & Howell, Inc.McGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
JM&/IS- npTocn5,Si!5 J\;/ ii
i
,r, 77-43ÿ2
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK . . "
NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
VITO FRANCIS BLUNDA
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 190385/09
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, New York Protective Coverings, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant. New York Protective Coverings, with prejudice in this
action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant. New York Protective Coverings, be andÿth(|saniÿre jÿÿeby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkDrMifC' l<i,2015
OCT 19 2015
GOUN FY CLilBK'S OFFICEN1W YORK
Kush Shukla, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiffs)Vito Francis BlundaWilentz,Goldman& Spitzer,P.A.110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, New York 10038-3901(212) 267-3091
KerryainTMrC'ook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantNew York Protective CoveringsMcGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
I-fom Peter H. Moulton MWSj;cc J- 9 77/
2177-214
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
LOUIS CAFARO
l.A.S. Part 50(Moullon, P.)
Index No.: 128517/95
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York., New YorkQLh2lrj±l,2015
FlL £ O0CT19 1015
qQUNTY
Kush Shukla, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Louis CafaroWilentz,Goldman & Spitzer,P.A.110 William Street, 26lh FloorNew York, New York 10038-3901(212) 267-3091
KerryÿnJVfrClook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantJohn W. Wallace & Co.McGivney & Kluger,P.C,
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED., I°i/ V ÿ
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
f:r'~r ÿÿÿ ~" 1 1J duib 582-650!•
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK__
__NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
PAUL COLLINSAND
JANE COLLINS
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 190099/08
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, New York Protective Coverings Industries, Inc., hereby
requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
§ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant. New York Protective Coverings
Industries, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, New York Protective Coverings Industries, Inc., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York.. 2015 £0
Kush Shukla, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Paul Collins and Jane CollinsWilentz,Goldman& Spitzer,P.A.110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, New York 10038-3901(212) 267-3091
KerryanÿM-iÿOK, Esq.Attorney for DefendantNew York Protective Coverings Industries, Inc.McGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter IT. Moulton
, 2177-200
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK.
NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
RICHARD W. CONNELL
l.A.S. Part 50(Moulton P.)
Index No.: 104179/98
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkOohur H ,2015
PILEDOCT 19 IOft
Kush Shukla, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Richard W. ConnellWlLENTZ, GOl,DMAN & Sl'lTZER,P.A.110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, New York 10038-3901(212) 267-3091
KerfÿarmHM. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantJohn W. Wallace & Co.McGivney & Klucer,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, /0//S//SHon. Peter H. Moulton
Oct ÿ
; 582-67jY-?L/ /M\7 )i /
ÿ O Pf) 715 /
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton P.)
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 113573/96
WILLIAM DUFFYNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., be and the ssed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkOoPohi< / ÿ ,20 15
ocn»«®,K,TYCLFW®O'iF,0eCLEWg,
Kush Shukla, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiff(s)William DuffyWlLENTZ, Got.DMAN & SP1TZER, P.A.110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, New York 10038-3901(212) 267-3091
KerAttorney for DefendantJohn W. Wallace & Co.McGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Ion. Peter H. Moulton
J
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 104156/01
ANTHONY PRANONO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, John W. Wallace & Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York D
CQUNi
Cook, Esq.Kush Shukla, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiffs)Anthony PranoWilentz, Goldman& Spitzer,P.A.1 10 William Street. 26th FloorNew York, New York 10038-3901(212) 267-3091
Kerryimu-MrCook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantJohn W. Wallace & Co.McGivney & Kluglr,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212)509-3456
SO ORDERED,•ton. Peter II. Moulton r "• v
j
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
-X
-XThis document relates to:
SPENCER OAKLEY
NYCALI.A. S. Part 50(Moulton, !?-)
Index No.: 190131/09
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
-X
WHEREAS, Defendant VIACOM, INC. requests summary judgment in the above-
entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs
complaint against VIACOM, INC.,without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
hereby
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
VIACOM, INC.,be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkOctober 1, 2015
Nicholas Novack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG LLP800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counselfor Plaintiff
9 7.06Dennis Vega, ISEDGWICK, LLP1Newark Center, 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102Counselfor Viacom, Inc.
SO ORDERED, 4iMln. Peter Moulton, J.S.C. /
Iu
/ Hi0 / i :- iJ
{00368597.DOCX}
CLB56229/legal/nosjm/MAY 2014
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XRUTH CAPPO, as Executrix for the Estate ofRAYMOND CAPPO and RUTH CAPPO, Individually, NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiff(s),
-against- Index No.: 190503/11
A.C. & S. INC., et al„ NYCALI.A.S. Partly
Defendant(s),-X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Frank Oritz, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiff
t-L £q ShawflitteEluitt.ShawflitteEluitt, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: FILEDOCT 19 2015
New York, New York
'Frank M. Ortiz, Esq. / "
COUNTY CLERK'S GFFlS/ÿJv Kneis, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. GATES LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys for Defendant700 Broadway CJUANE CO.New York, NY 10003 599 LexingtonAvenue(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022-6030
(212) 536-3900
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
7sOCT io ::T5
SEP-30-2015 16:00 From: To:212 344 5461 P.3'7
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION.............. .......... xThis Document Relates To:
WILLIAM A. STOCKHAUSEN and ANGELABELLE STOCKHAUSEN,
Plaintiff(s),- vs.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„
Defendants.
Index No.; 190062-11
NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: 10/a/jRNew York, New York
E DI.( (i ÿ 1 ' J(
Matthew Tarasofi", Esq" ÿ $ 2015 ÿi\ole M. Kozin, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. K&L GATES LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffÿ9L/NTY GlFftk-'o Attorneys for Defendant700 Broadway NfVy yqÿ°ÿFicE CRANE CO.New York, NY 10003 599 LexingtonAvenue(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022
(212) 536-3900
SO ORDERED,tHon. PetePeter Moulton
REC¬OCT 0 5 2015
t s\* •• • < ÿ-4i» 1 " \ - L_i [
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION- >
This Document Relates To:
LEON. SARRAZIN AND DORIS L. SARRAZIN,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)
Index No.: 115811/2000
A.C. and S„ INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & N°ÿ°PP?S.ITI0ÿSPMMÿ?YSUPPLY), et al„
. .JUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:_ÿ /2,(11New York, New York
0A/l>ISuzanne/Rhtcliffe,Esq.WEITZ/&JLUXENBERG,PrC.1 _ v,-•AttomepW Plaintiffs) OCT 1» Z015700 BroadwayNew York, NY 100e$)UNr/ CLERK'S OFFICE(212) 558-5500 NEW YORK
Kirsten Alford Kneis, Esq.KÿL GATES LLP
ttorneys for DefendantCRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900
SO ORDERED,on. Peter H. Moulton
7 :O /P 'c
-J
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-x
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
CONO AMILO MASCARELLA,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)
Index No.: 109071/2000
A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
SUPPLY), et a!., JUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: W
£ D1: TTi
New York, Ne1New York
Phan"Xlvafra3o, Esq. Kirsten Alford Kneis, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,FCÿV KM.GATES LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff(s) ÿÿC/Qg-Mtorneys for Defendant700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
CRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900
Hon. Peter H. Moultonf£
/// /V:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-x
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION—x
This Document Relates To:
RICHARD J. OTTALAGANO SR. andSHARON ANN OTTALAGANO,
Plaintiff(s),
igams
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, assuccessor-by-merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, etal,
Defendants,
NYCALI.A.S. PartJtf'S'O(Hon. Shorty Klein Ilcitlcr)-
Index No(s).: 190018-11
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated. zgj2jo\
New York, New York
aFrank M. Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.CnrrAttorneys for Plaintiff(s) *700 Broadway CnNew York, NY 10003 *°WVrY(212)558-5500
SO ORDERED,
*khuA
smKirstenAlford Kneis, Es (
K&L GATES LLP „Attorneys for DefendantCRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900
HON.PETERH.MOULTON CCi o ::
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
800 Third Avenue, 11th Floor ÿ 9 2015 44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10022 New York, NY 10005-2407Counselfor Plaintiff COUNFY CLERK'S m-r-,SS.unseÿfor Goulds Pumps, Incorporated
U 3 off CLERK'S OFFICFNEW YORK E
SO ORDERED, A--1ÿ1/Sj/\.TforkTeter H. Moulton ' ' I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
ÿX
InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A. S. Part 50(Moulton,P)
XThis document relates to: Index No.: 113467/98
HENRY DAWSON NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against GOULDS, without prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto, it is hereby
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
GOULDS, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.
September fO ,2015
Nicholas Npyadk, Esq. r a ÿ JohmFtmnirigÿEsq. /LEVYTCdNIGSBERG, LLP . Cuflen &pÿkman800 Third Avenue, 11th Floor OCT T9 ÿ * 44 WalfStreetNew York, NY 10022 /NpWTork, NY 10005-2407Counselfor Plaintiff y.v •, ,<kS QFrV&yunselfor Goulds Pumps, Incorporated
C0UN ' N6\N VOftK UlSH-S
SO ORDERED, ÿ2ÿHon. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XInRe: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A. S. Part 50(Moulton, f.)
XThis document relates to: Index No.: 101155/98
JOSEPH LANZA NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
X
WHEREAS, Defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO. INC. ("MARIO &
DIBONO") requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against MARIO & DIBONO,
without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
MARIO & DIBONO, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember 3 2015,,
ÿicbolaslSrovack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11th poorNew York, NY 10022
Jphfi Fhtmiffg, Esq.Cullep-& Dykman4JCWall StreetCullepÿc Dykman4ÿ-ÿall StreetNew York, NY 10005-2407Counselfor Mario & Dibono PlasteringCo. Inc.
Counselfor Plaintiff
COUNTY GLERK'3 OFFICENiW YORK
SO ORDERED,Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
XIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX
This Document Relates To:
Esther Shemberg, Individually and asExecutrix of the Estate of Zev Shemberg,
NYCALI.A.S . Part >0 S"£>(Judge Moulton)
Index No. : 190221/10
Plaintiff, NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- MOTION AND ORDER
A .0 . SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, CO. et . al . ,
Defendants .x
WHEREFORE, defendant David Fabricators of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing
plaintiff's Complaint against defendant David Fabricators of New
York, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross-claims against defendant David Fabricators of New York, Inc.
be dismissecL~w±th prejudice and without costs.
Date2015
Levy Konigsberg LLPAttorneys for PlaintiffZev Shemberg C |I£ D8 00 Third Avenfe , ill®® FT?New York, New York 10022 „.c
OCT 1»
S&r&h Mustafa, Esq.Cullen and Dykman, LLPAttorneys for DefendantDavid Fabricators ofNew York, Inc.44 Wall StreetNew York, New York 10005
So Ordered:
(212) 701-4183
roUHW CLERK'S OFFlCEOur File No.: 11279-40
ÿ----— !olisl/SHon. Peter H. Moulton, J\ S .C . I 152015
- Cv?:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
IMOGENE ARONE, as Personal Representativefor the Estate of RALPH ARONE,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 09/190107
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against-
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al. .
Defendants .
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York/pit
QCl 19 1S& Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.John J. FanniCullen and DyjAttorney for z)ef\ÿhnt pAttgrneys foNATIONAL GRID GENERATI Y GI- GG ® 7 00 Broadway......-ÿ
New York, NY 10003
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.for Plaintiffs
44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
mi*0c'i~l5 uij
"n
I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
VINCENT BOYLE and ELLEN BOYLE,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against-
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al . ,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No. : 01/11642601/111219
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants .x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York/ o( 1 2015
-L-E ID t*-Matthew Maclntyre, Esq./John J. Fanning,/Esq J
Cullen and Dykmafi \AaWM WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorney for DefendJ/rt QQJ 19 2015 Attorneys for PlaintiffsNATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC 700 Broadway44 Wall Street New York, NY 10003New York, NY 10005 COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICER 212) 558-5500(212) 732-2000 Nl-W YOKK
SO ORDERED,Peter H. Moulton
/ S//t> /OCT
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PHILLIPMOHR,as Executor of the Estate ofROBERTBURTON, and LORETTA BURTON, Individually,
Index No.: 190219/11
Plaintiff,NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
- against -
A.O. SMITHWATER PRODUCTS CO. et al.,NYCAL
I.A.S Part 50Hon. Peter H.Moulton
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests
summary judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with
prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs to eif
Dated: New York,New York
LauraB.HolfmanJÿq.Attorneyfor Defendant
MatthewMclntyre,Esq.A7Attorneyfor PlaintiffWEITZ&LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
NICOLA AZZARONE
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P)
Index No.: 190137/10,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Fay Spofford & Thorndike of New York, f/k/a Wolff &
Munier, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Fay Spofford
& Thorndike of New York, f/k/a Wolff & Munier, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Fay Spofford & Thorndike of New York, f/k/a Wolff & Munier, Inc., be and the same
are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
</ YorkDated: New York, New York20155Sj
rney lor Plaintiffs)Nicola AzzaroneLf,vy Konigsberg,LLP800 Third Avenue, 13'" FlNew York, New York 10022(212) 605-6200
SO ORDERED,Ion. Peter IT Moulton
F|led0CT I9 2015
e0UNÿks0ffice
KerryafttUJfl&kfEsq.Attorney for DefendantFay Spofford & Thorndike of New York, f/k/aWolff & Munier, Inc.McGivney & Klijger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
i0H/•5 iriiEd d namOCT 14 201W73
NY: - C-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P)
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190221/10,
ZEV SHEMBERGAND
ESTHER SHEMBERG NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Columbia Boiler Company of Pottslown, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Columbia Boiler Company of Pottslown, with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Columbia Boiler Company of Pottstown, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: Nr " ' ,XI 1 FILEDOCT 19 2015
j <1
Attorney tor Plaintiff(s)Zev Shemberg and Esther ShembergLevy Konigsberg, LLP800 Third Avenue, 1 3lh PINew York, New York 10022(212) 605-6200
:K'S OFFICE
KerryaiamCook, EsqAttorney for DefendantColumbia Boiler Company of PottslownMcGivneY & Kujgbr,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
-ÿ/'J/zJ/S
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
PATRICK T. SLEVIN
NYCALl.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P)
Index No.: 190406/10,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Nash Engineering Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs* complaint against defendant, The Nash Engineering Company, with prejudice in this
action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, The Nash Engineering Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York2015
N\ Mo-VAovc->Attorney for Plaintiffs)Patrick T. SlevinLevy Konigsberg,LLP800 Third Avenue, 13lh F1New York. New York 10022(212) 605-6200
KerryaiuiXIoo'k, Esq.Attorney for DefendantThe Nash Engineering CompanyMcGivney & Klijger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,l-lon. Peter H. Moulton
* *
; 1 9 mCo, e .„
C7 P
NlWYOrkOFFIG£
505-442
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNT'Y OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Pari 50(Moulton, P)
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190115/10,
JAMES RICHARD SMITHAND
EVELYN B. SMITH NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant. The Nash Engineering Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Nash Engineering Company, with prejudice in this
action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant. The Nash Engineering Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Attorney for Plaintiff(s)James Richard Smith and Evelyn B. SmithLevy Konigsberg,LLP
Attorney for DefendantThe Nash Engineering Company
800 Third Avenue, 13mPlNew York, New York 10022(212) 605-6200
McGivnf.Y & K.LUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED
* Hon. Peter II. Moulton
CQUNLr CLtHK'S OFfNEW YORK
LEI 505-397
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
RALPHN.BORELLIAND ANNE BORELLI
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No: 115075/98
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc.,n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company,
n/k/aBayer Cropscience, Inc. ("Amchem Products") hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Amchem Products, with prejudice, and there beingno
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Amchem Products, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
filedcosts.
Dated: New Yodc, New York_/p/6 .2015
OCT 19 2015
COUN iy (. .i LRK'S OFFICENhW YORK
Frank Ortiz, Esq. M<WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
HuLA Judith A. YaVitz, Esq.DARGER EKRANTEYAVITZ & BLAU,LLP
A/ 7
Attorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton Ol f i4
536 .12665/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
PHILIP R. ANZALONE , Deceased,
Plaintiff,
-against-
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,
et al . ,
Defendants .
NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)
Index No. : 127106/02107100/02
(March 2014 FIFO Trial Group)
NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United
Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims
against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costd
DATED : £'/// 5East Hanover, New Jersey
MATTHEW MACINTYRÿy ESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
OCT 19 2015
RK'S OFFICE
STEPHEN F. BALSAMU,GARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,
Hofiorable Peter H. Moulton
536.19036/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
KARIN DEAN,
Plaintiff ,
-against-
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,
et al . ,
Defendants .
NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)
Index No. : 101521/05
(March 2014 FIFO Trial Group)
NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United
Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims
against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and withi DDATED : //€>/&/ /5East Hanover, New Jersey
MATTHEW MACINTYRE,/aESQ .WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
STEPHEN F. BALSAMO, EEGARRITY, GRiULAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,Honorable Peter H. Moulton
10//*>//S
536 .12419/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
HENRY D. HOLKA,
Plaintiff ,
-against-
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al . ,
Defendants .
NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)
Index No. : 107404/02ÿ11433314ÿ
J 5 5•
(March 2014 FIFO Trhal Group)
NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United
Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims
against defendant, United Conveyor Corporap<on| |e e!|aS same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED : /0 K/// ZjEast Hanover, New Jersey
MATTHEW MACINTYRE, ÿSQ .WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
c...f i. 9 2015......-ÿ KB OFFICEf kJtlK
STEPHEN F. BAESAMO, ESQt-GARRITY, GRAlÿAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,Honorable Peter H. Moulton hl/sf'5
536 .12410/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)
This document relates to:
JAMES E. McCABE, Deceased,Index No.: 113073/02
106579/02
Plaintiff , (March 2014 FIFO Trial Group)
-against- NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERUNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,
et al . ,
Defendants .
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United
Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims
against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without..it:edDATED
East Hanover, New Jersey
WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
GOJN'TMATTHEW MACINTYRE, STEPHEN F. BALSAM07 ESQT*-
GARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALOSc FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,
Honorable Peter H. Moulton
536 .15321/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)
This document relates to:
CHRISTIAN MERRILL,Index No. : 111048/98
113102/98
Plaintiff , (March 2014 FIFO Trial Group)
-against- NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERUNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,
et al . ,
Defendants .
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United
Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims
against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation|l|e ajtg same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED: / (-'LI//'JEast Hanover, New Jersey
MURPHY, GAROFALO
A '1 J 'v
MATTHEW MACINTYREWEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,le Peter H. Moulton
536 .12424/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
LYLE V. MOSSOW,
Plaintiff ,
-against-
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al . ,
Defendants .
NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)
Index No. : 112280/02105718/02
(March 2014 FIFO Trial Group)
NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United
Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims
against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED: /V /C/ //East Hanover, New Jersey
MATTHEW MACINTYRE,WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff7 00 Broadway OCT 19 2015New York, New York 10003
STEPHENF . BaLsIGARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIC5.0. Box 43 8
NEW YORK East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,Honorable Peter H. Moulton
536 .07701/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
VINCENT BOYLE,
Plaintiff ,
-against -
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al . ,
Defendants .
NYCAL
IAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)
Index No. : 116426/01111219/01
(May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)
NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United
Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims
against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED :
East Hanover, New Jersey
fileMATTHEW MACINTYRE ESQ . STEPHEN F. BALSfAMOj ESgfWEITZ & LUXENBERG QQJ 1q GARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALOAttorneys for Plaintiff tUJ? & FLINN700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,New York, New York lQQfcJMTY CLERfC'sg United Conveyor Corporation
Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
- /.-)/'?//inorable Peter H. Moulton / 'SO ORDERED,
Honorable Peter H. Moulton
536 .12107/AJM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
JOSEPH M. DeMAURO, Deceased,
Plaintiff ,
-against-
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al . ,
Defendants .
NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)
Index No. : 125781/99104731/00
(May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)
NO OPPOSTXONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United
Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims
against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs. F" IL IEE SDDATED : / / // 3East Hanover, New Jersey
/ÿMATTHEW MACINTYRE/'ESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
OCT 1% 201§
COUNTY GLERK'H OFFICE
, esq:GARRITY, GRJVHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALOSc FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,Honorable Peter H. Moulton h/lSlS
536.22673/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)
This document relates to:Index No.: 190116/08
JOHN R. DRAPER,
Plaintiff , (May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)
-against- NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERUNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,
et al . ,
Defendants .
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United
Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims
against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs. 3C r I9 2015
DATED:
East Hanover, New JerseyCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
,,<EW YORK
MATTHEW MACINTYRE STEPHEN F. BALSAM!
GARRITY, GRAHAM, 1MURPHY, GAROFALOWEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,Honorable Peter H. Moulton
536 .12787/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
LESLIE FABER, Deceased,
Plaintiff,
-against-
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al . ,
Defendants .
NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)
Index No. : 109988/02
(May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)
NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United
Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims
against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED: / £"/£' / //.5East Hanover, New Jersey
MATTHEW MACINTYRE,WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 1M03
VO(JA,fy
m , MURPHY, GAROFALO
9 2015
nrv-. P.O. Box 438
EPHEJRITY, GF
& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350
Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,HongrableÿPetei H. Muult
/s /S
536 .20149/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
HORACE L. GARLAND, Deceased,
Plaintiff ,
-against -
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al . ,
Defendants .
NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)
Index No. : 29846/92102333/06
(May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)
NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant. United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United
Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims
against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the Jjiameÿ ajre hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
/> /&/ //'5DATED :
East Hanover, New Jersey
MATTHEW MACINTYRE,J&BQ. .WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
OCT 19 2015
COUf, j , CLERK'S office
:nF. BÿLSAM&7 iSQTÿMURPHY, GAROFALO
STEPHEGARRITY, G:& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,Honorable Peter H. Moulton
536 .16390/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
FRANCIS GOES,
Plaintiff ,
-against-
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al . ,
Defendants .
NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)
Index No. : 100904/03105028/03190413/11
(May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)
NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United
Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims
against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation,lS>e|aijd tpe Jktjfe are hereby0 H Irissj
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED : /fc/c/J/5East Hanover, New Jersey
WuMATTHEW MACINTYRE, ÿSQ .WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
OCT 1% 2015
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENIW YORK
STEPHEN F. BALZAMO, ESQ >GARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,
Honoiÿfjle Peter H. MoultonMtShs
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NYC ASBESTOS LITIGATION
IVETTTE MONTANEZ and PETER MONTANEZ,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. , INC. , et al. ,Defendants .
Index No.: 190409/2014
NO OPPOSITIONSUUMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
IAS Justice:Hon. Peter Moulton
-X
WHEREFORE, defendants VOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA, LLC, hereby
request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint
against defendant, VOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA, LLC, with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant, VOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA, LLC, and
the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: Port Washington, New York
Nahid Shaikh, Esq.THE LANIER LAW FIRM, PLLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs126 East 56ch Street, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 421-2800
Lance Perez, Esq.MAIMONE & ASSOCIATES PLLCAttorneys for DefendantsVOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA, LLC150 Haven AvenuePort Washington, NY 11050(516) 390-9595
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter Moulton
filedOCT 19 2015
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW York
18772278020 CELLINO & BARNES, PC 10:35:09 10-07-2015 2/2
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
HERMAN ANDERSON AND DONNA ANDERSON,INDIVIDUALLY AND AS HUSBAND AND WIFE,
Attorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350Lx 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,
Honorable Peter H. MouTtpn4 0 &
536.21592/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
PATRICK J. O'NEILL, Deceased,
Plaintiff ,
-against-
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al . ,
Defendants .
NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)
Index No. : 112263/07
(May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)
NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United
Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims
against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED: / 7 //5 IC ||East Hanover, New Jersey® 3*
OCT I9 2015
MATTHEW MACINTYRE, . F. BALSÿMCfrÿrgQ .GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALOWEITZ & LUXENBERG COUNTY CLERK'S 9;
Attorneys for Plaintiff N6YV YQRK& FLINN700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,New York, New York 10003 United Conveyor Corporation
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,ÿHonorable Peter H. Moulton
*0 />
536 .14414/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)
This document relates to:
SHARON M. REDDEN,Index No. : 113748/00
108388/00
Plaintiff , (May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)
-against - NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERUNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION.
et al . ,
Defendants .
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United
Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims
against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED : / ÿ'/£-'/ / / OEast Hanover, New Jersey
STEPHEN''FGARRITY, G& FLINN
MATTHEW MACINTYRE, E,
WEITZ & LUXENBERG GAROFALOWEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Attorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,morable Peter H. Moulton f/s//5
536 .12413/AJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
EDWIN C. WILSON, Deceased,
Plaintiff ,
-against-
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,et al . ,
Defendants .
NYCALIAS PART 50(Honorable Peter H. Moulton)
Index No. : 113609/02107222/02
(May 2014 FIFO Trial Group)
NO OPPOSTIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United
Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims
against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED :
East HanoverJoJo/J/5r, New Jers
5Jersey
MATTHEW MACINTYRE,WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
FILEDOCT 19 2015
MURPHY, GAROFALOSTEPHEÿ|\GARRITY, GF& FLINNAttorneys for Defendant,United Conveyor Corporation72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350P.O. Box 438East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,
Honorable Peter H. MoultonPlS/S
oz>-CO
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
GUILLERMO PINA and MIRIAMPINA,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.
NYCAL _I.A.S. PartÿTS £
Index No. 190041/2015
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTPEERLESS INDUSTRIES.INC.
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES,INC.,with prejudice in this
action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant PEERLESSINDUSTRIES,INC.,beand the same are hereby dismjp&edwithprejudice
and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkllyjK_
Oct 19 ?015ryA/,
CLFpl
Steven T. Corbin, Esq.Attorney for DefendantPeerless Industries, Inc.Lewis BrisboisBisgaard& Smith LLP77 Water Street, 21st FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 232-1300File No. 1863-29928
Benjaminfiparche, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsGuillermo Pina and MiriamPinaWeitz & Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDEREDC ÿHon. Peter H. Moulton
Id isis<- (ÿ I 14
ÿ „;3
4841-4637-2641.1
,NSYNeunowioNsupport RECEIVED BYLEWIS BRISBOIS
UUi |J20 15 SMITH LLP
OCT 01 2015
(/)
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
GUILLERMO PINA and MIRIAM PINA,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„
Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No. 190041/2015
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTKAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC.
WHEREFORE, defendant, KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC.,with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC., be and the same are herqfcy dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkYork, Mew Y<
ijnpS
:reby di
&/Oct
°°oa*9•%
ÿ ULSteven T. Corbin, Esq.Attorney for DefendantKaiser Gypsum Company, Inc.Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard& Smith LLP77 Water Street, 21st FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 232-1300File No. 29510.1407
Benjamin Darche, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsGuillermo Pina and Miriam PinaWeitz & Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDEREDon. Peter H. Moulton
-'.j
4822-9667-1014.1
i
i
INSYNcUTiflATioN SUPPORT
UCi 1 3 2015
w
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
ELIZABETHRENO,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50
Index No. 190070/15
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTPEERLESS INDUSTRIES.INC.
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES,INC., with prejudice inthis
action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant PEERLESSINDUSTRIES,INC.,be and the same are hereby dismissedwithprejudice
OCr. Q
and without costs.
Dated: NewYork,NewÿYork
57a
Stephanie L. Coleman, Esq.Attorney for DefendantPeerless Industries, Inc.Lewis BrisboisBisgaard& Smith LLP77 Water Street, 21st FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 232-1300File No. 1863.29965
SO ORDERED
Jofcenb-PT ÿOjMms, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsElizabeth RenoThe Williams Law Firm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
FRED C. BODDY,
Plaintiff,
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.
i NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No. 190137/2015
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTKAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC.
WHEREFORE, defendant, KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC.,with
prejudice inthis action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC., be and the same are Hs*eby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
phi .ÿ $0Dated: New York, New York
ÿ Id-11-MIS COlj,o°rl9 2015
djJL-ÿ7>r
Steven T. Corbin, Esq.Attorney for DefendantKaiser Gypsum Company, Inc.Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard& Smith LLP77 Water Street, 21st FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 232-1300File No. 29510.1455
/C£Adam Drexler, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffFred C. BuddyWeitz & Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
/ A.
SO ORDERED ÿ2ÿ—~---_ iolfSf/S / ÿi i4
"l ion. Peter FI. Moultonÿ / I l„,sÿL
" -0
4822-4 176-5416.1
f
GCO
s.'3(«0
125OS
CD
IP(3
«)
RBCfciVtiJ BYLEWIS BRI6B0IS
B1SGAARD a SMITH LLP
OCT 8 2015
'ttr.tl'pS
389-15/TMCSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
- XNEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION •
EUGENE STORY and RUTH STORY,
Plaintiffs,-against-
ABB TURBINE, INC., et al.
Defendants.
-X STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Index No. 190285/2015
-X
The undersigned hereby stipulates... that the action on behalf of EUGENE
STORY and RUTH STORY is herebydismissed against CROWLEY MARINE
SERVICES, INC., s/h/a CROWLEY MARITIME SERVICES, INC. with prejudice for
any claims against CROWLEY MARINE SERVICES, INC. arising out of Plaintiff's
service on the DELAIRES, which was being operated pursuant to a General Agency
Agreement with the War Shipping Adhftiflistration. Other than the claims related to
the service of the DELAIRES, the dismissal is without prejudice as to CROWLEY
MARINE SERVICES, INC., with plaintiffs reserving all rights and cdCsesÿfÿctioÿagainst all other co-defendants. C*
°C?to
coÿf %Dated: New York, New YorkOctober , 2015
Daniel P. BlouinfEsq,SIMMONS HANLY CONROY112 Madison AvenueNew York, NY 10016-7416Attorneys for PlaintiffsEugene Story andRuth Story
krh'C£:
r:*;, Thdmas M. Canevari, Esq;'ÿreehill hogan & mahar llp
(80 Pine Street• New York, NY 10005Attorneys for DefendantCrowley Marine Services, inc.
SO ORDERED:
440082.1
If.it-'WStt h\
/ Hon. Peter H. MoultonM/y/5
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law
48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
ARTHUR HALLBERG AND EMILIAHALLBERG,
against
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, ftINDEX NO.: 190475/13
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, KOHLER CO., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, KOHLER CO., with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, KOHLER CO., be and the same are hereby dis|usse| v|th pjgffjdipÿand without
costs.
DATED::/04<TNew York, New York
OCT 19 2015
ÿLERK'S OFFICE'NEW YORK
HA SHAH, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,KOHLER CO.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
SO ORDERED:
rCI IRISTOPI ICR GLADDr-ESQ.NAPOLI, BERN, RIPKATSHKNOLNIK &ASSOCIATES MifAa, j CLAttorneys for Plaintiff(s), ÿ 1ARTHUR HALLBERG and EMILIA HALLBERG350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7413New York, NY 10118
/W/v/aHonorable Peter H. Moulton
CN-HIP-13
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
This Document Relates to:JOHN CUZZOLINO and CONCETTA CUZZOLINO,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A.O SMITH WATER PRODUCT CO., et al.
Defendants,
-X
NYCAL(Hoitlcr, J)—IAS PartÿtfSb
Index No. 190270/2014
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
April 2015 InExtremis
-X
WHEREFORE, Defendant INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY incorrectly sued
herein as INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY f/k/a Hammermill Paper Co. and
Individually and as Successor to US Plywoodhereby requests Summary Judgment inthe above-
entitled case pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules §3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint
against INTERNATIONALPAPER COMPANY with prejudice, and there beingno opposition
thereto, it is
ORDERED, that uponnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without coats)fj lih j
Dated: Newf/Yorfl,New Yc<lh II ,>-Oroi5
7BELLUCrfBy_Jordan Fo546 FifthNew YorlÿWwYork 10036(212) 681-M5Attorneys for Plaintiffs
SO ORQERED:
Ft LEO
I& MILLER,P.C.
John S. Rana, Esq.99 CourKttreetWhite Plains,New York 10601(914) 946-8900Attorneys for Defendant INTERNATIONALPAPER COMPANY
Hon. Sherry Klein Iloitlor,J.S.C:
HON.PETERH.MOULTONDated: fb fÿJ
SbPp
ifURT-CII
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xINRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
xIVETTE MONTANEZ and PETER MONTANEZ,
Index No.: 190409/14
-against-Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC. et. al. Hon. Peter H. Moulton
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, Defendant HONDA MOTOR PARTS SERVICE CO., LTD., hereby
requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant HONDA MOTOR PARTS
SERVICE CO., LTD.,with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, HONDA MOTOR PARTS SERVICE CO., LTD., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party.
Dated: New York, New York / Y
/! II ED / (y$ \)f I/ f 1 —--Nahid A. snaikh, Esq. p-r \ C) 2.0ÿ Benjamm GÿiÿjrersrEsq.
LANIER LAW FIRM,PLLC * SEGAL McCXMBRIDGETSfNGERAttorneys for Plaintiff MAHONEY, LTD.126 East 56lh Street 6th Floor CLERK'S Attorneys for DefendantNew York, New York 1002ÿÿ ÿE\N YOR 850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100(212) 421-2800 New York, New York 10022
(212) 651-7500
SO ORDERED,'Hon Peter H. Moulton
I
I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
— - XINRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
XKATHLEEN CURTIN, as Administratrix for theEstate of KEVIN B. CURTIN, and KATHLEENCURTIN, Individually,
Plaintiffs,
Index No.: 190351/12
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION
- against - I.A.S. Part 50Hon. Peter H. Moulton
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.- X
WHEREFORE, Defendant GARDNER DENVER, INC. (hereinafter "GARDNER
DENVER"), hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant
GARDNER DENVER, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, GARDNER DENVER, be and the same are hereby dismissed withjprejudice and
without costs to either party.
Dated: CHbbe/~£,2015New York, New York
9Adam Raffo, ÿ
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
ed with_pr
EDOCT 19 M5
CK'S officeYORK
(ndrew W. Dean, Esq.SEGAL MdCAMBRIDGESINGER AlMAHONEY, LTD.Attorneysfo\DefendantGardner Denver, Inc.850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022(212) 651-7500
$ U Q
hfsisHon. Peter H. Moulton OCT
ÿ !
i4 ÿW/3
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION-X
-XIndex No.: 190386/14
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION
I.A.S. PartedHon. Peter H. Moulton
-X
JOSEPH P. HADDEN and ELEANOR HADDEN,
Plaintiffs,
- against -
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant GARDNER DENVER, INC. (hereinafter "GARDNER
DENVER"), hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant
GARDNER DENVER, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, GARDNER DENVER, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs to either party.
Dated: Oc4ÿbÿJ~(s>f 2015New York, New York
Adam Raffo, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Andrew WSEGAL ÿ
19 2015
MBRltefi0ÿÿSINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneysfor DefendantGardner Denver, Inc.850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022(212) 651-7500
SO ORDERED,Peter H. Moulton
jollS/h r-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
Index No.: 190025/14InRe:NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NELSONA. SIWA,
Plaintiff(s),NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION
t against -
AURORA PUMP COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY hereby requests Summary
Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, and
there beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Aurora Pump Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs to either party.
Dated:
007 9 2015/Gtsu. » i - ' " '
KatrinaH.MurpHypBsgÿ ÿSEGAL McCAMBRÿeJ;'S °f
SINGER & MAHONEY,LTO.
Ambref/Brandis, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Attorneys for DefendantAurora Pump Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
ffon.-f*eter H. Moulton
New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
SO ORDERED,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, ft)
This Document Relates to: Index No: 190025/2014
THERESA SIWA, as Executrix for the Estate ofNELSONA. SIWA, and THERESA SIWA,Individually
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,
and there beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporatio 1 ' hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
06ft)ber5 .2015
OÿWlPg ÿ PWpiirnnJrq,WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Jonathan B. Kromberg, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YA\Attorneys for UnionCarbide116 East 27th Street, 12thFloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
Attorneys for UnionCarbide CorporationDARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLP
(Xiq/ibit fiid/idis i
SO ORDERED,H<5n Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
THERESA SIWA, as Executrix for the Estate ofNELSONA. SIWA, and THERESA SIWA,Individually
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, ft)Index No: 190025/2014
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs. F/L POCT I
COU/VJ* ''YORK
Dated: New York, New York
Odtdhxr 5 .2oi5
K'S OFFICE
WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
dmbAt fÿardiS; 6S$
Jonathan B. Kromberg, Esq.DARGER ERRANTEYAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12thFloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, sf AHefi. PtTter H. Moulton ---fjfÿJ/ S
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
ELVIS LICUL AND NEVENKA RADOVICAS PROPOSED CO-EXECUTORS FOR THEESTATE OF ALBINA LICUL AND VICTORLIKUL, INDIVIDUALLY,
Plaintiffs,vs.
A.O. SMITHWATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No: 190173/2015
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Crosby Valve, LLC named in the complaint as "FMC
Corporation, on behalf of its former subsidiary Crosby Valve, Inc." hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Crosby Valve LLC with prejudice, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Crosby Valve LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed wppfjificegl 0outcosts.
Dated: New York, New York
j»Qc\mec ,2015
_ÿ
_Adam Dreksler, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorney for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Phone: (212) 558-5500
OCT 19 2015
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFI~
Seth L. Hughes, Escf.'Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Crosby Valve LLC101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212)309-6000
SO ORDERED,Tlon. Peter H. Moulton
OCT 14 20 15
NYS SOPF-50
JRT - CIVIL
iI
SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRENEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
ÿX NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, f?)
This Document Relates to: Index No: 190224-14
MARKRICCI, NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTIONANDORDER
X
WHEREFORE, defendant SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC., successor in interest to
SIEMENS ENERGY & AUTOMATION, INC. by its attorneys, WILBRAHAM, LAWLER &
BUBA, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant SIEMENS
INDUSTRY, INC., successor in interest to SIEMENS ENERGY & AUTOMATION, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC., successor in interest to SIEMENS ENERGY &
AUTOMATION, INC.,be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudicpndjwijjiout |swts.£ÿjDaÿd: / /X 2015 „
_/ ÿ / (vÿ XOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
John S. Howarth, Esq. YORKWILBRAHAM,LAWLER & BUBA1W0 Broadway, 46th Floor
j2nris Rjamanelli, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERGVÿliLJO
WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs
WILBRAHAM,LAWLER & BUBA1W0 Broadway, 46th FloorNew York, NY 10005Attorneys for Defendant, SIEMENSINDUSTRY, INC., successor in interest toSIEMENS ENERGY & AUTOMATION, INC.
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter Moulton
FSEeiflWiiD)OCT 14 2015
RT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against Georgia-Pacific LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against Georgia-Pacific LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
m/sr/nfMEIROWITZ & WASSERBERG, LLP LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff
amuel Meiro tz, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC
By:
233 Broadway, #950New York, NY 10279(212) 897-1988
FILE DOCT 19 2015
264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018 COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE(212) 302-2400 NEW YORK
Alexandra E. Ober, Esq.
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED: -. foj/ds-AHdCPeter H. Moulton, J.S.C. 7 '
octi4,.u;* -uID
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
OLAF THORLEIF LYBERG
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton,
Index No: 190059/2015
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Cooper Industries, Inc. (Individually and as Successor to
Crouse-Hinds Company), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against
defendant Cooper Industries, Inc. (Individually and as Successor to Crouse-Hinds Company),
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Cooper Industries, Inc. (Individually and as Successor to Crouse-Hinds Company), be
and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
/o/l ,2015
latthew Park, Esq.EARLY LUCARELLISWEENEY &MEISENKOTHEN,LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017(212) 986-2233
filedOCT 19 2015
LTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
Jonathan B. Kromberg, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for Cooper Industries, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,on. Peter H. M'oulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, f)
This Document Relates to: Index No: 190059/2015
OLAF THORLEIF LYBERG NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Gould Electronics, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant Gould Electronics, Inc., with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Gould Electronics, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Matthew PaiEARLY LL
Kromberg, Esq.EARLY LUCARELLI SWEENEY &MEISENKOTHEN,LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017(212) 986-2233
& DAKGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for Gould Electronics, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
ocU»®*
on. Peter H. MoultonSO ORDERED,
j
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton,
This Document Relates to: Index No: 190059/2015
OLAF THORLEIF LYBERG NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation (incorrectly sued herein as Certain-
Teed Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Keasbey & Mattison Company)
("CertainTeed Corporation"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs. filed
EARLY LUCARELLISWEENEY &MEISENKOTHEN,LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017(212) 986-2233
Dated: New York, Nyw York
/(/'9 .2015
Matthew Park. Esq. Jonathdp4)Jonathdp43. Kromberg, Esq.
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
OCT 19 2015
DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
DARGER
SO ORDERED,on. Peter H. Moulton
/
10/08/2015 THU 10: 28 FAX 0002/003
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendantsASBESTOS CORPORATION
LTD,with prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that uponnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants ASBESTOS CORPORÿTIÿLLÿB|, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without coslE*\ $
y. r>=Jiristapber-Gkdd;Esq.ÿ
, v Attorney for PlaintiffsNapoli BernRipka Assocaites350 FifthAvenue, Suite 7413New York, New York 10118
OFFICE
Joseph Digifegomo, Esq.ttorneys for AjSBESTOS CORPORATION
LTD.Barry McTieirfran & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600
SO ORDERED, /m//s-]4on Sherry Klm'ri-TTr.iflf.r
HON.PETERH.MOULTON5 ;U|5
X:CLB/61037./leeal/NOSJM/october2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK.. XDONNIE R. RUSSELL and DEBORAH J. RUSSELL,His wife,
Plaintiff(s),
- against -
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
Index No.: 190127/15
AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORP, et al.;
Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50
-X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
David Chandler, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsKarst & Von Oiste576 FifthAvenueNew York, New York 10036
SO ORDERED,Hon.'Peter Moulton
3yan Kleinman, Esq.Attorneys for CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan& Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006
o /S /S
filedOCT 19 2015
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
OCT & / 1 ; /
X:DOM/57S77./leeal/NOSJM/MAY2QI5
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OFNEW YORK
XHarriet D'Auria, Individually and as PersonalRepresentative of the Heirs and Estate of ALFONSOD'AURIA,deceased
Plaintiffs),
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
- against - Index No.: 190469/12
AKZO NOBEL PAINTS, LLC,et al.;
Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50
-X
WHEREFORE, defendants DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS, INC. hereby request
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS, INC.
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS, INC., be and the same are bespby dismissed with
iprejudice and without costs. 4*
°CTl»to,s
Bouglas Von Quite, Ecq.'tÿ<>o'A Ac. Marafioti, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiffs Attorneys for DOMCO Products Texas, Inc.Karst & Von Oiste Barry McTiernan & Moore576 FifthAvenue 2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10036 New York, New York 10006
(212)313-3600
SO ORDERED4lon. Peter Moulton
,) I
OCT 15 2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
ROBERT CASTERELLA,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
3M COMPANY Individually and as successor toMinnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, etal„
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)
Index No.: 190133/2015
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
Defendants.—x
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without <y>stÿ
Dated: iiiÿlew York, New York Oct*>.
-pi/qaotrSamuel Meirowitz, EsMEIROWITZ & WAÿSERBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff(s)233 Broadway, Ste. 950New York, NY 10279(212) 897-1988
Kirsten Alford Kneis, Esq.K&E GATES LLP
torneys for DefendantIRANE CO.
599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022"o03u(212) 536-3900 2/ H. )f]
OCT 5 20)5
SO ORDERED, I*Hon. Peter H. Moulton
OCT ] 3 2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION.....xThis Document Relates To:
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter Moulton)
Index No(s).: 190389/13
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
STANLEY HOBISH and ROSLYN HOBISH,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„
Defendants.
>WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstlaims
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and withoufcÿts.
Dated: \/Z\ S"~New York, New York
undsay MzDeCicco,Lihdsay MZDeCicco, Esq.Weitz &'Luxenberg P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
%V &
)avid Oxamendi, Esq.K&L GATES LLPAttorneys for DefendantCRANE CO.599 LexingtonAvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900 f U
Hem. Peter Moulton - 1 J
a A'f-..
SEP ?, 4 2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
-XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
MANUEL FIGUEROA and MARIA FIGUEROA,
Plaintiffs,
- against -
AERCO INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al . ,
Defendants.
-X
I.A.S. Part 50(Justice Moulton)
Index No.: 190247/15
NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
-X
WHEREFORE, defendant, HOWDEN NORTH AMERICA, INC., f/k/a,
and referred to hereinafter as, HOWDEN BUFFALO, INC.
("HOWDEN") , requests summary judgment in this action, pursuant
to CPLR 3212, dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint against HOWDEN,
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims
and cross claims against HOWDEN, be dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkOctober 2, 2015
Daniel Wasserberg, EsqMeirowirtz & Wasserbetg, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff233 Broadway, Suite 950New York, New York 10279(212) 897-1988
J/Burbridge, Esq.ilietfi and Dykman LLP
/Attorneys for DefendantHOWDEN NORTH AMERICA , INC.44 Wall Street, 15th FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 732-2000Our File No. : 11231-002.76
SO ORDERED:
Hon/ Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.'isjis
u fi]
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims
beand cross claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS,
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
/ b II , 2015
fl*ocT, &
Samuel Meirovaitz, E'sc
Meirowitz & Wasserberg LLPAttorneys for PlaintiffDario Battistoni233 Broadway, Suite 950New York, New York 10003(212) 897-1988
Kristen 'Morrissÿy Esq.Cullen and Dykman LLPAttorneys for DefendantGoulds Pumps, Inc.44 Wall Street, 15th FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 732-2000Our File No. : 6754-13738
SO ORDERED:
Hon. Peter H. MouTton(ojisfis
i& 2015
C'vU
I
t
r
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
InReNEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
LAWRENCE SERUYA,
-against-
-X
Plaintiff,
Index No.: 153302/2015
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTCROWN EQUIPMENTCORPORATION
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant, CROWN EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
ELLbEnDdCROWN EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, be and the
without costs.
Ed with prejudice and
OCT 19 2015Dated: Purchase, New York
I0 [Ql ,2015
1Kush Shukla, Esq.Wilentz, Goldman& Spitzer, P.A.Attorneysfor Plaintiff110 Williams Street, 26lh FloorNew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
Diane4L-Mttt€r, Esq.LITTLETON,JOYCE, UGHETTA, PARK &KELLY,LLP.Attorney'sfor DefendantsCrown Equipment Corporation4 Manhattanville Road, Suite 220Purchase, New York 10577(914)417-3400