Top Banner
“Fly-By-Wireless” Chris Dimoulis CS 441 Fall 2013
21
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: “Fly-By-Wireless” Chris Dimoulis CS 441 Fall 2013.

“Fly-By-Wireless”

Chris DimoulisCS 441

Fall 2013

Page 2: “Fly-By-Wireless” Chris Dimoulis CS 441 Fall 2013.

Aircraft Systems (Current)Benefits of Wireless SystemCharacteristics and ObstaclesProposed Solutions

Page 3: “Fly-By-Wireless” Chris Dimoulis CS 441 Fall 2013.

Cables and Pulleys Direct connection from flight controls to

control surface Hydraulic

Direct manipulation of hydraulic actuators in flight controls

Fly-By-Wire Avionics Full Duplex Switched Ethernet

(AFDX) used to send data from controls to actuators

Page 4: “Fly-By-Wireless” Chris Dimoulis CS 441 Fall 2013.

View and manipulate flight and engine data\

Old Systems Pressure systems for altitude and airspeed Mechanical linkages for engine data

(tachometer and manifold pressure) New Systems

Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC) Automatically controls engine parameters,

sends data to pilots through AFDX

Page 5: “Fly-By-Wireless” Chris Dimoulis CS 441 Fall 2013.

Cost from Weight Reduction Cable costs: A320: $14MB787: $50M [1]

A380: 300 miles (500 km) of wire [2]

Weight reduction means better fuel efficiency and increased space for revenue weight

Page 6: “Fly-By-Wireless” Chris Dimoulis CS 441 Fall 2013.

Improved Safety and Less Maintenance Less Wire degradation U.S. Navy: 78 aircraft made non-mission

capable due to wiring, 1000 aborts from wiring faults [2]

Wired interconnects and potential fires▪ B 747 tank explosion due to arcing between

fuel sensor wiring [3]

Page 7: “Fly-By-Wireless” Chris Dimoulis CS 441 Fall 2013.

Real-Time and Deterministic [1]

Aircraft Network must behave in a predictable way

Current system provides 100Mbps Latencies must be bounded and

deadline constraints respected

Page 8: “Fly-By-Wireless” Chris Dimoulis CS 441 Fall 2013.

Reliability and Availability Probability of failure needs to be 10-9 per

flight hour [1]

Fault Detection Long lifetime: Avionics system lifetime

can be 20 – 30 years [1]

Page 9: “Fly-By-Wireless” Chris Dimoulis CS 441 Fall 2013.

Security [1]

Data confidentiality to prevent passive eavesdropping

Data integrity to guarantee data is not altered in transit

Prevent unauthorized access to network

Page 10: “Fly-By-Wireless” Chris Dimoulis CS 441 Fall 2013.

Electromagnetic Compatibility[1]

Deployment is in a harsh physical environment

Large temperature and humidity changes along with vibrations

Intense radio frequency noise

Page 11: “Fly-By-Wireless” Chris Dimoulis CS 441 Fall 2013.

Table reproduced from [1]

Page 12: “Fly-By-Wireless” Chris Dimoulis CS 441 Fall 2013.

802.11n+Adequate Data rate+Uses Point Coordination Function for

contention free mode+Reliability: Automatic Retransmission

ReQuest (ARQ )- Not adapted for multicast[1]

- High possibility of interference from common devices[1]

Page 13: “Fly-By-Wireless” Chris Dimoulis CS 441 Fall 2013.

ECMA-368 High Rate Ultra WideBand+Adequate Data rate and ranges+Distributed Reservation Protocol

TDMA (Contention free)

+More secure from “man-in-middle” than 802.11

Page 14: “Fly-By-Wireless” Chris Dimoulis CS 441 Fall 2013.

Begin with a hybrid system Full Duplex Ethernet Switch to connect

clusters

Image reproduced from [1]

Page 15: “Fly-By-Wireless” Chris Dimoulis CS 441 Fall 2013.

MAC Protocol Proposals Need predictable behavior under real-

time constraints▪ Synchronization protocol for TDMA

Reliability Mechanism for sending/receiving data▪ Probability of failure to be 10-9 per flight hour

Page 16: “Fly-By-Wireless” Chris Dimoulis CS 441 Fall 2013.

Synchronization Protocol IEEE1588 Wired network synchronization

have been implemented within few nanoseconds precision

IEEE1558 has reached less than 200 nanosecond precision for wireless network synchronization, however too many messages

Proposed enhanced IEEE1588

Page 17: “Fly-By-Wireless” Chris Dimoulis CS 441 Fall 2013.

Synchronization Protocol Master/Slave/Passive

node If slave node fails

passive node canfill in

Image reproduced from [1]

Page 18: “Fly-By-Wireless” Chris Dimoulis CS 441 Fall 2013.

Reliability Mechanism Need adequate acknowledgement and

retransmission mechanism Communication is multicast▪ Multiple ACKs colliding?▪ Overhead from sender needing to receive all

ACKs

Page 19: “Fly-By-Wireless” Chris Dimoulis CS 441 Fall 2013.

Reliability Mechanism Designated “leader”

of cluster ACK from leader,

NACK from rest If sender hears NACK

or nothing (due to ACK/NACK collision) then it will retransmit

Image reproduced from [1]

Page 20: “Fly-By-Wireless” Chris Dimoulis CS 441 Fall 2013.

ECMA-368 can provide adequate data rate, contention free, and security properties

Needs predictable real-time behavior Enhanced IEEE1588 synchronization

Reliable data reception Cluster leaders with ACK/NACK

messages

Page 21: “Fly-By-Wireless” Chris Dimoulis CS 441 Fall 2013.

[1] D. Dang, A. Mifdaoui,and T. Gayraund, “Fly-By-Wireless for Next Generation Aircraft: Challenges and Potential solutions.” (In Press: 2012) In: Wireless days conference, 21-23 Nov 2012, Dublin, Ireland

[2] R. K. Yedavalli, R. K. Belapurkar, “Application of Wireless Sensor Networks to Aircraft Control and Health Management.” Journal of control Theory & Applications. February 2011; 9(1):28.

[3] M. Panitz, D. Hope, W. Crowther, et al. “The opportunities and challenges associated with wireless interconnects in aircraft.” Proceedings Of The Institution Of Mechanical Engineers -- Part G -- Journal Of Aerospace Engineering (Sage Publications, Ltd.) [serial online]. April 2010;224(4):459.