Top Banner
Flow of Presentation Objective. History. Reasons for Merger; a) Strategic Analyses b) Technical Analyses Valuation. Funding Current Scenario Conclusion.
18

Flow of Presentation Objective. History. Reasons for Merger; a) Strategic Analyses b) Technical Analyses Valuation. Funding Current Scenario.

Apr 01, 2015

Download

Documents

Gaige Elwood
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Flow of Presentation  Objective.  History.  Reasons for Merger;  a) Strategic Analyses  b) Technical Analyses  Valuation.  Funding  Current Scenario.

Flow of Presentation

Objective. History. Reasons for Merger; a) Strategic Analyses b) Technical Analyses Valuation. Funding Current Scenario Conclusion.

Page 2: Flow of Presentation  Objective.  History.  Reasons for Merger;  a) Strategic Analyses  b) Technical Analyses  Valuation.  Funding  Current Scenario.

Objective

Learning Process of M&A.Know how to do valuation.How to make profit my learning

M&A.

Page 3: Flow of Presentation  Objective.  History.  Reasons for Merger;  a) Strategic Analyses  b) Technical Analyses  Valuation.  Funding  Current Scenario.

Overview of companies

Cincinnati Based Established in yr.1837 Work force : 110,000 Market Capitalization :$141

bill. Suppliers : 85000 Manufacturing plants : 106

in 41 countries. Pre-acquisition revenues

(2004) : $51 bill.

Boston based Established in yr. 1895 Work force : 29400 Market capitalization : $45

billion. Suppliers : 26000 Manufacturing plants : 31

in 14 countries. Pre-acquisition revenues

(2004) : $9.8 bill.

Page 4: Flow of Presentation  Objective.  History.  Reasons for Merger;  a) Strategic Analyses  b) Technical Analyses  Valuation.  Funding  Current Scenario.

Strategic Analysis

Page 5: Flow of Presentation  Objective.  History.  Reasons for Merger;  a) Strategic Analyses  b) Technical Analyses  Valuation.  Funding  Current Scenario.
Page 6: Flow of Presentation  Objective.  History.  Reasons for Merger;  a) Strategic Analyses  b) Technical Analyses  Valuation.  Funding  Current Scenario.

Marketing Approach Global Regional

Culture Innovative Social -Responsibility

+

+

Synergy

Economy of Scale

P&G can havebenefits from theGillette R&Dstructure and use itsBrand Loyalty

P&G can have benefits if they adopt an HYBRID STRUCTURE ; But every change require some cost and they have to do INTEGRATION EFFORT.

Risk in Merger :

Page 7: Flow of Presentation  Objective.  History.  Reasons for Merger;  a) Strategic Analyses  b) Technical Analyses  Valuation.  Funding  Current Scenario.

Technical Analysis

Sales & Growth RatioProfit MarginLeverageConclusion.

Page 8: Flow of Presentation  Objective.  History.  Reasons for Merger;  a) Strategic Analyses  b) Technical Analyses  Valuation.  Funding  Current Scenario.

Sale

Page 9: Flow of Presentation  Objective.  History.  Reasons for Merger;  a) Strategic Analyses  b) Technical Analyses  Valuation.  Funding  Current Scenario.

Sale Growth Rate

Page 10: Flow of Presentation  Objective.  History.  Reasons for Merger;  a) Strategic Analyses  b) Technical Analyses  Valuation.  Funding  Current Scenario.

Operating Profit Margin.

Page 11: Flow of Presentation  Objective.  History.  Reasons for Merger;  a) Strategic Analyses  b) Technical Analyses  Valuation.  Funding  Current Scenario.
Page 12: Flow of Presentation  Objective.  History.  Reasons for Merger;  a) Strategic Analyses  b) Technical Analyses  Valuation.  Funding  Current Scenario.

Debt to Equity Ratio.

Page 13: Flow of Presentation  Objective.  History.  Reasons for Merger;  a) Strategic Analyses  b) Technical Analyses  Valuation.  Funding  Current Scenario.

Assumption about sale's growth

 % of net

sale2004

sales' growth in 2005

Weightage growth

% of projected sales 2005

sales' growth after 2005

Weightage sales' growth

Blades & Razor

41.32% 14.00% 5.78% 41.15% 12.00% 4.94%

Duracell 21.30% 9.00% 1.92% 20.28% 10.00% 2.03%

Oral Care 15.17% 25.00% 3.79% 16.57% 25.00% 4.14%

Braun 13.04% 15.00% 1.96% 13.10% 15.00% 1.97%

Personal Care

9.17% 11.00% 1.01% 8.89% 11.00% 0.98%

Total100.00

%  14.46% 100.00%   14.05%

Page 14: Flow of Presentation  Objective.  History.  Reasons for Merger;  a) Strategic Analyses  b) Technical Analyses  Valuation.  Funding  Current Scenario.

Assumption about EBIT margin

 % PFO2004

PFO‘ growth in 2005

Weightage PFO 's growth

%of projected PFO 2005

PFO'growth after 2005

Weightage PFO ' growth

Blades & Razor

63.68% 30.00% 19.10% 65.97% 30.00% 19.79%

Duracell 19.16% 22.00% 4.22% 18.63% 22.00% 4.10%

Oral Care 9.73% 14.50% 1.41% 8.88% 14.50% 1.29%

Braun 3.71% 10.50% 0.39% 3.27% 10.50% 0.34%

Personal Care

3.72% 10.00% 0.37% 3.26% 10.00% 0.33%

Total 100.00%   25.49% 100.00%   25.84%

Page 15: Flow of Presentation  Objective.  History.  Reasons for Merger;  a) Strategic Analyses  b) Technical Analyses  Valuation.  Funding  Current Scenario.

Assets to Sale  2004 2003 2002 2001

Operating Working Capital ($mill.) 0.00 170.00 708.00 1333.00

Operating Working Capital as %of sale NA 2.00% 8.00% 16.00%

Net Long term assets 5731.00 5614.00 4968.00 4979.00

Net Long term assets turnover 1.83 1.65 1.70 1.62

Capital expenditures ($mill.) 616.00 408.00 405.00 624.00

Capital expenditures % net sales 6.00% 4.00% 5.00% 8.00%

Page 16: Flow of Presentation  Objective.  History.  Reasons for Merger;  a) Strategic Analyses  b) Technical Analyses  Valuation.  Funding  Current Scenario.

Valuation

Individual Valuation of Firm

Valuation After Acquisition

Assumption for the Valuation

  2005 After 2005

Sales' Growth Rate 14.86%14.05%

EBIT Margin 25.49%25.85%

Tax Rate 30.00%30.00%

Operating Working Capital to sale 1.00%1.00%

Net Long term Assets to sale 60.00% 60.00%

Page 17: Flow of Presentation  Objective.  History.  Reasons for Merger;  a) Strategic Analyses  b) Technical Analyses  Valuation.  Funding  Current Scenario.

FCFF Valuation Method.

FCFF = NOPAT + depreciation & amortization

– changes in NWC – Capex

Discount Rate = WACC.

Page 18: Flow of Presentation  Objective.  History.  Reasons for Merger;  a) Strategic Analyses  b) Technical Analyses  Valuation.  Funding  Current Scenario.

Dream Deal

Total Deal Value : $57 bn Market Cap. : $48bn

@ 18% Premium

.975 P&G Share = 1 Gillette Share

Issued 962mn shares

Issued 79mn stock options

Buyback $22bn of shares

Investment Banker : Goldman Sachs & UBS AG