-
Egypt Exploration Society
A Flint Knife of King DjerAuthor(s): W. NeedlerSource: The
Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, Vol. 42 (Dec., 1956), pp.
41-44Published by: Egypt Exploration SocietyStable URL:
http://www.jstor.org/stable/3855120 .Accessed: 14/04/2014 18:01
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the
Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
.http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars,
researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information
technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new
formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please
contact [email protected].
.
Egypt Exploration Society is collaborating with JSTOR to
digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journalof Egyptian
Archaeology.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 194.214.161.15 on Mon, 14 Apr 2014
18:01:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
-
(41)
A FLINT KNIFE OF KING DJER By W. NEEDLER
THE flint knife illustrated on pl. III was acquired by the Royal
Ontario Museum, Toronto, more than forty years ago. It was bought
from a dealer in Luxor in the spring of I9I4 by G. D. Hornblower,
acting for the museum. Before buying it Mr. Horn- blower described
it in a letter as 'a very large flint knife, its handle covered
with gold and bearing a "hawk" name of an early king. Fine thin
flint, broken across in the finding.' It has not been published,
except recently in a brief listing by Godron.' It is especially
important to bring the knife to the attention of Egyptologists in
view of Professor Emery's discoveries at Sakkarah.2
Its outline and its flaking are characteristic of a type of
curved knife with small 'cut- out' handle which has been frequently
found in tombs of the First Dynasty. The type appears suddenly at
the beginning of the Dynasty, and its characteristic S-curved back
and downward-pointing handle-spur tend to degenerate towards a
straighter, clumsier outline after Udimu. Handled knives of roughly
similar outline and inferior quality come from the temple areas of
Abydos and Hierakonpolis. The finer and truly typical specimens
have been found only in tombs, principally the great tombs of
Abydos, Sakkarah and Nadah, butand Nakadah also at, Gzbutah also
Nagat edD, Tarkhan, and elsewhere.3
In the quality of its flint work the the Toronto knife compares
favourably with any of the known examples of the type. The
concavity of its back is about equal to that of the illustrated
specimens from Emery's tomb no. 3504 (Wadjy)4 and is greater than
that of the specimens from the tomb of Hemaka (Udimu),5 thus mildly
supporting Petrie's theory of the evolution of the type.6 The knife
is 37 cm. long, much larger than the knives from Emery's tomb no.
3504 and slightly larger than all those from the tomb of Hemaka
except the 41 cm. specimen. Its peculiar interest lies in the gold
foil covering the handle. A hieroglyphic inscription embossed on
the gold contains the name of King Djer, and, indeed, we do not
know of any other instance of an Early Dynastic knife having its
original gold overlay preserved.
I 'Activites de l'6gyptologie americaine (en souvenir de Brown
University)', in Bull. Soc. franf. d'LSg. ii (Oct. 1952), 63.
2 Professor Emery saw the knife when he was in Toronto in April
1955, and expressed the desire to see it published as soon as
possible. The writer is indebted to him for speeding a project long
overdue. It is hoped that he and other interested scholars will
solve the many problems connected with the object.
3 E.g. the fine specimen, 26 cm. long, from a small private
tomb, ILN, Jan. 2, 1937, 3, fig. 3. 4 Great Tombs of the 1st Dyn.
ii, 67, fig. 96, and pl. 34. s Tomb of Hemaka, p. 1 9, and pl. i i.
6 Abydos, i, 8. For an exceptionally late example of the
characteristic curved outline see Reisner, Early
Dyn. Cem. of Naga-ed-Der, p. I I2, and pl. 40 (a). The knives
from the tomb of Hemaka (Tomb of Hemaka, pl. i i) show that there
was considerable variation in outline among pieces found together.
The remarkable variation in size is best seen in Tombs of the
Courtiers, pl. 6.
This content downloaded from 194.214.161.15 on Mon, 14 Apr 2014
18:01:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
-
PLATE III
i. Flint knife of King Djer with gold-covered handle 2. The
gold-covered handle of the knife
3. Inscription on the gold covering of the handle
A FLINT KNIFE OF KING DJER IN THE ROYAL ONTARIO MUSEUM
This content downloaded from 194.214.161.15 on Mon, 14 Apr 2014
18:01:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
-
This overlay (p1. III, 2 and 3) has a straight-cut edge running
obliquely on each face from the inner angle of the handle cut-out
to the back of the blade. It consists of a large piece folded
around the grip, and covering about two-thirds of the obverse, and
a smaller piece folded over the end. The whole was carefully cut,
folded, and pressed to fit the peculiar outline of the handle. The
gold was secured to the stone by means of an adhesive, vwhich has
shrunk in the course of the centuries causing the gold to wrinkle
and crack.' We know of only one other flint knife in which the
original gold overlay is preserved, the Cairo knife said to be from
Gebel et-Tarif.2 The latter is dated before the First Dynasty,
mainly on grounds of flint-working technique. Unlike the gold
covering on our knife, the gold of the Cairo knife was cut in two
pieces, one
FIG. i. Inscription on knife of King Djer.
for each face, and secured by sewing down the overlap with gold
thread around the edges of the reverse. De Morgan mentions a flint
knife (presumably of the same type as the gold-handled knife in
Cairo) which was found with gold chlorides on one-third of its
length, evidence of a gold covering which had disappeared.3 Do any
known specimens of our type of knife bear such evidence, perhaps
undetected, of having been encased in gold? Little gold has escaped
the plunderers of the great Early Dynastic tombs at Sakkarah and
Abydos, but there is ample evidence that gold foil very similar to
the overlay on the Toronto knife was used lavishly for their
furnishing.4 Other knives from the royal tombs of the First Dynasty
may well have had this embellish- ment.
The knife is obviously intended for the right hand, since on the
lower edge of the handle the flint is bevelled for the three
fingers which would fit snugly between the blade and the spur. It
is fitting, therefore, that on the reverse face, which would be
I The nature of the adhesive is undetermined. It is perhaps
resin, which was used in sealing a jar from the tomb of HIemaka,
according to Lucas (Anc. Eg. Materials and Industries, 3rd ed.,
I2).
2 De Morgan, Recherches, I, 84, 112-15; Quibell, Archaic
Objects, 237, pl. 49 (14265); Capart, Primitive Art, 68-69. The
object is photographed only in De Morgan, Recherches, II, pl. 5,
where the foil may be compared with ours for quality and condition.
The Gebel et-Tarif provenance is uncertain.
3 Op. cit. I, 113-I4. 4 For examples of gold foil from the Early
Dynastic period see Abydos, I, pl. 5; Hierakonpolis, I, pI. 20
(9);
Great Tombs of the xst Dyn. II, pl. 13 (c), and fig. 3.
W. NEEDLER 42
This content downloaded from 194.214.161.15 on Mon, 14 Apr 2014
18:01:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
-
A FLINT KNIFE OF KING DJER covered by the hand when the knife
was in use, the gold is entirely devoid of decora- tion. The
inscription on the obverse is suitably placed about 3 cm. from the
end of the handle and a little below the centre, so that the thumb
and fingers would not press against it. This inscription (fig. i)
reads from left to right, and consists of the serekh name of Djer
followed by the falcon on a perch a within the pr sign 9c-. The
design was made with a pointed instrument which impressed but did
not cut the gold. The combined width of the signs is 2d7 cm. and
the distance between the top of the large falcon and the bottom of
the se of the serekh 3 cm. In spite of the wrinkling, which warps
and effaces parts of the signs, the hieroglyphs are quite clear on
close examination, including the dr and the pr, which may not show
up sufficiently well in the published photograph. I have not
succeeded in finding a parallel for this inscription. Was the
building a temple, tomb, or palace? It is perhaps not unreasonable
to suppose that it was the structure in which the knife was
buried.
Since it was purchased in Luxor, it seems nearly certain that
the knife knife was taken by plunderers from the tomb (or cenotaph)
of Djer at Abydos. Since it was purchased in 1914, it may have come
from the excavations of either Amelineau, Petrie, or Naville.
Notwithstanding the large quantities of material lost from
Amelineau's excavations, when the tomb must still have contained
much treasure, it does not seem particularly likely that the knife
was removed from the tomb fifteen years before it was picked up on
the market. Not even Petrie succeeded n s eliminating theft from
his excavations, and it is possible that the knife disappeared
during the course of his work at the tomb of Djer. But the purchase
date perhaps points to Naville. In April 1911 Hornblower wrote,
'Naville has been digging at Abydos, and has found fine predynastic
things, many of which have leaked out owing to his not giving
backsheesh, I suppose.' Naville dug at and around the tomb of Djer
between 1908 and 191iI. He mentions finding in the course of this
excavation less important material 'which had at an unknown period
strayed from the royal tombs'., One is reminded of Petrie's
accidental find at the tomb of Djer of Der of a 'strayed' human arm
bearing the four sensational bracelets.2
The knife immediately suggests the slaughter of animals offered
to the king during or after his funeral, and one can well imagine
it being used to slit the throats of oxen or oryx.3 It is also
tempting to see in it the instrument employed to kill a human
victim, as pictured on a tablet of Djer,4 whether or not that scene
represents a ceremony at the king's funeral. Its sharply retouched
cutting-edge extends around the point and along the back. With this
edge and with the small handle the type would be suitable for
thrusting as well as for slicing.
It is certain that a hieroglyph on one of the private stelae
from Abydos (reign of Udimu) is a knife of the same type as ours.
It seems to be a title or part of a title, and it follows the
common sign group ;h ' within inverted k; U, a group which
possibly
I Cem. of Ab. I, 38-39, and pl. 21, which shows the location and
extent of his digging in and around the tomb of Djer.
2 Royal Tombs, ii, 16-17. 3 A very similar knife was used for
slaughter of animals at least as early as the end of the Third
Dynasty.
See Montet, 'Scenes de boucherie', in Bull. Inst. fr. 7, 55, and
Montet, Anc. Emp. 164 if. 4 Tomb of Hemaka, 35-36, pis. 17, I8 The
scene also appears in Royal Tombs, Is, pl. 3 (Aha).
43
This content downloaded from 194.214.161.15 on Mon, 14 Apr 2014
18:01:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
-
44 W. NEEDLER
signifies a priestly title.' Is the knife on this stele
connected with the office of butcher for the royal funerary cult
and, if so, does it indicate the function of the Toronto knife? The
latter remains a mystery, but close examination shows that the
knife belongs beyond doubt to the reign of Djer, and it is thus an
important document of the First Dynasty.
I Royal Tombs, I, 27, pis. 31, 34 (24). For suggested
interpretations of the group which precedes the knife sign, see
Scharff, Altertiimer der Vor- und Frihzeit, 1, i88 (50I), and
Emery, Great Tombs of the 1st Dyn. 120 (24).
This content downloaded from 194.214.161.15 on Mon, 14 Apr 2014
18:01:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Article Contentsp. 41[unnumbered]p. 42p. 43p. 44
Issue Table of ContentsThe Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, Vol.
42 (Dec., 1956), pp. 1-132Front MatterEditorial Foreword [pp.
1-2]The Carnarvon Statuette of Amn [pp. 3-7]A Pharaonic Encomium
(II) [pp. 8-20]The Man Who Was Tired of Life [pp. 21-40]A Flint
Knife of King Djer [pp. 41-44]A Statuette of King Nyneter [pp.
45-49]King wf? [pp. 50-53]The Hieroglyph [unknown] [pp.
54-57]Maru-Aten: Pleasure Resort or Temple? [pp. 58-64]Solar Barks
Prow to Prow [pp. 65-79]The Dynastic Race in Egypt [pp.
80-85]Burial Customs and Beliefs in the Hereafter in Predynastic
Egypt [pp. 86-96]A Temple of atr at Kusae [pp. 97-98]S. R. K.
Glanville [pp. 99-101]Aylward Manley Blackman [pp.
102-104]Bibliography: Graeco-Roman Egypt: Greek Inscriptions (1955)
[pp. 105-115]Brief CommunicationsStone Bowls of Kha'ba (Third
Dynasty) [p. 116]A Further Note on Rock-Cut Boats [pp. 117-118]On
the Statue Group: Amn Affixing the Crown of the King [pp.
118-119]The Daily Income of Sesostris II's Funerary Temple [p.
119]A Ushabti with an Unusual Formula [p. 120]A Graffito of the
Scribe utotpe, Reckoner of Gold, in the South-Eastern Desert [pp.
121-122]Another Variant of nr ' wr (n) ' pr [p. 122]A Note on
Campioneum Nottinghamense [pp. 122-123]
Notices of Recent PublicationsReview: untitled [p. 124]Review:
untitled [pp. 124-125]Review: untitled [pp. 125-127]Review:
untitled [pp. 127-130]Review: untitled [p. 130]Review: untitled
[pp. 130-131]