Five basic objectives of ISTM 1. Identify & prioritize decisions, questions, and objectives 2. Review existing programs and designs 3. Identify monitoring designs, sampling frames, protocols, and analytical tools 4. Use trade-off analyses to develop recommendations for monitoring 5. Recommend implementation and reporting mechanisms Decision s and question s Review existin g program s Identify potential designs Trade- off analys es Implementati on recommendati ons Salmon and steelhead monitoring Habitat & watershed condition monitoring PNAMP
Five basic objectives of ISTM. Identify & prioritize decisions, questions, and objectives Review existing programs and designs Identify monitoring designs, sampling frames, protocols, and analytical tools Use trade-off analyses to develop recommendations for monitoring - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Five basic objectives of ISTMFive basic objectives of ISTM
1. Identify & prioritize decisions, questions, and objectives2. Review existing programs and designs3. Identify monitoring designs, sampling frames, protocols,
and analytical tools 4. Use trade-off analyses to develop recommendations for
monitoring5. Recommend implementation and reporting mechanisms
1. Identify & prioritize decisions, questions, and objectives2. Review existing programs and designs3. Identify monitoring designs, sampling frames, protocols,
and analytical tools 4. Use trade-off analyses to develop recommendations for
monitoring5. Recommend implementation and reporting mechanisms
Identified and prioritized VSP monitoring needs and fish related critical uncertainty research needs in Lower Columbia:
• Thematically
• Spatially
• Temporally
• Certainty
Identified and prioritized VSP monitoring needs and fish related critical uncertainty research needs in Lower Columbia:
• Thematically
• Spatially
• Temporally
• Certainty
Fry/Parr Index:
Juvenile Migrants
Adult Recruits
Spawners
Age Structure
Migration/Spawning Timing
Sex
Origin
Fry/Parr Spatial Structure
Spawner Spatial Structure
Prioritized Indicators
Filters• Recovery Priority• 3 - Primary populations (i.e. low or very low risk) are high priority• 2 - Contributing populations (i.e. moderate risk) are moderate priority• 1 - Stabilizing populations (i.e. high or very high risk) are low priority
• Current Natural Origin Abundance• 3 - average of >500 natural origin spawners over last six years• 2 - average of 100-500 natural origin spawners over last six years• 1 - average of <100 natural origin spawners over last six years
• In/Out Potential• 3 - High priority where existing infrastructure and methods allow for an
unbiased and precise adult and smolt abundance estimates (CV < 15%) for a substantial portion of the population area (>30%)
• 2 - Moderate priority where existing infrastructure and methods allow for an unbiased and precise adult and smolt abundance estimates (CV < 15%) for a small portion of the population area (<30%)
• 1 - Low priority where existing infrastructure and methods do not allow for unbiased and precise adult and smolt abundance estimates (CV > 15%)
• Special Case • 3 -High priority• 2 - Moderate priority• 1 - Low Priority
• Relative Indicator Score = (Raw Indicator Score) x (Recovery Priority Score) x (Current Abundance Score) x (Fish In/Fish Out Score) x (Special Cases Score)
• Total Species Population Score = ∑Relative Indicator Scores for a Species & Population
Calculations
• Relative Indicator Score = (Raw Indicator Score) x (Recovery Priority Score) x (Current Abundance Score) x (Fish In/Fish Out Score) x (Special Cases Score)
• Total Species Population Score = ∑Relative Indicator Scores for a Species & Population