EUROPEAN RESEARCH CONFERENCE Housing First. What’s Second? Berlin, 20th September 2013 First steps towards Housing First. Possible implementation of the Housing First approach in Hungary Anna Balogi
May 16, 2015
EUROPEAN RESEARCH CONFERENCE
Housing First. What’s Second?
Berlin, 20th September 2013
First steps towards Housing First.
Possible implementation of the Housing First
approach in Hungary
Anna Balogi
EUROPEAN RESEARCH CONFERENCE
Housing First. What’s Second?
Berlin, 20th September 2013
Hungarian context
Social services in general:
Social benefits very insufficient
No real housing benefit (inadequate, difficult to access)
Extremely low proportion of social housing units
Unemployment (especially among undereducated
people)
No guaranteed minimum income
Result: lack of affordable housing for those in need
EUROPEAN RESEARCH CONFERENCE
Housing First. What’s Second?
Berlin, 20th September 2013
Hungarian context
Homeless services
Homelessness most often not seen as a housing
or poverty problem – criminalization
„How do we end homelessness? By placing the
homeless in shelters” – increasing ban on public
sleeping
Staircase model very widespread
Dead-end staircase
EUROPEAN RESEARCH CONFERENCE
Housing First. What’s Second?
Berlin, 20th September 2013
Housing first approach in practice
Governmental schemes:
Housing support program 2005-2009
2007-2009: Pilisi Forest Project
2012-2013: „Back from the streets”
from 2012 ongoing: ESF-funded projects (at
early stages)
Civil projects:
2013: an initiative of The City is for All
EUROPEAN RESEARCH CONFERENCE
Housing First. What’s Second?
Berlin, 20th September 2013
Pilisi Forest Project
Original aim: clear the forest areas
Implemented by 7 NGOs
Social support
Financial support – 240 000 HUF (960 euro) / user/ year
Rent, renovation
Utensils, furniture
Travel costs
Any other (medication, food, clothing, etc.)
Duration: one year, could be prolonged
EUROPEAN RESEARCH CONFERENCE
Housing First. What’s Second?
Berlin, 20th September 2013
Housing retention
11
2
7
32
53
5
19 19
2 2
7
1 1
6
19
4
18 17 15
64
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Number of clients
type of housing
Chart 1: Type of housing during and at the end of co-operation period
EUROPEAN RESEARCH CONFERENCE
Housing First. What’s Second?
Berlin, 20th September 2013
Main results of the project
Out of total 152, 118 people stayed in proper
housing during and 45 people (29,6%) until the
end the co-operation period
Couples (greater financial and psychologial
stability), families with small children
Employment status, stable income
No severe addiction
Motivation
EUROPEAN RESEARCH CONFERENCE
Housing First. What’s Second?
Berlin, 20th September 2013
Strengths of the project
Flexibility
Tailored housing solutions
„Real help” for rough sleepers
Follow-up care
Cooperation with other organizations
Experiences gained, new skills learnt
EUROPEAN RESEARCH CONFERENCE
Housing First. What’s Second?
Berlin, 20th September 2013
Challenges of the project
Housing not sustainable without stable income
Financial support rather low and short term
No guideline nor training for support workers
Support work carried out besides daily tasks of staff (not
enough time, not enough money)
Lack of psychological and employment support
Period too short for preparation and selection
Difficulties in finding apartments, rental contracts
No inner evaluation
EUROPEAN RESEARCH CONFERENCE
Housing First. What’s Second?
Berlin, 20th September 2013
„Back from the streets” initiative
Funded by the ministry – „dealing with visible
homelessness”
between 1 March 2012 and 15 January 2013 (after-care:
February – June 2013)
18 projects (after-care: 15 projects)
Primary target group: chronic homeless – rough sleepers
with complex needs
Secondary target group: homeless service users able to
move on
Principles: innovative, tailored services providing housing
for participants that support their social integration
EUROPEAN RESEARCH CONFERENCE
Housing First. What’s Second?
Berlin, 20th September 2013
Services and figures enabling homeless service providers/institutions to host
target group – e.g. by ensuring more space and privacy
– 21 new places
making low threshold beds available for primary target
group by providing other type of accommodation to
secondary target group
tailored, complex services based on the cooperation with
a key worker (psychologist, addiction specialist, medical
check-up, dentist)
Employment or preparation to be employed (in 5
projects)
Renovation of 2 social housing units
EUROPEAN RESEARCH CONFERENCE
Housing First. What’s Second?
Berlin, 20th September 2013
Housing retention (%)
primary
target group
secondary
target group total
rental 25,2 7,3 32,5
family reunion 1 0,7 1,7
workers' hostel 11,6 7,6 19,2
53,30% homeless
services 27,5 3,3 30,8
institutions 2 1,3 3,3
rough sleeping 5,6 1 6,6
other 0,7 1 1,7
missing 1,7 2,5 4,2
total 75,3 24,7 100
EUROPEAN RESEARCH CONFERENCE
Housing First. What’s Second?
Berlin, 20th September 2013
„Back from the streets”
- an example
Project for rough sleeping women in Budapest
Difficulties with finding apartments
2x3 women sharing an apartment
Individual apartments not affordable
Community work seen as attribute (cooking together, for ex.)
Additional 2 women moved to workers’ hostel
EUROPEAN RESEARCH CONFERENCE
Housing First. What’s Second?
Berlin, 20th September 2013
„Back from the streets”
– an example 2
Intensive care
first weeks, several visits
later, weekly visits
Group work (self-help group, violence
against women self-esteem group)
EUROPEAN RESEARCH CONFERENCE
Housing First. What’s Second?
Berlin, 20th September 2013
Strengths of the project
Intensive and multidisciplinary approach
Involvement of couples as well as flexible housing solutions
Housing-related expenses (furniture, equipment, cleaning stuff)
New relationships – other than homeless people and homelessness services
EUROPEAN RESEARCH CONFERENCE
Housing First. What’s Second?
Berlin, 20th September 2013
Challenges of the project
Limited in time (8 months only)
Long-term success completely dependent on employment – 8 months was not enough to secure that
More time needed to build self-esteem and break away from homeless friends and services
Real difficulty in finding affordable apartments that provide a bill
EUROPEAN RESEARCH CONFERENCE
Housing First. What’s Second?
Berlin, 20th September 2013
From the forest to housing
– a special initiative
Cooperation of The City is for All, local
municipality, Social Housing Reconstruction
Project, Red Cross and several NGOs
Grassroot
Tenants and volunteers
renovating 1 social housing unit
together
EUROPEAN RESEARCH CONFERENCE
Housing First. What’s Second?
Berlin, 20th September 2013
Strengths of the project
Real cooperation between various stake-holders
Could serve as a model for other public
authorities
Involvement of homeless beneficiaries as well as
homeless peers in reconstruction
Good message: homeless people active and
willing to work and help others
Sustainable – integrated into housing support
services
EUROPEAN RESEARCH CONFERENCE
Housing First. What’s Second?
Berlin, 20th September 2013
Challenges of the project
Very small scale
Renovation costs and workforce provided by
NGOs and their volunteers
Housing allowance much less than in other
projects
Two people needed to be able to cover own
costs
No official intensive floating support
EUROPEAN RESEARCH CONFERENCE
Housing First. What’s Second?
Berlin, 20th September 2013
Conclusions
Housing or employment first? A general
dilemma of social workers
No housing without employment in the long-term
Insufficient social and housing benefits
Lack of financial sustainability
Duration of projects is too short (8-12 months)
No support after project ends (financial or mental)
Cannot be mainstreamed into „normal” housing
support as that is very insufficient
EUROPEAN RESEARCH CONFERENCE
Housing First. What’s Second?
Berlin, 20th September 2013
Conclusions 2
Target group: often not the most vulnerable;
priority given to those „most likely” to succeed
Couples and small groups
Those with less severe addiction/health problems
Those with an income
Those motivated (and likely) to find work
In several cases to those already using services –
rough sleepers can access the beds thus freed in
services (maybe modified to low-threshold)
EUROPEAN RESEARCH CONFERENCE
Housing First. What’s Second?
Berlin, 20th September 2013
Conclusions 3
Staircase approach is still mainstream
Half of the Back from the street projects place people in services
or workers’ hostels
Most support workers working with re-housed rough sleepers do
this job after their regular working hours in the staircase system
– attitudes cannot shift so fast
Staircase system – indicators are less risky, especially when
funding comes from ESF…
Housing First approach is slowly spreading
Not part of mainstream policy
Can any short-term project be considered housing first without
the element of sustainability?
EUROPEAN RESEARCH CONFERENCE
Housing First. What’s Second?
Berlin, 20th September 2013
Thank you for your attention!