Top Banner

Click here to load reader

of 41

First Exam Thursday 18 February

Jan 08, 2018

Download

Documents

Principle of Allocation Tolerance Curves Ray Huey Principle of Allocation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript

First Exam Thursday 18 February
Covers Chapters 1-4, 6-7plus Chapter 16 and first 8 lectures, 5 discussions, plus 8 Readings: Scientific Methods Natural Selection Human Nature Our Hunter-Gatherer Heritage Evolution of Uncaring Humanoids Unburnable Oil Population Growth Evolutions Problem Gamblers Principle of Allocation
Tolerance Curves Ray Huey Principle of Allocation Principle of Allocation
Tolerance Curves Ray Huey Principle of Allocation Principle of Allocation
Tolerance Curves Ray Huey Principle of Allocation Performance plotted against temperature
Acclimation Performance plotted against temperature Hypothetical response curves showinginteractions Resource Budgets Principle of Allocation
Time, Matter, and Energy Budgets Rock Pipits Anthus spinoletta Mild Winter versus Harsh Winter Feeding: 6.5 hours vs hours Resting: 1.75 hours vs. 0.6 hours Fighting: 0.75 hours vs. 0.1 hour Leaf Tactics Light Water availability Prevailing winds Herbivores
Costs and Profits of Leaf Size, Shape, and Placement Leaf Tactics Similar types of leaves have evolved independently in different plant lineages subjected to comparable climatic conditions Compound leaves conserve woody tissue Small leaflets in hot dry regions, but larger under warm moist conditions Shade tolerant understory species usually have larger and less lobed leaves than canopy species Lobed leaves do not cast as dense and solid a shadow as do leaves with continuous margins In lowland wet tropical rainforest, trees tend to have large evergreen leaves
In chaparral, plants tend to have small sclerophyllous evergreen leaves Arid regions tend to support leafless stem succulents such as cacti or plants with entire leaf margins Cold wet climates tend to support plants with notched or lobed leaf margins Adaptive Geometry Evergreen vs
Adaptive Geometry Evergreen vs. Deciduous Monolayered vs Multilayered plants Shade Tolerance Plant Life Forms Evergreen vs
Plant Life Forms Evergreen vs. Deciduous Monolayered vs Multilayered plants Shade Tolerance Xerophytic vs. Mesophytic leaves Also Hydrophytes (water lilies) Gordon Orians Otto Solbrig Plant Life Forms Evergreen vs
Plant Life Forms Evergreen vs. Deciduous Monolayered vs Multilayered plants Shade Tolerance Xerophytic vs. Mesophytic leaves Also Hydrophytes (water lilies)Creosote Bush Larrea divaricata-- Mesquite Prosopis Foraging Tactics and Feeding EfficiencyCosts and Profits of ForagingAn optimal foraging tactic maximizes the difference between foraging profits and their costsFood = matter and energy for maintenance and reproduction Hazards: exposure topredators, loss of time for other activitiesSit-and-Wait ambush predators(e.g. spiders at webs) Widely foraging active hunters (go out and find prey)Search Time (per item eaten) versus Pursuit Time (per item eaten) Search for all possible preyitems, but pursue them one at a time Preyitems can be ranked from most preferred to least desirable Economics of Consumer ChoiceAssumptions:a) Environmental structure is repeatable, withstatistical expectation of finding a given resource(habitat, microhabitat, or prey item)b) Food items can be arranged along a continuous spectrum, such as by size or energy rewardc) Similar phenotypes are closely equivalent in harvesting abilitiesd) Principle of Allocation applies: no one phenotype can be maximally efficient on all prey typese) An individuals economic goal is to maximize its total intake of food resources Robert MacArthur Economics of Consumer Choice Four Phases of Foraging:
Economics of Consumer Choice Four Phases of Foraging:1) deciding where to search2) searching for palatable food items3) upon locating a potential food item,deciding whether or not to pursue it4) pursuit itself, with possible capture and eatingSearch and pursuit efficiencies for each food type in each habitat are entirelydetermined bypreceding assumptions about morphology and environmental repeatability.These efficiencies dictate probabilities associated with search and pursuit (phases2 and 4) .Thus, need to consider only the two decisions: where to forage and which prey items to pursue (phases 1 and 3above) Robert MacArthur Economics of Consumer Choice (R. H
Economics of Consumer Choice(R. H. MacArthur)Clearly, an optimal consumer should forage where its expectation of yield is greatest an easy decision to make, given knowledgeof efficiency probabilities and the structure of the environment (of course, in reality, animals are not omniscient and must makedecisions based on incomplete information).The decision as to which prey items to pursue is also simple.Upon finding a potential prey item, a consumer has just twooptions: either pursue it or goon searching for a better itemand pursue that one instead.Both decisions end in the foragerbeginning a new search, so the best choice is clearly the one thatreturns the greatest yield per unit time.An optimal consumer should opt to pursue an item only when itcannot expect to locate, catch and eat a better item during the time required tocapture and ingest the first prey item. From Huey and Pianka 1981 Ecology 62: 991-999. C. S. Holling 400 Frames per second (3/100ths of a second)
Tom Frazzetta Thomas Frazzetta 400 Frames per second(3/100ths of a second) Physiological EcologyHomeostasis: maintenance of a relatively stable internal state under a much wider range of external environmental conditionsTemperature regulation (thermoregulation)Physiological Optima and Tolerance CurvesAcclimation Energetics of Metabolism and Movement Ingestion = Assimilation + Egestion Assimilation = Productivity + Respiration Productivity = Growth + ReproductionIngestion =Egestion + {Respiration + Growth + Reproduction} {Assimilation} Homeotherm versus Poikilotherm Endotherm versus Ectotherm Body Mass, grams Log, Metabolic Cost of Movement
Log, Log, Metabolic Cost of Movement
Log, Log, Metabolic Cost of Movement
Log, Log, Adaptation and Deterioration of Environment
Ronald A. Fisher Non-directed (random) changes in either Aor Bare equally likely to reduce the level of adaptation (d ) when small, but as the magnitude of undirected change increases, the probability of improvement diminishes. Duality of Fishers model (A and B can be interchanged) Water Economy in Desert Organisms Other Limiting Materials Sensory Capacities and Environmental Cues Adaptive Suites Design Constraints Heat Budgets and Thermal Ecology