FIR No. 193/11 PS : Crime Branch State Vs. Hasnova Mardona 02.07.2016 Present: Ld. APP for the State. Accused Alimona Dildora, Alaea Sadakot, Murtazaeva Zebo and Zulayals are PO vide order dated 06.10.2015. Accused Saira Abdulla is PO vide order dated 30.05.2016. Accused Hujaeva Sharofat is convicted vide her plea of guilt dated 30.05.2016. Accused Hasanova Mardona is absent despite calls. Her B/B/S/Bs are forfeited. NBWs be issued against her and notice to her surety for 06.09.2016 . (SATISH KUMAR ARORA) CMM/SE/Saket Courts New Delhi/02.07.2016
35
Embed
FIR No. 193/11 PS : Crime Branch Present: Ld. APP for the ...judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...and one local newspaper i.e Rajasthan Patrika, Jaipur edition
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
FIR No. 193/11PS : Crime BranchState Vs. Hasnova Mardona
Accused Pramod with Ld counsel Ms. M Begum who is also appearing for
accused Seema Malhotra and Joginder who are absent today.
Accused Rajni with Ld counsel Sh. Bhagwan Jha.
Accused Nidhi Garg with Ld. Counsel Sh Jinendra Jain also for accused
Vikas Garg who is absent today.
Matter today is listed for appearance of all the accused and for orders on
charge.
Common application seeking exemption from personal appearance of the
accused Seema Malhotra and Joginder is filed. Heard and perused. Allowed for today
only.
On the oral request and submissions of Ld counsel Sh. Jinendra Jain,
absentee accused Vikas Garg is also exempted from his personal appearance for today. Ld
APP has sought time to file the reply to the application u/s 205 r/w s. 317 Cr.PC of
accused Vikas Garg.
Be filed positively within 03 working days from today with copy to the
other side.
No time left for passing order on charge.
Be put up for clarifications, if any/orders on charge for 08.07.2016.
All the accused shall remain present on the date fixed.
(SATISH KUMAR ARORA) CMM/SE/Saket Courts New Delhi/02.07.2016
CC No. 35/01/14Praveen Sharma Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
02.07.2016
Present: Sh. Shailesh Shekhar, Ld proxy counsel for Sh.
Harshwardhan Sharma, Ld counsel for the complainant.
Adjournment sought due to illness of Ld counsel. Allowed as
last opportunity.
Be put up for arguments on summoning on 01.09.2016.
(SATISH KUMAR ARORA) CMM/SE/Saket Courts New Delhi/02.07.2016
CC No. 28/01/16Vivek Mehtrotra Vs. AKME Projects Ltd & Anr
02.07.2016
Present: Complainant Vivek Mahrotra with Ld counsel Ms. Ashu
Arora.
Matter today is listed for consideration/pre summoning
complainant evidence.
Perusal of the file reflects that the complainant has filed a
criminal complaint u/s 200 Cr.PC against the accused persons alleging
therein the commission of offence punishable u/s 406/420/506/120B IPC. I
have perused the complaint and the documents filed therewith.
Cognizance of the complaint is accordingly taken and complainant is
directed to examine himself and his other witnesses as per list filed with
the complaint in pre summoning evidence.
Complainant is examined and discharged as CW1. No other
CW is present or summoned.
Be summoned as per list on PF for pre summoning CE on
18.07.2016.
(SATISH KUMAR ARORA) CMM/SE/Saket Courts New Delhi/02.07.2016
CC No. 66/02/12HITADS P Ltd Vs. M/s Kuber Buildwell Ltd
02.07.2016
Present: Sh. Rishi Sehgal, Ld counsel for the complainant.
Accused P K Sharma with Ld counsel Sh. Mohd. Haaris.
Matter today is listed for further cross examination of
CW1/CE. It is jointly submitted that out of Court talks for settlement are
going on and adjournment sought for the same.
Be put up for settlement, if any/further proceedings for
23.08.2016.
(SATISH KUMAR ARORA) CMM/SE/Saket Courts New Delhi/02.07.2016
FIR No. 187/05PS : HN Din State Vs. Sudhir Kumar Singh etc 02.07.2016
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Both accused Sudhir Kumar Singh and Sanjay Singh are PO.
PW Amrit Sehgal and PW Vipin Kumar Bansal are absent
despite service of summons. BWs in the sum of Rs. 5,000/ each be issued
against them for PE u/s 299 Cr.PC for 27.08.2016.
(SATISH KUMAR ARORA) CMM/SE/Saket Courts New Delhi/02.07.2016
FIR No. 175/08PS : OIA State Vs. Umesh Roy etc
02.07.2016
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
All accused Umesh, Naresh and Kuldeep present in person.
Complainant/PW Mahesh Kumar Aggarwal present upon
service of summons, however, discharged unexamined as Ld counsel for the
accused persons is stated to be not available due to some personal
difficutly. Complainant is bound down for the NDOH.
Diet money of Rs. 500/ is paid to the witness by the accused
persons.
B/B/S/Bs verification of accused Kuldeep Singh Rawat is
received. Perused. B/B/S/Bs are accepted.
Be put up for PE on 12.08.2016.
(SATISH KUMAR ARORA) CMM/SE/Saket Courts New Delhi/02.07.2016
CC No. 29/14Mrs. Geeta Gandhi Vs. Ashvani Mallik
02.07.2016
Present: Complainant in person.
It appears that complainant has not taken the steps in
summoning the witnesses as per list. One opportunity is given.
Be put up for pre summoning complainant evidence for
01.08.2016.
(SATISH KUMAR ARORA) CMM/SE/Saket Courts New Delhi/02.07.2016
FIR No. 63/10PS : EOW South EastState Vs. Rakesh Verma & Anr
02.07.2016
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Accused Rakesh and Sidharth with Ld counsel Sh. Sanjay
Srivastav.
Accused Akhil Bhargav with Ld counsel Sh. Vikas Gupta.
IO Inspector Amandeep Sehgal has sent his request to the
notice served upon him. Fresh notice be issued for
consideration/arguments on charge for 17.08.2016.
(SATISH KUMAR ARORA) CMM/SE/Saket Courts New Delhi/02.07.2016
FIR No. 40/08PS : EOW South EastState Vs. B S Dahiya etc02.07.2016
Present: Ld. APP for the State.Accused Vishwas Lamba and Rajni Corda are PO.Accused Harsh Pushkarna with LD counsel Sh. S N Tripathi.Accused B S Dahiya with Ld counsel Ms. Garima Prasad.IO SI Bhagat Ram in person.Complainant Rajesh in person.Matter today is listed for arguments on charge. During the course
of arguments, Ld defence counsel for accused B S Dahiya has submitted that she has been supplied with only one copy of the chargesheet which has been today marked as No. 2 for necessary reference. She has further submitted that even during inspection of the file, she did not find the chargesheet today marked as No. 1 on the record file. IO has been inquired and has submitted that it was owing to the objections raised during checking of the file by the Ld Prosecutor, that he had filed two chargesheet in the matter owing to the present case being a multiple victim matter. In support of his submissions, he has also shown the case dairy where he has so mentioned. Let a copy thereof be placed on record. Copy of the chargesheet no. 1 with the accompanying documents be supplied to both the accused/their Counsels within one week from today against due acknowledgment.
During the course of further arguments, Ld counsel for accused B S Dahiya submitted that in fact the accused was the first complainant in this matter as he lodged a complaint dated 28.09.2007 (much prior in time to the complaint made by complainant Rajesh) with SHO PS Safdarjung Enclave/SHO PS Sarojini Nagar. Copy thereof is placed on record. Time sought to file it in original.
Ld APP has sought time to go through the statements u/s 161 Cr.PC as well as the complaint alleged to have been made by the accused herein. Ld APP has also requested to issue notice to all the victims/affected parties through the IO for necessary assistance. Allowed.
Be put up for further arguments on charge under notice to all the affected parties/victims through the IO with directions to the IO to remain present with the report on 30.08.2016.
(SATISH KUMAR ARORA) CMM/SE/Saket Courts New Delhi/02.07.2016
FIR No. 53/16PS : Sunlight ColonyState Vs. Surender Vashisht 02.07.2016
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
IO HC Trilok Dabbas is absent despite being directed to
remain present with the supplementary chargesheet.
BWs in the sum of Rs. 5,000/ be issued against the IO with
show cause notice u/s 60/122 DP Act for 25.07.2016.