Asian Center for Engineering Computations and Software Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand IW-CAAD 2004 Understanding and Using Finite Element Analysis July 19-21, 2004 Moratuwa, Sri Lanka
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 1/275
Asian Center for Engineering Computations and Software
Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand
IW-CAAD 2004
Understanding and Using
Finite Element Analysis
July 19-21, 2004
Moratuwa, Sri Lanka
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 2/275
Understanding and Using
Finite Element Analysis
Buddhi S. Shrama
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 3/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y
s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
The Objective
• To understand the fundamentals of theFinite Element Method and the Finite Element
Analysis
• To apply the Finite Element Analysis Tools forModeling and Analysis of Structures
• Use SAP2000 as Tool for Finite Element
Modeling and Analysis of Structures
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 4/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y
s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
The Program
• What is FEM and Why it is needed
• Fundamental concepts in FEM and FEA
• Concept of Stiffness
• Finite Elements and their Usage
• Constructing Finite Element Models• Applying Loads to FE Models
• Interpreting FE Results
• Modeling Different Types of Structures using FE
• Intro to Non-linear and Dynamic Analysis
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 5/275
What is Finite Element Analysis
and Why do We Need It!
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 6/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y
s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
The Structural System
EXCITATION
Loads
VibrationsSettlements
Thermal Changes
RESPONSES
Displacements
StrainsStresses
Stress Resultants
STRUCTURE
pv
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 7/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y
s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
The Need For Analysis
We need to determine the
Response of the Structure to
Excitations
so that:
We can ensure that the structure
can sustain the excitation with an
acceptable level of response
Analysis
Design
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 8/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y
s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Analysis of Structures
pv
xx yy zz
vx x y z p 0
Real Structure is governed by “Partial Differential Equations” of various order
Direct solution is only possible for:
• Simple geometry
• Simple Boundary• Simple Loading.
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 9/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y
s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
The Need for Structural Model
Structural
Model
EXCITATION Loads
VibrationsSettlements
Thermal Changes
RESPONSES Displacements
StrainsStress
Stress Resultants
STRUCTURE
pv
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 10/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y
s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
The Need for Modeling
A - Real Structure cannot be Analyzed:It can only be “Load Tested” to determine
response
B - We can only analyze a“Model” of the Structure
C - We therefore need tools to Model the
Structure and to Analyze the Model
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 11/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y
s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Finite Element Method and FEA
• Finite Element Analysis (FEA)“A discretized solution to a continuum
problem using FEM”
• Finite Element Method (FEM)
“A numerical procedu re for solvin g (part ial)
dif ferent ial equat ion s associated with f ield
prob lems, with an accuracy acceptable to
engineers”
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 12/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y
s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
From Classical to FEM
xx yy zzvx x y z
p 0
t
v
t
s
t
v
dV p u dV p u ds _ _ _
Assumptions
Equilibrium
Compatibility
Stress-Strain Law
(Principle of Virtual Work)
“Partial Differential
Equations”
Classical
Actual Structure
Kr R“Algebraic
Equations”
K = Stiff ness
r = Response
R = Loads
FEM
Structural Model
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 13/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y
s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Simplified Structural System
Loads (F) Deformations (u)
Fv
F = K u
F
K (Stiffness)
u
Equilibrium Equation
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 14/275
F i n i t e E l
e m e n t A n a l y
s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
The Total Structural System
EXCITATION RESPONSES
STRUCTURE
pv
• Static
• Dynamic
• Elastic
• Inelastic
• Linear
• Nonlinear
Eight types of equilibrium equations are possible!
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 15/275
F i n i t e E l
e m e n t A n a l y
s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
The Main Equilibrium Equations
1. Linear-Static Elastic
2. Linear-Dynamic Elastic
3. Nonlinear - Static Elastic OR Inelastic
4. Nonlinear-Dynamic Elastic OR Inelastic
F Ku
)()()()( t F t Kut uC t u M
)()()()()( t F t F t Kut uC t u M NL
F F Ku NL
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 16/275
F i n i t e E l
e m e n t A n a l y
s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
The Basic Analysis Types
Excitation Structure Response Basic Analysis Type
Static Elastic Linear Linear-Elastic-Static Analysis
Static Elastic Nonlinear Nonlinear-Elastic-Static Analysis
Static Inelastic Linear Linear-Inelastic-Static Analysis
Static Inelastic Nonlinear Nonlinear-Inelastic-Static Analysis
Dynamic Elastic Linear Linear-Elastic-Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Elastic Nonlinear Nonlinear-Elastic-Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Inelastic Linear Linear-Inelastic-Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Inelastic Nonlinear Nonlinear-Inelastic-Dynamic Analysis
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 17/275
F i n i t e E l
e m e n t A n a l y
s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Special Analysis Types
• Non-linear Analysis
– P-Delta Analysis – Buckling Analysis
– Static Pushover Analysis
– Fast Non-Linear Analysis (FNA)
– Large Displacement Analysis
• Dynamic Analysis
– Free Vibration and Modal Analysis
– Response Spectrum Analysis
– Steady State Dynamic Analysis
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 18/275
F i n i t e E l
e m e n t A n a l y
s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
The Finite Element Analysis Process
Evaluate Real Structure
Create Structural Model
Discretize Model in FE
Solve FE Model
Interpret FEA Results
Physical significance of Results
Engineer
Software
Engineer
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 19/275
The Fundamentals
In Finite Element Method
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 20/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y
s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
From Continuum to Structure
From Structure To Structural Model
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 21/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y
s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Solid – Structure - Model
(Governed by partial
differential equations)
Simplification (geometric)
Discretization 3D SOLIDS
CONTINUOUS MODEL
OF STRUCTURE
(Governed by either
partial or total dif-
ferential equations)
DISCRETE MODEL
OF STRUCTURE
(Governed by algebraic
equations)
3D-CONTINUM
MODEL
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 22/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
xx
yy zz
vx x y z p 0
t vt
st
v
dV p u dV p u ds _ _ _
Assumptions
Equilibrium
Compatibility
Stress-Strain Law
(Principle of Virtual Work)
“Partial Differential
Equations”
Continuum
Actual Structure
Kr R“Algebraic
Equations”
K = Stiff ness r = Response
R = Loads
Structure
Structural Model
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 23/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Continuum Vs Structure
• A continuum extends in all direction, has infinite
particles, with continuous variation of material
properties, deformation characteristics and stress
state
• A Structure is of finite size and is made up of an
assemblage of substructures, components and
members
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 24/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Physical Categorization of Structures
• Structures can be categorized in many ways.
• For modeling and analysis purposes, the overall
physical behavior can be used as basis of
categorization
– Cable or Tension Structures
– Skeletal or Framed Structures
– Surface or Spatial Structures
– Solid Structures
– Mixed Structures
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 25/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Structure, Member, Element
• Structure can be considered as an assemblage of
“Physical Components” called Members
– Slabs, Beams, Columns, Footings, etc.
• Physical Members can be modeled by using one
or more “Conceptual Components” called
Elements
– 1D elements, 2D element, 3D elements
– Frame element, plate element, shell element, solid
element, etc.
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 26/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Structural Members
Dimensional Hierarchy of Structural Members
Continuum
Regular Solid
(3D)
Beam (1D)
b h
L>>(b,h)
b
ht
z
Plate/Shell (2D)
x z
t<<(x,z)
xz
y
xL
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 27/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
The Reference System
• To convert continuum to structures, the first step
is to define a finite number of reference
dimensions
• The Four Dimensional Reference System:
– Three Space Dimensions, x, y, z
– One Time Dimension, t
• The Entire Structural System is a function of
Space and Time
– S (x, y, z, t)
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 28/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Global Axis and Local Axis
• Global Axis used to reference the
overall structure and to locate its
components:
Also called the Structure Axis
• Local Axis used to reference the
quantities on part of a structure or a
member or an element:
Also called the Member Axis or
Element Axis
X
Y
Z
G G C i S
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 29/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
The General Global Coordinate System
• The global coordinate system is a three-
dimensional, right-handed, rectangular coordinatesystem.
• The three axes, denoted X, Y, and Z, are mutuallyperpendicular and satisfy the right-hand rule.
• The location and orientation of the global systemare arbitrary. The Z direction is normally upward,but this is not required.
• All other coordinates systems are converted ormapped back and forth to General Coordinate
System
P l C di S
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 30/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Polar Coordinate Systems
• Polar coordinates include
– Cylindrical CR-CA-CZcoordinates
– Spherical SB-SA-SR
coordinates.
• Polar coordinate systemsare always defined with
respect to a rectangular X-
Y-Z system.
L l C di t S t
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 31/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Local Coordinate Systems
• Each part (joint, element, or constraint) of the
structural model has its own local co-ordinate
system used to define the properties, loads, and
response for that part.
• In general, the local co-ordinate systems may
vary from joint to joint, element to element, andconstraint to constraint
L l A i d N t l A i
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 32/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Local Axis and Natural Axis
• The elements and
variation of fields canoften be described bestin terms “NaturalCoordinates”
• Natural coordinates maybe linear or curvilinear
• Shape functions can areused to associate thelocal system and natural
system
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 33/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Primary Relationships
Th B i St t l Q titi
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 34/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
The Basic Structural Quantities
• Loads
• Actions
• Deformations
• Strains
• Stresses• Stress Resultants
The main focus ofStructural Mechanics is to
develop relationships
between these quantities
The main focus of FEM issolve these relationships
numerically
Mechanics Relationships
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 35/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Mechanics Relationships
Load
Action Deformation
StrainStressStress Resultant
Primary Relationships
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 36/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Primary Relationships
• Load – Action Relationship
• Action – Deformation Relationship
• Deformation – Strain Relationship
• Strain – Stress Relationship
• Stress – Stress Resultant Relationship• Stress Resultant – Action Relationship
• Most of these relationships can defined
mathematically, numerically and by testing
Action
Deformation Relationship
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 37/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Action - Deformation Relationship
• This involves two types of relationships
– Deformations produced due to given
Actions
• Example:
– Actions needed to produce or restrain
certain Deformation
• Example:
• Moment-Curvatures, Load-Deflection
Curves are samples of this relationship
• The represents to “Element Stiffness”
P
d
P
d
M
f
M M
E A
L P
L
A E P
Simplified Examples of Action
Deformation
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 38/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Simplified Examples of Action-Deformation
P
V
M
P
M
V
V
v
M
P
V
M
P
V
M
P P
M
V
M
V
V
v
M
V
v
M
E A
L P
L M V
EI Lv 326
3
V L
M
EI
L 2
2
2
Deformation
Strain Relationship
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 39/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a l
y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Deformation – Strain Relationship
• In general, strain is the first derivative of
deformation
• Basic Deformation and Corresponding Strains are:
– Shortening Axial Strain – Curvature Axial Strain
– Shearing Shear Strain
– Twisting Shear Strain + Axial Strain
• Total Strain is summation of strains from differentdeformations
Strain
–
Stress Relationship
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 40/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a l
y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Strain – Stress Relationship
• The resistance of the material to strain, derived
from the stiffness of the material particles
• For a general Isotropic Material
• For 2D, Isotropic Material, V=0
zx
yz
xy
z
y
x
zx
yz
xy
z
y
x
v
v
v
vvv
vvv
vvv
vv
E
2
2100000
02
210000
002
21000
0001
0001
0001
211
x xx E
kf c
f y
xy xy G
The Stress Strain Components
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 41/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a l
y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
The Stress Strain Components
• The Hook's law is
simplified form ofStress-Strain
relationship
• Ultimately the six
stress and strain
components can berepresented by 3
principal summations
xx
yy
zz
xy
zx
yx
zy
xz
yz x
y
z
At any point in a continuum, or solid,
the stress state can be completely
defined in terms of six stress
components and six correspondingstrains.
xx
yy
zz
xy
zx
yx
zy
xz
yz x
y
z
At any point in a continuum, or solid,
the stress state can be completely
defined in terms of six stress
components and six correspondingstrains.
Secondary Relationships
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 42/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a l
y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Secondary Relationships
• Global Axis - Local Axis
– Geometric Transformations Matrices
• Local Axis - Natural Axis
– Shape Functions
– Jacobian Matrix
What are Shape Functions
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 43/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a l
y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
What are Shape Functions
• Shape Functions or Interpolation Functions provide a
means of computing value of any quantity (field) at somepoint based on the value specified at specific locations
• Shape Functions are used in FEM to relate the values ateNodes to those within the Element
– Nodal Displacements to Element Deformation – Nodal Stresses to Stresses within the Element
• Shape Functions can be in 1D, 2D or in 3D
• Shape Functions can be Liner or Polynomials
One Dimensional Shape Functions
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 44/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a l
y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
One Dimensional Shape Functions
)1(5.0)(1 s s s N
)1)(1()(2 s s s N
)1(5.0)(3 s s s N
3
1
332211
)(
)()()()(
i
ii w N sw
w s N w s N w s N sw
S=0 S =-1 S =+1
S=1 S=0 )1()(1 s s N
s s N )(1
S is the “Natural Coordinate System”
The Jacobian Matrix
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 45/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
The Jacobian Matrix
• The Strain is Derivative of Displacement
• Displacements are specified on nodes, in ElementLocal Axis
• For computing K. strains are needed in element in“Natural Coordinates”
• Shape Functions relate Nodal Displacements withElement Displacements
• Jacobian Matrix relates the derivative of Nodal
Displacement, directly with Element Strains
i si w N J
w s
N
w s
N
w s
N
s
w
J
,
33
22
11
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 46/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
The Concept of DOF
The Concept of DOF
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 47/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
e Co cep o O
• In a continuum, each point can move in infinite
ways
• In Structure, movement of each point is
represented or resolved in limited number of
ways, called Degrees Of Freedom (DOF)
• The DOF of range from 1 to 7 depending on typeand level of structural model and the element
being considered
• Global and Local DOF have different meaning
and significance
The Basic Six DOF
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 48/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• Three Translations along the
reference axis
– Dx, Dy, Dz
• Three Rotations about the
reference axis
– Rx, Ry, Rz
The Seven Degrees of Freedom
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 49/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
g
• The General Beam
Element may have 7degrees of freedom
• The seventh degree
is Warping
• Warping is out-ofplane distortion of
the beam cross-
section
z
y
x
xu
y
u
z u
xr
yr
z r
z w
Each section on a beam
member can have seven
Degrees Of Freedom
(DOF) with respect to its
local axis.
z
y
x
xu
y
u
z u
xr
yr
z r
z w
Each section on a beam
member can have seven
Degrees Of Freedom
(DOF) with respect to its
local axis.
Actions and DOF
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 50/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
The Complete DOF Picture
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 51/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
p
§ u z Axial deformation Axial strain Axial stress
§ u x Shear deformation Shear strain Shear stress
§ u y Shear deformation
Shear strain
Shear stress§ r z Torsion Shear strain Shear stress
§ r y Curvature Axial strain Axial stress
§ r x Curvature Axial strain Axial stress
§ w z
Warping Axial strain Axial stress
Global Structural DOF
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 52/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• Only 3 DOF are real ly n eeded at Global Level
• The deformation of the structure can be defined
completely in terms of 3 translations of points with
respect to Global Axis
• Rotations may be defined arbitrarily at various
locations for convenience of modeling and
interpretation
Local DOF and Natural DOF
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 53/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• DOF can be defined for local movements of joints
and elements in 3 Orthogonal reference system
• Natural DOF can be defined in terms of Natural
Coordinates System of the element which may be
orthogonal or curvilinear
• Relationship between Global, Local and Natural
DOF is established through Transformation
Matrices
Types of DOF in SAP2000
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 54/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• Active
– the displacement is computed during the analysis• Restrained
– the displacement is specified, and the correspondingreaction is computed during the analysis
• Constrained
– the displacement is determined from thedisplacements at other degrees of freedom
• Null – the displacement does not affect the structure and is
ignored by the analysis
• Unavailable – The displacement has been explicitly excluded from
the analysis
Constraints and Restraints
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 55/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• Restraints:
– Direct limits on the DOF – External Boundary Conditions
– Fixed Support , Support Settlement
• Constraints – Linked or dependent limits on DOF
– Internal linkages within the structure, in addition toor in place of normal connections
– Rigid Diaphragm, Master-Slave DOF
Body Constraints
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 56/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• A Body Constraint causes all of its constrained joints to
move together as a three-dimensional rigid body.
• All constrained joints are connected to each other by rigid
links and cannot displace relative to each other.
• This Constraint can be used to:
– Model rigid connections, such as where several beams
and/or columns frame together
– Connect together different parts of the structural model
that were defined using separate meshes
– Connect Frame elements that are acting as eccentric
stiffeners to Shell elements
Constraints in SAP2000
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 57/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• A constraint is a set of two or more constrained
joints.
• The displacements of each pair of joints in the
constraint are related by constraint equations.
• The types of behavior that can be enforced by
constraints are:
– Rigid-body behavior
– Equal-displacement behavior
– Symmetry and anti-symmetry conditions
Constraints in SAP2000
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 58/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• Rigid-body behavior
– Rigid Body: fully rigid for all displacements
– Rigid Diaphragm: rigid for membrane behavior in a
plane
– Rigid Plate: rigid for plate bending in a plane
– Rigid Rod: rigid for extension along an axis
– Rigid Beam: rigid for beam bending on an axis
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 59/275
The Concept of
Stiffness
What is Stiffness ?
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 60/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• In structural terms, stiffness
may be defined as“Resistance to Deformation”
• So for each type ofdeformation, there is acorresponding stiffness
• Stiffness can be consideredor evaluated at various levels
• Stiffness is also the“constant” in the Action-
Deformation Relationship
u
F K
F Ku
F u
For Linear Response
The Structure Stiffness
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 61/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a
l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Material Stiffness
Section Stiffness
Member Stiffness
Structure Stiffness
Material Stiffness
Cross-section Geometry
Member Geometry
Structure Geometry
Stress/Strain
EA, EI
EA/L
Structure Stiffness
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 62/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a
l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• The overall resistance
of the structures to overall loads, called theGlobal StructureStiffness.
• Derived from the sumof stiffness of itsmembers, theirconnectivity and the
boundary or therestraining conditions.
Member and Element Stiffness
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 63/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a
l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• The resistance of each
Element to local actionscalled the Element StiffnessThis is derived from thecross-section stiffness andthe geometry of theElement.
• In FEM, the MemberStiffness can be derivedfrom stiffness of Elements
used to model the Member
Beam Element Cross
-
section Stiffness
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 64/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a
l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• The resistance of the cross-section to unit strains. This is derived
from the cross-section geometry and the stiffness of the
materials from which it is made.• For each of degree of freedom, there is a corresponding
stiffness, and a corresponding cross-section property§ u z Cross-section area, A x § u x Shear Area along x, SA x § u y Shear Area along y, SA y § r z
Torsional Constant, J § r x Moment of Inertia, I xx § r y Moment of Inertia, I yy § w z Warping Constant, W zz or C w
Computing Element Stiffness
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 65/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a
l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• Assume Nodal Displacements (Deformations)
• Determine Deformations within the element using“Shape Functions”
• Determine the Strains within the element usingStrain-Displacement Relationship
• Determine Stress within the element usingStress-Strain Relationship
• Use the principle of Virtual Work and integrate theproduct of stress and strain over the volume ofthe element to obtain the Stiffness
Deriving the Basic Stiffness Equation
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 66/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a
l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Internal Work
W I W E ..
F W E .
V
T dvW I .
D
V
T T
V
T T
V
T
dv B D BW I
dv B D BW I
dv DW I
.
.
.
V
dvW I .
K F
dv B D B F
dv B D B F
V
T
V
T T T
External Work
Equilibrium
B
Stress-Strain
Strain-Disp.
Stiffness Equation: An Example
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 67/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a
l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
F
L
E
1
L
EA K
AL L
E K
dv L
E K
dv
L
E
L
K
V
V
2
2
11
L B
E D
1
B
D
V
T dv B D B K
L
EA
The Matrices in FEM
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 68/275
F i n i t e E
l e m e n t A n a
l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Element Nodal Deformations
Deformation in Element Space
Strain In Element Space
Stress in Element Space
Global Nodal Deformations
T-Matrix
Global-Local Cords.
N-Matrix
Shape Functions
B-MatrixStrain-Deforrmation
D-Matrix
Stress-Strain
What is Stiffness Matrix
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 69/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a
l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• The actions and deformations of different DOF in
an element are not independent – One action may produce more than one
deformations
– One Deformation may be caused by more than one
Action• A Stiffness Matrix relates various Deformation
and actions within an Element
• A Stiffness Matrix is generalized expression of
overall element stiffness
Element Stiffness Matrix
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 70/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a
l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
R 1
K 11
K 12
K 13
K 14
K 15
K 16
r1
R 2 K 21 K 22 K 23 K 24 K 25 K 26 r2
R 3
K 31
K 32
K 33
K 34
K 35
K 36
r3
R 4
K 41
K 42
K 43
K 44
K 45
K 46
r4
R 5
K 51
K 52
K 53
K 54
K 55
K 56
r5
R 6
K 61
K 62
K 63
K 64
K 65
K 66
r6
=
Node1 Node2
r1
r2r3
r4
r5 r6
A 2D Frame Element Stiffness
U2
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 71/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a
l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Node1 Node2
U1
U2U3
U1
U2U3
E ,A ,I ,L
(P1)1 EA/L 0 0 -EA/L 0 0 (U1)1
(P2)1 0 12EI/L3 6EI/L2 0 -12EI/L3 6EI/L2 (U2)1
(P3)1 0 6EI/L2 4EI/L 0 -6EI/L2 2EI/L (U3)1
(P1)2 -EA/L 0 0 EA/L 0 0 (U1)2
(P2)2 0 -12EI/L3 -6EI/L2 0 12EI/L3 -6EI/L2 (U2)2
(P3)2 0 6EI/L2 2EI/L 0 -6EI/L2 4EI/L (U3)2
( U1)1 (U2)1 (U3)1 (U1)2 (U2)2 (U3)3
=
Direct Stiffness Method and FEM
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 72/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a
l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• Basically there is no conceptual difference
between DSM and FEM. DSM is a special caseof the general FEM
• Direct Stiffness Method (DSM)
– The terms of the element stiffness matrix are definedexplicitly and in close form (formulae)
– It is mostly applicable to 1D Elements (beam, truss)
• Finite Element Method
– The element stiffness matrix terms are computed bynumerical integration of the general stiffness
equation
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 73/275
Isoparametric Elements
Introduction
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 74/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a
l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• In real world, the problem domains are such that
they have no proper shape• It is difficult to find the exact solution of the real
problems
• Isoparametric elements are used to discretize a
complex shape problem domain into a number ofgeometrical shapes
• Analysis is carried out on the simple discretized
shapes and then the result is integrated over the
actual problem domain to get the approximatenumerical solution
1D Isoparametric Shape
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 75/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a
l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• Consider the example of a bar element
• For simplification, let the bar lie in x-axis
• First, relate the Global coordinate X to natural
coordinate system with variable r,
Z
Y
X, U
x1
x2
U1
U2
r r = +1r = -1
11 r
1D Isoparametric Shape
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 76/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a
l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
21 )1(21)1(
21 X r X r X
)1(2
1)1(
2
121 r hand r h
Transformation is given by:
are interpolation of
shape functions
2
1i
iiU hU
The bar global displacements are shown by:
h1 h2
Z
Y
X, U
x1
x2
U1 U2
r r = +1r = -1
1D Isoparametric Shape
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 77/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a
l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
22
2
12
12
L X X
dr
dX
and
U U
dr
dU
dX dr
dr dU
Element Strains can be calculated by:
Where L is the length of the bar
1D Isoparametric Shape
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 78/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a
l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
LU U 12
Therefore, we have
111
L
B
u B ˆ
So, Strain displacement transformation
matrix can be shown as:
1D Isoparametric Shape
Where
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 79/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a
l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
dV EB B K v
T
Jdr L
AE K 11
1
11
1
2
The Stiffness Matrix is given by:
Where E is the Elasticity constant
Therefore, we have
Where,
• A = area of the bar
• J = Jacobianrelating an element
length in the global
coordinate system
to an element
length in thenatural coordinate
system
2
L J so
dr J dX
1D Isoparametric Shape
Therefore K is evaluated as
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 80/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a
l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
11
11
L
AE K
21 )1(2
1)1(
2
1 X r X r X
2
1i
iiU hU
Therefore, K is evaluated as
Substituting the value of r from
And put in
2/
2/)21(
L
X X X r
To get
Example 01
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 81/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Derive
• Interpolation Matrix H• Strain Displacement
Interpolation Matrix B
• Jacobian Operator J
for the three-node element
as shown in figure
X, Ur = 0 r = +1r = -1
L/2L/2x1
1 3 2
Example 01
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 82/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Finding the interpolation
functions of the given
element r = -1 r = +1r = 0
+1
)1(2
1 r r
h
+1
r = -1 r = +1r = 0
2
3 1 r h
r = -1 r = +1r = 0
+1
)1(2
2 r r
h
Example 01
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 83/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
So,
The strain displacement
matrix B is obtained by
r r r J B
dr
dH J B
2)2
1()
2
1(1
1
321 hhh H
Example 01
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 84/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
For Jacobian Operator
2
det;2
2
22
)2
)(1())(1(2
)1(2
1
1
12
11
332211
L J
L
J
L J
dr dx J
r L L
x x
L xr L xr
r xr
r x
xh xh xh x
2D Isoparametric Element
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 85/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• Linear and quadratic two-dimensional
isoparametric finite elements use the same shapefunction for specification of the element shape
and interpolation of the displacement field
2
1
3
4
4
1
2 3
5
1
23
4
65
7
2D Isoparametric Element
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 86/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• Shape functions Ni are
defined in localcoordinates
• The same shape
functions are used forinterpolations of
displacements of
coordinates
)1,1(,
iiii
iiii
y N y x N x
v N vu N u
;
;
2D Isoparametric Element
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 87/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• Shape functions for linear quadratic two-
dimensional isoparametric elements are shownhere
• Linear Elements 4-node: )1)(1(
4
1 Ni oo
2D Isoparametric Element
Q d ti El t 8 d
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 88/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Quadratic Elements 8-nodes
where
8,4)1)(1(2
1
6,2)1)(1(2
1
7,5,3,1)1)(1(4
1
)1)(1(41)1)(1(
41 N
2
2
2
2i
i N
i N
i
oi
oi
o
ooo
ioio ;
Example 02
D i th i
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 89/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• Derive the expressions
needed for the calculationof Stiffness Matrix of the
isoparametric 4-node
finite element shown in
the figure. Assume plane
stress or plane strain
conditions
y, v
1
2
3
4
r or
sor
y4
x4 x, u
Example 02
Th f i t l ti f ti f th li
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 90/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• The four interpolation functions for the linear
quadratic isoparametric element are
y, v
1
2
3
4
r or
sor
y4
x4 x, u
)1)(1(4
1 h
)1)(1(4
1 h
)1)(1(4
1 h
)1)(1(4
1 h
4
3
2
1
sr
sr
sr
sr
Example 02
The coordinate interpolations for the element is given by
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 91/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
The coordinate interpolations for the element is given by
Using the interpolation functions, the coordinate
interpolations for this element are
4
1
4
1;
i
ii
i
ii yh y xh x
4321
4321
)1)(1(4
1)1)(1(
4
1)1)(1(
4
1)1)(1(
4
1y
)1)(1(41)1)(1(
41)1)(1(
41)1)(1(
41x
y sr y sr y sr y sr
x sr x sr x sr x sr
Example 02
The displacement interpolations for the element is given
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 92/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
The displacement interpolations for the element is given
by
Using the interpolation functions, the coordinate
interpolations for this element are
4
11
4
1
; ii
i
ii vhvuhu
4321
4321
)1)(1(4
1)1)(1(
4
1)1)(1(
4
1)1)(1(
4
1 v
)1)(1(4
1)1)(1(
4
1)1)(1(
4
1)1)(1(
4
1u
v sr v sr v sr v sr
u sr u sr u sr u sr
Example 02
The element strains are given by
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 93/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
The element strains are given by
To evaluate the displacement derivatives, we need to
evaluate
x
v
y
u
y
v
x
u xy yy xx
xy yy xx
T
;;
x J
r or
y
x
s
y
s
x
r
y
r
x
s
r
Example 02
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 94/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
where
4321
4321
4321
4321
)1(4
1)1(
4
1)1(
4
1)1(
4
1
s
y
)1(4
1)1(
4
1)1(
4
1)1(
4
1
r
y
)1(
4
1)1(
4
1)1(
4
1)1(
4
1
s
x
)1(4
1)1(
4
1)1(
4
1)1(
4
1
r
x
yr yr yr yr
y s y s y s y s
x s xr xr xr
x s x s x s x s
Example 02
For any value of r and s
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 95/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
For any value of r and s
We can form the Jacobian matrix. Assuming we evaluate
J at
1111 sand r
ji s sand r r at
s
r J
y
x
1
ji s sand r r
Example 02
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 96/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
To evaluate the element strains, we use
4321
4321
4321
4321
)1(4
1)1(
4
1)1(
4
1)1(
4
1
s
v
)1(4
1)1(
4
1)1(
4
1)1(
4
1
r
v
)1(
4
1)1(
4
1)1(
4
1)1(
4
1
s
u
)1(4
1)1(
4
1)1(
4
1)1(
4
1
r
u
vr vr vr vr
v sv sv sv s
u sur ur ur
u su su su s
Example 02
Simplifying the above relations we get
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 97/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Simplifying the above relations, we get
Where
u sr r r
s s s s J
and
u sr r r
s s s s J
ˆ)1(0)1(01010
10)1(0)1(010
4
1
y
v
x
v
ˆ0)1(0)1(0101
010)1(0)1(01
4
1
y
u
xu
1
1
ji
T
s sand r r where
vuvuvuvuu
44332211ˆ
Example 02
Strain-displacement transformation is given by
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 98/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n
a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Strain displacement transformation is given by
So, we can get
u Bijij ˆ
sr sr sr sr
r r r r s s s s
Bij
1)1()1()1()1(111
)1(0)1(01010010)1(0)1(01
4
1
Example 02
Stiffness Matrix K is given by
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 99/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n
a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Stiffness Matrix K is given by
In the above expressions, C is the material property
matrix, t is the thickness of the element at the samplingpoint (r,s)
ijij
T
ijij
ji
ijijij
J CB B F where
F t K
det
,
Example 03
• Calculate the
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 100/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n
a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Calculate the
deflection uAof the
structural
model shown
Section AA
0.5 cm2 each
0.1cm
0.1cm
U1
U2
U3
U4
U5
U6
U7= u A
U8
Y
Bar with x-
sectional
area =
1cm26 cm
6 cm
8 cm
E= 30 x 106 N/cm2
3.0
Z
A
A
Example 03
By symmetry and boundary
diti l d tZ
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 101/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n
a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
conditions, we only need to
evaluate the stiffness coefficientcorresponding to u A
We know that
U1
U2
U3
U4
U5
U6
U7= u A
U8
Y
Bar wi th x-
sectional
area =
1cm26 cm
6 cm
8 cm
E= 30 x 106 N/cm
3.0
Z
A
A
s
y
s
x
r y
r x
J
Example 03
So, we have
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 102/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n
a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Now, calculating B
3004 J
)1(4
...0...
)1(3
48
1
r
s
B
Example 03
Stiffness K for an Area is,
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 103/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n
a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
The stiffness of the truss is AE/L, or
cm N K
dsdr
r
s
s
r s E
K
dsdr J t EB B K T
/34.1336996
)12)(1.0(
)1)(1(2
)1(3
)1(3
)1(40)1(3148
1
det
2
1
1
21
1
cm N X
k /37500008
)1030)(1( 6
Example 03
Hence,
K = 6 424 x 106 N/cm
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 104/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n
a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Ktotal = 6.424 x 106 N/cm
Now, since P = Ku
Therefore, u = P/K
cm X X
u 4
61034.9
10424.66000
cm X u 41034.9
Shell Element
• A Shell element is used to model shell,
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 105/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n
a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
membrane, and plate behavior in planar andthree-dimensional structures
• The membrane behavior uses an isoparametricformulation that includes translational in-plane
stiffness components and a rotational stiffnesscomponent in the direction normal to the plane ofthe element.
Shell Element
Axis 3
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 106/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n
a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Axis 1 Axis 2
J1
J2
J3
J4
Face 1
Face 2
Face 3
Face 4
Face5 Bottom
Face6 Top
Shell Elements
• A simple quadrilateral Shell Element
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 107/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n
a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• Two dimensional plate bending and membraneelements are combined to form a four-node shell
element
+ =
xu
yu
z
xy
z
x
y
z xu
yu
z
x
y
z u
Plate Bending Element Membrane Element Shell Element
Shell Elements
• A simple quadrilateral Shell Element
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 108/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n
a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• A thin-plate (Kirchhoff) formulation is normally
used that neglects transverse shearing
deformation
• A thick plate (Mindlin/Reissner) formulation can
also be chosen which includes the effects of
transverse shearing deformation
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 109/275
What are
The Finite Elements(in SAP2000)
Nodes and Finite Elements
• The Finite Elements are discretizedt ti f th ti t t
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 110/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n
a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
representation of the continuous structure
• Generally they correspond to the physicalstructural components but sometimes dummy oridealized elements my also be used
• Elements behavior is completely defined within its
boundaries and is not directly related to otherelements
• Nodes are imaginary points used describearbitrary quantities and serve to provideconnectivity across element boundaries
Basic Categories of Finite Elements
• 1 D Elements (Beam type)
O l di i i t ll d l d li th
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 111/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n
a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
– Only one dimension is actually modeled as a line, other
two dimensions are represented by stiffness properties
– Can be used in 1D, 2D and 2D
• 2 D Elements (Plate type)
– Only two dimensions are actually modeled as a
surface, third dimension is represented by stiffnessproperties
– Can be used in 2D and 3D Model
• 3 D Elements (Brick type)
– All three dimensions are modeled as a solid
– Can be used in 3D Model
The Joint or Node
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 112/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n
a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
The Joint or Node
Basic Properties of Joints
• All elements are connected to the structure at the joints
Th t t i t d t th j i t i R t i t
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 113/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n
a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• The structure is supported at the joints using Restraints
and/or Springs
• Rigid-body behavior and symmetry conditions can be
specified using Constraints that apply to the joints
• Concentrated loads may be applied at the joints
• Lumped masses and rotational inertia may be placed atthe joints
• Loads and masses applied to the elements are transferred
to the joints
• Joints are the primary locations in the structure at which
the displacements are known (the supports) or are to bedetermined
Joint Local Coordinates
• By default, the joint local 1-2-3 coordinate system is
identical to the global X-Y-Z coordinate system
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 114/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n
a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
identical to the global X-Y-Z coordinate system
• It may be necessary to use different local coordinatesystems at some or all joints in the following cases:
– Skewed Restraints (supports) are present
– Constraints are used to impose rotational symmetry
– Constraints are used to impose symmetry about a plane
that is not parallel to a global coordinate plane
– The principal axes for the joint mass (translational or
rotational) are not aligned with the global axes
– Joint displacement and force output is desired in
another coordinate system
Joint Local Coordinates
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 115/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n
a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Spring Restraints on Joints
• Any of the six degrees of freedom at any of the
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 116/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n
a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
joints in the structure can have translation orrotational spring support conditions.
• Springs elastically connect the joint to the ground.
• The spring forces that act on a joint are related to
the displacements of that joint by a 6x6symmetric matrix of spring stiffness coefficients.
– Simple Springs
– Coupled Springs
Simple Spring Restraints
• Independent spring
stiffness in each DOF
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 117/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n
a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
stiffness in each DOF
Coupled Spring Restraints
• General Spring Connection
•
Global and skewed springs
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 118/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n
a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Global and skewed springs
• Coupled 6x6 user -defined
spring stiffness option (for
foundation modeling)
Stiffness Matrix for Spring Element
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 119/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n
a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
where u1 ,u2 ,u3 ,r1 ,r2 and r3 are the joint displacements and rotations,
and the terms u1, u1u2, u2, ... are the specified spring stiffness
coefficients.
Some Sample Finite Elements
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 120/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n
a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Truss and Beam Elements (1D,2D,3D)
Plane Stress, Plane Strain, Axisymmetric, Plate and Shell Elements (2D,3D)
Brick Elements
One Dimensional Elements
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 121/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n
a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
DOF for 1D Elements
Dy
DxDz
DyDy
Rz
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 122/275
F i n i t e
E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Dx
Dx
Dx
Dy
Rz
Dy
RxRz DxDz
Dy
Rx
Rz
Ry
2D Truss 2D Beam 3D Truss
2D Frame 2D Grid 3D Frame
Variation of 1D Elements
• Based on DOF
–
2D Truss
• Non
-
Linear Elements
–
NL Link
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 123/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
– 3D Truss
– 2D Beam
– 3D Beam
– 2D Grid
• Based on Behavior – Thick Beam/ Thin Beam
– Liner/ Isoperimetric
– Gap Element
– Tension Only
– Compression Only
– Friction
– Cable – Damper
Usage of 1D Elements
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 124/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
3D Frame
2D Grid
2D Frame
Nonlinear Link Element in SAP2000
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 125/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Two Dimensional Elements
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 126/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
DOF for 2D Elements
DyDy
Ry ?
Dy
Ry ?
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 127/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Dx
Dy
RzRx
Dz Rx
Rz
Dx
Membrane Plate Shell
Membrane Element
General•
Total DOF per Node = 3 (or 2)
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 128/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• Total Displacements per Node = 2• Total Rotations per Node = 1 (or 0)
• Membranes are modeled for flat
surfaces
Application• For Modeling surface elements
carrying
in- plane loadsMembrane
U1
Node 1
R3U2
U1
Node 3
R3U2
U1
Node 4
R3
U2
U1
Node 2
U2
3 2
1
Variation of Membrane Elements
1 unit
Plain-Strain
Assumptions x
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 129/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
1 unit
x1
x3
x2
3D Problem
2D Problem
x
Plane Stress ProblemPlane Strain Problem
Plate Element
General
• Total DOF per Node = 3
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 130/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• Total Displacements per Node = 1
• Total Rotations per Node = 2
• Plates are for flat surfaces
Application
• For Modeling surface
elements carrying
out of plane loads
R1
Node 1
U3R2
1
23
R1
Node 2
U3R2
R1
Node 3
U3R2
R1
Node 4
U3R2
Plate
Shell Element
General•
Total DOF per Node = 6 (or 5)
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 131/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• Total Displacements per Node = 3• Total Rotations per Node = 3
• Used for curved surfaces
Application• For Modeling surface elements
carrying general loads
1
23
U1, R1
Node 3
U3, R3
U2, R2
U1, R1
Node 1
U3, R3 U2, R2
U1, R1
Node 4
U3, R3
U2, R2
U1, R1
Node 2
U3, R3
U2, R2
Shell
Variations of Plate Elements
– Based on Behavior
–
2D Plane Stress
– Based on Number of Nodes
–
3 Node, 6 Node
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 132/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
– 2D Plane Strain – Axisymetric Solid
– Plate
– Shell
– Based on Material Model
– Rubber
– Soil
– Laminates
– Isotropic/ Orthotropic
– 4 Node, 8 Node, (9 Node)
Shell Elements in SAP2000
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 133/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Shell Elements in SAP2000
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 134/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Local Cords for Shell Element
• Each Shell elementhas its own localcoordinate system
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 135/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
used to defineMaterial properties,loads and output.
• The axes of this local
system are denoted 1,2 and 3. The first twoaxes lie in the plane ofthe element the thirdaxis is normal
Three Dimensional Elements
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 136/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
DOF for 3D Elements
D
Dy
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 137/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
DxDz
Solid/ Brick
Brick Element in SAP2000
• 8-Node Brick
• Bricks can be
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 138/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
added by using
Text Generation in
V7. New version
8 will have
graphical interfacefor Bricks
Connecting Dissimilar Elements
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 139/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Connecting Different Types of Elements
Truss Frame Membrane Plate Shell Solid
TrussOK OK Dz OK OK OK
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 140/275
F i n i t
e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
FrameRx, Ry, Rz OK
Rx, Ry, Rz,
Dz
Rx ?
Dx, DyRx ? Rx, Ry, Rz
MembraneOK OK OK Dx, Dy OK OK
PlateRx, Rz OK Rx, Rz OK OK Rx, Rz
ShellRx, Ry, Rz OK
Rx, Ry, Rz,
DzDx, Dz OK Rx, Rz
SolidOK OK Dz Dx, Dz OK OK
0
Orphan Degrees Of Freedom:
1 2 3 4
Connecting Dissimilar Elements• When elements with different degree of freedom at
ends connect with each other, special measures
may need to be taken to provide proper connectivity
d di S ft C bilit
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 141/275
F i n i t
e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
depending on Software Capability
Beams to Plates Beam to Brick Plates to Brick
Connecting Dissimilar Elements
• When members with mesh of different size or
configuration need to be connected we may
have to:
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 142/275
F i n i t
e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
have to: – Use special connecting elements
– Use special Constraints
– Use mesh grading and subdivision
– Use in-compatible elements (Zipper Elements inETABS)
– Automatic “Node” detection and internal
meshing by the Software
Connecting Beams with Membrane
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 143/275
F i n i t
e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Modeling Shear-Wallsusing Panels only
(No Moment continuity
with Beams and Columns unless
6 DOF Shell is used)
Modeling Shear-Walls using
Panels, Beams, Columns
(Full Moment continuity
with Beams and Columns is restored
by using additional beams)
Meshing Slabs and Walls
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 144/275
F i n i t
e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
In general the mesh in the slab
should match with mesh in the
wall to establish connection
Some software automatically
establishes connectivity by using
constraints or “Zipper” elements
“Zipper”
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 145/275
How to Apply Loads to
Finite Element Model
Loads To Design Actions
• Loads
L d C
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 146/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• Load Cases
• Load Combinations
• Design Envelopes
• Design Actions
Load Cases
• Load cases are defined by the user and used foranalysis purpose only
St ti L d C
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 147/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• Static Load Cases
– Dead Load
– Live Load
– Wind Load
• Earthquake Load Cases – Response Spectrum Load Cases
– Time History Load Cases
• Static Non-Linear Load Cases
Load Combinations
• The Load Combinations may be created by theprogram, user defined or a combination of both.
• Some Examples: [Created by the program]
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 148/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• Some Examples: [Created by the program] – 1.4ΣDL
– 1.4ΣDL + 1.7(ΣLL + ΣRLL)
– 0.75[1.4ΣDL + 1.7(ΣLL + ΣRLL) + 1.7WL]
– 0.75[1.4ΣDL + 1.7(ΣLL + ΣRLL) - 1.7WL]
– 0.9ΣDL + 1.3WL – 0.9ΣDL - 1.3WL
– 1.1 [1.2ΣDL + 0.5(ΣLL + ΣRLL) + 1.0E]
– 1.1 [1.2ΣDL + 0.5(ΣLL + ΣRLL) - 1.0E]
– 1.1 (0.9ΣDL + 1.0E)
– 1.1 (0.9ΣDL - 1.0E)
Applying Gravity Loads
• All gravity loads are basically “Volume Loads” generated
due to mass contained in a volume
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 149/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• Mechanism and path must be found to transfer these loads
to the “Supports” through a Medium
• All type of Gravity Loads can be represented as:
– Point Loads
– Line Loads
– Area Loads
– Volume Loads
Load Transfer Path
• The Load is transferred through a medium which may be:
– A Point
– A Line
An Area
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 150/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
– An Area
– A Volume
– A system consisting of combination of several mediums
• The supports may be represented as:
– Point Supports
– Line Supports
– Area Supports
– Volume Supports
Graphic Object RepresentationObject
Point Load
Concentrated LoadNode
Point Support
Column SupportPoint
LoadGeometry
Medium
Support
Boundary
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 151/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Line
Area
Volume
Beam Load
Wall Load
Slab Load
Slab LoadWind Load
Seismic Load
Liquid Load
Beam / Truss
Connection Element
Spring Element
Plate Element
Shell ElementPanel/ Plane
Solid Element
Line Support
Wall Support
Beam Support
Soil Support
Soil Support
ETABS and SAP200 uses graphic object modeling concept
Load Transfer Path is difficult to Determine
• Complexity of Load Transfer
Mechanism depend on:
A
Vol.
Load
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 152/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
– Complexity of Load
– Complexity of Medium
– Complexity of BoundaryPoint Line Area Volume
Line
Area
LineArea
Volume
Medium
Boundary
Load Transfer Path is difficult to Determine
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 153/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Transfer of a Point Load to Point Supports Through Various Mediums
Line AreaVolume
Simplified Load Transfer
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 154/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Transfer of Area Load
To Lines To Points To Lines and Points
Applying Wind Loads
• At least 3 basic Wind Load Cases should beconsidered
– Along X-Direction
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 155/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
g – Along Y Direction
– Along Diagonal
• Each Basic Wind Load Case should be enteredseparately into load combinations twice, oncewith (+ve) and once with (-ve) sign
• Total of 6 Wind Load Cases should considered inCombinations, but only 3 Load Cases need to bedefined and analyzed
Applying Wind Loads
WxAt least 3 Basic Load
Case for Wind Load
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 156/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Wy
Wxy
should be considered
Diagonal wind load may
be critical for special
types and layouts of
buildings
Wind Load CombinationsComb1 Comb2 Comb3 Comb4 Comb5 Comb6
Wx +f -f 0 0 0 0
Wy 0 0 +f -f 0 0
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 157/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Wxy 0 0 0 0 +f -f
(f) Is the load factor specified for Wind in
the design codes
Six Additional Load Combinations are
required where ever “Wind” is
mentioned in the basic Load
Combinations
Example:
Comb = 0.75(1.4D + 1.7W) will need Six
Actual Combinations
Comb1= 0.75(1.4D + 1.7Wx)
Comb2 = 0.75(1.4D - 1.7Wx)
Comb3 = 0.75(1.4D + 1.7Wy)
Comb4 = 0.75(1.4D - 1.7Wy)
Comb5 = 0.75(1.4D + 1.7Wxy)
Comb6 = 0.75(1.4D - 1.7Wxy)
Nature of Dynamic Loads
• Free Vibration
• Forced Vibration
• Random Vibration
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 158/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• Seismic Excitation
• Response Spectrum
• Time History
• Steady-State Harmonic Load• Impact
• Blast
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 159/275
Getting and Interpreting
Finite Element Results
What Results Can We Get ?
(in SAP2000)
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 160/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
At Joints
• Joint Displacements
• Spring Reactions
• Restrained Reactions
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 161/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• Constrained Forces
• Results Available For:
– For all Available DOF
– Given on the “Local Joint Coordinates” – Given for all Load Case, Mode
Shapes,Response Spectrums, Time Histories,Moving Loads, and Load Combinations
For Frame Elements
• The Actions Corresponding to Six DOF at Both
Ends, in Local Coordinate System
12 12
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 162/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
1
3
3
2
+P+V2
+V3
+V3
+V2+P
3
3
2
+T+M2
+M3
+M3
+M2+T
For Shell Element
• The Shell element internal forces (also called stress
resultants) are the forces and moments that result from
integrating the stresses over the element thickness.• The results include the “Membrane Results” (in plane
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 163/275
F i n i
t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• The results include the Membrane Results (in-plane
forces) and “Plate Bending Results”
• The results are given for Element Local Axis
• It is very important to note that these stress resultantsare forces and moments per unit of in-plane lengt h
Shell Stress Resultants
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 164/275
F i n i
t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Membrane Results
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 165/275
F i n i
t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Plate Bending Results
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 166/275
F i n i
t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Obtaining Design Actions From Basic Results
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 167/275
F i n i
t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Obtaining Envelop Results
Comb1 Comb2 Comb3 Comb N
Load Case -1
L d C 2
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 168/275
F i n i
t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
TotalMax, PMin, P
Load Case - 2
Load Case - 3
Load Case - M
Envelop Results
P1 P2 P3 P N
Can Envelop Results be Used for Design ?
P• Actions Interact with each other, effecting the
stresses
• For Column Design: P, Mx, My
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 169/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Mx
My
• For Beam Design: Mx, Vy, Tz
• For Slabs: Mx, My, Mxy
– At least 3 Actions from each combination must be
considered together as set
• Therefore, Envelop Results Can Not be Used
• Every Load Combinations must be used for
design with complete “Action Set”
Design Actions For Static Loads
• For static loads, Design
Actions are obtained as
the cumulative result
from each load
bi ti t f
Combinations
a d C
a s e s
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 170/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
combination, as set for
all interacting actions
• The final or criticalresults from design of
all load combinations
are adopted
L o a
Design Actions
Obtained as set
from all
Combinations
Static, Dynamic and Nonlinear ResultsFor a Single Action:
Static Load Case
1
+
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 171/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Response Spectrum Load Case
Time History Load Case
Static Non-linear Load Case
+
-
1 for each Time Step
OR 1 for envelop
1 for each Load Step
Load
Combination
Table
OR 1 for Envelop
Response Spectrum Case – All response spectrum cases are assumed to be
earthquake load cases
– The output from a response spectrum is all positive.
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 172/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
– Design load combination that includes a responsespectrum load case is checked for all possiblecombinations of signs (+, -) on the response spectrum
values
– A 3D element will have eight possible combinations ofP, M2 and M3 and eight combinations for M3, V, T
Response Spectrum Results for Action SetDesign Actions needed for Columns:
+P, +Mx, +My
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 173/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
+P, +Mx, -My
+P, -Mx, +My
+P, -Mx, -My
-P, +Mx, +My-P, +Mx, -My
-P, -Mx, +My
-P, -Mx, -My
Maximum Results obtained by:
SRSS, CQC, etc.
P, Mx, My>
L o a d C o m b
i n a t i o n T a b l e
Time History Analysis Results
Max Val
Option
–
2:
Design For All Values
(At each tim e step)
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 174/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
Min Val
Response Curve for One Action
Option – 1:
Envelope DesignT (sec)
Time
-
History Results – The default design load combinations do not include any time
history results
– Define the load combination, to include time history forces in a
design load combination
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 175/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
– Can perform design for each step of Time History or design forenvelops for those results
– For envelope design, the design is for the maximum of eachresponse quantity (axial load, moment, etc.) as if they occurredsimultaneously.
– Designing for each step of a time history gives correctcorrespondence between different response quantities
Time History Results
– The program gets a maximum and a minimum value foreach response quantity from the envelope results for a timehistory
– For a design load combination any load combination that
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 176/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
g yincludes a time history load case in it is checked for allpossible combinations of maximum and minimum timehistory design values.
– If a single design load combination has more than one timehistory case in it, that design load combination is designedfor the envelopes of the time histories, regardless of what isspecified for the Time History Design item in the preferences.
s
Static Non Linear Results
– The default design load combinations do not
include any Static Nonlinear results
– Define the load combination, to include Static
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 177/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
,
Nonlinear Results in a design load combination
– For a single static nonlinear load case the design isperformed for each step of the static nonlinear
analysis.
s
Obtaining Reinforcement From Actions
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 178/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
s
Computing Rebars For Beam Elements• For Beam type elements (1D
elements) design actions like Axial
force, moments, and shear force are
output directly.•
These actions can be used directly for
design purposes
y
z
x
M z
M y
T x
N x
V y
V z
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 179/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
design purposes
• Generally, design is carried out in two
parts
• Axial- Flexural: P, Mx, My
• Shear Torsion: T, Vx, Vy
• Beam Design: Mx, Vy, T
• Column Design: Mx, My, P
y
z
x
M z
M y
N x
Biaxial & Load
3D Beam Column
s
Computing Rebars For Beam Elements A sc + Al /4: To resist compression due to
moment Mx (doubly reinforced beams) and
tension due to Torsion
A st : To resist
tension due to My
A sc : To resist compressiondue to My (may not be needed)
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 180/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
A st + Al /4 : To resist main tension due tomoment and tension due to Torsion
A sw + Al /4 : To resist secondary tension
in deep beams due to moment and due to
Torsion
A svt + A sv /2: To resist shear due to
Torsion. Must be closed hoops on sides of
the section
s
Computing Rebars For Plate Elements• Moment output for plate type elements in Finite Element
Analysis is reported in moment per unit width along the
local axis of the plate element. These need to be
converted to moments along x and y for design purposes.
• The following procedure can be used:
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 181/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
g p
The portion of a plate element bounded by a crack is
shown in the Adjoining figure. The moment about an axisparallel to the crack may be given as:
sindymkdymcoskdymdymdsm xy y xy xc
xy y xc kmmk mdx
dym 2
2
2
dx =k dy
dy
ds
Crack
s
Computing Rebars For Plate Elements• The plate needs to be reinforced
with bars in the x and y direction
• The corresponding moment
capacity at the assumed crack is
m xy kdy
my kdy
m xy dy
m x dy ms ds
mry kdy2
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 182/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i s
ACECOMS, AIT
• Where mrc must equal or exceed
mc solving for the minimum we
get
ryrx m ,m
Positive moment
capacities per unit width
mry kdy
mrx dy mrc ds
ryrxrc mk mdx
dym
2
2
xy yry mk
mm1
s
Computing Rebars For Plate Elements• The reinforcement at
the bottom of the slab in
each direction is
designed to provide
resistance for the
positive moment
xy xrx
xy yry
mmm
mmm
mry and mrx are set to zero if they
yield a negative value
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 183/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i
ACECOMS, AIT
p
• The reinforcement at
the top of the slab in
each direction isdesigned to provide
resistance for the
negative moment
xy xrx
xy yry
mmm
mmm
mry and mrx are set to zero if they
yield a positive value
s
Computing Rebars For Brick Elements• For Brick elements the FEA results in the nodal stresses
and strains.
• The stresses on the brick elements need to be
integrated along x and y direction to obtain forces.
•
Stress variation in both the directions may be
considered and integrated.
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 184/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i
ACECOMS, AIT
g
• These forces are then used to find the moment aboutthe two orthogonal axes and the net axial force. Similarapproach is used to obtain shear forces in two directions
• After the axial forces, moments and shear forces areobtained then the section can be designed as arectangular beam
i s
Computing Rebars For Brick ElementsSample Calculations for P and M
Following equations are based on the
assumption that there is no stress
variation in the transverse direction
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 185/275
F i n
i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i
ACECOMS, AIT
C1
C2TCL
x1
x2
x3
n
i
i
i
M M
.......Tx xC xC M
1
32211
n
i
i
i
P P
........T C C P
1
21
Modeling
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 186/275
Structures
Using FEM
i s
Global Modeling or ”Macro Model” • A model of the Whole Structure
• Objective is to get Overall StructuralResponse
• Results in the form of member forces andstress patterns
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 187/275
F i n
i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i
ACECOMS, AIT
• Global Modeling is same for nearly allMaterials
• Material distinction is made by using specificmaterial properties
• Global Model may be a simple 2D beam/frame model or a sophisticated full 3D finiteelement model
• Generally adequate for design of usualstructures
i s
Local Model or “Micro Model” • Model of Single Member or part of a Member
• Model of the Cross-section, Opening, Joints,
connection
• Objective: To determine local stress
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 188/275
F i n
i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i
ACECOMS, AIT
concentration, cross-section behavior,
modeling of cracking, bond, anchorage etc.
• Needs finite element modeling, often usingvery fine mesh, advance element features,
non-linear analysis
• Mostly suitable for research, simulation,
experiment verification and theoretical studies
i s
Global Modeling of Structural Geometry
(a) Real Structure
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 189/275
F i n
i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s i
ACECOMS, AIT
(b) Solid Model (c) 3D Plate-Frame (d) 3D Frame
(e) 2D Frame
Fig. 1 Various Ways to Model a Real Struture
(f) Grid-Plate
i s
The Basic Issues• Which Model to be used ?
– 3D or 2D
– Frame or Grid
– Plate, Membrane, Shell, Solid
• Which Elements to be used ?
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 190/275
F i n
i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s
ACECOMS, AIT
– Beam, Plate, Brick
– Size and number of elements
• Which Solution to be used ?
– Linear or Nonlinear
– Static or Dynamic
– Linear static or Nonlinear dynamic
– Linear dynamic or Nonlinear static
s i s
Overall Procedure
–
Linear Static
• Setup the Units to be used
• Define Basic Material Properties
• Define Cross-sections to be used• Draw, generate Nodes and Elements
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 191/275
F i n
i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s
ACECOMS, AIT
• Assign XSections, Restraints, Constraints etc.
• Apply Loads to Nodes and Elements
• Run the Analysis
• Check Basic Equilibrium and Deformations
• Interpret and use the Results
What Type of Analysis
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 192/275
Should be Carried out
s i s
The type of Analysis to be carr ied out
depends on the Structural System
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 193/275
F i n
i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s
ACECOMS, AIT
– The Type of Excitation (Loads)
– The Type Structure (Material and Geometry) – The Type Response
s i s
• P-Delta Analysis
• Buckling Analysis
• Static Pushover Analysis• Response Spectrum Analysis
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 194/275
F i n
i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s
ACECOMS, AIT
• Fast Non-Linear Analysis (FNA)
• Steady State Dynamic Analysis
• Free Vibration and Modal Analysis
• Large Displacement Analysis
s i s
• Static Excitation
– When the Excitation (Load) does not vary rapidly with Time
– When the Load can be assumed to be applied “Slowly”• Dynamic Excitation
Wh th E it ti i idl ith Ti
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 195/275
F i n
i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s
ACECOMS, AIT
– When the Excitation varies rapidly with Time
– When the “Inertial Force” becomes significant
• Most Real Excitation are Dynamic but are considered
“Quasi Static”
• Most Dynamic Excitation can be converted to
“Equivalent Static Loads”
s i s
Excitation/ Load Static Dynamic
Self Load Normal Operation At lifting/ placement
Superimposed Dead
Load
Normal Operation At placement
Live Load Normal Operation Depends on type
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 196/275
F i n
i t e E l e m e n t A n a l y s
ACECOMS, AIT
Highway Traffic Quasi Static Impact
Water/ Liquid Normal Operation Filling, Sloshing
Creep, Shrinkage Static No DynamicComponent
Wind Equivalent Static Random Vibration
Seismic Excitation Equivalent Static Response Spectrum,
Time HistoryVibratory Machines Equivalent Static Impulse At Startup
Stead State at
s i s
• Elastic Material
– Follows the same path during loading and unloading and
returns to initial state of deformation, stress, strain etc. after
removal of load/ excitation
• Inelastic Material
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 197/275
F i n
i t e E l e m e n t
A n a l y
ACECOMS, AIT
– Does not follow the same path during loading and unloading and
may not returns to initial state of deformation, stress, strain etc.
after removal of load/ excitation
• Most materials exhibit both, elastic and inelastic behavior
depending upon level of loading.
y s i s
Creating Finite Element Models
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 198/275
F i n
i t e E l e m e n t
A n a l y
ACECOMS, AIT
y s i s
Model Creation Tools
• Defining Individual Nodes and Elements
• Using Graphical Modeling Tools
• Using Numerical Generation• Using Mathematical Generation
U i C d R li ti
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 199/275
F i n
i t e E l e m e n t
A n a l y
ACECOMS, AIT
• Using Copy and Replication
• Using Subdivision and Meshing
• Using Geometric Extrusions
• Using Parametric Structures
•
y s i s
Graphic Object Modeling
• Use basic Geometric Entities to create FE Models
• Simple Graphic Objects
– Point Object Represents Node
– Line Object Represents 1D Elements
– Area Object Represents 2D Elements
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 200/275
F i n
i t e E l e m e n t
A n a l y
ACECOMS, AIT
– Brick Object Represents 3D Elements
• Graphic Objects can be used to represent
geometry, boundary and loads• SAP2000, ETABS and SAFE use the concept of
Graphic Objects
y s i s
Modeling Objects and Finite Elements• Structural Members are representation of actual
structural components
• Finite Elements are discretized representation ofStructural Members
• The concept of Graphic Objects can be used tot b th th St t l M b ll
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 201/275
F i n
i t e E l e m e n t
A n a l y
ACECOMS, AIT
represent both, the Structural Members as well asFinite Elements
• In ETABS, the Graphic Objects representing theStructural Members are automatically divided intoFinite Elements for analysis and then back tostructural members for result interpretation
y s i s
Unstable Structures
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 202/275
F i n
i t e E l e m e n t
A n a l y
ACECOMS, AIT
y s i s
When is Structure Unstable in FEM Solution
• When the Global Stiffness Matrix is Singular
– The determinant of matrix is zero
– Any diagonal element in the matrix is zero• When the Global Stiffness Matrix is Ill-
Conditioned
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 203/275
F i n
i t e E l e m e n t
A n a l y
ACECOMS, AIT
Conditioned
– The numerical values in various matrix cells are of
grossly different order – Numerical values are either too small or too large
y s i s
Why are the FEM Models Unstable
• Restraint Instability
– Not enough Boundary Restraints
• Geometric Instability
– Not enough Elements
– Not enough stiffness of Elements
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 204/275
F i n
i t e E l e m e n t
A n a l y
ACECOMS, AIT
– Elements not connected properly
– Presence of Orphan Degrees Of Freedom
• Material Instability – Not enough Material Stiffness, (E, G)
– Not enough Cross-section Stiffness (A, I, J, ..)
y s i s
Structure Types
• Cable Structures• Cable Nets
• Cable Stayed
• Bar Structures• 2D/3D Trusses
• 2D/3D Frames, Grids
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 205/275
F i n
i t e E l e m e n t
A n a l y
ACECOMS, AIT
2D/3D Frames, Grids
• Surface Structures• Plate, Shell
• In-Plane, Plane Stress
• Solid Structures
How to Model the
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 206/275
Foundations
y s i s
Soil
-
Structure Interaction
• Simple Supports
•
Fix, Pin, Roller etc.
•
Support Settlement
• Elastic Supports
•
Spring to represent soil
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 207/275
F i n
i t e E l e m e n t
A n a l y
ACECOMS, AIT
Spring to represent soil
• Using Modulus of Sub-grade reaction
• Full Structure-Soil Model
• Use 2D plane stress elements
• Use 3D Solid Elements
y s i s
Modeling of Foundations and Mats
Beam Plate BrickConstraint
Yes Yes Yes
Modeling of Mat
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 208/275
F i n
i t e E l e m e n t
A n a l
ACECOMS, AIT
SpringYes Yes Yes
Brick No Yes Yes
S o i l
l y s i s
Computing Soil Spring
• A = Spacing of
Springs in X
•
B = Spacing of
Springs in Y
•
Ks = Modulus of
B
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 209/275
F i n
i t e E l e m e n t
A n a l
ACECOMS, AIT
sub-grade reaction
(t/cu m etc.)
• K = Spring constant
(t/m etc) A
K= ks*A*B
A
B
l y s i s
Raft as Beam
-
Grid, Soil as Spring
• The raft is represented as a
grillage of beams
representing slab strips in
both directions• The soil is represented by
spring
Thi h i
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 210/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t
A n a l
ACECOMS, AIT
• This approach is
approximate and does not
consider the Mxy or thetorsional rigidity of the mat
l y s i s
Raft as Plate, Soil as Spring
• The raft is modeled using
Plate (or Shell) elements
• At least 9-16 elements
should be used in onepanel
• Soil springs may be
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 211/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t
A n a l
ACECOMS, AIT
located or every node or
at alternate nodes
• Not suitable fro very thickrafts like thick pile caps
etc
l y s i s
Raft as Brick, Soil as Spring
• The raft is represented by
brick elements, soil as
springs
• More than one layer ofbrick elements should be
used along thickness
(usually 3 5) unless higher
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 212/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t
A n a l
ACECOMS, AIT
(usually 3-5) unless higher
order elements are used
• Suitable for very thickmats and pile caps etc.
• Difficult to determine
rebars from brick results
l y s i s
Raft as Plate, Soil as Brick
• The raft is represented by
plate elements, soil as
bricks
• Soil around the mat shouldalso be modeled (min 2
times width)
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 213/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t
A n a
ACECOMS, AIT
a l y s i s
Raft as Brick, Soil as Brick
• The raft is represented bybrick elements, soil as bricksalso
• More than one layer of brick
elements should be usedalong thickness (usually 3-5)unless higher order elementsare used
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 214/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t
A n a
ACECOMS, AIT
• Soil around the mat shouldalso be modeled (min 2 times
width)• Suitable for very thick mats
and pile caps etc.
• Difficult to determine rebarsfrom brick results
a l y s i s
Modeling of Cellular Mats
• The top slab, the walls
and the bottom slab
should be modeled using
plate elements• More than one plate
element layer should be
used in the walls
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 215/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t
A n a
ACECOMS, AIT
used in the walls
• The soil may be
represented by springs orby bricks
a l y s i s
Modeling of Piles
• For analysis and designof individual Pile, it canbe modeled as beam
element and soilaround it as series oflateral and verticalsprings
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 216/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t
A n a
ACECOMS, AIT
springs
• For analysis of superstructure, entire pilecan be represented bya single a set of springs
a l y s i s
Using Nonlinear Springs to Model Soil
• The springs used to represent may be either
linear or non linear
• The non-linear response of the soil can be
obtained from actual tests
• The non-linear response can then be used to
determine “K” for various levels of load or
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 217/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t
A n a
ACECOMS, AIT
determine K for various levels of load or
deformation
• Nonlinear springs are especially useful for
vertical as well as lateral response of piles
and pile groups
a l y s i s
Modeling of Shear Walls
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 218/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a
ACECOMS, AIT
a l y s i s
Modeling of Planner Walls
Using Truss
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 219/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a
ACECOMS, AIT
Using Beam and Column Using Panels, Plates and Beams
a l y s i s
Frame Model for Planer Walls
• Specially Suitable when H/B
is more than 5
• The shear wall is
represented by a column ofsection “B x t”
• The beam up to the edge of
the wall is modeled asB
H
t
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 220/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a
ACECOMS, AIT
Rigid Zones
the wall is modeled as
normal beam
• The “column” is connected to
beam by rigid zones or very
large cross-section
B
a l y s i s
Using Plates to Model Walls
Multiple elements greater accuracy in determination of stress
distribution and allow easy modeling of openings
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 221/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n a
ACECOMS, AIT
Using Plate Elements only
(No Moment continuity
with Beams and Columns unless
6 DOF Shell is used)
Using Plate Elements with
Beams, Columns
(Full Moment continuity
with Beams and Columns)
a l y s i s
Truss Model for Planner Walls
• For the purpose of analysis, assumethe main truss layout based on wallwidth and floor levels
• Initial member sizes can beestimated as t x 2t for main axial
members and t x t for diagonalmembers
• Use frame elements to model thetruss. It is not necessary to usetruss elements
t x t
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 222/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n
ACECOMS, AIT
truss elements
• Generally single diagonal is sufficient
for modeling but double diagonalmay be used for easier interpretationof results
• The floor beams and slabs can beconnected directly to truss elements
C
tB
t x 2t
n a l y s i s
Modeling of Cellular Shear Walls
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 223/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n
ACECOMS, AIT
Uniaxial Biaxial
n a l y s i s
Modeling Walls With Openings
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 224/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A n
ACECOMS, AIT
Plate-Shell Model Rigid Frame Model Truss Model
Introduction
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 225/275
To Dynamic Analysis
n a l y s i s
What is Seismic Analysis
Determination of Structural Response due to Seismic
Excitation
• The Seismic Excitation is Dynamic in nature• So the Response is governed by
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 226/275
F i
n i t e E l e m e n t A n
ACECOMS, AIT
“The Dynamic Equilibrium Equation”
• The question is how to solve this equation?
n a l y s i s The General
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 227/275
F i
n i t e E l e m e n t A n
ACECOMS, AIT
Dynamic nalysis
n a l y s i s
•
Capture the Realistic Behavior of Structures
•
No Conservative Approximations in Analysis
•
Puts Check on Structural Irregularities
•
Identifies Ductility Demands
Why Dynamic Analysis
–
In General
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 228/275
F i
n i t e E l e m e n t A n
ACECOMS, AIT
• Lower Base Shears• Required by Code
n a l y s i s
P(u,a)
K
Static Elastic Only:
Displacement (U)=Force (P) /Stiffness(K)
U = P/K or K u = P
M
Basic Dynamic Equilibrium
–
No Damping
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 229/275
F i
n i t e E l e m e n t A n
ACECOMS, AIT
Inertia Only :
Acceleration (a)=Force (P) / Mass(M)
a = P/M or Ma = P
BOTH :
Ma+Ku=P
n a l y s i s
F
I
+ F
D
+ F
S
= F
F(t)
I
+ F(t)
D
+ F(t)
S
= F(t)
M a(t) + C v(t) + K u(t) = F (t)
F = External Force
FS = I nternal Forces
FD = Energy Dissipation Forces
FI = Inertial Force (t) = Varies with time
u’’ = Acceleration (a)
u’ = Velocity (v)
F
Basic Dynamic Equilibrium
–
With Damping
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 230/275
F i
n i t e E l e m e n t A n
ACECOMS, AIT
M u’’(t) +C u’(t) + K u(t) = F(t)
(Second order di ff erential equation for
li near structural behavior)
u = D isplacement
M = Mass
C = Damping
K = Stif fness
n a l y s i s
Basics of Structure Dynamics
• Idealization for a Single
Floor
– Mass less Column, Entiremass is concentrated on the
roof
– Rigid roof, Rigid ground
Roof
Column
Ground
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 231/275
F i
n i t e E l e m e n t A n
ACECOMS, AIT
g , g g
– Column is flexible in lateral
direction but rigid in vertical
direction
n a l y s i s
What is Dynamic Response ?
• If the roof is displaced laterally by a
distance uo and then released the
structure will oscillate around its
equilibrium position.
Roof
Column
Ground
One Cycle
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 232/275
F i
n i t e E l e m e n t A n
ACECOMS, AIT
uo
1 2
-uo
3 4
uo
5
n a l y s i s
Dynamic Response•
The oscillation will continue
forever with the same
amplitude u
o
and the structure
will never come to rest.
• Actual structure will oscillate
with decreasing amplitude
and will eventually come to
rest.
1
2
3
4
5
time
u
o
-
u
o
Displacement
Amplitude
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 233/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
ACECOMS, AIT
uo
1 2
-uo
3 4
uo
5
A n a l y s i s
Damped Dynamic Response
• To incorporate damping or
dying out of dynamic
response feature into the
idealized structure, an energy
absorbing element should be
introduced.
Mass m
Stiffness K
Damping C
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 234/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n t A
ACECOMS, AIT
Idealized One storeyBuilding
• Viscous damper is the most
commonly used energyabsorbing element in the
dynamic modeling of
structures
A n a l y s i s
Displacement, Velocity, Acceleration
• Displacement Change in Location
•
Velocity Rate of Change of Displacement wrt Time
•
Acceleration Rate of Change of Velocity wrt Time• Time Period
The time taken to complete one cycle
• Frequency
The no. of cycles per second
u
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 235/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n
t A
ACECOMS, AIT
2
2
dt
ud uva
dt
duuv
u
A n a l y s i s
Free Vibration nalysis
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 236/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n
t A
ACECOMS, AIT
A n a l y s i s
• Definition
–
Natural vibration of a structure released from initial
condition and subjected to no external load or
damping
•
Main governing equation
-
Eigen Value Problem
t t
t t
P u K ucu M
Free Vibration Analysis
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 237/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n
t A
ACECOMS, AIT
• Solution gives – Natural Frequencies
– Associated mode shapes
– An insight into the dynamic behavior and response
of the structure
A n a l y s i s
Free Vibration
M u’’(t) +C u’(t) + K u(t) = F(t)
M u’’(t) + K u(t) = 0
Which leads to eigenvalue
problem
• No external force is applied
•
No damping of the system
= natural f requencies
= M ode shape
0d
0
2
2
2
MK
M K
M K
nn
nnn
w
w
A mode shape is set of
relative (not absolute)
nodal displacement for a
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 238/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n
t A
ACECOMS, AIT
0det 2 M K nw
Solution of above equation yields a
polynomial of order n for w , which in
turn gives n mode shapes
nodal displacement for a
particular mode of freevibration for a specific
natural frequency
A n a l y s i s
Modal Analysis
• Determination of
natural frequencies
and mode shapes.
• No external load or
excitation is appliedto the structure.
• Obtained from
eigenvalue analysis.
Th
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 239/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n
t A
ACECOMS, AIT
• There are as many
modes as there areDOF in the system
A n a l y s i s nalysis for
Ground Motion
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 240/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n
t A
ACECOMS, AIT
A n a l y s i s
g
g
umumumum
umkuucum
mcm
k
ummg um F
F kuucum
22
2;
ww
w w
Basic Dynamic for Ground Motion
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 241/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n
t A
ACECOMS, AIT
• The unknown is displacement and its
derivatives ( velocity, acceleration)
• Variables are ground acceleration, damping
ratio and circular frequency
g
g
uuuu
umumumum
22
2
w w
w w
A n a l y s i s
g uuuu 22 w w
Ground Motion Input and Displacement Output
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 242/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n
t A
ACECOMS, AIT
A n a l y s i s
Response History Analysis
• Determination the totaldynamic response ofstructure as the sum ofresponse of all modeshapes using the groundacceleration at each timestep
0 15
+ Damping Ratio for each mode
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 243/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n
t A
ACECOMS, AIT
-0.15
-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Time (Second)
Acceleration
(a/
g)
A n a l y s i s
Modal Displacements for Ground Motion
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 244/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n
t A
ACECOMS, AIT
A n a l y s i s Response
Spectrum
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 245/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n
t A
ACECOMS, AIT
nalysis
A n a l y s i s
What are Response Spectra
• For a ground acceleration at particular time, for a giventime period and damping ratio, a single value ofdisplacement, velocity and acceleration can be obtained
• Output of the above (u, v, a) equation are the dynamicresponse to the ground motion for a structure consideredas a single DOF
g uuuu 22 w w
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 246/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n
t A
ACECOMS, AIT
as a single DOF
• A plot of the “maximum” response for different groundmotion history, different time period and damping ratio givethe “Spectrum of Response”
A n a l y s i s
Response Spectrum Generation
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 247/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n
t A
ACECOMS, AIT
A n a l y s i s
Response Spectrum Generation
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 248/275
F i n i t e E l e m e n
t
ACECOMS, AIT
A n a l y s i s
• Spectral Displacement Sd
•
Pseudo Spectral Velocity Sv
•
Pseudo Spectral Acceleration Sa
2
2
dt
ud uva
dt duuv
u
d va
d v
S S S
S S
2w w
w
Spectral Parameters
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 249/275
F
i n i t e E l e m e n
t
ACECOMS, AIT
A n a l y s i s
Spectra For Different Soils
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 250/275
F
i n i t e E l e m e n
t
ACECOMS, AIT
A n a l y s i s
How to Use Response Spectra
• For each mode of free vibration, corresponding Time
Period is obtained.
• For each Time Period and specified damping ratio, the
specified Response Spectrum is read to obtain the
corresponding Acceleration
• For each Spectral Acceleration, corresponding velocity
and displacements response for the particular degree
of freedom is obtained
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 251/275
F
i n i t e E l e m e n
t
ACECOMS, AIT
• The displacement response is then used to obtain thecorresponding stress resultants
• The stress resultants for each mode are then added
using some combination rule to obtain the final
response envelop
t A n a l y s i s
Modal combination Rules
• ABS SUM Rule• Add the absolute maximum value from
each mode. Not so popular and notused in practice
• SRSS• Square Root of Sum of Squares of the
peak response from each mode.Suitable for well separated naturalfrequencies
N
n
no r r 1
0
N
n
no r r 1
2
0
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 252/275
F
i n i t e E l e m e n
t
ACECOMS, AIT
frequencies.
• CQC• Complete Quadric Combination is
applicable to large range of structuralresponse and gives better results than
SRSS.
N
i
N
n
niino r r r 1 1
00
t A n a l y s i s
Response Spectrum Analysis
• Determination ofpeak response of thestructure based on adesign or specifiedresponse spectrumand the specifiedmode shapes
• Uses modal 1
1.2
1.4
eartion
0%
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 253/275
F
i n i t e E l e m e n
t
ACECOMS, AIT
combination rules todetermine total peakresponse from allmodes
0
0.2
0.4
0.60.8
1
0 1 2 3 4 5
Time Period (Sec)
SpectralAccele
2%
5%
Introduction to
Non-linear Analysis
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 254/275
t A n a l y s i s
Basic Sources of Non
-
Linearity
• Geometric Non-Linearity
• Material Non-Linearity
•
• Compound Non-Linearity P
P
M
f
M M
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 255/275
F
i n i t e E l e m e n
t
ACECOMS, AIT
• Large Displacementsdd
t A n a l y s i s
Geometric Non Linearity
• The deformations change the
basic relationships in the
stiffness evaluation
• Example: Axial LoadChanges Bending Stiffness
• The deformation produce
additional actions, not present
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 256/275
F
i n i t e E l e m e n
t
ACECOMS, AIT
at initial conditions• Example: Axial load causes
additional moments
t A n a l y s i s
Material Non
-
Linearity
• The basic material
“constants” (E, G, v)
etc. change with level of
strain• Example: Stress-Strain
curve is non-linear
• The cross-section
kf c
b
Kd
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 257/275
F
i n i t e E l e m e n
t
ACECOMS, AIT
properties change withlevel of strain
• Example: Cracking in
reinforced concrete
reduces A, I etc
d
Kd
yt
N.A
A s
t A n a l y s i s
Material Non
-
linearity
Semi-confined,High Strength Concrete
Moment
–
Curvature
curve generated for a
rectangular column
with circular core. The
outer portion is
modeled by stress
- strain curve for low
strength unconfined
concrete where as the
core is modeled by
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 258/275
F
i n i t e E l e m e n
ACECOMS, AIT
Rectangular Whitney Curve
lightly confinedconcrete. Observe the
drop in moment
capacity as the outer
concrete fails.
n t A n a l y s i s
Types of Non
-
Linearity
• Smooth , Continuous
–
Softening
–
Hardening
•
Discontinuous
• Snap
-
through
•
Bifurcation
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 259/275
F
i n i t e E l e m e n
ACECOMS, AIT
• Elastic Buckling• In-Elastic Buckling
• P-Delta
n t A n a l y s i s
Non
-
linear Analysis in SAP2000
• The non-linear analysis is “Always” carried out
together with Time History Dynamic analysis
• Non-linear behavior can be modeled by:
– NL Link Element – For Dynamic – Nonlinear
• Elastic Stiffness for Linear Analysis
• Gap, Hook, Damper, Isolator for Nonlinear
– Hinge Element – For Static Pushover
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 260/275
F
i n i t e E l e m e n
ACECOMS, AIT
• Material Non linearity
• Load-Deflection Curves
Introduction to
Push-over Analysis
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 261/275
n t A n a l y s i s
Why Pushover Analysis
• Buildings do not respond as l inearly elastic systems
during strong ground shaking
• Improve Understanding of Building Behavior
- More accurate prediction of global displacement
- More realistic prediction of earthquake demand on individual
components and elements
- More reliable identification of “bad actors”
• Reduce Impact and Cost of Seismic Retrofit
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 262/275
F
i n i t e E l e m e n
ACECOMS, AIT
- Less conservative acceptance criteria
- Less extensive construction
• Advance the State of the Practice
n t A n a l y s i s
Performance Based Design
-
Basics
• Design is based not on Ultimate Strength butrather on Expected Performance
– Basic Ultimate Strength does not tell us what will beperformance of the structure at Ultimate Capacity
• Performance Based Design Levels
– Fully Operational
– Operational
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 263/275
F
i n i t e E l e m e n
ACECOMS, AIT
– Life Safe
– Near Collapse
– Collapse
n t A n a l y s i s
Pushover Spectrum
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 264/275
F
i n i t e E l e m e n
ACECOMS, AIT
n t A n a l y s i s
Pushover Demand Curves
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 265/275
F
i n i t e E l e m e n
ACECOMS, AIT
n t A n a l y s i s
Earthquake Push on Building
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 266/275
F
i n i t e E l e m e n
ACECOMS, AIT
n t A n a l y s i s
The Pushover Curve
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 267/275
F
i n i t e E l e m e n
ACECOMS, AIT
n t A n a l y s i s
Pushover Capacity Curves
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 268/275
F
i n i t e E l e m e
ACECOMS, AIT
n t A n a l y s i s
Demand Vs Capacity
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 269/275
F
i n i t e E l e m e
ACECOMS, AIT
n t A n a l y s i s
Non
-
linearity Considered in Pushover
• Material nonlinearity at discrete, user-defined hinges in
frame/line elements.
1. Material nonlinearity in the link elements.
• Gap (compression only), hook (tension only), uniaxial plasticity
base isolators (biaxial plasticity and biaxial friction/pendulum)..
2. Geometric nonlinearity in all elements.
• Only P-delta effects
• P-delta effects plus large displacements
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 270/275
F
i n i t e E l e m e
ACECOMS, AIT
3. Staged (sequential) construction.• Members can be added or removed in a sequence of stages
during each analysis case.
n t A n a l y s i s
Important Considerations
• Nonlinear analysis takes time and patience
• Each nonlinear problem is different
• Start simple and build up gradually.
• Run linear static loads and modal analysis first
• Add hinges gradually beginning with the areas
where you expect the most non-linearity.
• Perform initial analyses without geometric non-
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 271/275
F
i n i t e E l e m e
ACECOMS, AIT
linearity. Add P-delta effects, and large
deformations, much later.
n t A n a l y s i s
Important Considerations
• Mathematically, static nonlinear analysis does not
always guarantee a unique solution.
• Small changes in properties or loading can cause
large changes in nonlinear response.• It is Important to consider many different loading
cases, and sensitivity studies on the effect of
varying the properties of the structure
N li l i t k ti d ti
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 272/275
F
i n i t e E l e m e
ACECOMS, AIT
• Nonlinear analysis takes time and patience.Don’t Rush it or Push to Hard
n t A n a l y s i s
Procedure for Static Pushover Analysis
1. Create a model just like for any other analysis.
2. Define the static load cases, if any, needed for use in thestatic nonlinear analysis (Define > Static Load Cases).
3. Define any other static and dynamic analysis cases that
may be needed for steel or concrete design of frameelements.
4. Define hinge properties, if any (Define > Frame NonlinearHinge Properties).
5. Assign hinge properties, if any, to frame/line elements
(A i F /Li F N li Hi )
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 273/275
F
i n i t e E l e m e
ACECOMS, AIT
(Assign > Frame/Line > Frame Nonlinear Hinges).6. Define nonlinear link properties, if any (Define > Link
Properties).
n t A n a l y s i s
Procedure for Static Pushover Analysis
7. Assign link properties, if any, to frame/line elements(Assign > Frame/Line > Link Properties).
8. Run the basic linear and dynamic analyses (Analyze >Run).
9. Perform concrete design/steel design so that reinforcingsteel/ section is determined for concrete/steel hinge ifproperties are based on default values to be computed bythe program.
10. For staged construction, define groups that represent thevarious completed stages of construction.
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 274/275
F
i n i t e E l e m e
ACECOMS, AIT
11. Define the static nonlinear load cases (Define > StaticNonlinear/Pushover Cases).
n t A n a l y s i s
Procedure for Static Pushover Analysis
12.Run the static nonlinear analysis (Analyze > Run
Static Nonlinear Analysis).
13.Review the static nonlinear results (Display >
Show Static Pushover Curve), (Display > ShowDeformed Shape), (Display > Show Member
Forces/Stress Diagram), and (File > Print Tables
> Analysis Output).
14 P f d i h k th t tili t ti
7/17/2019 Finite Element Analysis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/finite-element-analysis-568c9faeb16ea 275/275
F
i n i t e E l e m e
ACECOMS, AIT
14.Perform any design checks that utilize staticnonlinear cases.
15.Revise the model as necessary and repeat.