T. Trimpe 2006 http://sciencespot.net
Jan 12, 2016
T. Trimpe 2006 http://sciencespot.net
Fingerprint Principles
According to criminal investigators, fingerprints follow 3 fundamental principles:
• A fingerprint is an individual characteristic; no two people have been found with the exact same fingerprint pattern.
• A fingerprint pattern will remain unchanged for the life of an individual; however, the print itself may change due to permanent scars and skin diseases.
• Fingerprints have general characteristic ridge patterns that allow them to be systematically identified.
Fingerprint Classes
There are 3 specific classes for all fingerprints based upon their visual pattern: arches, loops, and whorls.
Each group is divided into smaller groups as seen in the lists below.
ArchPlain arch
Tented arch
LoopRadial LoopUlnar loop
WhorlPlain whorl
Central pocket whorlDouble loop whorl
Accidentical
Interesting Info
Did you know?Dactyloscopy is the study of fingerprint identification.
Police investigators are experts in collecting “dactylograms”, otherwise known as fingerprints.
Fingerprint Factoid: 60% of people have loops, 35% have whorls,
and 5% have arches
ArchesArches are the simplest type of fingerprints that are formed by ridges that enter on one side of the print and exit on the other. No deltas are present.
Plain ArchRidges enter on one side and
exit on the other side.
Tented Arches Similar to the plain arch,
but has a spike in the center.
Spike or “tent”
LoopsLoops must have one delta and one or more ridges that enter and leave on the same side. These patterns are named for their positions related to the radius and ulna bones.
Delta
Ulnar Loop (Right Thumb)
Loop opens toward right or the ulna bone.
Radial Loop (Right Thumb)
Loop opens toward the left or the radial bone.
NOTE: On the left hand, a loop that opens to the left would be an ulnar loop, while one that opens to the right would be a radial loop.
WhorlsWhorls have at least one ridge that makes (or tends to make) a complete circuit. They also have at least two deltas. If a print has more than two deltas, it is most likely an accidental.
Draw a line between the two deltas in the plain and central pocket whorls. If some of the curved ridges touch the line, it is a plain whorl. If none of the center core touches the line, it is a central pocket whorl.
Plain Whorl
Central Pocket Whorl
Whorls – Part 2
Accidental Whorl
Accidental whorls contain two or more patterns (not including the plain arch), or does not clearly fall under any of the other categories.
Double Loop Whorl
Double loop whorls are made up of any two loops combined into one print.
Delta
Delta
Identify each fingerprint pattern.
Right Hand
Left Hand
Left Hand
Right Hand
Right Hand
Fingerprint Activity
Fingerprint Unit VocabularyArch- a fingerprint pattern in which the ridge pattern originates from one side of the print and leaves from the other side. Core- a center of a loop or whorl Delta- a triangular ridge pattern with ridges that go in different directions above and below a triangle Fingerprint- an impression left on any surface that consists of patterns made by the ridges on a finger. Latent Fingerprint- a hidden fingerprint made visible through the use of powders or other techniques. Loop- a fingerprint pattern in which the ridge pattern flows inward and returns in the direction of the origin. Minutiae- the combination of details in the shapes and positions of ridges in fingerprints that made each unique; also called ridge characteristics. Patent Fingerprint- a visible fingerprint that happens when fingers with blood, ink, or some other substance on them touch a surface and transfer the pattern of their fingerprint to that surface. Plastic Fingerprint- a three-dimensional (3-D) fingerprint made in soft material such as clay, soap, or putty. Ridge Pattern- the recognizable pattern of the ridges found in the end joints of fingers that form lines on the surfaces of objects in a fingerprint. They fall into three categories: arches, loops, and whorls. Ten Card- a form used to record and preserve a person’s fingerprints. Whorl- a fingerprint pattern that resembles a bull’s-eye
How do our fingerprint patterns compare to the
expected averages?
It’s time to makesome prints!
Avoid Partial Prints
GOOD PRINTGet as much of the top part of your finger as possible!
Study Your Fingerprints Activity
Review1. What is a delta?
2. How many deltas does an arch have? Loop? Whorl?
3. How can you tell the difference between a plain and
central pocket whorl?
4. What is another name for a hidden print
5. How many people on Earth have the same fingerprints as you?
6. What is this print? (Right Hand) 7. What is the most common type of print
8. What is the center of a loop and whorl called?
Forensic Science
T. Trimpe 2007 http://sciencespot.net/
Fingerprint visibility• Latent fingerprint- earlier stated was invisible to the eye since they are
just perspiration and sometimes oil. – Composed mainly of water (95%) and 5% other substances –
chemicals used to make these visible react with some of these substances
• Patent fingerprint: visible prints made by fingers touching a surface after ridges have been in contact with colored material: BLOOD, PAINT, GREASE, INK
• Plastic Prints are ridge impressions left in soft material- putty, wax, soap, or dust.
• Locating visible prints are easier being visible and distinct to the eye.
• Latent prints are more difficult and require use of technologies and techniques that will make the print visible.
Latent prints are impressions left by friction ridge skin on a surface, such as a tool handle, glass, door, etc.
Prints may be collected by revealing them with a dusting of black powder and then lifted with a piece of clear tape.
Did you know? Camel hair is the most common animal hair used to make fingerprint brushes. Now many brushes (like the one above) are made out of fiberglass.
METHODS OF DETECTING LATENT FINGERPRINTS
• THE METHOD OF CHOICE WILL DEPEND ON THE SURFACE BEING LIFTED OR TESTED.
• Hard and non-absorbent surfaces (glass, mirror, tile, and painted wood) require different approaches than soft and porous- paper, cloth, or cardboard.
• The most challenging thing an examiner faces is location of latent prints.
Visualization of Latent Prints
• On hard surfaces:– Powder
• Grey or black• Florescent• Magnetic
– Superglue – Lighting Techniques
• On soft surfaces:– Iodine fuming
• Nonpermanent visualization
– Ninhydrin• Reacts with proteins
– Gentian violet• Binds to cells and oils on tape
Ninhydrin
The cyanoacrylate fuming method (often called the super glue method) is a procedure that is used to develop latent fingerprints on a variety of objects.
Bottom Right: http://www.forensicsrus.com/images/SupergluePrint.jpg
Magnetic powder can also be used to reveal latent prints. This type of powder works better on shiny surfaces or plastic baggies or containers.
Top Left: http://www.stapletonandassociates.com/images/MagPowder.jpg
Bottom Left: http://www.ok.gov/osbi/images/ninhydrin%20print.jpg
Click the icon to view the Crime 360Super Glue Video
Some investigators use fluorescent powder and UV lights to help them find latent prints on multi-colored or dark surfaces.
Ninhydrin is a chemical that bonds with the amino acids in fingerprints and will produce a blue or purple color. It is used to lift prints from surfaces such as paper and cardboard.
Fingerprint Powders• Commercially available in a
variety of colors and textures (photographing)
• Lightly applied to nonabsorbent surfaces with camelhair brush will ADHERE TO PERSPIRATION RESIDUES AND BODY OILS.
• Black and gray for photographing on surfaces- produce contrast.
Fluorescent Powders
• Fluorescent powders that fluoresce under ultraviolet light- used when color or pattern of background obscures visibility of the print. (plaid, newsprint, etc).
• Prints are typically not tape lifted, but photographed and digitized or transferred to a computer for analysis
Ultraviolet Imaging Systems• Light sources can be used to
locate prints which can then be enhanced and lifted using other methods. This saves time and energy by narrowing a search.
• Reflected Ultraviolet Imaging System- locates prints on nonabsorbent surfaces without chemical or powder treatments.
• When UV light strikes the fingerprint, light is reflected back to the viewer- differentiating the print from its background surface.
Ultraviolet Imaging Systems
Latent fingerprint on Painted Wall.Illustration of Contrast Effect due to variation of illumination angle.
Depending on what angle the user holds the light, a print can either appear white or black.
Untreated Oily Print on sticky side of Duct (Duck) tape.
35mm Black and White film.Scene Scope excels at detecting prints on surfaces that a forensic light source would find difficult or impossible.
Ultraviolet Imaging Systems
• Hand held Forensic Light Sources
CHEMICAL METHODS FOR VISUALIZING LATENT PRINTS
Iodine fuming• Iodine is a solid crystal that when heated, turns into
a vapor without passing through a liquid phase– this transformation is called sublimation.
• Suspect material is placed in an enclosed cabinet with iodine crystals
• Once heated, vapors fill the chamber and combine with amino acids in the latent print to make it visible.
• Iodine prints are not permanent and begin to fade once fuming is stopped. The print may be “fixed”– IT IS NECESSARY TO PHOTOGRAPH
IMMEDIATELY• Can be fixed with 1% solution of starch in water
applied by spraying- this will turn blue and last for several weeks or longer.
Super Glue Fuming• Super Glue fuming- works
great on nonporous surfaces- metals, leather, plastic bags.
• Created when superglue is placed on a hot plate.
• Heating produces vapors that polymerize on the print.
• Fumes and object contained within an enclosed chamber for up to 6 hrs.
• Produces white latent print.• The print may be enhanced
with a conventional powder
Gentian Violet• Once the standard for lifting
latent prints on sticky surfaces like tape – has now been replaced by a commercial product called “Sticky-Side Powder”
• The dark purple dye stains sebaceous material (oil) and skin cells which have sloughed off of the person's fingers and palms and which have stuck to the adhesive side where the tape was touched.
Ninhydrin• One of the major components of
fingerprints is amino acids. Several substances bind to them, but ninhydrin is particularly effective.
• It is sprayed or poured onto the evidence, and a permanent pink and purple fingerprint results.
• On the downside, it is toxic and causes blinding headaches if inhaled
Ninhydrin Reaction
Lifting Your Own Prints Activity
Let’s determine the rate of occurrence for our fingerprint patterns ...
Pattern # Total Prints %
Arch
Loop
Whorl
How do our results compare to the averages?
60% - Loops 35% - Whorls 5 % - Arches
__% - Loops __% - Whorls __% - ArchesWrite a paragraph on your worksheet that summarizes our results.
Let’s determine the rate of occurrence to compare males vs. females.
Pattern#
Male#
FemaleTotal
Prints%
Arch
Loop
Whorl
Which pattern is most common pattern among the males in this class?
Which is most common pattern among the females?
How do the averages for each sex compare to the expected averages?
A Closer Look at Fingerprints
Image from ftp://sequoyah.nist.gov/pub/nist_internal_reports/ir_6534.pdf T. Trimpe 2007 http://sciencespot.net/
Ridgeology: The study of the uniqueness of friction ridge structures and their use for personal identification.1
1Introduction to Basic Ridgeology by David Ashbaugh, May 1999 Image from http://www.cs.usyd.edu.au/~irena/minutia.gif
The koala is one of the few mammals (other than primates) that has fingerprints. In fact, koala fingerprints are remarkably similar to human fingerprints; even with an electron microscope, it can be quite difficult to distinguish between the two.
As we have learned in our first lesson, a fingerprint is made of a series of ridges and valleys on the surface of the finger. The uniqueness of a fingerprint can be determined by the pattern of ridges and valleys as well as the minutiae points, which are points where the ridge structure changes.
Fingerprint IdentificationWhen minutiae on two different prints match, these are called points of similarity or points of identification. At this point there is no international standard for the number of points of identification required for a match between two fingerprints. However, the United Kingdom requires a minimum sixteen points while Australia requires twelve.
Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS)
http://www.fdle.state.fl.us/CrimeLab/images/fingerrint%20comparison%20for%20afis.jpg
AFIS is a computerized system capable of reading, classifying, matching, and storing fingerprints for criminal justice agencies. Quality latent fingerprints are entered into the AFIS for a search for possible matches against the state maintained databases for fingerprint records to help establish the identity of unknown deceased persons or suspects in a criminal case.
IAFIS• INTEGRATED AUTOMATED FINGERPRINT
IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM
• Large database of fingerprint collections- using individual characteristics of fingerprints converted into DIGITAL MINUTIAE: ridge endings, and branching.
• Location and relationship of minutiae in a digitally recorded geometric pattern
– A computer can make thousands of fingerprint comparisons in a second.
• IAFIS does not make final verification of print identity, but rather flags prints with the closest correlation to the search prints.
• ALLOWS CRIMINAL INVESTIGATORS TO SPEND LESS TIME DEVELOPING SUSPECT LISTS AND MORE TIME INVESTIGATING SUSPECTS GENERATED BY THE COMPUTER.
• Fingerprints are voluntarily submitted to the FBI by local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies. These agencies acquire the fingerprints through criminal arrests or from non-criminal sources, such as employment background checks. The FBI then catalogs the fingerprints along with any criminal history linked with the subject.
Rid
ge C
har
acte
rist
ics
Use these characteristics as points of identification when comparing fingerprint samples. The more points you can find in common, the better the match!
http://cnx.org/content/m12574/latest/properties.jpg
Ridge Characteristics
Crossover
Core
Bifurcation (fork)
Ridge ending
Island
Delta
Pore
Scar
http://www.dkfz.de/tbi/projects/bmcv/images/iu_it246_04s_fingerprint1.jpg
How many ridge characteristics can you identify in this fingerprint?
http://www.dkfz.de/tbi/projects/bmcv/images/iu_it246_04s_fingerprint1.jpg
How many ridge characteristics can you identify in this fingerprint?
Ending Ridge
Core
Island or Dot
Fork or Bifurcation
Short Ridge
Bridge
Studying Minutiae Activity
Putting it all together Activity
Extra Slides
53
Forensic Fingerprints•1000 BCE; archaeological evidence of ancient Chinese and
Babylonian civilizations using fingerprints to sign legal documents.
•Early 1880's - William Herschel, Chief Administrative Officer of Bengal used thumb impressions to identify workers.
•1880 - Dr Henry Faulds, an English physician working in Tokyo, published a letter in the journal Nature suggesting the use of fingerprints for identification purposes.
•1892 - After some years of research the English scientist Sir Francis Galton published a book entitled Finger Prints in which was laid out a method of classification of fingerprints.
•1897 - Indian Police officer Sir Edward Henry proposed a modified classification system which was adopted by Scotland Yard in 1901 and is still the basis of the systems used in most English speaking countries.
•1901 - First official use of fingerprints in the USA by the New York City Civil Service Commission.
•1930 National fingerprint file set up in America by the FBI.
Alphonse Bertillon
• 1883 Created the first systematic system of individual classification & identification
• Detailed description of subject, full-length & profile photographs & a system of precise body measurements (anthropometry)
http://www.spsmvbr.cz/cesky/os_stranky/jedlicka/muzeumzla/bertilon/bertilon.htmlhttp://criminaljustice.state.ny.us/ojis/history/measure.jpg
Sir Francis Galton - 1888
• Sir Francis Galton, a British anthropologist and a cousin of Charles Darwin, began his observations of fingerprints as a means of identification in the 1880's.
• In 1892, he published his book, "Fingerprints", establishing the individuality and permanence of fingerprints. The book included the first classification system for fingerprints.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Galton
Sir Francis Galton - 1888
• Galton's primary interest in fingerprints was as an aid in determining heredity and racial background. – He soon discovered that fingerprints offered no firm
clues to an individual's intelligence or genetic history – He demonstrated that fingerprints do not change
over the course of an individual's lifetime, and that no two fingerprints are exactly the same
– According to his calculations, the odds of two individual fingerprints being the same were 1 in 64 billion.
Will West
• 1903: William West incident– Fort Leavenworth prison– New prisoner William
West couldn’t be distinguished from unrelated inmate with same name by anthropometry
– Discovered that their fingerprints differed
58
Fingerprints• Fingerprints form by contact of friction ridges on hands, feet, or lips with an
object (called 'friction' ridges because of their biological function to assist in our ability to grasp and hold onto objects - approximately 2,700 ridge "units" per square inch of friction skin).
• Pore openings present on surface of the friction ridges.
• Fingerprints are formed underneath the skin in the dermal papilae. As long as that layer of papilae is
there, fingerprints will always come back, even
after scarring or burning. • Prints are left because a
body is constantly secreting water, oils, etc. through pores.
59
Forensic Fingerprints• Your fingerprint patterns are hereditary. • They are formed before a person is born. • They are unique and they never change. • Gloves don't necessarily stop fingerprints.
Prints can be left through surgical gloves. Gloves can also be turned inside out to yield fingerprints from the inside surfaces.
• Leather gloves leave prints that is unique to that glove and no other - leather comes from cow skin, sim.to human skin). Even cloth gloves, such as mittens, can leave a distinctive print that can be traced back to the mitten that made it.
Latent Leather Glove Print
Ref. Leather Glove Print
Admissibility
Fingerprints and their use in court
• The low probability of 2 unrelated prints matching is the foundation for its acceptance in court– Recall Galton said the probability that two
fingerprints could match is one in 64 billion.– This is supported by the millions of individuals
who have had prints taken over the past 90 years in the FBI central system- no two have ever been found to be identical
Fingerprints and their use in court
• Which of the Daubert Standards does fingerprint analysis meet?
• Subjected to peer review and publication • The theory or technique must be falsifiable,
refutable, and testable. • Whether there are standards controlling the
technique's operations. • Expert's qualifications. • Technique and its results be described with plain
meaning. • Known or potential error rate.
Error Rate
• A case being argued at the Supreme Court in Boston recently challenged the idea that fingerprint analysis has a “zero error rate”
• While testifying, fingerprint examiners give all-or-nothing judgments.
• The International Association for Identification, the oldest and largest professional forensic association in the world, states in a 1979 resolution that any expert giving "testimony of possible, probable or likely [fingerprint] identification shall be deemed to be engaged in conduct unbecoming".
• Is fingerprint analysis that robust? Consider the following studies…
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn8011
Error Rate
• The FBI's Latent Fingerprint Section in Quantico, Virginia took a set of 50,000 pre-existing images of fingerprints and compared each one electronically against the whole of the data set, producing a grand total of 2.5 billion comparisons.
• It concluded that the chances of each image being mistaken for any of the other 49,999 images were vanishingly small, at 1 in 1097
• Critics say that showing an image is more like itself than other similar images is irrelevant. The study does not mimic what happens in real life, where messy, partial prints from a crime scene are compared with inked archive prints of known criminals.
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn8011
Error Rate• One unpublished study may go some way to answering
the critics. It documents the results of exercises in which 92 students with at least one year's training had to match archive and mock "crime scene" prints. Only two out of 5861 of these comparisons were incorrect, an error rate of 0.034 per cent.
• But evidence from qualified fingerprint examiners suggests a higher error rate. These are the results of proficiency tests in the Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology (vol 93, p 985).
• These estimates that false matches occurred at a rate of 0.8 per cent on average, and in one year were as high as 4.4 per cent. Even if the lower figure is correct, this would equate to 1900 mistaken fingerprint matches in the US in 2002 alone.
• How reliable are fingerprint analyses? You be the judge!
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn8011