Top Banner
Findings from CCS Administrative Data Lee M. Sanders, MD, MPH Lisa J. Chamberlain, MD, MPH Stanford Center for Policy, Outcomes and Prevention (CPOP) CCS Redesign Stakeholder Advisory Board
25

Findings from CCS Administrative Datahealthpolicy.ucla.edu/Documents/Spotlight/StanfordCPOP...Retrospective, population-based analysis of all paid claims for the CCS Program (2007-2012)

Aug 01, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Findings from CCS Administrative Datahealthpolicy.ucla.edu/Documents/Spotlight/StanfordCPOP...Retrospective, population-based analysis of all paid claims for the CCS Program (2007-2012)

Findings from CCS Administrative Data

Lee M. Sanders, MD, MPH

Lisa J. Chamberlain, MD, MPH

Stanford Center for Policy, Outcomes and Prevention (CPOP)

CCS Redesign Stakeholder Advisory Board

Page 2: Findings from CCS Administrative Datahealthpolicy.ucla.edu/Documents/Spotlight/StanfordCPOP...Retrospective, population-based analysis of all paid claims for the CCS Program (2007-2012)

Analytic Guidance for CCS Program Reform

To use data to help protect the health of children with serious chronic illness.

1. To provide CCS and its stakeholders with data-driven analytic guidance to improve the quality and efficiency of care for children served by the CCS program.

2. To implement a coordinated strategy that bridges the gap between analytic activities and innovative care strategies in CCS subspecialty care centers.

2

Page 3: Findings from CCS Administrative Datahealthpolicy.ucla.edu/Documents/Spotlight/StanfordCPOP...Retrospective, population-based analysis of all paid claims for the CCS Program (2007-2012)

Essential Questions

How do we protect the health and well-being of a large population of children with serious chronic illness?

1. How do these children use health care services?

2. What is the quality (or appropriateness) of care received by this population?

3. What is the distribution of costs for that care?

3

Page 4: Findings from CCS Administrative Datahealthpolicy.ucla.edu/Documents/Spotlight/StanfordCPOP...Retrospective, population-based analysis of all paid claims for the CCS Program (2007-2012)

Analytic Design

Retrospective, population-based analysis of all paid claims for the CCS Program (2007-2012)

Total capture of all care episodes Inpatient bed days Outpatient visits (primary, subspecialty, non-MD) ED visits Home health and Durable Medical Equipment (DME) Residential care Pharmacy

Total capture of all CCS-related costs Partial capture of non-CCS-related costs (FFS)

N = 323,922 children

4

Page 5: Findings from CCS Administrative Datahealthpolicy.ucla.edu/Documents/Spotlight/StanfordCPOP...Retrospective, population-based analysis of all paid claims for the CCS Program (2007-2012)

-

Stanford CPOP CCS Analytics Advisory Board

Ted Lempert Children Now Dr. Tom Klitzner UCLA Complex Care

Laurie Soman CRISS Dr. David Bergman Stanford Complex Care

Bernardette Arrellano CCHA

Rich Cordova CHLA

Dr. Fran Kaufman CHLA Dr. Robert Dimand State

Dr. Bert Lubin CHORI County

Dr. Mark Pian San Diego

Dr. Mary Doyle LA County

Dr. Louis Girling Alameda

Advocacy

Out Patient

Care Systems

CCS Policy

Hospitals

Advisory

Board

Research

Foundations

Families

Richard Pan CA Assembly

Maya Altman Health Plan

San Mateo

Dr. Melissa Aguirre Fresno

John Barry, OTR Shasta Christy Bethell PhD OHSU

County

Neal Halfon PhD UCLA

Moira Inkelas PhD UCLA Teresa Jurado CCS, Health Plan San Mateo

Dylan Roby PhD UCLA Eileen Crumm PhD Family Voices

Meg Okumura, MD, UCSF

Chris Perrone CHCF

Dr. Ed Schor LPFCH

CCS Redesign Stakeholder Advisory Board 5

Page 6: Findings from CCS Administrative Datahealthpolicy.ucla.edu/Documents/Spotlight/StanfordCPOP...Retrospective, population-based analysis of all paid claims for the CCS Program (2007-2012)

CCS-enrolled Children: Social and Clinical Characteristics

%

Age – mean (SD) 7.3 (6.5) years Sex - Female 43.0 Race/Ethnicity White 16.6 Black 8.7 Hispanic 56.4 Insurance Medicaid Managed care 47.6

Medicaid Fee for Service 19.6 CHIP 7.5 Mixed / Other 25.3 Medical complexity Complex Chronic 51.4 Non-complex Chronic 25.3 Non-Chronic 23.3 Diagnostic category Neurology 14.6 Cardiology 12.6 ENT / Hearing Loss 11.6 Trauma / Injury 10.8 Endocrine 6.8

> 2 organ systems, or progressive

CCS Redesign Stakeholder Advisory Board 6

Page 7: Findings from CCS Administrative Datahealthpolicy.ucla.edu/Documents/Spotlight/StanfordCPOP...Retrospective, population-based analysis of all paid claims for the CCS Program (2007-2012)

Patterns of Care Visits per child per year

Children with > 1 visit

per year

Visits per child per year Mean (SD)

Outpatient Visits (MD) 94% 7.6 (8.6)

Outpatient Pharmacy Visits 87% 18.7 (28.7)

ED Visits 49% 1.6 (1.8)

Hospitalizations (Bed Days) 31% 14.8 (30.5)

Outpatient visits (Non-MD) 29% 10.2 (13.7)

Home health visits 16% 5.8 (13.3)

CCS Redesign Stakeholder Advisory Board 7

Page 8: Findings from CCS Administrative Datahealthpolicy.ucla.edu/Documents/Spotlight/StanfordCPOP...Retrospective, population-based analysis of all paid claims for the CCS Program (2007-2012)

Patterns of Care by Age

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Age at first visit

Med

i an

en

cou

nte

r r a

te p

er

y ear

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

100000

Nu

mb

er o

f ch

il dr e

n

Hos pital Bed Days Emergency Department Visits Early Periodic Screening, Diagnosis & Treatment Dental Vis its Home Health Visits Outpatient clinic visits Other outpatient visits Pharmacy prescriptions filled Number of children

CCS Redesign Stakeholder Advisory Board 8

Page 9: Findings from CCS Administrative Datahealthpolicy.ucla.edu/Documents/Spotlight/StanfordCPOP...Retrospective, population-based analysis of all paid claims for the CCS Program (2007-2012)

Patterns of Care by Medical Complexity

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Mean e

ncounte

r ra

te p

er

year

Outpatient pharmacy fills

Other outpatient visits

Home health visits

ED visits

Outpatient physician visits

Bed days

Complex Chronic Non-Chronic

CCS Redesign Stakeholder Advisory Board 9

Page 10: Findings from CCS Administrative Datahealthpolicy.ucla.edu/Documents/Spotlight/StanfordCPOP...Retrospective, population-based analysis of all paid claims for the CCS Program (2007-2012)

Patterns of Care by Diagnostic Category

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Neurolo

gy

Hemato

logy

Oncolo

gy

Cardio

logy

Otolary

ngology

Gastro

entero

logy

Pulmonary

Inju

ry

CCS eligible diagnosis

Perc

ent

of t

otal

exp

endi

ture

Inpatient Home health PharmacyOutpatient clinic Other outpatient DME% total expenditures % children

% o

f to

tal vis

its

CCS Redesign Stakeholder Advisory Board 10

Page 11: Findings from CCS Administrative Datahealthpolicy.ucla.edu/Documents/Spotlight/StanfordCPOP...Retrospective, population-based analysis of all paid claims for the CCS Program (2007-2012)

Outpatient: Inpatient Patterns by Diagnostic Category

CCS Redesign Stakeholder Advisory Board 11

Page 12: Findings from CCS Administrative Datahealthpolicy.ucla.edu/Documents/Spotlight/StanfordCPOP...Retrospective, population-based analysis of all paid claims for the CCS Program (2007-2012)

Patterns of Care Regional Variability

CCS Redesign Stakeholder Advisory Board 12

Page 13: Findings from CCS Administrative Datahealthpolicy.ucla.edu/Documents/Spotlight/StanfordCPOP...Retrospective, population-based analysis of all paid claims for the CCS Program (2007-2012)

Quality of Care: Potentially Preventable Hospitalizations

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

20000

Bac

teria

l pne

umon

ia

Deh

ydra

tion

Asthm

a

Epile

psy

Kidne

y/ur

inar

y infe

ction

Sev

ere

ENT in

fect

ion

Cellulitis

Gas

troen

terit

is

Hyp

oglyce

mia

Mas

toiditis

Ane

mia

Nut

ritio

nal d

eficie

ncy

Imm

unizat

ion

prev

enta

ble

cond

ition

s

Tuber

culosis

Pelvic in

flam

mat

ory dise

ase

Diabe

tes

Stre

toco

ccal m

enin

gitis

Seizu

res

Failu

re to

thriv

e

Ambulatory Sensitive Condition

Nu

mb

er

of

Ch

ild

ren

Ho

sp

ita

lize

d

24.8% of all CCS

hospitalizations

CCS Redesign Stakeholder Advisory Board 13

Page 14: Findings from CCS Administrative Datahealthpolicy.ucla.edu/Documents/Spotlight/StanfordCPOP...Retrospective, population-based analysis of all paid claims for the CCS Program (2007-2012)

Quality of Care: No Care After Hospital Discharge

(Overall Readmission Rate: 9.6%)

78.9

51.9

67.8

39

61.1

33.6

56.3

30.3

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

No MD visits within 7 days Post-hospitalization

No Outpatient Visit of any kind within 7 days Post-Hospitalization

No MD visits within 14 days Post-hospitalization

No Outpatient Visit of any kind within 14 days Post-Hospitalization

No MD visits within 21 days Post-Hospitalization

No Outpatient Visit of any kind within 21 days Post-Hospitalization

No MD visits within 28 days Post-Hospitalization

No Outpatient Visit of any kind within 28 days Post-Hospitalization

Percent of hospitalized CCS enrollees

CCS Redesign Stakeholder Advisory Board 14

Page 15: Findings from CCS Administrative Datahealthpolicy.ucla.edu/Documents/Spotlight/StanfordCPOP...Retrospective, population-based analysis of all paid claims for the CCS Program (2007-2012)

Cost Distribution By Child

50

2

40

26

5

15

4

32

1

25

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Children Annual expenditures

Pe

rce

nt

Chart Title

CCS Redesign Stakeholder Advisory Board 15

Page 16: Findings from CCS Administrative Datahealthpolicy.ucla.edu/Documents/Spotlight/StanfordCPOP...Retrospective, population-based analysis of all paid claims for the CCS Program (2007-2012)

Cost Distribution By Medical Complexity

Among All CCS Enrollees Among “High Cost” Children*

47%

27%

26%

Complex Chronic

Non-complex Chronic

Non-Chronic

85%

6%

9%

*Top 10% of annual expenses

**Pediatric Medical Complexity Algorithm (PMCA), Mangione-Smith R. 2014

16

Page 17: Findings from CCS Administrative Datahealthpolicy.ucla.edu/Documents/Spotlight/StanfordCPOP...Retrospective, population-based analysis of all paid claims for the CCS Program (2007-2012)

Cost Distribution Over Time

CCS Redesign Stakeholder Advisory Board 17

Page 18: Findings from CCS Administrative Datahealthpolicy.ucla.edu/Documents/Spotlight/StanfordCPOP...Retrospective, population-based analysis of all paid claims for the CCS Program (2007-2012)

Chart Title

36%

21%

9%

17%

1%

14%

2%

0%

0%

Inpatient Home healthPharmacy Residential facilityOutpatient clinic Other outpatientDME DentalED

Cost Distribution By Type of Care

DME Emergency Care

Outpatient (nonMD)

Outpatient (MD)

HospitalResidential Facility

Pharmacy

Home Health

18

Page 19: Findings from CCS Administrative Datahealthpolicy.ucla.edu/Documents/Spotlight/StanfordCPOP...Retrospective, population-based analysis of all paid claims for the CCS Program (2007-2012)

Cost Distribution, by Medical Complexity

Complex Chronic Non-complex/non-chronic

67.7

6.6

13.9

0.8

8.4

1.2

Inpatient Home health Pharmacy Outpatient clinic Other outpatient DME

67.7

6.6

13.9

0.8

8.4

1.2

Inpatient Home health Pharmacy Outpatient clinic Other outpatient DME

31.1

21.5

16.1

2.4

27.7

0.7

Inpatient Home health Pharmacy Outpatient clinic Other outpatient DME

CCS Redesign Stakeholder Advisory Board 19

Page 20: Findings from CCS Administrative Datahealthpolicy.ucla.edu/Documents/Spotlight/StanfordCPOP...Retrospective, population-based analysis of all paid claims for the CCS Program (2007-2012)

Cost Distribution by Diagnostic Category

13.8

10.7

5.93.9

7.12.52.62.93.3

31.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

Neurolo

gy/N

eurosu

rger

y

Hemat

ology

NICU

Cardiol

ogy/C

ardio

thora

cic Su

rgery

Oncolo

gy ENT

Gastro

entero

logy

Pulmonar

y

Gen Peds

/Behav

Devt

Exte

rnal/

Injur

y

CCS-Eligible Diagnosis

Pe

rce

nt

of

Tota

l Exp

en

dit

ure

sfo

r al

l

dia

gno

ses

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

Nu

mb

er

of

Ch

ildre

n

CCS Redesign Stakeholder Advisory Board 20

Page 21: Findings from CCS Administrative Datahealthpolicy.ucla.edu/Documents/Spotlight/StanfordCPOP...Retrospective, population-based analysis of all paid claims for the CCS Program (2007-2012)

Cost Distribution by Hospital Type

Infants (< 12 months)

21CCS Redesign Stakeholder Advisory Board

Medically Complex Children

All Children

Other Hos pitals

1%

County Hos pitals

6%

UC Sys tem

Hos pitals

13%

Non-Profit & For-

Profit Hos pitals

25%

Free-Standing

Children's

Hos pitals

55%

Other Hos pitals

1%

County Hos pitals

8%

UC Sys tem

Hospitals

11%

Free-Standing

Children's Hospitals

37%

Non-Profit &

For-Profit Hospitals

43%

Free-Standing Children's

Hospitals

64%

Non-Profit &

For-Profit

Hospitals

18%

UC System

Hospitals

13% County Hospitals

5%

Other Hospitals

<1%

Page 22: Findings from CCS Administrative Datahealthpolicy.ucla.edu/Documents/Spotlight/StanfordCPOP...Retrospective, population-based analysis of all paid claims for the CCS Program (2007-2012)

Summary

• Distinct patterns of care use – particularly by age and medical complexity.

• Wide variability in care patterns, particularly before and after hospitalization.

• Costs are highly skewed, driven by inpatient and residential care, and persistent over time.

22

Page 23: Findings from CCS Administrative Datahealthpolicy.ucla.edu/Documents/Spotlight/StanfordCPOP...Retrospective, population-based analysis of all paid claims for the CCS Program (2007-2012)

Implications for CCS Program Reform • Care System Innovation – Redesign Outpatient Systems to reduce Inpatient Care – Enhance Regionalized Subspecialty and Primary Care

• Population Health Management – Tier Care Coordination by Clinical Complexity

– Build Regional Learning Collaboratives

• Public Policy and Payment Reform – Establish Risk Pools for Skewed Cost Distribution – Monitor and Evaluate Impact of Reforms

CCS Redesign Stakeholder Advisory Board 23

Page 24: Findings from CCS Administrative Datahealthpolicy.ucla.edu/Documents/Spotlight/StanfordCPOP...Retrospective, population-based analysis of all paid claims for the CCS Program (2007-2012)

24

CCS Redesign Stakeholder Advisory Board

CPOP Policy Briefs

https://cpopstanford.wordpress.com/our-work/state/

Page 25: Findings from CCS Administrative Datahealthpolicy.ucla.edu/Documents/Spotlight/StanfordCPOP...Retrospective, population-based analysis of all paid claims for the CCS Program (2007-2012)

Megie Okumura, MD, UCSF

Dana Hughes, PhD, UCSF

Stanford University Center for Policy, Outc Prevention

Thank You California Stakeholders

Robert Dimand, MD

Katie Schlageter, Alameda

Louis Girling, MD, Alameda

Maya Altman, HPSM

Fiona Donald, MD; Anand Chabra, MD

Teresa Jurado

David Alexander, MD

Ed Schor, MD

Juno Duenas

Eileen Crumm

Laurie Soman

Christy Sandborg, MD, Stanford

David Bergman, MD, Stanford

Jori Bogetz, MD; Doriel Pearson-Nishioka

Bert Lubin, MD, CHRCO

Tom Klitzner, MD, UCLA

Moira Inkelas, PhD, UCLA

Dylan Roby, PhD, UCLA

Paul Wise, MD, MPH

Jason Wang, MD, PhD

Vandana Sundaram, MPH

Ewen Wang, MD

Ben Goldstein, PhD

Monica Eneriz-Wiemer, MD

Keith van Haren, MD

Stafford Grady, MD

Susan Fernandez, RN, PhD

MyMy Buu, MD

Nathan Luna, MD

Rachel Bensen, MD

Stephanie Crossen, MD

Olga Saynina, MS

Gene Lewitt, PhD

Maureen Sheehan, RN

Regan Foust

Sonja Swenson

omes and

25