Financing the Millennium Development Goals and Beyond: The Challenge in 2005 Arabella Fraser, Policy Adviser, Oxfam GB Research Team
Jan 29, 2016
Financing the Millennium Development Goals and Beyond: The Challenge in 2005
Arabella Fraser, Policy Adviser, Oxfam GB Research Team
The price of failure
45 million more children under five will die between 2005 and 2015
247 million more people in sub-Saharan Africa living on less than $1 a day in 2015
97 million more children still out of school in 2015
53 million more people without proper sanitation facilities
1. The case for aid2. Increasing aid to meet the MDGs and
beyond3. Making aid work better for poverty reduction
Structure
1. The case for aid
Econometric studies, case study evidence Economic marginalisation of the poorest
economies Evidence for productive use of aid in many
low-income countries
Fig. 1 Aid levels up, but generosity downNet ODA, $ million and as a percentage of GNI, 1960-2004, OECD countries, 2003 prices
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
Net ODA $ Million
ODA as a % of GNI
Fig. 2 Progress on meeting the 0.7% targetNet ODA as % of GNI, OECD donors, 2004 preliminary data
Fig. 3 Projected donor shortfalls in aidVolumes of ODA under different scenarios, based on 2001-2005 average growth rates
259665
203415
130625
72241
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
US
$mn
0.7 in 2010
MDG Needs
Total of current commitments
Fig. 4 Developed country expenditure priorities
22.5
22
120
245
616
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Additional money estimatedto be required for Africa to
reach the MDGs
US, UK, French spending onarms exports
Additional money required for0.7
OECD country farmsubsidies
OECD country defencespending
$ billion
A Debt Relief Deal
HIPC too limited to meet the MDGs Importance of additional finance Current proposals inadequate: UK ‘debt
holiday’ and US ‘bold plan’
Fig. 5 ‘Effective’ aid volumesNet ODA by purpose, 2002
Making aid work better for poverty reduction
The DAC process Aid allocation criteria Conditionality: undercutting ownership
Fig. 6 Bound in red tapeResponses to the question ‘How much of your ministry’s time is spent in reporting to the donor?’
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
US World Bank Japan Germany EC UK
%
Don't know
Acceptable
Too much
Excessive
Fig. 7 Expect delays in aid deliveryResponses to the question `Generally speaking, how late do the donor’s aid disbursements arrive?’
35
20
25
3
14
21
29
21
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
ON TIME 1-6 MONTHS 6-12 MONTHS OVER 1 YEAR
All otherdonors
EC
The DAC process
Monitorable, ambitious, relevant targets Robust accountability mechanisms Integration into the MDGs process
Real aid allocationsAverage income per capita (PPP, 2003 estimates) of the top three recipients of gross aid (ODA and Official Aid (OA)) in absolute terms, 2002
Aid conditions: undercutting ownership
Ongoing administrative burden of conditions
Undermining domestic accountability mechanisms and ‘ownership’ of policy reform
Need greater independent impact assessment
Conclusions and recommendations:
Cancellation of multilateral debt for countries that require it to meet MDGs; resources available from additional contributions and use IMF gold reserves
Immediate $50 billion and binding timetables to meet 0.7 by 2010
Full implementation of Rome and Paris commitments; strong targets and monitoring mechanisms
Focus on poorest countries and communities Restriction in use of conditions to financial
accountability and poverty reduction; respect national processes and independent impact assessment
Financing the Millennium Development Goals and Beyond: The Challenge in 2005
Arabella Fraser, Policy Adviser, Oxfam GB Research Team